The existing literature argues that both higher levels of political and economic development can dampen real GDP growth volatility. The problem, however, is that both forms of development are thought to be highly correlated. Using a dataset of 94 countries, we address this problem and find that not only does economic and political development have non-linear relationships with volatility, but that the effect of the former is more substantively significant than that of political development after a certain level of development is attained.
Contents
- Article
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedThe Effects of Economic and Political Development on GDP Growth VolatilityLicensedJune 9, 2009
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedTariffs, Horizontal Regulatory Standards and Protection against Foreign CompetitorsLicensedJune 9, 2009
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedInfrastructure, Commodity Spectra, and Trade Transitions in Economic DevelopmentLicensedJune 9, 2009
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedHow Structural Macroeconomic Shocks Can Explain Exchange Rate Pass-Through in Developing Countries: A Common Trend ApproachLicensedJune 9, 2009
- What's New in Our World?
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedGrowth of Government Expenditure in Bangladesh: An Empirical Enquiry into the Validity of Wagner's LawLicensedJune 9, 2009
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedPoland, the European Union, and the Euro: Poland's Long Journey to Full European IntegrationLicensedJune 9, 2009
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedFinancial Fragility and Crisis Union in the Asia-Pacific RegionLicensedJune 9, 2009
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedStructural Breaks and Exports in the PhilippinesLicensedJune 9, 2009