Home Thermal Flow Instability in Metal Injection Molding: Experiment and Simulation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Thermal Flow Instability in Metal Injection Molding: Experiment and Simulation

  • J. F. Stevenson and F. Ilinca
Published/Copyright: April 6, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Metal injection molding (MIM) is similar to plastic molding in many respects, but MIM compounds (metal powders with polymer binders) are more susceptible to thermally induced flow instability because of their higher thermal diffusivity. The flow patterns for a 17-4PH MIM compound were observed and simulated for mold filling through a diaphragm gate over a range of filling times and melt-mold interface temperatures. Simulation predicted the observed free annular jet and internal voids in the molded part and also predicted that initial contact with the outside wall of the gate would eliminate the jet, thereby reducing voids and surface defects. Parts made using a mold with a thicker gate verified these predictions. For combinations of operating conditions and mold geometry that gave large thermally induced viscosity gradients, both observation and simulation showed unstable, asymmetric flow. In these cases, flow slowed and stopped in one region of the gate and accelerated in other regions. When the flow was inherently unstable, simulations predicted an exponential growth in maximum temperature differences at symmetric locations in the mold gate. Based on 34 experimental observations and 102 simulations, a boundary was established between regions of stable and unstable flow in terms of the dimensionless Graetz number Gz (ratio of heat conduction time to fill time) and B, a dimensionless ratio indicating the sensitivity of viscosity to temperature differences in the mold. To establish a common basis for comparison of simulation and experiment, the melt-mold interface temperature was estimated using a heat transfer coefficient, which was a fixed value for experiment and a parameter for simulation.


Mail address: J. Stevenson, Honeywell International, 101 Columbia Road, Morristown, NJ 07962, U.S.A. E-mail:

References

1Stevenson, J. F., Hieber, C. A., Galskoy, A., Wang, K. K.: SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers34, p. 282 (1976)Search in Google Scholar

2Ilinca, F., Hetu, J.-F., Perrault, M., Derdouri, A., Stevenson, J. F., Scott, C.: Advances in Powder Metallurgy & Particulate Materials4, p. 73 (2000)Search in Google Scholar

3Ilinca, F., Hetu, J.-F., Derdouri, A., Stevenson, J. F.: Polym. Eng. Sci. 42, p. 760 (2002)10.1002/pen.10988Search in Google Scholar

4Stevenson, J. F., Ilinca, F., Holmes, B.: Advances in Powder Metallurgy & Particulate Materials8, p. 110 (2003)Search in Google Scholar

5Stevenson, J. F., Ilinca, F.: Paper393 Polymer Processing Society 2004 Annual Meeting, Akron, Ohio (2004)Search in Google Scholar

6Shah, Y. T., Pearson, J. R. A.: Chem. Eng. Sci. 29, p. 737 (1974)10.1016/0009-2509(74)80190-9Search in Google Scholar

7Pearson, J. R. A.: Mechanics of Polymer Processing. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London (1985)Search in Google Scholar

8Pearson, J. R. A., Shah, Y. T., Vieira, E. S. A.: Chem. Eng. Sci. 28, p. 2079 (1973)10.1016/0009-2509(73)85052-3Search in Google Scholar

9Shah, Y. T., Pearson, J. R. A.: Chem. Eng. Sci. 29, p. 1485 (1974)10.1016/0009-2509(74)80173-9Search in Google Scholar

10Costa, A., Macedonio, G.: Geophysical Research Letters29 No. 10, 40 (2002)10.1029/2001GL014493Search in Google Scholar

11Morris, S. J. S.: J. Fluid Mech. 308, p. 111 (1996)10.1017/S0022112096001413Search in Google Scholar

12Stevenson, J. F.: Proceedings Second World Congress of Chemical Engineering VI, p. 447 Montreal (1981)Search in Google Scholar

13Ilinca, F., Hetu, J.-F.: Int. Polym. Process16, p. 291 (2001)Search in Google Scholar

14Stevenson, J. F., Roser, R., Ilinca, F., Derdouri, A., Kozlov, A.: Advances in Powder Metallurgy & Particulate Materials4, p. 77 (2001)Search in Google Scholar

15Papanastasiou, T. C.: J. Rheol. 31, p. 385 (1987)10.1122/1.549926Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2005-3-10
Accepted: 2005-10-1
Published Online: 2013-04-06
Published in Print: 2006-05-01

© 2006, Hanser Publishers, Munich

Downloaded on 6.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.1908/html
Scroll to top button