Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Anticausative and passive in Vedic
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Anticausative and passive in Vedic

Which way reanalysis?
  • Hans Henrich Hock
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

In a 2001 publication on reanalysis and linguistic change, Henning Andersen states that “(i)t is not clear yet what constitutes structural ambiguity in surface realizations; this remains a question for the future”. As a tribute to Henning, this paper examines a case of (near-)systematic structural ambiguity regarding Vedic passives and anticausatives and demonstrates that this ambiguity creates serious obstacles to determining whether anticausatives are reanalyzed from passives or vice versa. In fact, given the persistent structural ambiguity it is possible that different speakers preferred different accounts, whether for all relevant verbs, for subsets of the verbs, or even for individual verbs, in individual contexts.

Abstract

In a 2001 publication on reanalysis and linguistic change, Henning Andersen states that “(i)t is not clear yet what constitutes structural ambiguity in surface realizations; this remains a question for the future”. As a tribute to Henning, this paper examines a case of (near-)systematic structural ambiguity regarding Vedic passives and anticausatives and demonstrates that this ambiguity creates serious obstacles to determining whether anticausatives are reanalyzed from passives or vice versa. In fact, given the persistent structural ambiguity it is possible that different speakers preferred different accounts, whether for all relevant verbs, for subsets of the verbs, or even for individual verbs, in individual contexts.

Heruntergeladen am 18.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.345.07hoc/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen