Startseite Characteristics of the distribution of minerals among the space groups
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Characteristics of the distribution of minerals among the space groups

  • Carl N. Drummond ORCID logo EMAIL logo und Princess N. Sarpong
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. Februar 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The RRUFF online database (a project by Robert Downs, University of Arizona) catalogs the occurrence of point and space group symmetries of over 4800 of the nearly 6000 currently accepted mineral species. Of these, over 90% are monomorphic, while the remaining species have been recognized to be polymorphic. To avoid issues of reliability and inconsistency of characterization, the 4499 monomorphic minerals are the subject of this analysis. It has long been recognized that minerals are non-uniformly distributed among the space groups as well as their corresponding point groups and crystal systems. However, this non-uniformity is not non-systematic. A random distribution of minerals among the space groups would result in an average of about 20 species per group. In fact, the observed distribution of minerals is highly skewed. Analysis of the frequency distribution of minerals among the space groups reveals three distinct populations: those without currently known monomorphic species (52), those sparsely populated by minerals that exhibit an exponential distribution of species abundances (170), and those most populous space groups (8) that are differentiated from the others by an inflection in the slope of the species frequency distribution. Additionally, a series of relationships have been identified, and they collectively characterize crystallographic controls on and resultant distributions of mineral occurrence. First, there is a strong preference across all crystal systems for minerals to exhibit structures associated with the holohedral space groups relative to those pedial groups of the lowest symmetry. Second, mineral species exhibit a strong preference for the Laue class space groups over their paired Sohncke groups. Furthermore, it is recognized that the space groups that make up the 11 enantiomorphic pairs are either sparsely populated or devoid of known mineral species. Third, the centering types of the Bravais lattices and structures defined by the Wyckoff multiplicities of the various space groups are recognized to strongly influence the distribution of mineral species such that more structurally and symmetrically complex space groups (those with non-primitive lattice structures) tend to be represented by more minerals. Fourth, when considering the 73 arithmetic space group classes, inmost cases non-symmorphic space groups are more richly populated than their linked symmorphic space groups, and in those cases where both hemisymmorphic and asymmorphic space groups are present in the same arithmetic class, the asymmorphic space groups typically contain more species. Together, these observations and interpretations augment and advance previously achieved understandings of mineral frequency distributions among the point groups and imply four future lines of inquiry: extending consideration to polymorphic species as well as relating distributions among the space groups to terrestrial mineral species abundance, mineral chemistry, as well as the evolution of mineral chemistry and paragenesis.

Acknowledgments and Funding

Early drafts of this manuscript were significantly improved by the comments, corrections, and encouragement of Bart Kahr and Dexter Perkins. The final version was significantly improved by the constructive and critical comments of Marko Bermanec, an anonymous reviewer, and Daniel Hummer. This work was supported by a grant from the Lilly Endowment to the Indiana Data Mine.

References Cited

Barlow, W. (1894) Über die Geometrischen Eigenschaften homogener starrer Strukturen und ihre Anwendung auf Krystalle. Zeitschrift für Krystallographie und Minerologie, 23, 1–63.Suche in Google Scholar

Barton, I.F. (2019) Trends in the discovery of new minerals over the last century. American Mineralogist, 104, 641–651, https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2019-6844.Suche in Google Scholar

Baur, W.H. and Kassner, D. (1992) The perils of Cc: Comparing the frequencies of falsely assigned space groups with their general population. Acta Crystallographica Section B, Structural Science, 48, 356–369, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768191014726.Suche in Google Scholar

Baur, W.H. and Tillmanns, E. (1986) How to avoid unnecessarily low symmetry in crystal-structure determinations. Acta Crystallographica Section B, Structural Science, 42, 95–111, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768186098518.Suche in Google Scholar

Bermanec, M., Vidovic, N., Gavryliv, L., Morrison, S.M., and Hazen, R.M. (2024) Evolution of symmetry index in minerals. Geoscience Data Journal, 11, 69–85, https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.177.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernal, J.D. (1924) The structure of graphite. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 106, 749–773.Suche in Google Scholar

Bosi, F., Biagioni, C., and Oberti, R. (2019) On the chemical identification and classification of minerals. Minerals, 9, 591, https://doi.org/10.3390/min9100591.Suche in Google Scholar

Bragg, W.L. (1912) The specular reflection of X-rays. Nature, 90, 410, https://doi.org/10.1038/090410b0.Suche in Google Scholar

Bragg, W.L. (1913) The structure of some crystals as indicated by their diffraction of X-rays. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 89, 248–277, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1913.0083.Suche in Google Scholar

Bragg, W.H. and Bragg, W.L. (1913) The reflection of X-rays by crystals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 88, 428–438, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1913.0040.Suche in Google Scholar

Brock, C.P. and Dunitz, J.D. (1994) Towards a grammar of crystal packing. Chemistry of Materials, 6, 1118–1127, https://doi.org/10.1021/cm00044a010.Suche in Google Scholar

Carlson, J. and Grotzinger, J.P. (2001) Submarine fan environment inferred from turbidite thickness distributions. Sedimentology, 48, 1331–1351, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3091.2001.00426.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Dolivo-Dobrovol’sky, V.V. (1988) On so-called rules of statistic mineralogy. Zap. Vseross. Mineral. O-va, 117, 387–393.Suche in Google Scholar

Downs, R.T. (2006) The RRUFF Project: An integrated study of the chemistry, crystallography, Raman and infrared spectroscopy of minerals. Program and Abstracts of the 19th General Meeting of the International Mineralogical Association, Kobe, Japan, O03-13.Suche in Google Scholar

Drummond, C.N. (1999) Bed-thickness structure of multi-sourced ramp turbidites: Devonian Brallier formation, central Appalachian basin. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 69, 115–121, https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.69.115.Suche in Google Scholar

Drummond, C.N. (2024) Some characteristics and causes of changes in the rate of discovery of new minerals since 1800. Earth Sciences History, 43, 118–139, https://doi.org/10.17704/1944-6187-43.1.118.Suche in Google Scholar

Fyodorov, E.S. (1891) Symmetry of crystals. American Crystallography Association Monograph, 7, 50–131.Suche in Google Scholar

Gavryliv, L., Ponomar, V., Bermanec, M., and Putis, M. (2022) The taxonomy of mineral occurrence rarity and endemicity. Canadian Mineralogist, 60, 731–758, https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.2200010.Suche in Google Scholar

Hassel, O. and Mark, H. (1924) Über die Kristallstructur des Graphits. The European Physical Journal A, 25, 317–337, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01327534.Suche in Google Scholar

Hatert, F., Mills, S.J., Hawthorne, F.C., and Rumsey, M.S. (2021) A comment on “An evolutionary system of mineralogy: Proposal for a classification of planetary materials based on natural kind clustering”. American Mineralogist, 106, 150–153, https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2021-7590.Suche in Google Scholar

Hazen, R.M. and Morrison, S.M. (2022) On the paragenetic modes of minerals: A mineral evolution perspective. American Mineralogist, 107, 1262–1287, https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2022-8099.Suche in Google Scholar

Hazen, R.M., Papineau, D., Bleeker, W., Downs, R.T., Ferry, J.M., McCoy, T.J., Sverjensky, D.A., and Yang, H. (2008) Mineral evolution. American Mineralogist, 93, 1693–1720, https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2008.2955.Suche in Google Scholar

Herbstein, F.H. (1963) Accurate determination of cell dimensions from single-crystal X-ray photographs. Acta Crystallographica, 16, 255–263, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X63000712.Suche in Google Scholar

Hummer, D.R. (2021) Fractal distribution of mineral species among the crystallographic point groups. American Mineralogist, 106, 1574–1579, https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2021-7698.Suche in Google Scholar

Kaan, G. and Cole, W.F. (1949) The measurement and correction of intensities from single-crystal X-ray photographs. Acta Crystallographica, 2, 38–43, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X49000096.Suche in Google Scholar

Kahr, B. (2023) A periodic-like table of space groups. Acta Crystallographica Section E, Crystallographic Communications, 79, 124–128, https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989023000786.Suche in Google Scholar

Kitaigorodsky, A.I. (1945) The close-packing of molecules in crystals of organic compounds. Journal of Physics (USSR), 9, 351–352.Suche in Google Scholar

Kostov, I. and Kostov, R.I. (1999) Crystal habits of minerals. Bulgarian Academic Monographs, 1, 3–56.Suche in Google Scholar

Krivovichev, S.V. (2013) Structural complexity of minerals: Information storage and processing in the mineral world. Mineralogical Magazine, 77, 275–326, https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2013.077.3.05.Suche in Google Scholar

Krivovichev, S.V. and Krivovichev, V.G. (2020) The Fedorov-Groth law revisited: Complexity analysis using mineralogical data. Acta Crystallographica Section A, Foundations and Advances, 76, 429–431, https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273320004209.Suche in Google Scholar

Krivovichev, V.G., Charykova, M.V., and Krivovichev, S.V. (2018) The concept of mineral systems and its application to the study of mineral diversity and evolution. European Journal of Mineralogy, 30, 219–230, https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/2018/0030-2699.Suche in Google Scholar

Krivovichev, S.V., Krivovichev, V.G., Hazen, R.M., Aksenov, S.M., Avdontceva, M.S., Banaru, A.M., Gorelova, L.A., Ismagilova, R.M., Kornyakov, I.V., Kuporev, I.V., and others. (2022) Structural and chemical complexity of minerals: An update. Mineralogical Magazine, 86, 183–204, https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2022.23.Suche in Google Scholar

Lafuente, B., Downs, R.T., Yang, H., and Stone, N. (2015) The power of databases: The RRUFF project. In T. Armbruster and R.M. Danisi, Eds., Highlights in Mineralogical Crystallography, W, 1–30. De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Mackay, A.L. (1967) The statistics of the distribution of crystalline substances among the space groups. Acta Crystallographica, 22, 329–330, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X67000623.Suche in Google Scholar

Marsh, R.E. (1994) The centrosymmetric-noncentrosymmetric ambiguity: Some more examples. Acta Crystallographica Section A, Foundations of Crystallography, 50, 450–455, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767393012796.Suche in Google Scholar

Marsh, R.E. (1999) P1 or P1? Or something else? Acta Crystallographica B, Structural Science, 55, 931–936, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768199009441.Suche in Google Scholar

Marsh, R.E., Kapon, M., Hu, S., and Herbstein, F.H. (2002) Some 60 new space-group corrections. Acta Crystallographica Section B, Structural Science, 58, 62–77, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768101017128.Suche in Google Scholar

Nespolo, M. (2020) Not so elementary, my dear Wyckoff. International Union of Crystallography Newsletter, 20, https://www.iucr.org/news/newsletter/volume-28/number-1/not-so-elementary,- my-dear-wyckoff.Suche in Google Scholar

Nespolo, M., Aroyo, M.I., and Souvignier, B. (2018) Crystallographic shelves: Space-group hierarch explained. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 51, 1481–1491, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576718012724.Suche in Google Scholar

Novatskii, N. (1949) Supplement to the Translation of “Stereochemistry” by P. Niggli, IL, Moscow.Suche in Google Scholar

Nowacki, W. (1954) Systematic Tables—Classification of crystalline substances by space groups. In J.D.H. Donnay and W. Nowacki, Eds., Crystal Data: Classification of Substances by Space Groups and Their Identification from Cell Dimensions. Geological Society of America.Suche in Google Scholar

Prabhu, A., Morrison, S.M., Eleish, A., Zhong, H., Huang, F., Golden, J.J., Perry, S.N., Hummer, D.R., Ralph, J., Runyon, S.E., and others. (2021) Global earth mineral inventory: A data legacy. Geoscience Data Journal, 8, 74–89, https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.106.Suche in Google Scholar

Rothman, D.H., Grotzinger, J.P., and Flemmings, P. (1994) Scaling in turbidite deposition. Journal of Sedimentary Research, A64, 59–67.Suche in Google Scholar

Schoenflies, A.M. (1891) Kristallsysteme und Kristallstrukur.Suche in Google Scholar

Shafranovskii, I.I. (1973) Statistical regularities and generalized law in the distribution of minerals according to their symmetry. Zapiski Vsesoyuznogo Mineralogicheskogo Obshchestva, 102, 87–88.Suche in Google Scholar

Turcotte, D.L. (1994) Fractal aspects of geomorphic and stratigraphic processes. GSA Today, 4, 201–213.Suche in Google Scholar

Urusov, V.S. (2007) Symmetry statistics of mineral species and the evolutionary dissymmetrizatiion of mineral matter. Geology of Ore Deposits, 49, 497–504, https://doi.org/10.1134/S107570150707001X.Suche in Google Scholar

Urusov, V.S. and Nadezhina, T.N. (2006) Empty and sparse spatial groups in structural mineralogy, Vestnik Moskovski Gosudarstvennyi Universitet. Seriya Geologiya, 6, 52–59.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-03-06
Accepted: 2024-05-31
Published Online: 2025-02-04
Published in Print: 2025-02-25

© 2025 Mineralogical Society of America

Heruntergeladen am 25.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2138/am-2024-9381/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen