Humanzentrierte Implementierung von (teil-)autonomen Drohnen

Literatur

1 Maghazei, O.; Lewis, M. A.; Netland, T. H.: Emerging Technologies and the Use Case: A Multi-Year Study of Drone Adoption. Journal of Operations Management 68 (2022) 6/7, S. 560–591 10.1002/joom.1196Search in Google Scholar

2 INGKA Holding B. V.: One Hundred Drones Now Used Across IKEA Retail for Stock Inventory (2023). Online unter https://www.ingka.com/news/one-hundred-drones-now-used-across-ikea-retail-for-stock-inventorySearch in Google Scholar

3 Malang, C.; Charoenkwan, P.; Wudhikarn, R.: Implementation and Critical Factors of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Warehouse Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Drones 7 (2023) 2, 80 10.3390/drones7020080Search in Google Scholar

4 Mourtzis, D.; Angelopoulos, J.; Panopoulos, N.: UAVs for Industrial Applications: Identifying Challenges and Opportunities from the Implementation Point of View. Procedia Manufacturing 55 (2021), S. 183–190 10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.026Search in Google Scholar

5 Aiello, G.; Hopps, F.; Santisi, D.; Venticinque, M.: The Employment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Analyzing and Mitigating Disaster Risks in Industrial Sites. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67 (2020) 3, S. 519–530 10.1109/TEM.2019.2949479Search in Google Scholar

6 Cristiani, D.; Bottonelli, F.; Trotta, A.; Di Felice, M.: Inventory Management through Mini-Drones: Architecture and proof-of-concept implementation. In: 2020 IEEE 21^st International Symposium on „A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks“ (WoWMoM), S. 317–322 10.1109/WoWMoM49955.2020.00060Search in Google Scholar

7 Moshref-Javadi, M.; Winkenbach, M.: Applications and Research Avenues for Drone-based Models in Logistics: A Classification and Review. Expert Systems with Applications 177 (2021), Artikel-No. 114854 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114854Search in Google Scholar

8 Sandino, J.; Vanegas, F.; Gonzalez, F.; Maire, F.: Autonomous UAV Navigation for Active Perception of Targets in Uncertain and Cluttered Environments. In: 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference At: Big Sky, Montana, US 2020 10.1109/aero47225.2020.9172808Search in Google Scholar

9 EASA: Early Access Rules for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (2022). Online unter https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/easy-access-rules/online-publications/easy-access-rules-unmanned-aircraft-systemsSearch in Google Scholar

10 Maghazei, O.; Netland, T.: Drones in Manufacturing: Exploring Opportunities for Research and Practice. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 31 (2020) 6, S. 1237–1259 10.1108/JMTM-03-2019-0099Search in Google Scholar

11 Maddikunta, P.K.; Hakak, S.; Alazab, M.; Bhattacharya, S.; Gadekallu, T.R.; Khan, W.Z.; Pham, Q.-V.: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Smart Agriculture: Applications, Requirements, and Challenges. IEEE Sensors Journal 21 (2021) 16, S. 17608–17619 10.1109/jsen.2021.3049471Search in Google Scholar

12 Breque, M.; De Nul, L.; Petridis, A.: Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human Centric and Resilient European Industry. Publications Office (2021) 10.2777/308407Search in Google Scholar

13 Xu, X.; Lu, Y.; Vogel-Heuser, B.; Wang, L.: Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 – Inception, Conception and Perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 61 (2021), S. 530–535 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006Search in Google Scholar

14 McCarley, J. S.; Wickens, C.D.: Human Factors Implications of UAVs in the National Airspace. Aviation Human Factors Division, Savoy, IL, Tech. Rep. AHFD-05-05/FAA-05-01, 2005Search in Google Scholar

15 Jeelani, I.; Gheisari, M.: Safety Challenges of UAV Integration in Construction: Conceptual Analysis and Future Research Roadmap. Safety Science 144 (2021), 105473 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105473Search in Google Scholar

16 Adoni, W.; Lorenz, S.; Fareedh, J.; Gloaguen, R.; Bussmann, M.: Investigation of Autonomous Multi-UAV Systems for Target Detection in Distributed Environment: Current Developments and Open Challenges. Drones 7 (2023) 4, S. 263 10.3390/drones7040263Search in Google Scholar

17 Szalma, J. L.; Hancock, P.A.: Noise Effects on Human Performance: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 137 (2011) 4, S, 682–707 10.1037/a0023987Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18 Liebl, A.; Haller, J.; Jödicke, B.; Baumgartner, H.; Schlittmeier, S.; Hellbrück, J.: Combined Effects of Acoustic and Visual Distraction on Cognitive Performance and Well-Being. Applied Ergonomics 43 (2012) 2, S. 424–434 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19 Asbach, C.; Hellack, B.; Schumacher, S.; Bassler, M.; Spreitzer, M.; Pohl, T.; Weber, K.; Monz, C.; Bieder, S.; Schultze, T.; Todea, A.M.: Anwendungsmöglichkeiten und Grenzen kostengünstiger Feinstaubsensoren. Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft 78 (2018) 6, S. 242–250Search in Google Scholar

20 Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (BAuA): Sicherheit und Gesundheit bei der Arbeit – Berichtsjahr 2022 (2023) 10.21934/BAUA:BERICHT20230817Search in Google Scholar

21 Callanan, J.; Ghassemi, P.; DiMartino, J.; Dhameliya, M.; Stocking, C.; Nouh, M.; Chowdhury, S.: Ergonomic Impact of Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Noise in Warehouse Environments. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 100 2022: Unfallverhütungsbericht Arbeit. 1. Aufl., Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund.2023. Online unter https://www.baua.de/DE/Angebote/Publikationen/Berichte/Suga-2022.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

22 Kramer, S.E.; Goverts, S.T.; van Til, M.J.; Festen, J.M.: The Challenge of Aging in the Workforce: Hearing Impairment and Vocational Enablement. Hearing Care for Adults, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2009, S. 181–190Search in Google Scholar

23 Acharya, U.; Bevins, A.; Duncan, B. A.: Investigation of Human-Robot Comfort with a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Compared to a Ground robot. In: IROS Vancouver 2017: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems: Vancouver, BC, Canada, September 24-28, 2017, S. 2758–2765 10.1109/IROS.2017.8206104Search in Google Scholar

24 Hwang, J.-H.; Lee, K.; Kwon, D.-S.: The Role of Mental Model and Shared Grounds in Human-Robot Interaction. In: 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE 2005, S. 623–628 10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513849Search in Google Scholar

25 Eißfeldt, H.; Vogelpohl, V.; Stolz, M.; Papenfuß, A.; Biella, M.; Belz, J.; Kügler, D.: The Acceptance of Civil Drones in Germany. CEAS Aeronautical Journal 11 (2020) 3, S. 665–676 10.1007/s13272-020-00447-wSearch in Google Scholar

26 Baker, A.L.; Phillips, E.K.; Ullman, D.; Keebler, J.R.: Toward an Understanding of Trust Repair in Human-Robot Interaction. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 8 (2018) 4, S. 1–30 10.1145/3181671Search in Google Scholar

27 Cauchard, J. R.; Jane, L. E.; Zhai, K. Y.; Landay, J. A.: Drone & Me. In: Mase, K. et al. (Hrsg.): Ubicomp 2015: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: September 7-11, 2015, Osaka, Japan, S. 361–365 10.1145/2750858.2805823Search in Google Scholar

28 Leather, P.; Beale, D.; Sullivan, L.: Noise, Psychosocial Stress and Their Interaction in The Workplace. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (2003) 2, S. 213–222 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00082-8Search in Google Scholar

29 Häusler, R.; Sträter, O.: Arbeitswissenschaftliche Aspekte der Mensch-RoboterKollaboration. In: Buxbaum, H.-J. (Hrsg.): Mensch-Roboter-Kollaboration. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden 2020. S. 35–54 10.1007/978-3-658-28307-0_3Search in Google Scholar

30 Tausch, A.; Kluge, A.: Dynamische Aufgabenallokation in der Fabrik der Zukunft: Der Mensch als Impulsgeber. ZWF 118 (2023) 6, S. 364–370 10.1515/zwf-2023-1073Search in Google Scholar

31 Roesler, E.; Onnasch, L.: Teammitglied oder Werkzeug – Der Einfluss anthropomorpher Gestaltung in der Mensch-Roboter-Interaktion. In: Buxbaum, H.-J. (Hrsg.): Mensch-Roboter-Kollaboration. Springer-Gabler-Verlag, Wiesbaden 2020, S. 163–175 10.1007/978-3-658-28307-0_11Search in Google Scholar

32 Tausch, A.; Kluge, A.: The Best Task Allocation Process Is to Decide on One’s Own: Effects of the Allocation Agent in Human-Robot Interaction on Perceived Work Characteristics and Satisfaction. Cognition, Technology & Work 24 (2022) 1, S. 39–55 10.1007/s10111-020-00656-7Search in Google Scholar

33 Moreno, H. V.; Jansing, S.; Polikarpov, M.; Carmichael, M. G.; Deuse, J.: Obstacles and Opportunities for Learning from Demonstration in Practical Industrial Assembly: A Systematic Literature Review. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 86 (2024), 102658 10.1016/j.rcim.2023.102658Search in Google Scholar

34 Salas, E.; Rosen, M. A.; Held, J. D.; Weissmuller, J. J.: Performance Measurement in Simulation-based Training: A Review and Best Practices. Simulation in Aviation Training. Simulation and Gaming 40 (2009) 3, S. 328–376 10.1177/1046878108326734Search in Google Scholar

35 Bevins, A.; Duncan, B. A.: Aerial Flight Paths for Communication. In: Bethel, C. (Hrsg.): ACM Digital Library – Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery (2021), S. 16–23 10.1145/3434073.3444645Search in Google Scholar

36 Charalambous, G.; Fletcher, S.; Webb, P.: Identifying the Key Organisational Human Factors for Introducing Human-Robot Collaboration in Industry: An Exploratory Study. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 81 (2015) 9–12, S. 2143–2155 10.1007/s00170-015-7335-4Search in Google Scholar

37 Niederberger, M.; Wassermann, S. (Hrsg.): Methoden der Experten- und Stakeholdereinbindung in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung. Springer VS, Berlin 2015 10.1007/978-3-658-01687-6Search in Google Scholar

38 Körber, M.: Theoretical Considerations and Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Trust in Automation. In: Bagnara, S.; Tartaglia, R.; Albolino, S.; Alexander, T.; Fujita, Y. (Hrsg.): Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 823): Proceedings of the 20^th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018): Volume VI: Transport Ergonomics and Human Factors (TEHF), Aerospace Human Factors and Ergonomics. Springer International Publishing, Cham 2019, S. 13–30 10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_2Search in Google Scholar

39 Berretta, S.; Tausch, A.; Peifer, C.; Kluge, A.: The Job Perception Inventory: Considering Human Factors and Needs in the Design of Human-AI Work. Frontiers in Psychology 14 (2023), 1128945 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128945Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40 Morgeson, F. P.; Humphrey, S. E.: The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and Validating a Comprehensive Measure for Assessing Job Design and the Nature of Work. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (2006) 6, S. 1321–1339 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41 Elmokadem, T.; Savkin, A. V. :Towards Fully Autonomous UAVs: A Survey. Sensors 21 (2021) 18, S. 6223 10.3390/s21186223Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42 Vogel, O.; Dyrska, R.; Müller, J.; Mönnigmann, M.; Kluge, A.: What is Buzzing around Me? Assessing the Influence of Indoor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles on Human Cognitive Performance and Well-Being. [under revision]Search in Google Scholar