Home Effect of Distributor Geometry on Crimp Contraction of PET Side-by-side Bicomponent Fibers
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of Distributor Geometry on Crimp Contraction of PET Side-by-side Bicomponent Fibers

  • T. H. Oh
Published/Copyright: March 26, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The effect of distributor geometry on crimp contraction in the melt spinning and drawing of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) side-by-side bicomponent fibers was studied. Three different distributors located on top of the spinneret were designed to change curvature ratio of a side-by-side cross-section of bicomponent fibers. Regular and modified PET were selected to make latent crimp yarns. Spinning and drawing conditions were changed to choose the effective variables heat set temperature and draw ratio. Crimp contraction increased with increasing draw ratio and decreasing heat set temperature. Die geometry had a significant effect on crimp contraction by changing the curvature ratio of the cross-section. Under the same spinning and drawing conditions, the crimp contraction with higher curvature ratio was larger.


Mail address: T. H. Oh, Huvis R&D Center, 1690-1, Shinil Dong, Daedeok Ku, Daejeon, South Korea. E-mail:

References

1Washino, Y.: Functional Fibers, Toray Research Center, Shiga (1993)Search in Google Scholar

2Bhuvanesh, Y. C., Gupta, V. B.: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 58, p. 663 (1991)10.1002/app.1995.070580321Search in Google Scholar

3Hongu, T., Phillips, G.: New Fibers. Ellis Hornwood, New York (1990)Search in Google Scholar

4Matsui, M.: Sen-I Kikai Gakkaishi34 (7), p. 319 (1981)10.4188/transjtmsj.34.7_P319Search in Google Scholar

5Matsumoto, T. K.: Textile Res. J. 51, p. 18 (1981)10.1177/004051758105100104Search in Google Scholar

6Shimizu, J., Okui, N., Kikutani, T.: High Speed Spinning. Wiley Interscience, New York (1985)Search in Google Scholar

7Chuah, H. H., Lin-Vien, D., Soni, U.: Polymer42, p. 7137 (2001)10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00043-XSearch in Google Scholar

8Han, C. D.: Mutiphase Flow in Polymer Processing. Academic Press, New York (1981)Search in Google Scholar

9Timoshenko, S. S.: J. Opt. Soc. Am. 11, p. 233 (1925)10.1364/JOSA.11.000233Search in Google Scholar

10Brown, T. D., Onions, W. J.: J. Text. Inst. 52, p. 101 (1961)Search in Google Scholar

11Brand, R. H., Becker, S.: Text. Res. J. 32, p. 39 (1962)10.1177/004051756203200106Search in Google Scholar

12El-Shiekh, A., Bogdan, J. F., Gupta, R. K.: Text. Res. J. 41, p. 281 (1971)10.1177/004051757104100401Search in Google Scholar

13Gupta, B. S., George, T. W.: Text. Res. J. 45, p. 338 (1975)10.1177/004051757504500412Search in Google Scholar

14Fitzgerald, W. E., Kundsen, J. P.: Text. Res. J. 37, p. 447 (1967)10.1177/004051756703700602Search in Google Scholar

15Wu, Y., Wu, A.: Taguchi Methods for Robust Design. McGraw-Hill, New York (2000)10.1115/1.801578Search in Google Scholar

16Gupta, V. B., Ramesh, C., Gupta, A. K.: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 29, p. 4203 (1984)10.1002/app.1984.070291250Search in Google Scholar

17Vasanthan, N.: Text. Res. J. 74, p. 545 (2004)10.1177/004051750407400614Search in Google Scholar

18Qureshi, N., Stepanov, E. V., Schiraldi, D., Hilter, A., Baer, E.: J. Polym. Sci.,: Polym. Phy. 38, p. 1679 (2000)10.1002/1099-0488(20000701)38:13<1679::AID-POLB10>3.0.CO;2-PSearch in Google Scholar

19Tadmor, Z., Gogos, C. G.: Principles of Polymer Processing. John Wiley, New York (1979)Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2005-9-2
Accepted: 2006-1-9
Published Online: 2013-03-26
Published in Print: 2006-09-01

© 2006, Hanser Publishers, Munich

Downloaded on 30.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.0006/html
Scroll to top button