Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
From the Editor-in-Chief
-
Suzy Szasz Palmer
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
28. November 2007
I am pleased to devote this issue to the subject of digitization as a preservation reformatting method, and thank the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) for granting permission to reprint their important report, Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method.
Published Online: 2007-11-28
Published in Print: 2004-December
© 2004 by K. G. Saur
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Impressum
- From the Editor-in-Chief
- Comment and News
- Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- “Wouldn't Be Prudent”: Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- A Critique of “Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method”
- Addressing a Risk Perspective when Considering Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method: A Response from “Down Under”
- Digitization as a Preservation Method – A Comment from Singapore
- Digitization as a Preservation Method – Comments from the Netherlands
- Digital Preservation in the Context of Changing Reading Behaviors and Research Methods
- It's Time to Recognize the Technologies That Are in Place
- Digitization for Preservation: Far Too Many Benefits over Microfilming
- Why the Preservation Community Should Support ARL's Call for Acceptance of Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- Evans Digital Edition
- TL-2 (Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edition) Online
- Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Impressum
- From the Editor-in-Chief
- Comment and News
- Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- “Wouldn't Be Prudent”: Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- A Critique of “Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method”
- Addressing a Risk Perspective when Considering Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method: A Response from “Down Under”
- Digitization as a Preservation Method – A Comment from Singapore
- Digitization as a Preservation Method – Comments from the Netherlands
- Digital Preservation in the Context of Changing Reading Behaviors and Research Methods
- It's Time to Recognize the Technologies That Are in Place
- Digitization for Preservation: Far Too Many Benefits over Microfilming
- Why the Preservation Community Should Support ARL's Call for Acceptance of Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
- Evans Digital Edition
- TL-2 (Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edition) Online
- Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review
