How the Investor’s Risk Preferences Influence the Optimal Allocation in a Credibilistic Portfolio Problem

References

[1] Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C, Schlesinger H. Economic and financial decisions under risk. Princeton University Press, 2005.10.1515/9781400829217Search in Google Scholar

[2] Gollier C. The economics of risk and time. MIT, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Arrow K J. Essays in the theory of risk bearing. North Holland, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Pratt J W. Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 1964, 32: 122–136.10.2307/1913738Search in Google Scholar

[5] Athayde G, Flores R. Finding a maximum skewness portfolio a general solution to three-moments portfolio choice. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2004, 28: 1335–1352.10.1016/S0165-1889(02)00084-2Search in Google Scholar

[6] Garlappi L, Skoulakis G. Taylor series approximations to expected utility and optimal portfolio choice. Mathematical and Financial Economics, 2011, 5: 121–156.10.1007/s11579-011-0051-4Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kimball M S. Precautionary saving in the small and in the large, Econometrica, 1990, 58: 53–73.10.2307/2938334Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kimball M S. Precautionary motives for holding assets. New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance, London: MacMillan Press: 1992 and New York: Stockton Publishers: 1992, 3: 158–161.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ñiguez T M, Paya I, Peel D. Pure higher-order effects in the portfolio choice model. Finance Research Letters, 2016, 19: 255–260.10.1016/j.frl.2016.08.010Search in Google Scholar

[10] Le Courtois O. On prudence, temperance, and monoperiodic portfolio optimization. Risk and choice: A conference in honor of Louis Eeckhoudt, Toulouse, France, July 12, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1978, 1: 3–28.10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5Search in Google Scholar

[12] Carlsson C, Fullér R. Possibility for decision. Springer, 2011.10.1007/978-3-642-22642-7Search in Google Scholar

[13] Dubois D, Prade H. Possibility theory. New York: Plenum Press, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Georgescu I. Possibility theory and the risk. Springer, 2012.10.1007/978-3-642-24740-8Search in Google Scholar

[15] Georgescu I. The effect of prudence on the optimal allocation in possibilistic and mixed models. Mathematics, 2018, 6(8): 133.10.3390/math6080133Search in Google Scholar

[16] Liu B. Uncertainty theory. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Liu B, Liu Y K. Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected models. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2002, 10: 445–450.10.1109/TFUZZ.2002.800692Search in Google Scholar

[18] Huang X. Portfolio analysis. From Probabilistic to Credibilistic and Uncertain Approaches, Springer, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Georgescu I, Kinnunen J. Credibilistic risk aversion and prudence. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 2016, 11(1): 146–160.10.1504/IJBIR.2016.077614Search in Google Scholar

[20] Bhattacharyya R, Chatterjee A, Kar S. Mean-variance-skewness portfolio selection model in general uncertain environment. Indian Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2012, 3(1): 45–61.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Fono L A, Kamdem J S, Tassak C. Moments and semi-moments for fuzzy portfolios selection. 2011, Hal Archives-Ouvertes, hal-00567012.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ravindranath P J, Balasubrahmanyam M, Babu M S. A fuzzy mean-variance-skewness portfolios selection problem. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention, 2016, 4(3): 41–52.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Thavaneswaran A, Thiagarajahb K, Appadoo S S. Fuzzy coefficient volatility (FCV) models with applications. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2007, 45: 777–786.10.1016/j.mcm.2006.07.019Search in Google Scholar

[24] Thavaneswaran A, Appadoo S S, Paseka A. Weighted possibilistic moments of fuzzy numbers with applications to GARCH modeling and option pricing. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2009, 49: 352–368.10.1016/j.mcm.2008.07.035Search in Google Scholar