Home Social Sciences 11 Service users, students and staff: co-producing creative educational activities on a social work programme in the UK
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

11 Service users, students and staff: co-producing creative educational activities on a social work programme in the UK

  • Kieron Hatton , Kevin Holmes and Pete Shepherd
View more publications by Policy Press

Abstract

From limited beginnings service-user/carer involvement has become central to the accreditation and validation of social work programmes in the UK (Hatton, 2015). The extent and depth of service-user/carer involvement varies widely across the country and in many, but not all, cases focuses on the involvement of service users/carers in the traditional elements of the programme – admissions interviews, guest teaching and as expert speakers. This chapter suggest that if we are to make service-user/carer involvement meaningful, we need to develop a more holistic and complex way of understanding how service users/carers can contribute to social work education. This will involve seeing service users/carers as co-producers and partners in the educational experience rather than seeing their involvement as a way of legitimising our commitment to inclusion. To achieve this, this chapter argues that we need a more developed analysis of power, agency, imagination and creativity. The chapter uses the phrase ‘service users/carers’ for clarity, although it fully recognises that: a) service users/carers are not a homogenous grouping, and b) the very words are themselves contentious (McLaughlin, 2009). In current discourses, service users/carers are more often referred to as experts by experience or people with lived experience (PWLE). The authors also recognises that service users/carers have multiple identities beyond their status as service users/carers, and that many of these roles intersect (Hill Collins and Bilge, 2016) and cause contradictions/conflicts. This is the content of a recently published companion piece (Hatton, 2020).

Over the last 20 years, service users/carers have at last been recognised as having a significant role in the delivery, management and development of welfare services.

Abstract

From limited beginnings service-user/carer involvement has become central to the accreditation and validation of social work programmes in the UK (Hatton, 2015). The extent and depth of service-user/carer involvement varies widely across the country and in many, but not all, cases focuses on the involvement of service users/carers in the traditional elements of the programme – admissions interviews, guest teaching and as expert speakers. This chapter suggest that if we are to make service-user/carer involvement meaningful, we need to develop a more holistic and complex way of understanding how service users/carers can contribute to social work education. This will involve seeing service users/carers as co-producers and partners in the educational experience rather than seeing their involvement as a way of legitimising our commitment to inclusion. To achieve this, this chapter argues that we need a more developed analysis of power, agency, imagination and creativity. The chapter uses the phrase ‘service users/carers’ for clarity, although it fully recognises that: a) service users/carers are not a homogenous grouping, and b) the very words are themselves contentious (McLaughlin, 2009). In current discourses, service users/carers are more often referred to as experts by experience or people with lived experience (PWLE). The authors also recognises that service users/carers have multiple identities beyond their status as service users/carers, and that many of these roles intersect (Hill Collins and Bilge, 2016) and cause contradictions/conflicts. This is the content of a recently published companion piece (Hatton, 2020).

Over the last 20 years, service users/carers have at last been recognised as having a significant role in the delivery, management and development of welfare services.

Chapters in this book

  1. Front Matter i
  2. Contents vii
  3. List of figures and tables ix
  4. Notes on contributors x
  5. Acknowledgements xix
  6. Introduction 1
  7. Collaborative models in social work education
  8. The gap-mending concept: theory and practice 11
  9. Mending gaps in social work education in the UK 23
  10. Service users as tandem partners in social work education 35
  11. Service users as supervisors in social work education: mending the gap of power relations 49
  12. Involving students with mental health experience in social work education 61
  13. The Living Library in social work education 73
  14. Creating a platform together for the voice of the service user: inspiration for organising an event together with service users 85
  15. Reflections on inspiring conversations in social work education: the voices of Scottish experts by experience and Italian students 97
  16. Joint workshops with students and service users in social work education: experiences from Esslingen, Germany 109
  17. Service users, students and staff: co-producing creative educational activities on a social work programme in the UK 117
  18. Collaborative models in research and policy
  19. The co-researcher role in the tension between recognition, co-option and tokenism 133
  20. Community of development: a model for inclusive learning, research and innovation 145
  21. Dialogue, skills and trust: some lessons learned from co-writing with service users 158
  22. Participatory pathways in social policymaking: between rhetoric and reality 170
  23. Experiential knowledge as a driver of change 183
  24. Reflective chapters
  25. Experiences matter equally 199
  26. Ethical issues in the meaningful involvement of service users as co-researchers 209
  27. Involving service users in social work education and research: is this structural social work? 224
  28. Index 238
Downloaded on 29.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447358350-014/html
Scroll to top button