Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Was Old Frech -able borrowable? A diachronic study of word-formation processes due to language contact
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Was Old Frech -able borrowable? A diachronic study of word-formation processes due to language contact

  • Carola Trips und Achim Stein
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company
English Historical Linguistics 2006
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch English Historical Linguistics 2006

Abstract

An in-depth corpus study will show that the ability of -able formations to highlight other arguments of the verbal base is present from the start in Old French texts, similarly to findings for Modern French (2003). Old French formations like (par)durable, decevable or changable show that unergatives and unaccusatives can just as well serve as input to -able formations, and that the traditional distinction between transitive and intransitive types cannot account for the variety of derivatives we are already faced with in the Old French period.

We also argue against the assumptions that in Old French the active meaning was clearly dominant and that in ME the free morpheme able explains the rise of the suffix -able. The semantic analysis has shown that an adequate word-formation rule should account for the event structure of the base verb rather than rely on the syntactic or semantic frame alone.

Abstract

An in-depth corpus study will show that the ability of -able formations to highlight other arguments of the verbal base is present from the start in Old French texts, similarly to findings for Modern French (2003). Old French formations like (par)durable, decevable or changable show that unergatives and unaccusatives can just as well serve as input to -able formations, and that the traditional distinction between transitive and intransitive types cannot account for the variety of derivatives we are already faced with in the Old French period.

We also argue against the assumptions that in Old French the active meaning was clearly dominant and that in ME the free morpheme able explains the rise of the suffix -able. The semantic analysis has shown that an adequate word-formation rule should account for the event structure of the base verb rather than rely on the syntactic or semantic frame alone.

Heruntergeladen am 7.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.296.15tri/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen