Startseite 38 Against the organization of misery? The Marmot Review of Health Inequalities
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

38 Against the organization of misery? The Marmot Review of Health Inequalities

Social Science and Medicine (2010) no 71, pp 1231–3
  • Daniel Dorling
Weitere Titel anzeigen von Policy Press
Fair play
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Fair play

Abstract

In February 2010, the UK Government published Fair Society, Healthy Lives: Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post-2010, better known as “The Marmot Review” after its lead author Professor Sir Michael Marmot. The very first words of the report are a variation on a quotation from Pablo Neruda:

“Rise up with me against the organisation of misery” Marmot et al, 2010, p 2

Pablo Neruda was a Chilean writer, a left-wing politician, and a confidant of president Salvador Allende; he died within days of August Pinochet’s coup. An official British document that begins with a quotation from a revolutionary communist would seem to promise unusually radical content.

The Marmot Review (2010) received extensive coverage and acclaim from London’s Guardian newspaper and was covered, albeit more briefly, in the Times and the Daily Telegraph, but few of the initial commentators seemed to believe that any of its main recommendations would actually be implemented. These included improving prenatal and early years provision, better drug addiction treatment, and raising social security payments. Rather than anticipating real progress in tackling health inequalities in the wake of the financial crash, one journalist suggested that:

“This grim situation makes those few Marmot recommendations that need not involve great public expense, such as better workplace procedures to deal with stress at work, all the more important, and every one should now get behind these.”(Guardian, 2010, March 15, p 30)

If all that can be done to reduce Britain’s grievous and persistent inequalities in health is to try to abate stress in the workplace, what does that say about the commitment of the British (government, academics, public health professionals, and public alike) to truly creating a fairer and healthier society?

The Marmot Review (2010) followed an earlier report also led by Sir Michael.

Abstract

In February 2010, the UK Government published Fair Society, Healthy Lives: Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post-2010, better known as “The Marmot Review” after its lead author Professor Sir Michael Marmot. The very first words of the report are a variation on a quotation from Pablo Neruda:

“Rise up with me against the organisation of misery” Marmot et al, 2010, p 2

Pablo Neruda was a Chilean writer, a left-wing politician, and a confidant of president Salvador Allende; he died within days of August Pinochet’s coup. An official British document that begins with a quotation from a revolutionary communist would seem to promise unusually radical content.

The Marmot Review (2010) received extensive coverage and acclaim from London’s Guardian newspaper and was covered, albeit more briefly, in the Times and the Daily Telegraph, but few of the initial commentators seemed to believe that any of its main recommendations would actually be implemented. These included improving prenatal and early years provision, better drug addiction treatment, and raising social security payments. Rather than anticipating real progress in tackling health inequalities in the wake of the financial crash, one journalist suggested that:

“This grim situation makes those few Marmot recommendations that need not involve great public expense, such as better workplace procedures to deal with stress at work, all the more important, and every one should now get behind these.”(Guardian, 2010, March 15, p 30)

If all that can be done to reduce Britain’s grievous and persistent inequalities in health is to try to abate stress in the workplace, what does that say about the commitment of the British (government, academics, public health professionals, and public alike) to truly creating a fairer and healthier society?

The Marmot Review (2010) followed an earlier report also led by Sir Michael.

Kapitel in diesem Buch

  1. Front Matter i
  2. Contents v
  3. Sources of extracts vii
  4. Foreword xi
  5. Acknowledgements xiv
  6. Introduction 1
  7. Inequality and poverty
  8. Prime suspect: murder in Britain 13
  9. The dream that turned pear-shaped 31
  10. The soul searching within New Labour 41
  11. Unequal Britain 49
  12. Axing the child poverty measure is wrong 57
  13. Injustice and ideology
  14. Brutal budget to entrench inequality 63
  15. New Labour and inequality: Thatcherism continued? 65
  16. All in the mind? Why social inequalities persist 83
  17. Glass conflict: David Cameron’s claim to understand poverty 93
  18. Clearing the poor away 97
  19. Race and identity
  20. Ghettos in the sky 103
  21. Worlds apart: how inequality breeds fear and prejudice in Britain 111
  22. How much evidence do you need? Ethnicity, harm and crime 115
  23. UK medical school admissions by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and sex 121
  24. Race and the repercussions of recession 125
  25. Education and hierarchy
  26. What’s it to do with the price of fish? 133
  27. Little progress towards a fairer education system 139
  28. One of Labour’s great successes 147
  29. Do three points make a trend? 149
  30. Educational mobility, England and Germany 155
  31. Cash and the not so classless society 159
  32. Britain must close the great pay divide 165
  33. Raising equality in access to higher education 170
  34. Elitism and geneticism
  35. The Darwins and the Cecils are only empty vessels 189
  36. The Fabian essay: the myth of inherited inequality 193
  37. The return to elitism in education 199
  38. The super-rich are still soaring away 209
  39. Mobility and employment
  40. The trouble with moving upmarket 217
  41. Britain – split and divided by inequality 221
  42. London and the English desert: the grain of truth in a stereotype 225
  43. Are the times changing back? 237
  44. Unemployment and health 243
  45. Bricks and mortar
  46. Mortality amongst street sleeping youth in the UK 249
  47. Daylight robbery: there’s no shortage of housing 251
  48. The influence of selective migration patterns 255
  49. The geography of poverty, inequality and wealth in the UK and abroad 263
  50. All connected? Geographies of race, death, wealth, votes and births 291
  51. Well-being and misery
  52. Against the organization of misery? The Marmot Review of Health Inequalities 299
  53. Inequality kills 307
  54. The geography of social inequality and health 311
  55. The cartographer’s mad project 327
  56. The fading of the dream: widening inequalities in life expectancy in America 333
  57. The importance of circumstance 339
  58. Advocacy and action
  59. Mean machine: how structural inequality makes social inequality seem natural 347
  60. Policing the borders of crime: who decides research? 351
  61. Learning the hard way 357
  62. When the social divide deepens 363
  63. Ending the scandal of complacency 365
  64. Our grandchildren will wonder why we were addicted to social inequality 369
  65. Mind the gap: New Labour’s legacy on child poverty 373
  66. Remapping the world’s population: visualizing data using cartograms 379
  67. If I were king 385
  68. Bibliography 387
  69. Index 389
Heruntergeladen am 9.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781847428813-042/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen