Home Physical Sciences Validation of an In-Mold Multivariate Sensor for Measurement of Melt Temperature, Pressure, Velocity, and Viscosity
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Validation of an In-Mold Multivariate Sensor for Measurement of Melt Temperature, Pressure, Velocity, and Viscosity

  • G. Gordon , D. O. Kazmer , X.-Y. Tang , Z.-Y. Fan and R. X. Gao
Published/Copyright: July 31, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A multivariate sensor (MVS) is described for measurement of melt temperature, melt pressure, melt velocity, and melt viscosity. Melt pressure and temperature are respectively obtained through the incorporation of a piezo-ceramic element and infrared thermopile. Melt velocity is derived from the initial response of the melt temperature as the polymer melt flows across the sensor lens. The apparent melt viscosity is then derived based on the melt velocity and the time derivative of the increasing melt pressure. The response of the MVS is analyzed using an instrumented mold including piezoelectric pressure sensors, an infrared pyrometer, and thermocouples. A 12-run, blocked half-fractional design of experiments (DOE) was run to characterize the effect of melt temperature, mold temperature, packing pressure, and ram velocity. The results show that the MVS provides excellent measurement of melt temperature and pressure. The accuracy of the melt velocity estimations depended on the ram velocity set-point, yielding a coefficient of determination of 0.91 for the lower ram velocities, and reaching saturation for melt velocities about 450 mm/s. The apparent melt viscosity estimated by the MVS are close to those predicted by the Cross-WLF model, exhibiting appropriate shear thinning but behavior but inconsistent temperature dependence.


*Correspondence address, Mail address: Guthrie Gordon, Department of Plastics Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 1 University Avenue, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, USA, E-mail:

References

Aeppel, T., “Workers Not Included”, The Wall Street Journal, B1 (2002)Search in Google Scholar

Agrawal, A., Pandelidis, I. and Pecht, M., “Injection-Molding Process Control–A Review”, Polym. Eng. Sci., 27, 1345–1357 (1987) 10.1002/pen.760271802Search in Google Scholar

Bicerano, J.: Prediction of Polymer Properties. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA (2002)10.1201/9780203910115Search in Google Scholar

Coates, P. D., Speight, R. G., “Towards Intelligent Process Control of Injection Moulding of Polymers”, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 209, 357–367 (1995) 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_095_02Search in Google Scholar

Cross, M. M., “Rheology of Non-Newtonian Fluids: A New Flow Equation for Pseudoplastic Systems”, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 20, 417–437 (1965) 10.1016/0095-8522(65)90022-XSearch in Google Scholar

Diduch, C., Dubay, R. and Li, W. G., “Temperature Control of Injection Molding. Part I: Modeling and Identification”, Polym. Eng. Sci., 44, 2308–2317 (2004) 10.1002/pen.20258Search in Google Scholar

Dubay, R., Bell, A. C. and Gupta, Y. P., “Control of Plastic Melt Temperature: A Multiple Input Multiple Output Model Predictive Approach”, Polym. Eng. Sci., 37, 1550–1563 (1997) 10.1002/pen.11803Search in Google Scholar

Giboz, J., Copponnex, T. and Mélé, P., “Microinjection Molding of Thermoplastic Polymers: A Review”, J. Micromech. Microeng., 17, R96 (2007) 10.1088/0960-1317/17/6/R02Search in Google Scholar

Hottel, H. C., Sarofim, A. F.: Radiative Transfer. McGraw-Hill Education, New York City, New York, USA (1967)Search in Google Scholar

Kazmer, D.: Injection Mold Design Engineering, Hanser Gardner, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA (2007) PMid:17187222; 10.3139/9783446434196Search in Google Scholar

Kazmer, D. O., Johnston, S. P., Gao, R. X. and Fan, Z., “Feasibility Analysis of an In-mold Multivariate Sensor”, Int. Polym. Proc., 26, 6372 (2011) 10.3139/217.2397Search in Google Scholar

Kirby, B.: Micro-and Nanoscale Fluid Mechanics: Transport in Microfluidic Devices, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom (2010)10.1017/CBO9780511760723Search in Google Scholar

Malkin, A. Y., Isayev, A. I.: Rheology: Concepts, Methods, and Applications, William Andrew, Norwich, New York, USA (2005)Search in Google Scholar

Mann, J. W., “Process Parameter Control: The Key to Optimization”, Plast. Eng., 30, 25–27 (1974)Search in Google Scholar

Mendible, G. A., Kazmer, D. O. and Johnston, S. P., “Validation of an Analytical Method to Estimate the Bulk Melt Temperature from In-Mold Temperature Data”, Society of Plastics Engineers Annual Conference ANTEC, 1591965 (2013), http://www.4spe.org/Resources/resource.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

Müller, F., Rath, G., Lucyshyn, T., Kukla, C., Burgsteiner, M. and Holzer, C., “Presentation of a Novel Sensor Based on Acoustic Emission in Injection Molding”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 127, 4744–4749 (2013) 10.1002/app.38083Search in Google Scholar

Schulz, H., “Characteristics of Modern Manufacturing Techniques”, AMST’05 Advanced Manufacturing Systems and Technology, 5–15 (2005) PMid:16230743; 10.1007/3-211-38053-1_2Search in Google Scholar

Tanner, R. I.: Engineering Rheology, OUP Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (2000)Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Xiao, Y., Zhang, Q., Gao, X. L. and Fu, Q., “The Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Dynamic Packing Injection Molded PP/PS Blends”, Polymer, 44, 1469–1480 (2003) 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00011-9Search in Google Scholar

Yokoi, H., Murata, Y. and Tsukakoshi, H., “Measurement of Melt Temperature Profiles during Filling and Packing Processes Using a New Integrated Thermocouple Sensor”, SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers, 1875–1881 (1992)Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-04-02
Accepted: 2017-02-14
Published Online: 2017-07-31
Published in Print: 2017-08-11

© 2017, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich

Downloaded on 11.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.2964/html
Scroll to top button