Startseite Empirical Analysis of AH-Shares
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Empirical Analysis of AH-Shares

  • Hongxing Yao EMAIL logo und Kejuan Zhou
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 25. August 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Recent studies of correlations in Chinese stock market have mainly focused on the static correlations in financial time series, and then we pay great attention to investigate their dynamic evolution of correlations. Our paper reports on topology of 41 AH-shares companies traded on Shanghai and Hong Kong Stock Exchange in Chinese stock market. We apply the concept of minimum spanning tree (MST) and hierarchical tree (HT) to analyze and reveal the dynamic evolution of correlations between different market sectors for the period 2008–2014. From these trees, we can detect that significantly industry clustering effects are in the stock network. We measure the linkage of different companies geared to different industrial sectors. We observe the evolution of AH-shares companies in the stock network based on the moving window technique and investigate the correlations by calculating the correlation coefficient distribution, mean correlation coefficient and mean distance of these companies with time. Therefore, through our analysis, we find that companies working in the same branch of production tend to make up cluster. The results present the difference and similarity between different industry sectors in different time periods.

1 Introduction

Recently, the complex network theory is widely used to investigate the stock market. A number of works[13] have been done to analyze the topological properties of stock networks and the correlations among stocks based on those methods including Random Matrix Theory (RMT)[47], Principal Component Analysis (PCA)[8], Planar Maximally Filtered Graph (PMFG)[9], correlation based on clustering[10], and hierarchical structure[11]. For example, Mantegna[12, 13] studied the hierarchical structure in financial markets based on minimum spanning tree and hierarchical tree with the time series of stock returns. Utsugi[14] investigated correlated groups of issues in these markets and proposed a refined method to identify correlated groups based on RMT. Tolga[15] reported on complexity of major UK companies between 2006 and 2010 by using Hierarchical structure method approach. Numerous researches at home and abroad have focused on global stock markets. Du, et al.[16] found the comovement effect of stock market by the community structure and obtained the accurate block in the Chinese stock market. Zhang, et al.[17] applied Partial Correlation Coefficients and Simple Correlation Coefficients to construct network of stocks. Hu, et al.[18] discussed the dynamic characteristics of the stock networks evolution based on calculating the correlation coefficient, setting threshold and combining the financial index system. Gui, et al.[19] detected some characters of dynamic communities in each time window based on Blondel's algorithm. Yang, et al.[20] analyzed the linkage effects among industry sectors in Chinese stock market before and after the financial crisis. Onnela, et al.[21] investigated the dynamics of market correlations and taxonomy analysis in detail. Michael[11] has shown that hierarchical structure methods can be used to analyze the topology of foreign exchange markets and found that the price determination structure of international currency markets is tree like and sparsely clustered. This implies dynamic behavior related to complex networks can be applied to currency markets. In other words, the stock market is a complex network because of their price fluctuations. Therefore, in this research, we analyze the dynamic evolution of AH-shares companies in Chinese stock market by virtue of graphs. A-shares purchased and traded on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges are shares of Renminbi currency, while H-shares listed in Hong Kong are foreign capital stocks. We choose those shares published both in Chinese Mainland and Hong Kong to represent Chinese stock market. In this paper we also need to take account of Chinese industry characteristic and circumstances to explore the topological characteristics of Chinese stock market. We can find financial business companies, industry companies, service industry companies and energy industry companies have cluster behavior. In the case of the emerging market, there are only a few large companies separated from other companies of the market. In this work, we also find individual stocks are clustered based on their individual sectors to which they belong.

In Section 2, we describe the sample datasets. In Section 3, we show the methodology used in this paper. In Sections 4 and 5, we present the dynamic behaviors and our empirical results and analysis of this study. Finally, conclusions are given in Section 6.

2 Sample Dataset

In this paper, to better understand the correlation structures under different market environments, we select 41 AH-shares stocks traded on Shanghai and Hong Kong Stock Exchange from March 10, 2008 to November 24, 2014 (excluding weekends and market closed dates). The dataset is filtered as follows: 1) Make sure that the stocks have enough number of trading days; 2) Delete those stocks from the dataset when the stock has missing closing prices for more than 10 continuous trading days; 3) Use the closing prices of the previous trading day to fill those missing closing prices. According to the above principles, 41 stocks remain in the sample dataset and each stock has 1632 observations. Stocks and codes are listed in Table 1. In accordance with the China Securities Index Co. Ltd, the listed companies are classified into 7 industries by the China Industry Classification Standard (CICS). These companies are divided into 12 Financial and Real Estate Industry, 14 Industry and Service Industry, 3 Public Service Industry, 6 Energy Industry, 2 Consumer Staple Industry and 4 Material Industry.

Table 1

Code of listed companies

Company nameA /H shares codeCode
Huaneng Power Intl600011/0902HPI
Anhui Expressway600012/0995AE
China Minsheng Bank600016/1988CMSB
China Shipping Development600026/1138CSDC
Huadian Power600027/1071HP
SINOPEC600028/0386SINOPEC
China Southern Airlines600029/1055CZ
Citic Securities600030/6030CITICS
China Merchants Bank600036/3968CMB
Yanzhou Coal Mining Company600188/1171YZC
Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical600196/2196SFP
Jiangxi Copper600362/0358JCCL
Jiangsu Expressway Company600377/0177JE
Shenzhen Expressway600548/0548SE
Anhui Conch Cement600585/0914ACC
Tsingtao Beer600600/0168TB
Kunming Machine600806/0300KM
Magang stocks trading Co.600808/0323MS
Haitong Securities600837/6837HS
TCEPY600874/1065TCEPY
Dongfang Electric600875/1072DEC
China Shenhua Energy601088/1088CSE
Air China601111/0753CA
China Railway Construction601186/1186CRCC
Bank of Communications601328/3328BOCOM
Guangzhou-Shenzhen Railway601333/0525GSH
China Railway Engineering Corporation601390/0390CRE
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China601398/1398ICBC
Beijing North Star601588/0588BEIJF
Chinese aluminum industry601600/2600CHALCO
China Pacific Insurance601601/2601CP
China Life Insurance601628/2628LFC
China Oilfield Services601808/2883COSL
PetroChina601857/0857CNPC
China Shipping Container Lines601866/2866CSCL
ChinaCoal601898/1898CC
China Cosco Holdings601919/1919COSCO
China Construction Bank601939/0939CCB
Bank of China601988/3988BOC
Datang Intl Power601991/0991DIP
China Citic Bank601998/0998CITICB

The database analyzed in this paper contains the daily stock data of 41 AH-shares companies in China traded on both Shanghai Stock Exchange (SHSE) and Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEx). The data source is from NetEase Finance.

3 Methods

3.1 Calculation Method

Before we quantify the cross-correlations among stocks, we use logarithmic yields to calculate correlation coefficients and distances among stocks. Here, we take logarithm of the prices because the fluctuation of stock prices is typically given by the geometric Brownian motion. The logarithmic yield for a given stock i is defined as

Sit=lnpitlnpi(t1),(1)

where pi(t) is the closing price of stock i at time t, pi(t − 1) is the closing price of stock i at time t − 1, and t is in units of one day. Then the correlation coefficient between two stock logarithmic yields Si(t) and Sj(t) is defined as

Cij=Si(t)Sj(t)Si(t)Sj(t)(Si2(t)Si(t)2)(Sj2(t)Sj(t)2),(2)

where 〈Si(t)〉 is the average return of stock i in period n, Si(t)=1ni=1nSi(t);Si(t)Sj(t) stands for the average yield of their product at the same time. The correlation coefficient is used to measure the dependence between the return series in the whole period of the sample stocks. In this paper, there are N = 41 sample stocks. Accordingly, we obtain a correlation matrix C with 41 × 41 correlation coefficients as elements. Every element Cij corresponds to the correlation between stock i and stock j. By the definition of Cij, every element is restricted to the domain − 1 ≤ Cij ≤ 1; if − 1 ≤ Cij ≤ 0, then the stocks are negative correlated; if 0 ≤ Cij ≤ 1, then the stocks are correlated; and if Cij = 0, the stocks are uncorrelated. Mantegna[12] introduced a definition of the similarity distance between stock i and stock j rigorously calculated by the D matrix:

Dij=2(1Cij).(3)

The correlation coefficient defined above is utilized to calculate the dependence between the return series in the whole period of the sample dataset. The distances Dij are used to create a complete undirected graph,where each node corresponds to a listed company, and each edge stands for the similarity distance between two companies. In addition, we use the moving window technique to further study the dynamic evolution of the stock correlations with time t. The size T of the moving window is fixed to be 200 trading days, i.e., about one year. Equation (2) is applied to calculate the correlation coefficients over a subset of return series within the moving window [tT + 1, t]. The moving distance is step by step. For instance, in consideration of our sample dataset, which is from 3/10/2008 to 11/24/2014, the first moving window covers the period from 3/10/2008 to 12/25/2008. Hence, our dataset is divided into 1433 windows.

Then the mean correlation coefficient is expressed as follows:

Cij=1N(N1)ijCij.(4)

The mean distance is expressed as follows:

Dij=1N1Dij.(5)

Numbers of hierarchical clustering methods used to detect the information associated to the correlation matrix can be found in the literature. It is worth noting that hierarchical clustering methods can as well be applied to distance matrices. Our analysis is a filtering procedure based on the estimation of the subdominant ultrametric distance associated with a metric distance obtained from the correlation coefficient matrix of a set of n stocks. The subdominant ultrametric[22] is the ultrametric structure closest to the original metric structure. With the above definition Dij fulfills the three axiom of a metric 1) Dij ≥ 0, Dij = 0 if and only if i = j; 2) Dij = Dji (symmetry); 3) DijDik + Dkj. In mathematics, ultrametric distances Dij are distances satisfying the inequality Dij ≤ max{Dik, Djk}. And then the subdominant ultrametric matrix can be obtained from generating its minimum spanning tree and associating with the metric space. We can use Matlab7.0 software to obtain the hierarchical tree by using the equation written above.

3.2 Hierarchical Tree and Minimum Spanning Tree

Using the minimum spanning tree (MST) and hierarchical tree (HT), we study the structure and dynamics of the listed companies and explore the hierarchical structure in various time series.

The distance matrix Dij is then used to determine the MST connecting the n stocks. The MST is a graph without loops connecting all the n nodes with the shortest n − 1 links among all the links. The MST is also a graph of a set of elements in the node arrangement in a given metric space, e.g., an ultrametric space.

Kruskal algorithm is a greedy algorithm. A brief description of the Kruskal algorithm is as follow: View each node as an isolated branch and sort all the possible edges in the order of increasing weights. Kruskal's minimum spanning tree algorithm starts with an empty graph and then attempts to add edges in increasing order of weight. Repeatedly add the next lightest edge that doesn't produce a loop until n − 1 edges are added by the time the minimum spanning tree is formed.

4 Dynamical Behavior

From above, we first analyze the distribution of the elements Cij of the correlation matrix to obtain the statistical properties. In Figure1, the probability density function P(cij) of the correlation coefficients calculated from the return series of 41 AH-shares stocks evolved with the time t is shown. It will be found in the figure that the center of the distribution clearly deviates from zero. We observe the values of the coefficient Cij located at the peaks of P(cij) are significantly positive. As t tends to 2009 and 2011, the peaks of P(cij) show two local maximum of Cij. The valleys of P(cij) are probably at 2010 and 2012. On September 15, 2008, the fifth-largest US investment bank Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy and Merrill Lynch was also acquired by Bank of America, which caused the global financial crisis. Moreover, the stock markets around the world, certainly including the Chinese stock market, have been hit hard in the downturn. This indicates that stock price variations are more likely to be correlated around the market crashes.

Figure 1 Dynamics of correlation coefficient distribution
Figure 1

Dynamics of correlation coefficient distribution

To further verify the dependence of the stock correlations on the time and the dynamic stability of the network, we also compute the mean correlation coefficient 〈Cij〉 and the mean distance 〈Dij〉 in the moving window. In Figures 2, 3 we present a plot of the mean correlation coefficients and the mean distances among all stocks.

Figure 2 Dynamic of mean correlation coefficient of AH-shares companies
Figure 2

Dynamic of mean correlation coefficient of AH-shares companies

Figure 3 Dynamic of mean distances of AH-shares companies
Figure 3

Dynamic of mean distances of AH-shares companies

As shown in Figures 2 and 3, we can find that the mean correlation coefficients and the mean distances have a relatively strong negative correlation. With the reduction of distances, correlations among the stocks increased dramatically and the relevance became more closely. By observing the dynamic of mean correlation coefficient figure we can see that for the years 2008, 2010 and 2012 the mean value of the correlation coefficient matrix increased dramatically. In fact, during these years there was a sudden decline in the Chinese stock market (as in the rest of the world). This large increase of the mean correlation value suggests that during this crisis period all stocks were so highly correlated. Figure 2 shows that the mean correlation coefficients are stable in most of the time,but we can also see great volatility during three periods, which are late 2008, mid-2010 and early 2012. So in this paper we use March 10, 2010 and March 13, 2012 as dividing points. We can see clearly that the mean correlation coefficient is in decline as a whole, while the mean distance is gradually increasing over time. It is enough to suggest that the correlation of stock market is increasingly weaking.

5 Empirical Results and Analysis

In this section, using 41 AH-shares companies price indicators, we show the MSTs and their HTs, and investigate the topology and structure of the correlation networks in Chinese stock market. A number of researches about the engaged connections among the listed companies can be implemented by analyzing the MSTs and HTs. Analyzing these trees it can be checked that companies working in the same branch of production tend to cluster. The MSTs showed in Figures 4, 5 and 6 are obtained by using Kruskal's algorithm as we have discussed above. The HTs of the subdominant ultrametric space associated with the MST are shown in Figures 7, 8 and 9. Through a comprehensive comparative analysis of the 41 AH-shares company indices minimum spanning tree structures, we note that obvious clusters exist in all periods, especially among the similar industries. It will be found in the research that both MSTs and HTs show significantly different structures in three periods: From March 10, 2008 to March 10, 2010, from March 11, 2010 to March 12, 2012, and from March 13, 2012 to November 24, 2014. Notice that almost three groups are easily identified, financial and estate industry market (black dash line circle), industry and service industry market (green dash line circle), and energy industry market (blue dash circle). See Figure 4, inside each group, we find that financial and estate industry (black colour nodes) are linked to energy industry (blue colour nodes). Energy industry (blue colour nodes) are also linked to industry and service industry (green colour nodes). Thus the energy industry market acts as a bridge between the financial and estate industry market and the industry and service industry market. In Figure 4, the different colours represent the different sectors of economic activity. The black nodes mean the stocks included in Financial and Real Estate Industry. The blue nodes denote stocks from Energy Industry. The green nodes stand for Industry and Service Industry. Red nodes mean the stocks which are not included.

Figure 4 Minimum spanning tree of AH-Shares Companies from 2008/3/10 to 2010/3/10
Figure 4

Minimum spanning tree of AH-Shares Companies from 2008/3/10 to 2010/3/10

Figure 5 Minimum spanning tree of AH-Shares Companies from 2010/3/11 to 2012/3/12
Figure 5

Minimum spanning tree of AH-Shares Companies from 2010/3/11 to 2012/3/12

Figure 6 Minimum spanning tree of AH-Shares Companies from 2012/3/13 to 2014/11/24
Figure 6

Minimum spanning tree of AH-Shares Companies from 2012/3/13 to 2014/11/24

Figure 7 Hierarchical tree of AH-Shares Companies from 2008/3/10 to 2010/3/10
Figure 7

Hierarchical tree of AH-Shares Companies from 2008/3/10 to 2010/3/10

Figure 8 Hierarchical tree of AH-Shares Companies from 2010/3/11 to 2012/3/12
Figure 8

Hierarchical tree of AH-Shares Companies from 2010/3/11 to 2012/3/12

Figure 9 Hierarchical tree of AH-shares Companies from 2012/3/13 to 2014/11/24
Figure 9

Hierarchical tree of AH-shares Companies from 2012/3/13 to 2014/11/24

In order to find the main important companies appeared in different periods, we investigate the degrees of the core nodes in the networks. The degrees of the core nodes in different periods are shown in Table 2, 3 and 4. As Tables show, we can find that ChinaCoal (CC) is still a central node in different networks. Meanwhile, the degree of ChinaCoal rises from 4 to 9, indicating that its linkage effect with other companies has improved. While it must be pointed out that Beijing North Star (BEIJF), China Shipping Development (CSDC) and ChinaCoal (CC) belong to financial and estate industry, industry and service industry and energy industry respectively. Thus it can be seen that the center of the market is quite different in different periods due to the various market environment. By comparing those MSTs, we find that Figure 4 shows a structure that differs greatly from that in Figure 5 especially the industry and service industry market (green dash line circle). Figure 6 also shows that the boundaries separating companies.

Table 2

Degrees of core nodes

2008.3.10–2010.3.10
nodeBEIJFCOSCOCCBLFCCC
degree55444
Table 3

Degrees of core nodes

2010.3.11–2012.3.12
nodeCSDCCMBHSCC
degree9654
Table 4

Degrees of core nodes

2012.3.13–2014.11.24
nodeCCCITICSCZCSE
degree7655

In hierarchical tree, each horizontal line denotes a listed company, while the height of the vertical line represents the ultrametric distance at which the two companies are merged. The HTs can show the classification information of all these companies and present the linkage effects among company clusters. The hierarchical trees can reveal the correlation degrees of companies where the ones strongly linked in the network are at the same level. For instance, Air China (CA) and China Southern Airlines (CZ) are always at the same level in Figures 79, indicating that they are closely related. However, the distance between CA and CZ and other companies has gradually become larger, indicating that their linkage with other companies has weakened. Moreover, Tsingtao Beer (TB) is almost always at the highest level in all the three periods. It is enough to show that TB's linkage with other companies is rather weak. From Figure 7, we can see that the distance between ChinaCoal (CC) and China Shenhua Energy (CSE) is the smallest of the sample, indicating a strong relationship between these two companies. Financial and estate companies and industry companies are very close so that they make up the cluster.

6 Conclusion

In this paper, we investigated the clustering properties of individual industrial sectors in MST and HT structures estimated from a correlation matrix describing 41 individual AH-shares stocks listed on Shanghai and Hong Kong. The dynamic evolution study of stock network stability indicates that the network is stable in most of the time and the network has significantly fluctuation during the years 2008, 2010 and 2012, which this paper takes as dividing points. We find that the stock returns behave more collectively in volatile periods, showing the distribution of correlation coefficients centered around larger positive coefficients and larger values of mean correlation coefficient as the time approaches the three big crashes.


Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71271107, 71271103)


References

[1] Ricardo C, Claire G G, Brian L. The evolution of interdependence in world equity markets: Evidence from minimum spanning trees. Physica A, 2007, 376: 455–466.10.1016/j.physa.2006.10.045Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Antonios G, Panos A. Correlation study of the Athens Stock Exchange. Physica A, 2007, 380: 399–410.10.1016/j.physa.2007.02.097Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Jung W S, Chae S, Yang J, et al. Characteristics of the Korean stock market correlations. Physica A, 2006, 361: 263–271.10.1016/j.physa.2005.06.081Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Laloux L, Cizeau P, Bouchaud J P, et al. Noise dressing of financial correlation matrices. Physical Review Letters, 199, 83: 1467–1470.10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1467Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Plerou V, Gopikrishnan P, Rosenow B, et al, Stanley HE. Universal and nonuniversal properties of cross correlations in financial time series. Physical Review Letters, 1999, 83: 1471–1474.10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1471Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Eom C, Oh G, Jung W S, et al. Topological properties of stock networks based on minimal spanning tree and random matrix theory in financial time series. Physica A, 2009, 388: 900–906.10.1016/j.physa.2008.12.006Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Eom C, Kwon O, Jung W S, et al. The effect of a market factor on information flow between stocks using the minimal spanning tree. Physica A, 2010, 389: 1643–1652.10.1016/j.physa.2009.12.044Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Kritzman M, Li Y Z, Page S, et al. Principal components as a measure of systemic risk. Portfolio Management, 2011, 37: 112–126.10.3905/jpm.2011.37.4.112Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Tumminello M, Aste T, Di Matteo T, et al. A tool for filtering information in complex systems. Proceedings of the National Acadamic Sciences, 2005, 102: 10421–10426.10.1073/pnas.0500298102Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Huan C, Yong M, Sai-Ping L. Analysis of network clustering behavior of the Chinese stock market. Physica A, 2014, 414: 360–367.10.1016/j.physa.2014.07.039Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Michael J N, Lawrence C R, Brendan J M. Topology of foreign exchange markets using hierarchical structure methods. Physica A, 2007, 382: 199–208.10.1016/j.physa.2007.02.019Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Mantegna R N. Hierarchical structure in financial markets. European Physical Journal B, 1999, 11: 193–197.10.1007/s100510050929Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Bonanno G, Caldarelli G, Lillo F, et al. Topology of correlation-based minimal spanning trees in real and model markets. Physical Review E, 2003, 68: 046130.10.1103/PhysRevE.68.046130Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Utsugi A, Ino K, Oshikawa M. Random matrix theory analysis of cross correlations in financial markets. Physical Review E, 2004, 70: 026110.10.1103/PhysRevE.70.026110Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Tolga U, Mustafa K, Ayoub S, et al. Complexity of major UK companies between 2006 and 2010: Hierarchical structure method approach. Physica A, 2012, 391: 5121–5131.10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.026Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Du C, Wang X, Qiu L. Block & Comovement Effect of Stock Market in Financial Complex Network. Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 2009, 5: 1248–1260.10.1007/978-3-642-02469-6_6Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Zhang J, Chen Y, Zhai D. Network analysis of Shanghai sector in Chinese stock market based on partial correlation. Information Management and Engineering, 2010: 321–324.10.1109/ICIME.2010.5477888Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Hu P, Qi J, Wang B. The characteristics analysis of the stock network based on weighted relative values: An example of information service industry. International Conference on Science and Social Research, 2013, 64: 411–416.10.2991/icssr-13.2013.93Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Gui X, Li L, Cao J. Dynamic communities in stock market. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014: 723482.10.1155/2014/723482Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Yang R, Li X, Zhang T. Analysis of linkage effects among industry sectors in China's stock market before and after the financial crisis. Physica A, 2014, 411: 12–20.10.1016/j.physa.2014.05.072Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Onnela J P, Chakraborti A, Kaski K. Dynamics of market correlations: Taxonomy and portfolio analysis. Physical Review E, 2003, 68: 056110.10.1103/PhysRevE.68.056110Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Huang F X, Gu J, Li Y X, et al. Linkages and dynamic stability of the national of global primary stock index before and after the financial crisis. Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2010, 30(10): 1729–1740.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-8-8
Accepted: 2016-1-7
Published Online: 2016-8-25

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.21078/JSSI-2016-343-11/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen