Startseite Automation and validation of a fast method for the assessment of in vivo oxidative stress levels
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Automation and validation of a fast method for the assessment of in vivo oxidative stress levels

  • Cristina Vassalle , Claudio Boni , Pietro Di Cecco , Rudina Ndreu und Gian Carlo Zucchelli
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. November 2006
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background: The d-ROMs test for the evaluation of serum hydroperoxides (HP) is simple, reliable, and cheap. Furthermore, it can easily be adapted to automated analyzers. Changing from the manual to an automated procedure allows the simultaneous processing of a large number of samples in a greatly reduced time, avoiding manual handling of samples and reagents and reducing variability sources.

Methods: This study was performed to adjust the manual procedure to a routine automated method in the clinical laboratory. We carried out the d-ROMs test in sera from 90 subjects of both sexes (34 men and 56 women) with age ranging from 20 to 80years (mean 51±14years). All subjects were free from acute or chronic inflammatory disease, immunological disease and history or evidence of malignancy. Subjects were not on vitamin and/or antioxidant therapies.

Results: The detection limit of the assay was 40AU. Linearity was observed up to 475AU. The recovery ranged between 97% and 105%. Within- and between-run imprecision was <5%. The mean HP value was 304±8AU, with no significant difference between men (291±10AU) and women (311±11AU). A significant positive correlation was observed between age and HP in the whole population (r=0.4, p=0.0002).

Conclusions: The automated test for the estimation of serum hydroperoxides represents a reliable and feasible procedure for increasing efficiency and reducing costs compared to the manual method, and is particularly suitable for evaluating oxidative stress in a variety of clinical conditions.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:1372–5.


Corresponding author: Dr. Cristina Vassalle, PhD, Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica-Area di ricerca CNR, Via Moruzzi 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy Phone: +39-050-3152199, Fax:+39-050-3152166

References

1. Locatelli F, Canaud B, Eckardt KU, Stenvinkel P, Wanner C, Zoccali C. Oxidative stress in end-stage renal disease: an emerging threat to patient outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18:1272–80.10.1093/ndt/gfg074Suche in Google Scholar

2. Ridker PM, Brown NJ, Vaughan DE, Harrison DG, Mehta JL. Established and emerging plasma biomarkers in the prediction of first atherothrombotic events. Circulation 2004; 109:IV6–19.10.1161/01.CIR.0000133444.17867.56Suche in Google Scholar

3. Vassalle C, Andreassi MG. 8-Iso-prostaglandin F2α as a risk marker in patients with coronary heart disease. Circulation 2004; 110:49–50.10.1161/01.CIR.0000141257.61498.6ASuche in Google Scholar

4. Alberti A, Bolognini L, Macciantelli D, Carratelli M. The radical cation of N,N-diethyl-para-phenylendiamine: a possible indicator of oxidative stress in biological samples. Res Chem Intermed 2000; 26:253–67.10.1163/156856700X00769Suche in Google Scholar

5. Cornelli U, Terranova R, Luca S, Cornelli M, Alberti A. Bioavailability and antioxidant activity of some food supplements in men and women using the D-Roms test as a marker of oxidative stress. J Nutr 2001; 131:3208–11.10.1093/jn/131.12.3208Suche in Google Scholar

6. Lubrano V, Vassalle C, L'Abbate A, Zucchelli GC. A new method to evaluate oxidative stress in humans. Immunoanal Biol Spec 2002; 17:172–5.10.1016/S0923-2532(02)01188-2Suche in Google Scholar

7. Griendling KK, FitzGerald GA. Oxidative stress and cardiovascular injury: Part I: basic mechanisms and in vivo monitoring of ROS. Circulation 2003; 108:1912–6.10.1161/01.CIR.0000093660.86242.BBSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Dalle-Donne I, Rossi R, Colombo R, Giustarini D, Milzani A. Biomarkers of oxidative damage in human disease. Clin Chem 2006; 52:601–23.10.1373/clinchem.2005.061408Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Devaraj S, Hirany SV, Burk RF, Jialal I. Divergence between LDL oxidative susceptibility and urinary F(2)-isoprostanes as measures of oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes. Clin Chem 2001; 47:1974–9.10.1093/clinchem/47.11.1974Suche in Google Scholar

