Home Law “Me first!” or Why The Bundeskartellamt Approach in the Hotel Platform Cases Is an Unfortunate Precedent
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“Me first!” or Why The Bundeskartellamt Approach in the Hotel Platform Cases Is an Unfortunate Precedent

  • Christoph Stadler
Published/Copyright: April 19, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper offers a critique of the December 2013 prohibition order of the Bundeskartellamt in the HRS hotel platform case. It discusses the FCO’s market investigation, its definition of the relevant market, its theory of harm as well as its assessment of efficiencies. The paper argues that, from a policy point of view, the FCO’s approach of issuing prohibition orders against HRS and Booking.com in the absence of adequate co-ordination with other competition authorities in the EU, is not a model to be followed in the ECN.

Abstract

“Me first!” or Why The Bundeskartellamt Approach in the Hotel Platform Cases Is an Unfortunate Precedent

This paper offers a critique of the December 2013 prohibition order of the Bundeskartellamt in the HRS hotel platform case. It discusses the FCO’s market investigation, its definition of the relevant market, its theory of harm as well as its assessment of efficiencies. The paper argues that, from a policy point of view, the FCO’s approach of issuing prohibition orders against HRS and Booking.com in the absence of adequate co-ordination with other competition authorities in the EU, is not a model to be followed in the ECN.

Online erschienen: 2016-4-19
Erschienen im Druck: 2016-3-10

© 2016 RWS Verlag Kommunikationsforum GmbH, Aachener Str. 222, 50931 Köln.

Downloaded on 4.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.15375/zwer-2016-0103/html
Scroll to top button