Startseite Altertumswissenschaften & Ägyptologie Dead Letters, Documentality, and the Noctes Atticae of Aulus Gellius
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Dead Letters, Documentality, and the Noctes Atticae of Aulus Gellius

  • Scott J. DiGiulio
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Documentality
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Documentality

Abstract

Amidst the explosive proliferation of written texts in the latter half of the second century CE, Aulus Gellius’ miscellany, the Noctes Atticae (NA), offers a critical lens for understanding how at least one ancient reader approached reading different material in the Roman Empire. This chapter examines Gellius’ use of texts that would be conventionally termed “documentary” and argues that he sees them as more analogous to the literary works quoted throughout the NA than we might initially assume. While his narratives discussing the treatment of official documents suggest that some material had privileged status, his citations from the letters of Cicero and Augustus, as well as his discussions of public inscriptions, reveal that the divide between the documentary and the literary was more permeable than we might otherwise imagine. In his hands, literary works and documents stand together as authoritative evidence for Latin language and style within the broader text-world of his miscellany.

Abstract

Amidst the explosive proliferation of written texts in the latter half of the second century CE, Aulus Gellius’ miscellany, the Noctes Atticae (NA), offers a critical lens for understanding how at least one ancient reader approached reading different material in the Roman Empire. This chapter examines Gellius’ use of texts that would be conventionally termed “documentary” and argues that he sees them as more analogous to the literary works quoted throughout the NA than we might initially assume. While his narratives discussing the treatment of official documents suggest that some material had privileged status, his citations from the letters of Cicero and Augustus, as well as his discussions of public inscriptions, reveal that the divide between the documentary and the literary was more permeable than we might otherwise imagine. In his hands, literary works and documents stand together as authoritative evidence for Latin language and style within the broader text-world of his miscellany.

Heruntergeladen am 1.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110791914-008/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen