Home Business & Economics Proving Anti-Competitive Conduct in the U.S. Courtroom: The Plaintiff's Argument in Pickett v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.: Comment
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Proving Anti-Competitive Conduct in the U.S. Courtroom: The Plaintiff's Argument in Pickett v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.: Comment

Published/Copyright: December 30, 2004

David Domina’s article: “Proving Anti-Competitive Conduct in the U.S. Courtroom: The Plaintiff’s Argument in Pickett v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.,” Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization: Vol. 2: No. 1, Article 8, is littered with rank speculation and baseless opinion, most of which can be dismissed without further comment. However, Mr. Domina’s characterization of the Court’s post-trial ruling—in which the Court entered judgment in favor of Tyson—is a deliberate misstatement. This Journal’s readers are entitled to an accurate report of the Court’s disposition of the Pickett case, which I have provided in this Comment, and which can be verified by a review of the relevant court orders.

Published Online: 2004-12-30

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2202/1542-0485.1102/html
Scroll to top button