Startseite Aggregation Similarity Measure Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Closeness Degree and Its Application to Clustering Analysis
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Aggregation Similarity Measure Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Closeness Degree and Its Application to Clustering Analysis

  • Feng Wang EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. März 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In order to distinguish with effect different hesitant fuzzy elements (HFEs), we introduce the asymmetrical relative entropy between HFEs as a distance measure for higher discernment. Next, the formula of attribute weights is derived via an optimal model according to TOPSIS from the relative closeness degree constructed by the discerning relative entropy. Then, we propose the concept of co-correlation degree from the viewpoint of probability theory and develop another new formula of hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient, and prove their similar properties to the traditional correlation coefficient. To make full use of the existing similarity measures including the ones presented by us, we consider aggregation of similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and derive the synthetical similarity formula. Finally, the derived formula is used for netting clustering analysis under hesitant fuzzy information and the effectiveness and superiority are verified through a comparison analysis of clustering results obtained by other clustering algorithms.

References

[1] Torra V, Narukawa Y. On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. The 18th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy systems, Jeju Island, Korea, 2009: 1378–1382.10.1109/FUZZY.2009.5276884Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010, 25: 529–539.10.1002/int.20418Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20: 87–96.10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Dubois D, Prade H. Fuzzy sets and systems: Theory and applications. Academic Press, New York, 1980.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Yager R R. On the theory of bags. International Journal of General Systems, 1986, 13: 23–37.10.1080/03081078608934952Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Xia M M, Xu Z S. Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2011, 52: 395–407.10.1016/j.ijar.2010.09.002Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Xia M M, Xu Z S, Chen N. Some Hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2013, 22: 259–279.10.1007/s10726-011-9261-7Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Xu Z S, Zhang X L. Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 52: 53–64.10.1016/j.knosys.2013.05.011Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Zhu B, Xu Z S, Xia M M. Dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Journal of Applied mathematics, 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/879629.10.1155/2012/879629Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Zhu B, Xu Z S. Some results for dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 26: 1657–1668.10.3233/IFS-130845Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Xia M M, Xu Z S. Entropy/Cross entropy-based group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Information Fusion, 2012, 13: 31–47.10.1016/j.inffus.2010.12.001Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Olcer A I, Odabasi A Y. A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion manoeuvting system slection problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 166: 93–114.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.010Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Leyva-López J C, Fernández-González E. A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 148: 14–27.10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00273-4Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Wan S P. Congregation of the experts’ weights based on relative entropy for group decision-making problem with incomplete information. Communication on Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2009, 23: 66–70.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Qiu W H. Management decision and applied entropy. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Zhou Y F, Wei F J. Combination weighting approach in muitiple attribute decision making based on relative entropy. Operations Research and Management Science, 2006, 15: 48–53.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Gerstenkorn T, Manko J. Correlation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Systems, 1991, 44: 39–43.10.1016/0165-0114(91)90031-KSuche in Google Scholar

[18] Hong D H, Hwang S Y. Correlation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in probability spaces. Fuzzy Set Systems, 1995, 75: 77–81.10.1016/0165-0114(94)00330-ASuche in Google Scholar

[19] Hung W L, Wu J W. Correlation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets by centroid method. Information Sciences, 2002, 144: 219–225.10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00181-0Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Bustince H, Burillo P. Correlation of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Systems, 1995, 74: 237–244.10.1016/0165-0114(94)00343-6Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Hong D H. A note on correlation of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Systems, 1998, 95: 113–117.10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00311-9Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Xu Z S, Xia M M. On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2011, 26: 410–425.10.1002/int.20474Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Xu Z S, Chen J, Wu J J. Clustering algorithm for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 2008, 178: 3775–3790.10.1016/j.ins.2008.06.008Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Wang Z, Xu Z S, Liu S S, et al. A netting clustering analysis method under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 2011, 11: 5558–5564.10.1016/j.asoc.2011.05.004Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Xu Z S. Intuitionistic fuzzy hierarchical clustering algorithms. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 20: 90–97.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Hwang C, Rhee F C H. Uncertain fuzzy clustering: Interval type-2 fuzzy approach to C-means. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, 15: 107–120.10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.889763Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Yang M S, Lin D C. On similarity and inclusion measures between type-2 fuzzy sets with an application to clustering. Computers and Mathematical with Applications, 2009, 57: 896–907.10.1016/j.camwa.2008.10.028Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Chen N, Xu Z S, Xia M M. Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to clustering analysis. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 2013, 37: 2197–2211.10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.031Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Mao J J, Wang C C, Yao D B, et al. Mutiple-attribute decision-making method of normal distribution interval number based on cross-entropy. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2012, 48: 44–48.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Shen H F. Probability theory and mathematical statistics. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Xu Z S, Xia M M. Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 2011, 181: 2128–2138.10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.028Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Cover T M, Thomas J A. Elements of information theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Liu X D, Zhu J J, Liu S F. Similarity measure of hesitant fuzzy sets based on symmetric cross entropy and its application in clustering analysis. Control and Decision, 2014, 29: 1816–1822.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Zhang N, Wei G W. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 2013, 37: 4938–4947.10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.002Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Du W S, Hu B Q. Aggregation distance measure and its induced similarity measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2015: 60–61, 65–71.10.1016/j.patrec.2015.03.001Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Bustince H, Jurio A, Pradera A, et al. Generalization of the weighted voting method using penalty functions constructed via faithful restricted dissimilarity functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 225: 472–478.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.009Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Xu Z S, Hu H. Projection models for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 2010, 9: 267–280.10.1142/S0219622010003816Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Stamelos I, Tsouki`as A. Software evalution problem situations. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 145: 273–286.10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00534-9Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Morisio M, Tsouki`as A. LusWare: A methodology for the evalution and section of software products. IEEE Process Software Engine, 1997, 144: 162–174.10.1049/ip-sen:19971350Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Zhang X L, Xu Z S. Hesitant fuzzy agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithms. International Journal of Systems Science, 2015, 46: 562–576.10.1080/00207721.2013.797037Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Zhang X L, Xu Z S. A MST clustering analysis method under hesitant fuzzy environment. Control and Cybernetics, 2012, 41: 645–666.Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Chen N, Xu Z S, Xia M M. Hierarchical hesitant fuzzy K-means clustering algorithm. Applied Mathematics — A Journal of Chinese Universities, 2014, 29: 1–17.10.1007/s11766-014-3091-8Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-05-09
Accepted: 2018-07-11
Published Online: 2019-03-18

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 20.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.21078/JSSI-2019-070-20/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen