Startseite Two Lies and deception in the backlash
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Two Lies and deception in the backlash

  • Sarah Nelson
Weitere Titel anzeigen von Policy Press
Tackling Child Sexual Abuse
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Tackling Child Sexual Abuse

Abstract

In order to escape accountability for his crimes, the perpetrator does everything in his power to promote forgetting. If secrecy fails, the perpetrator attacks the credibility of his victim. If he cannot silence her absolutely, he tries to make sure no one listens. (Herman, 1992)

The opening chapter discussed some ways in which the modern backlash against the exposure of child sexual abuse (CSA) has undermined protection of children at risk. Supporters of accused adults have used media and academic discourse to shape public, legal and medical opinion; and at times to discredit, intimidate and silence child and adult survivors of CSA, the children’s mothers and professionals who have tried to protect or support them.

Theories promoted by proponents of the backlash against exposure of CSA have received widespread credibility and media publicity. Those who believed abused children and adults have often found themselves portrayed as gullible and naive. This chapter examines how credible some major examples of backlash theories have actually been: the ‘satanic panic’, ‘false memory syndrome’ (FMS) and ‘parental alienation syndrome’ (PAS). Some individuals particularly active against sexual abuse, and repeatedly targeted for discredit, are discussed. Continuing attempts at discredit are suggested through the example of the ‘Butner study’.

Careful academic and legal critiques already exist of FMS and PAS. As discussed later, the memory debates from the early 1990s onwards inspired valuable professional analyses of amnesia and memory issues following trauma. Rather than simply repeat these, I concentrate here on sometimes glaring weaknesses in backlash theories, which should have raised obvious doubts about their reliability and credibility, yet did not.

Abstract

In order to escape accountability for his crimes, the perpetrator does everything in his power to promote forgetting. If secrecy fails, the perpetrator attacks the credibility of his victim. If he cannot silence her absolutely, he tries to make sure no one listens. (Herman, 1992)

The opening chapter discussed some ways in which the modern backlash against the exposure of child sexual abuse (CSA) has undermined protection of children at risk. Supporters of accused adults have used media and academic discourse to shape public, legal and medical opinion; and at times to discredit, intimidate and silence child and adult survivors of CSA, the children’s mothers and professionals who have tried to protect or support them.

Theories promoted by proponents of the backlash against exposure of CSA have received widespread credibility and media publicity. Those who believed abused children and adults have often found themselves portrayed as gullible and naive. This chapter examines how credible some major examples of backlash theories have actually been: the ‘satanic panic’, ‘false memory syndrome’ (FMS) and ‘parental alienation syndrome’ (PAS). Some individuals particularly active against sexual abuse, and repeatedly targeted for discredit, are discussed. Continuing attempts at discredit are suggested through the example of the ‘Butner study’.

Careful academic and legal critiques already exist of FMS and PAS. As discussed later, the memory debates from the early 1990s onwards inspired valuable professional analyses of amnesia and memory issues following trauma. Rather than simply repeat these, I concentrate here on sometimes glaring weaknesses in backlash theories, which should have raised obvious doubts about their reliability and credibility, yet did not.

Heruntergeladen am 20.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447313885-004/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen