Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
Reply to Gebhard Kirchgässner
-
Lars P. Feld
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
30. November 2019
Abstract
In this reply to Kirchgässner, four issues are addressed: (1) the extent of double counting in attempts to reconcile estimates of the shadow economy based on the survey method and estimates based on the MIMIC (cum currency demand) approach, (2) advantages and disadvantages of the survey method, (3) of macro methods like the MIMIC approach and (4) the potential role of plausibility checks of estimates from the MIMIC approach with the survey method.
Published Online: 2019-11-30
Published in Print: 2017-02-01
© 2019 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- When a Door Closes, a Window Opens? Long-Term Labor Market Effects of Involuntary Separations
- Candidates’ Education and Turnout: Evidence from Italyn Municipal Elections
- von Thünen: Capital, Production Functions, Marginal Productivity Wages, and the Natural Wage
- On the Incentive Effects of Sample Size in Monitoring Agents – A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis
- On Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy
- Reply to Gebhard Kirchgässner
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
Shadow economy;
model approach;
currency demand approach;
survey method
Artikel in diesem Heft
- When a Door Closes, a Window Opens? Long-Term Labor Market Effects of Involuntary Separations
- Candidates’ Education and Turnout: Evidence from Italyn Municipal Elections
- von Thünen: Capital, Production Functions, Marginal Productivity Wages, and the Natural Wage
- On the Incentive Effects of Sample Size in Monitoring Agents – A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis
- On Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy
- Reply to Gebhard Kirchgässner
