Home Review of regulatory requirements relevant to calibration of monitoring instruments in research reactors
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Review of regulatory requirements relevant to calibration of monitoring instruments in research reactors

  • H. Gomaa , A. Khedr and K. El-Din Talha
Published/Copyright: April 24, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The objective of this work is to demonstrate the regulatory requirements pertaining to calibration of monitoring instruments in research reactors. The regulatory statements concerning this subject in IAEA safety standards and the implementation of such regulations in twelve countries with different levels of nuclear programs are surveyed: Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Egypt, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom of England and United States of America. In addition, the requirements of ISO/IEC17025 and NUPIC (Nuclear Utilities Procurement Issues Committee) are compared. Seven technical and administrate aspects are suggested as the comparison criteria and the explicit expression of the statements, the level of document (i. e.: act, requirement or guide) are the considered resources. The main differences and similarities between the different approaches are identified in order to provide an input for future development of the national regulations.

Kurzfassung

In diesem Beitrag werden die gesetzlichen Regelungen in Bezug auf die Kalibrierung von Überwachungsgeräten in Forschungsreaktoren beschrieben. Es wird ein Überblick gegeben über die entsprechenden Anforderungen in IAEA Sicherheitsstandards und über die Implementierung solcher Anforderungen in 12 Ländern mit unterschiedlichen nuklearen Programmen: Australien, Bulgarien, Kanada, Ägypten, Finnland, Deutschland, Ungarn, Slovenien, Südkorea, Spanien, Großbritannien und die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika. Zusätzlich dazu werden die relevanten Anforderungen der ISO/IEC17025 Norm und des NUPIC (Nuclear Utilities Procurement Issues Committee) Komitees miteinander verglichen. Es werden 7 technische und administrative Aspekte als Vergleichskriterien vorgeschlagen und die Hierarchiestufe des jeweiligen Dokuments (Gesetz, Verordnung oder Richtlinie) betrachtet. Die Hauptunterschiede und die Ähnlichkeiten der verschiedenen Ansätze werden identifiziert um einen Beitrag für zukünftige Entwicklungen nationaler Regelungen in diesem Bereich zu leisten.


* Corresponding author: E-mail:

References

1 ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994, AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE, Calibration Laboratories and Measuring and Test Equipment – General Requirements, 1994Search in Google Scholar

2 EPRI, Revision 1 of TR-102644, ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, Calibration of Radiation Monitors at Nuclear Power Plants, 2005Search in Google Scholar

3 IAEA Safety Glossary, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Terminology Used In Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection, 2007 Edition.Search in Google Scholar

4 IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-G-3.1, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Application of the Management System for Facilities and Activities, 2006Search in Google Scholar

5 IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-R-1, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Governmental, Legal and regulatory framework for safety, General Safety Requirements Part 1 2010Search in Google Scholar

6 IAEA Safety Standards Series No. NS-G-4.2, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Maintenance, Periodic Testing and Inspection of Research Reactors, 2006Search in Google Scholar

7 IAEA Safety Standards Series No. NS-G-4.4, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Operational Limits and Conditions and Operating Procedures for Research Reactors, 2008Search in Google Scholar

8 IAEA Safety Standards Series No. NS-R-4, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Safety of Research Reactors, 2005Search in Google Scholar

9 IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-10, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Aging management of research reactors, specific safety guide, 2010Search in Google Scholar

10 IAEA, Safety Reports Series No. 22, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Quality standards: comparison between IAEA 50-C/SG-Q and ISO 9001:2000, 2002Search in Google Scholar

11 IAEA, Safety Standards Series No. GS-G-3.2, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The Management System for Technical Services in Radiation Safety, 2008Search in Google Scholar

12 IAEA, Safety Standards Series No. NS-G 4.6, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Safety Guide: Radiation Protection and Radioactive Waste Management in the Design and Operation of Research Reactors, 2008Search in Google Scholar

13 IAEA, Safety Standards Series No. NS-G-4.5, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The Operating Organization and the Recruitment, Training and Qualification of Personnel for Research Reactors, 2008Search in Google Scholar

14 ISA, The Automation, Systems, and Instrumentation Dictionary, 4th Ed., 2003Search in Google Scholar

15 ISO/IEC 17025, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories, 1999Search in Google Scholar

16 NISTIR 6989, Comparison of ISO/IEC 17025 with the NUPIC Audit Checklist, Department of Commerce, USA, 2003Search in Google Scholar

17 USA, DOE-STD-1054-93, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Guideline to Good Practices for Control and Calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE) at DOE Nuclear Facilities, 1993Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-08-07
Published Online: 2015-04-24
Published in Print: 2015-04-28

© 2015, Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Downloaded on 8.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/124.110444/html
Scroll to top button