Startseite Altertumswissenschaften & Ägyptologie Passion, Knowledge and Truth: Second Thoughts on Sophocles’ Tereus
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Passion, Knowledge and Truth: Second Thoughts on Sophocles’ Tereus

  • Daniela Milo

    Daniela Milo is an Associate Professor in Ancient Greek Language and Literature at the University of Naples Federico II. Her main research interests concern Greek tragic theatre, especially Sophoclean and Euripidean tragedy, both extant and fragmentary, of which she investigates the use of language, questions of dramaturgy, staging, and reconstruction of the plot of lost plays (she is the author of the edition of Sophocles’ Tereus, 2008, and of a wide range of publications on these subjects). She is a member of the Board of Directors of Associazione Internazionale di Studi Tardoantichi and of the Scientific Committee of the Journals Κοινωνία and Frammenti sulla scena.

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Tereus Through the Ages
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Tereus Through the Ages

Abstract

This chapter offers a new interpretation of P.Oxy. 5292, paying particular attention to the prologue of the play, the significance of the woven fabric, and the role of the Shepherd. In light of the publication of the new Oxyrhynchus papyrus, the author suggests some interpretative hypotheses. For example, the placement of fr. 583 R2 (= 2 M.) in the prologue should be rejected, and particular attention should instead be devoted to other fundamental aspects of the fragmentary tragedy. Specifically, the author investigates what character recites the prologue; the state of Procne’s mind and knowledge; when and how the meeting between Procne and Philomela takes place; what role the Shepherd plays and the nature of the news he brings; the use of the woven fabric as a dramatic device in the recognition scene; and the purpose of the libations mentioned by the Shepherd in his conversation with Procne. Thus, this essay sheds fresh light on the interpretation of the controversial aspects emerging from P.Oxy. 5292 and re-contextualizes the fragments in the light of Sophocles’ poetics and theatre.

Abstract

This chapter offers a new interpretation of P.Oxy. 5292, paying particular attention to the prologue of the play, the significance of the woven fabric, and the role of the Shepherd. In light of the publication of the new Oxyrhynchus papyrus, the author suggests some interpretative hypotheses. For example, the placement of fr. 583 R2 (= 2 M.) in the prologue should be rejected, and particular attention should instead be devoted to other fundamental aspects of the fragmentary tragedy. Specifically, the author investigates what character recites the prologue; the state of Procne’s mind and knowledge; when and how the meeting between Procne and Philomela takes place; what role the Shepherd plays and the nature of the news he brings; the use of the woven fabric as a dramatic device in the recognition scene; and the purpose of the libations mentioned by the Shepherd in his conversation with Procne. Thus, this essay sheds fresh light on the interpretation of the controversial aspects emerging from P.Oxy. 5292 and re-contextualizes the fragments in the light of Sophocles’ poetics and theatre.

Heruntergeladen am 28.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110728804-005/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen