Skip to main content
Presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services

Manchester University Press

Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

4 The right to sovereign seizure? Taxation, valuation, and the Imperial British East Africa Company

Abstract

While today it is widely accepted that some right to sovereign seizure is a common feature of all existing polities, this framework is premised on the normative relationship between sovereign power and taxation. What, then, are we to make of a tax regime haphazardly developed and administered by a corporation and designed not simply to bind the ruler to the ruled but to enrich corporate shareholders? Beginning in the 1880s, this chapter charts the emergence of the Imperial British East Africa Company (IBEA). The Crown and the Sultan of Zanzibar authorised the operations of the joint-stock company, proclaiming it the de jure sovereign in Eastern Africa. A core sovereign prerogative granted to the company was the right to ‘raise taxes, impose customs dues, administer justice, make treaties, and generally assume the powers of government within a specified area’. This regime of value capture would not only constitute the Company’s revenue regime, but was to form the basis of corporate profits and the dividends of British shareholders. However, and as I show, administrators faced severe limitations in securing a monopoly over valuation as they confronted competing visions of the relationship between seizure and political authority. These struggles notwithstanding, taxation emerges in this period not as a stable category binding the ruler to the ruled, but as a flexible though ideologically dense claim on the public hoard, one which calls into question the epistemological status of taxation in its connection to sovereignty.

Abstract

While today it is widely accepted that some right to sovereign seizure is a common feature of all existing polities, this framework is premised on the normative relationship between sovereign power and taxation. What, then, are we to make of a tax regime haphazardly developed and administered by a corporation and designed not simply to bind the ruler to the ruled but to enrich corporate shareholders? Beginning in the 1880s, this chapter charts the emergence of the Imperial British East Africa Company (IBEA). The Crown and the Sultan of Zanzibar authorised the operations of the joint-stock company, proclaiming it the de jure sovereign in Eastern Africa. A core sovereign prerogative granted to the company was the right to ‘raise taxes, impose customs dues, administer justice, make treaties, and generally assume the powers of government within a specified area’. This regime of value capture would not only constitute the Company’s revenue regime, but was to form the basis of corporate profits and the dividends of British shareholders. However, and as I show, administrators faced severe limitations in securing a monopoly over valuation as they confronted competing visions of the relationship between seizure and political authority. These struggles notwithstanding, taxation emerges in this period not as a stable category binding the ruler to the ruled, but as a flexible though ideologically dense claim on the public hoard, one which calls into question the epistemological status of taxation in its connection to sovereignty.

Downloaded on 29.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7765/9781526166159.00013/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button