Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Digitization for Preservation: Far Too Many Benefits over Microfilming
-
Ellen Cunningham-Kruppa
Published/Copyright:
November 28, 2007
The authors of Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method present a cogent case for the use of digitization as a preservation reformatting technology. As a preservation educator and former practitioner, I support the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) endorsement, and propose that the ARL library community consider limiting the use of microfilm technology for reformatting print source originals.
Published Online: 2007-11-28
Published in Print: 2004-December
© 2004 by K. G. Saur
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Impressum
- From the Editor-in-Chief
- Comment and News
- Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- “Wouldn't Be Prudent”: Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- A Critique of “Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method”
- Addressing a Risk Perspective when Considering Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method: A Response from “Down Under”
- Digitization as a Preservation Method – A Comment from Singapore
- Digitization as a Preservation Method – Comments from the Netherlands
- Digital Preservation in the Context of Changing Reading Behaviors and Research Methods
- It's Time to Recognize the Technologies That Are in Place
- Digitization for Preservation: Far Too Many Benefits over Microfilming
- Why the Preservation Community Should Support ARL's Call for Acceptance of Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- Evans Digital Edition
- TL-2 (Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edition) Online
- Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review
Articles in the same Issue
- Impressum
- From the Editor-in-Chief
- Comment and News
- Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- “Wouldn't Be Prudent”: Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- A Critique of “Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method”
- Addressing a Risk Perspective when Considering Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method: A Response from “Down Under”
- Digitization as a Preservation Method – A Comment from Singapore
- Digitization as a Preservation Method – Comments from the Netherlands
- Digital Preservation in the Context of Changing Reading Behaviors and Research Methods
- It's Time to Recognize the Technologies That Are in Place
- Digitization for Preservation: Far Too Many Benefits over Microfilming
- Why the Preservation Community Should Support ARL's Call for Acceptance of Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- Evans Digital Edition
- TL-2 (Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edition) Online
- Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review
