Home Physical Sciences Remediation of pesticides, acetamiprid and imidacloprid from aqueous solutions using cellulose derived from sawdust of Populus nigra
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Remediation of pesticides, acetamiprid and imidacloprid from aqueous solutions using cellulose derived from sawdust of Populus nigra

  • Azmat Ullah , Saqib Ahmad , Abdullah Gul , Samiullah Khan , Muhammad Zahoor EMAIL logo , Muhammad Naveed Umar and Riaz Ullah
Published/Copyright: February 27, 2024

Abstract

In this study a low cost and easily available Black Poplar Sawdust (Populus nigra L.) was converted into an efficient adsorbent for the removal of acetamiprid (AMR) and imidacloprid (ICR) pesticides from aqueous solutions. The effect of adsorption effecting parameters including initial pesticides concentration, variations in the adsorbent amount, time of contact, and pH were investigated to understand the adsorption process of both pesticides. Further the kinetic, thermodynamic, and isotherm models were used to get an insight into the process of adsorption taking place. The results of the study suggested that the isotherm data align effectively with both the Langmuir and Temkin isotherm models (both pesticides). The maximum adsorption capacity (qm) for AMR was found to be 25.22 mg g−1, while for ICR, it was 25.65 mg g−1. Furthermore, the adsorption kinetics were best described by the pseudo-second-order model with value of R2 = 0.9934 & 0.9964 respectively for AMR and ICR. The thermodynamic analysis confirmed the spontaneity and feasibility of the adsorption process, evident from the negative ∆G° values at different temperatures. The thermodynamics parameter values also suggested that the adsorption process is physisorption and exothermic due to the negative ∆H° value. From the results it was concluded that the devised adsorbent could be effectively used in reclamation pesticides contaminated water subjected to further verifications through testing against other pesticides.


Corresponding author: Muhammad Zahoor, Department of Chemistry, Govt. Degree College Mingora, Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

The authors extend their appreciation to the researchers supporting Project number (RSP2024R110) King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for financial support.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: MZ, AU, RU and MNU conceptualized the study and wrote the paper. MZ, AU, RU and MNU revised the paper. SA, AG, and SK helped in write up of the paper and experiments. Final proof reading was done by MZ. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  3. Competing interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

  4. Research funding: Researchers supporting Project number (RSP2024R110) King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

  5. Data availability: All the data is presented in this paper. None of the associated data is there in any repository.

References

1. Popp, J., Pető, K., Nagy, J. Pesticide productivity and food security. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 33, 243–255; https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0105-x.Search in Google Scholar

2. Sharma, A., Kumar, V., Shahzad, B., Tanveer, M., Sidhu, G. P. S., Handa, N., Thukral, A. K., Yadav, P., Bali, A. S., Parihar, R. D., Dar, O. I., Singh, K., Jasrotia, S., Bakshi, P., Ramakrishnan, M., Kumar, S., Bhardwaj, R. Worldwide pesticide usage and its impacts on ecosystem. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1–16; https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1485-1.Search in Google Scholar

3. Carvalho, F. P. Agriculture, pesticides, food security and food safety. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2006, 9, 685–692; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.08.002.Search in Google Scholar

4. Young, L., Rao, S. R., Cort, S. G. Industry corner: the pesticide market and industry: a global perspective. Bus. Econ. 1996, 31, 56–60.Search in Google Scholar

5. Carriger, J. F., Rand, G. M., Gardinali, P. R., Perry, W. B., Tompkins, M. S., Fernandez, A. M. Pesticides of potential ecological concern in sediment from South Florida canals: an ecological risk prioritization for aquatic arthropods. Soil Sediment Contam. 2006, 15, 21–45; https://doi.org/10.1080/15320380500363095.Search in Google Scholar

6. Yadav, I. C., Devi, N. L., Syed, J. H., Cheng, Z., Li, J., Zhang, G., Jones, K. C. Current status of persistent organic pesticides residues in air, water, and soil, and their possible effect on neighboring countries: a comprehensive review of India. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 511, 123–137; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.041.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Foo, K. Y., Hameed, B. H. Detoxification of pesticide waste via activated carbon adsorption process. J. Hazard Mater. 2010, 175, 1–11; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Crini, G., Lichtfouse, E., Wilson, L. D., Morin-Crini, N. Conventional and non-conventional adsorbents for wastewater treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 195–213; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0786-8.Search in Google Scholar

9. Khalaf, B., Hamed, O., Jodeh, S., Hanbali, G., Bol, R., Dagdag, O., Samhan, S. Novel, environment-friendly cellulose-based derivatives for tetraconazole removal from aqueous solution. Polymers 2021, 13, 450; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030450.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Akhtar, M., Iqbal, S., Bhanger, M. I., Moazzam, M. Utilization of organic by-products for the removal of organophosphorous pesticide from aqueous media. J. Hazard Mater. 2009, 162, 703–707; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.084.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Moradeeya, P. G., Kumar, M. A., Thorat, R. B., Rathod, M., Khambhaty, Y., Basha, S. Nanocellulose for biosorption of chlorpyrifos from water: chemometric optimization, kinetics and equilibrium. Cellulose 2017, 24, 1319–1332; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1197-x.Search in Google Scholar

12. Zahoor, M. Effect of agitation speed on adsorption of imidacloprid on activated carbon. J. Chem. Soc. Pakistan 2011, 33, 305–312.Search in Google Scholar

13. Zahoor, M., Mahramanlioglu, M. Removal of imidacloprid by activated and magnetic activated carbon from aqueous solutions. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 2011, 25, 55–63.Search in Google Scholar

14. Hassanisaadi, M., Riseh, R. S., Rabiei, A., Varma, R. S., Kennedy, J. F. Nano/micro-cellulose-based materials as remarkable sorbents for the remediation of agricultural resources from chemical pollutants. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 246, 125763; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125763.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Azelee, N. I. W., Manas, N. H. A., Hanapi, S. Z., Sarip, S. H. M., Abd Malek, R., El-Enshasy, H. A., Dailin, D. J., Ngah, M. F. Removal of pesticides from water and wastewater by agricultural biomass-based adsorbents. In Pesticides Remediation Technologies from Water and Wastewater, 2022; pp. 365–384.10.1016/B978-0-323-90893-1.00017-9Search in Google Scholar

16. Febrianto, J., Kosasih, A. N., Sunarso, J., Ju, Y. H., Indraswati, N., Ismadji, S. Equilibrium and kinetic studies in adsorption of heavy metals using biosorbent: a summary of recent studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 616–645; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Kumar, K. V., Sivanesan, S. Comparison of linear and non-linear method in estimating the sorption isotherm parameters for safranin onto activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 123, 288–292; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.040.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Foo, K. Y., Hameed, B. H. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 2–10; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013.Search in Google Scholar

19. Ringot, D., Lerzy, B., Chaplain, K., Bonhoure, J. P., Auclair, E., Larondelle, Y. In vitro biosorption of ochratoxin A on the yeast industry by-products: comparison of isotherm models. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 1812–1821; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Vijayaraghavan, K. T. V. N., Padmesh, T. V. N., Palanivelu, K., Velan, M. Biosorption of nickel (II) ions onto Sargassum wightii: application of two-parameter and three-parameter isotherm models. J. Hazard Mater. 2006, 133, 304–308; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.10.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Tan, I. A. W., Ahmad, A. L., Hameed, B. H. Enhancement of basic dye adsorption uptake from aqueous solutions using chemically modified oil palm shell activated carbon. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. 2008, 318, 88–96; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.12.018.Search in Google Scholar

22. Zhu, H. Y., Fu, Y. Q., Jiang, R., Jiang, J. H., Xiao, L., Zeng, G. M., Zhao, S. L., Wang, Y. Adsorption removal of Congo red onto magnetic cellulose/Fe3O4/activated carbon composite: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 494–502; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.020.Search in Google Scholar

23. Karapinar, N., Donat, R. Adsorption behaviour of Cu2+ and Cd2+ onto natural bentonite. Desalination 2009, 249, 123–129; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.12.046.Search in Google Scholar

24. Wu, Y., Luo, H., Wang, H., Wang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z. Adsorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions by graphene modified with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 394, 183–191; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.11.049.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Shrestha, S., Son, G., Lee, S. H., Lee, T. G. Isotherm and thermodynamic studies of Zn (II) adsorption on lignite and coconut shell-based activated carbon fiber. Chemosphere 2013, 92, 1053–1061; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.068.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-12-16
Accepted: 2024-02-14
Published Online: 2024-02-27
Published in Print: 2024-09-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zpch-2023-0522/html
Scroll to top button