10. Iamele L, Fiocchi R, Vernocchi A. Evaluation of an automated spectrophotometric assay for reactive oxygen metabolites in serum. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:673–6.10.1515/CCLM.2002.115Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Cavalleri A, Colombo C, Venturelli E, Miceli R, Mariani L, Cornelli U, et al. Evaluation of reactive oxygen metabolites in frozen serum samples. Effect of storage and repeated thawing. Int J Biol Markers 2004; 19:250–3.10.1177/172460080401900312Suche in Google Scholar

12. Gerardi G, Usberti M, Martini G, Albertini A, Sugherini L, Pompella A, et al. Plasma total antioxidant capacity in hemodialyzed patients and its relationships to other biomarkers of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:104–10.10.1515/CCLM.2002.019Suche in Google Scholar

13. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 2000; 408:239–47.10.1038/35041687Suche in Google Scholar

14. Helmersson J, Mattsson P, Basu S. Prostaglandin F2α metabolite and F2-isoprostane excretion in migraine. Clin Sci (Lond) 2002; 102:39–43.10.1042/CS20010179Suche in Google Scholar

15. Signorelli SS, Neri S, Sciacchitano S, Pino LD, Costa MP, Pennisi G, et al. Duration of menopause and behavior of malondialdehyde, lipids, lipoproteins and carotid wall artery intima-media thickness. Maturitas 2001; 39:39–42.10.1016/S0378-5122(01)00174-8Suche in Google Scholar

16. Griendling KK, FitzGerald GA. Oxidative stress and cardiovascular injury: Part II: animal and human studies. Circulation 2003; 108:2034–40.10.1161/01.CIR.0000093661.90582.c4Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Vassalle C, Petrozzi L, Botto N, Andreassi MG, Zucchelli GC. Oxidative stress and its association with coronary artery disease and different atherogenic risk factors. J Intern Med 2004; 256:308–15.10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01373.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2006-5-26
Accepted: 2006-8-23
Published Online: 2006-11-7
Published in Print: 2006-11-1

©2006 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Renal function – estimation of glomerular filtration rate
  2. Research translation: a new frontier for clinical laboratories
  3. Association of APOA5 c.553G>T polymorphism with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Chinese population
  4. MTRR 66A>G polymorphism in relation to congenital heart defects
  5. Increased homocysteine in heart failure: a result of renal impairment?
  6. Urine flow cytometry and detection of glomerular hematuria
  7. Chymotrypsin effects on the determination of sperm parameters and seminal biochemistry markers
  8. Evaluation of cardiac involvement following major orthopedic surgery
  9. Increased sensitivity in detecting renal impairments by quantitative measurement of marker protein excretion compared to detection of pathological particles in urine sediment analysis
  10. Clinical chemistry reference values for 75-year-old apparently healthy persons
  11. Serum pro-hepcidin concentrations and their responses to oral iron supplementation in healthy subjects manifest considerable inter-individual variation
  12. Comparability of five analytical systems for the determination of triiodothyronine, thyroxine and thyroid-stimulating hormone
  13. Automated analysis of pleural fluid total and differential leukocyte counts with the Sysmex XE-2100
  14. Automation and validation of a fast method for the assessment of in vivo oxidative stress levels
  15. Analytical validation of the new plasma calibrated Accu-Chek® Test Strips (Roche Diagnostics)
  16. Use of insulin immunoassays in clinical studies involving rapid-acting insulin analogues: Bi-insulin IRMA preliminary assessment
  17. Analytical and clinical evaluation of a new heart-type fatty acid-binding protein automated assay
  18. A caveat for OV-Monitor (CA 125 antigen) measurement: something is improving, something is not
  19. Reply to the letter written by Dorizzi et al.
Heruntergeladen am 5.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2006.243/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen