Home On ratchetting-based models of Wear and Rolling Contact Fatigue* (RCF)
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On ratchetting-based models of Wear and Rolling Contact Fatigue* (RCF)

  • Luciano Afferrante and Michele Ciavarella
Published/Copyright: May 28, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Recent efforts to develop simple unified models of both wear and rolling contact fatigue (Kapoor et al. [1], Franklin et al. [2]) are discussed, in view of previous theoretical and experimental results on ratchetting in rolling contact. It is shown that ratchetting in rolling contact is a combination of “structural ratchetting” (that modelled with the perfect plasticity model) and “material ratchetting”, and the latter is very sensitive to the hardening behaviour of the material. Also, rolling contact fatigue at large number of cycles in the Clayton and Su experiments [3, 4] seems not well correlated with shakedown theory, and accordingly, simple ratchetting equations based on excess of shakedown such as that of Tyfoor et al. [5], do not seem well suited as a Wohler SN life curve. However, these conclusions are only very qualitative as the materials in the two tests are different, and at present empirical separate models for wear and rolling contact fatigue based on hardness of materials and a posteriori data fitting seem the only quantitative way forward for engineering purposes.

Kurzfassung

Die bisherigen Anstrengungen zur Entwicklung einfacher und einheitlicher Modelle für beides, die Abtragungs- und die Rollkontakt-Ermüdung nach Kapoor et al. [1] und Franklin et al. [2]) werden im vorliegenden Beitrag im Licht neuer theoretischer und experimenteller Resultate zum Ratchetting bei Rollkontakt diskutiert. Es wird gezeigt, dass Ratchetting bei Rollkontakt eine Kombination von “structural ratchetting” (das mit dem vollständigen Plastizitätsmodell dargestellt werden kann) und “material ratchetting” darstellt, das sehr sensitive in Bezug auf das Verfestigungsverhalten des Werkstoffes ist. Darüber hinaus scheint die Rollkontakt-Ermüdung bei hohen Lastspielzahlen in den Experimenten von Clayton und Su [3, 4] nicht mit der so genannten shakedown Theorie abgestimmt zu sein, so dass einfache Gleichungen zum Ratchetting, wie zum Beispiel die von Tyfoor et al. [5] sich zur Darstellung nicht so gut eigneten wie Wöhler-Kurven. Da die Werkstoffe in den beiden Tests jedoch unterschiedlich waren, sind diese Schlussfolgerungen nur sehr qualitative und bisher erscheinen separate empirische Modelle für die Abtragungs- und Rollkontakt-Ermüdung basierend auf der Härte der Werkstoffe und nachfolgende Angleichung der Werte als der einzige nach vorn führende Weg für technische Anwendungen.


Dr. Ing. Luciano Afferrante, born in 1976, got the Diploma Liceo Classico in 1995 with the highest vote. He graduated on Mechanical Engineering at Politecnico di Bari with the highest vote in 2001. At present he is PhD student on Mechanical Engineering at Politecnico di Bari with the supervision of Proff. Ciavarella and Demelio. His research activity concerns: contact mechanics (in particular rolling contact fatigue), thermo-elastic-dynamic contact and fracture statistics problems. He is author of 13 articles on International Journals and numerous articles on International Conferences.

Prof. Ing. Michele Ciavarella, PhD, born in Bari in 1970, graduated from PoliBA in Mech. Eng. in 1994 with laude, and 3 years later got his PHD with a thesis on “Contact Problems with friction and application to the study of Fretting Fatigue”, tutors Prof. G. Monno & Prof. D. A. Hills, Univ. Oxford. He has spent various periods of study in UK and USA; in particular, at the U. of Michigan, U. Oxford, U. Harvard, MIT, Purdue, WPAF Res Lab, UC Berkeley. In Oct. 1998 moved as Senior Research Fellow to USouthampton, UK. In Feb. 1999 he returned to Italy, with a position as Senior Researcher at CNR (National Research Council). From Nov. 2002, he is Associate Professor at the second Faculty of Engineering of the Politecnico di Bari, Italy. His interests span various areas of contact mechanics and fatigue, on which he has published about 60 journal papers.

*

Contribution to the 7th International Conference on Biaxial/Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture (7ICBMFF)


References

1 Kapoor, A.; Franklin, F. J.: Tribological layers and the wear of ductile materials, Wear245 (Sp. Iss. Oct. 2000), No. 1–2, p. 20410.1016/S0043-1648(00)00480-4Search in Google Scholar

2 Franklin, F. J.; Widiyarta, I.; Kapoor, A.: computer Simulation of Wear and Rolling Contact Fatigue, Wear251 (2001). No. 1-2, p. 94910.1016/S0043-1648(01)00732-3Search in Google Scholar

3 Clayton, P.; Su, X.: Surface initiated fatigue of pearlitic and bainitic steels under water lubricated rolling/sliding contact, Wear200 (1996), p. 6310.1016/S0043-1648(96)07250-XSearch in Google Scholar

4 Su, X.; Clayton, P.: Ratchetting strain experiments with a pearlitic steel under rolling/sliding contact, Wear205 (1997), p. 13710.1016/S0043-1648(96)07263-8Search in Google Scholar

5 Tyfoor, W. R.; Beynon, J. H.; Kapoor, A.: Deterioration of Rolling Contact Fatigue Life of Pearlitic Rail Steel due to Dry-Wet Rolling-Sliding Line Contact, Wear197 (1996), No. 1–2, p. 25510.1016/0043-1648(96)06978-5Search in Google Scholar

6 Johnson, K. L.: Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)10.1017/CBO9781139171731Search in Google Scholar

7 Merwin, J. E.: Plastic deformation of surfaces in rolling, PhD Thesis, Cambridge University, UK (1962)Search in Google Scholar

8 Merwin, J. E.; Johnson, K. L.: An analysis of plastic deformation in rolling contact, in: Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. 177 (1963), p. 676Search in Google Scholar

9 Ponter, A. R. S.; Afferrante, L.; Ciavarella, M.: A note on Merwin's analysis of forward flow in rolling contact, Wear, 256 (2004), No. 3–4, p. 32110.1016/S0043-1648(03)00407-1Search in Google Scholar

10 Lim, S. C.; Ashby, M. F.: Wear-Mechanism maps, Overview No. 55, Acta Metall., 35 (1987), No.1, p. 110.1016/0001-6160(87)90209-4Search in Google Scholar

11 Afferrante, L.; Ciavarella, M.; Demelio, G.: A Re-examination of Rolling Contact Fatigue Experiments by Clayton & Su with Suggestions for Surface Durability Calculations, Wear256, (2004), No. 3–4, p. 32910.1016/S0043-1648(03)00408-3Search in Google Scholar

12 Kapoor, A.; Johnson, K. L.: Plastic ratchetting as a metallic wear, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. a. Mat., 445 (1994), p. 36710.1098/rspa.1994.0066Search in Google Scholar

13 Kapoor, A.; Johnson, K. L.: Plastic ratchetting as a mechanism of erosive wear, in: Wear, 186 (1995), No. 1, p. 8610.1016/0043-1648(95)07179-2Search in Google Scholar

14 Kapoor, A.; Johnson, K. L.; Williams, J. A.: A model for the mild ratchetting wear of metals, Wear200 (1996), No. 1–2, p. 3810.1016/S0043-1648(96)07329-2Search in Google Scholar

15 Bower, A. F.; Johnson, K. L.: The influence of strain-hardening on cumulative plastic-deformation in rolling and sliding line contact, J Mech. Phys. Solids37 (4), (1989), p. 47110.1016/0022-5096(89)90025-2Search in Google Scholar

16 Kapoor, A.: A Re-evaluation of the Life to Rupture of Ductile Metals by Cyclic plastic Strain, Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct.17 (1994), p. 20110.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00801.xSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-05-28
Published in Print: 2006-03-01

© 2006, Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/120.100713/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button