Home Social Sciences 15 Building research capacity: scaffolding the process through arts-based pedagogy
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

15 Building research capacity: scaffolding the process through arts-based pedagogy

  • Ronald P.M.H. Lay
View more publications by Policy Press

Abstract

Research into arts-based interventions is complex as art cannot be directly translated into words. Increasingly, there has been a global incessant call for research into using the arts in a range of mental health disciplines. Ongoing debates over methodology, primarily quantitative and qualitative, persist and this just may affect one’s decision to engage in research. However, research is needed for a range of reasons including providing evidence of the integrity of a discipline, asserting core competencies of practitioners, for third party and stakeholder purposes including advocacy, the formation of relevant laws, protections, and access to services, and, of course, to highlight emerging trends and contemporary best practices to effectively address a plethora of the complex needs of clients. As such, arts-based practitioners are uniquely situated to make significant contributions to the research base given their direct engagement with the arts with individuals, families, communities, and society at large (McNiff, 2013; Thomas et al., 2020). Art is rich with metaphor and symbol, and often can be accessed and applied when answers to questions are not easily obtained nor addressed through words alone, even if the art may seem abstract at first (McNiff, 2013; Chilton et al., 2015; Boden et al., 2019; Potash, 2019; Thomas et al., 2020). Indeed, art is not the opposite of research as in the dichotomic paradigm of arts versus science, but rather art, and art making, are a type of research in and of themselves, just as research can also involve creativity and nonlinear engagement (McNiff, 2013; Kapitan, 2018).

Abstract

Research into arts-based interventions is complex as art cannot be directly translated into words. Increasingly, there has been a global incessant call for research into using the arts in a range of mental health disciplines. Ongoing debates over methodology, primarily quantitative and qualitative, persist and this just may affect one’s decision to engage in research. However, research is needed for a range of reasons including providing evidence of the integrity of a discipline, asserting core competencies of practitioners, for third party and stakeholder purposes including advocacy, the formation of relevant laws, protections, and access to services, and, of course, to highlight emerging trends and contemporary best practices to effectively address a plethora of the complex needs of clients. As such, arts-based practitioners are uniquely situated to make significant contributions to the research base given their direct engagement with the arts with individuals, families, communities, and society at large (McNiff, 2013; Thomas et al., 2020). Art is rich with metaphor and symbol, and often can be accessed and applied when answers to questions are not easily obtained nor addressed through words alone, even if the art may seem abstract at first (McNiff, 2013; Chilton et al., 2015; Boden et al., 2019; Potash, 2019; Thomas et al., 2020). Indeed, art is not the opposite of research as in the dichotomic paradigm of arts versus science, but rather art, and art making, are a type of research in and of themselves, just as research can also involve creativity and nonlinear engagement (McNiff, 2013; Kapitan, 2018).

Chapters in this book

  1. Front Matter i
  2. Contents ix
  3. List of figures and tables xi
  4. Notes on contributors xiii
  5. Introduction 1
  6. Arts-based research as a method to understand and give voice to marginalised groups
  7. Using arts-based methods to explore existential issues around ageing 13
  8. Arts- and music-based activities and nondeliberative participatory research methods: building connection and community 24
  9. Arts-based methods to co-create knowledge and reconstruct power relations with marginalised women in and through research 33
  10. Autoethnographic playwriting and performance for self-healing and advocacy 45
  11. Using photography to research the ‘other’: the validity of photography for social work research – a visual case study from China 55
  12. Mixed arts-based methods as a platform for expressing lived experience 68
  13. Arts-based methods to support and reveal new mothers’ and families’ experiences: a positive parenting and feminist approach 77
  14. Using arts-based research to listen to, and give voice to, children in social work
  15. “I don’t like the cameras in the house. They’re looking at us all the time”: the contribution of Photovoice to children in a post-hospitalisation programme 89
  16. Arts-based research work with migrant children 102
  17. Using creative art research approaches to assess arts-based interventions with children in post-disaster contexts 117
  18. Arts-based research as a way for researchers and community members to understand communities
  19. Murals and photography in community engagement and assessment 129
  20. Forum theatre as participatory action research with community workers 139
  21. A/r/tography, rhizomatic storytelling, and ripple effects mapping: a combined arts-based and community mapping methodology to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 expressive arts support groups for frontliners in the Philippines 148
  22. Art and artefact: displaying social work through objects 162
  23. Building research capacity: scaffolding the process through arts-based pedagogy 170
  24. Art as a way of improving participatory action research: an experience with youngsters with an intellectual disability and their families 181
  25. Epilogue 198
  26. Index 200
Downloaded on 28.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447357919-018/html
Scroll to top button