Home Method for the Optimisation of Screw Elements for Tightly Intermeshing, Co-rotating Twin Screw Extruders
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Method for the Optimisation of Screw Elements for Tightly Intermeshing, Co-rotating Twin Screw Extruders

  • H. Potente and A. Thümen
Published/Copyright: April 6, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Demanding mixing tasks are usually solved through the use of tightly intermeshing, co-rotating twin screw extruders. Since both the barrel and the screw are of a modular design, the extruder can be optimised for a given task. In the framework of this investigation, the screw-element geometry for tightly intermeshing co-rotating twin screw extruders is optimised in order to achieve specific aims. The threaded elements have been optimised for different materials and operating conditions.

The investigation set out to achieve a screw-element geometry that would generate the maximum pressure gradient while, at the same time, ensuring that the temperature increase and the power consumption were kept to a minimum. The pressure profile, the temperature progression and the power consumption have been calculated on the basis of one-dimensional models of the type used in the SIGMA process simulation software. The geometrical data of the individual elements was varied with the aid of non-linear algorithms, and the quality of an individual geometry was assessed on the basis of quality functions. Subsequent to the theoretical optimisation, experimental analyses were performed for purposes of verifying the optimisation method used.


Mail address: A. Thümen, Universität Paderborn, Institut für Kunststofftechnik (KTP), Pohlweg 47–49, D-33098 Paderborn, Germany. E-mail:

References

1Potente, H., Pape, J.: Paper presented at PPS-17 (2001)Search in Google Scholar

2Zelleröhr, M.: PhD Thesis, University of Paderborn (2000)Search in Google Scholar

3Gaspar Cunha, A.: PhD Thesis, University of Minho (1999)Search in Google Scholar

4Gaspar Cunha, A., Poulesquen, A., Vergnes, B., Covas, J. A.: Intern. Polym. Processing17, p. 201 (2002)10.3139/217.1701Search in Google Scholar

5Potente, H., Kretschmer, K.: Kunststoffe – Plast Europe91, p. 26, 76 (2001)Search in Google Scholar

6Kretschmer, K.: PhD Thesis, University of Paderborn (2004)Search in Google Scholar

7Potente, H., Bastian, M., Flecke, J.: Advances in Polymer Technology18, p. 147 (1999)10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199922)18:2<147::AID-ADV5>3.0.CO;2-XSearch in Google Scholar

8Potente, H., Kretschmer, K., Pohl, T.: Paper presented at PPS-18 (2002)Search in Google Scholar

9Booy, M. L.: Polym. Eng. Sci. 18, p. 973 (1978)10.1002/pen.760181212Search in Google Scholar

10Lasdon, L. S., Waren, A. D., Jain, A., Ratner, M.: ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software4, p. 34 (1978)10.1145/355769.355773Search in Google Scholar

11Lasdon, L. S., Smith, S.: ORSA Journal on Computing4, p. 28 (1992)Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2005-6-21
Accepted: 2005-11-7
Published Online: 2013-04-06
Published in Print: 2006-05-01

© 2006, Hanser Publishers, Munich

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.0086/pdf
Scroll to top button