We examine how group decision-making affects other-regarding behavior in experimental dictator games. In particular, we assess whether the effects of iterated games differ for group and individual decision-making and whether the difference in decision-making style (individual or group) changes the perception of social identity. We make two findings on group decision-making. First, group decisions become more selfish when repeating the game after changing group members. Second, a dictator group donates more to a recipient group at the same university than to a recipient group at a different university. These findings are not true for individual decision-making.
Contents
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedContagion of Self-Interested Behavior: Evidence from Group Dictator Game ExperimentsLicensedNovember 30, 2019
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedThe Impact of the German Child Benefit on Household Expenditures and ConsumptionLicensedNovember 30, 2019
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedSemi-Parametric Estimates of Taylor Rules for a Small, Open Economy – Evidence from SwitzerlandLicensedNovember 30, 2019
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedMispricing of Risk in Sovereign Bond Markets with Asymmetric InformationLicensedNovember 30, 2019
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedAcknowledgementsLicensedNovember 30, 2019
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedIndex: Volume 17, 2016LicensedNovember 30, 2019