Home Physical Sciences Cd/SBA-15 heterogeneous catalyst used for acetic acid conversion: pseudo-homogeneous kinetic model, response surface methodology, and historical data design
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Cd/SBA-15 heterogeneous catalyst used for acetic acid conversion: pseudo-homogeneous kinetic model, response surface methodology, and historical data design

  • Veli Şimşek EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 22, 2023

Abstract

Mesoporous materials (MMs) in the Santa Barbara Amorphous (SBA) family can be used as catalysts or support materials (SMs) for catalysts because they have controllable pore structure, thermal and chemical stability, and their surface properties can be modified easily depending on the desired reaction type. Surfactant (Pluronic p123; it is a symmetric triblock copolymer comprising poly and its chemical formula; HO(CH2CH2O)20(CH2CH(CH3)O)70(CH2CH2O)20H), a silica source (such as Tetraethyl orthosilicate: TEOS; SiC8H20O4), and a solvent are used in the synthesis of the SBA family (SBA-15). The SBA-15 was given with the hydrothermal method (HM) a catalyst feature by loading the active substance at a rate of 10, 25 % (cadmium/silica) by mass. Esterification reactions (ERs) were carried out with Cd-SBA-15 (Cd/Si: 10–25 %) catalyst at a feed rate of 1/2 (methanol/acetic acid), in the presence of 0.4 g catalyst, at a reaction temperature of 373 K and for 6–48 h. After 48 h, the catalytic activity (CA) values were obtained as 65 and 68 %, respectively. The re-usability of the catalysts was repeated two times under the same experimental conditions. It was observed that the catalysts maintained their catalytic activity of 73.35 and 68.72 % (3 × 48 h). In addition, the limited effect of catalyst amount on acetic acid conversion was investigated by Response Surface Methodology, and Historical Data Design. Moreover, k1, k2, equilibrium constant and activation energy values were calculated using the pseudo-homogeneous kinetic model. The physical features of the catalysts were investigated by BET, XRD, FTIR, DRIFT, SEM/EDX, and MAPPING analysis methods.


Corresponding author: Veli Şimşek, Chemical Engineering Department, Bilecik Seyh Edebali University, 11210, Gulumbe Campus, Bilecik, Türkiye, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Mustafa Oğuzhan Çağlayan for his support of RSM and HDD.

  1. Research ethics: The author state that the manuscript is not be submitted simultaneously to another journal. The submitted work is original and has not been published elsewhere in any form or language. The author agrees to participate in submitting his manuscript to this journal and agrees to the publication of his research data in this journal.

  2. Author contributions: Veli Şimşek: Synthesis and characterizations of catalysts, esterification reactions, calculation of reaction parameters, writing and reading of the manuscript. Briefly, all the work in the article was carried out by the author.

  3. Competing interests: I declare that I have no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: I declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Alothman, Z. A. Materials 2012, 5, 2874–2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma5122874.Search in Google Scholar

2. Simsek, V. Synthesis, Characterization and Investigation Catalytic Activity in the Glycerol Esterification Reaction of Acidic Catalyst. Ph.D. Thesis, Gazi University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

3. Cedric, J. G. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 257, 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.08.009.Search in Google Scholar

4. Quargli-Saker, R., Bouazizi, N., Boukoussa, B., Barrimo, D., Paola-Nunes-Beltrao, A., Azzouz, A. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 411, 476–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.165.Search in Google Scholar

5. Cao, Z., Du, P., Duan, A., Guo, R., Zhao, Z., Zhang, H. L., Zheng, P., Xu, C., Chen, Z. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2016, 155, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

6. Verma, P., Kwahara, Y., Mori, K., Raja, R., Yamashita, H. Nanoscale 2020, 21, 11333–11363. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nr00732c.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Ziarani, G. M., Rhani, S., Badieib, A., Badiei, A. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 41048. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra09038f.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Simsek, V., Avcı, P. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2018, 8, 20170246. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2017-0246.Search in Google Scholar

9. Quargli, R., Hamacha, R., Benharrats, N., Boos, A., Bengueddach, A. J. Porous Mater. 2015, 22, 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-015-9921-0.Search in Google Scholar

10. Şimşek, V., Pat, Z., Murtezaoğlu, K. BSEU J. Sci. 2019, 6, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.603274.Search in Google Scholar

11. Jinchun, T., Wang, R., Wangchang, G., Lai, X., Zhang, T., Li, N., Yue, N., Li, X. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 2009, 136, 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2008.12.006.Search in Google Scholar

12. Ueno, Y., Tate, A., Niwa, O., Zhou, H. S., Yamada, T., Honma, I. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2005, 382, 804–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2974-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Thieleman, J. P., Girgsdies, F., Schlögl, R., Hess, C. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.2.13.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Dai, Q., Wang, X., Chen, G., Zheng, Y., Lu, G. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2007, 100, 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.11.015.Search in Google Scholar

15. Murphy, J. D., Mc Carthy, K. Applied Energy 2005, 82, 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2004.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

16. Rustamov, V. R., Abdullayev, K. M., Samedov, E.-A. Energy Convers. Manage. 1998, 39, 869–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-8904(97)10035-8.Search in Google Scholar

17. Maki-Arvela, P., Salmi, T., Sundell, M., Ekman, K., Peltonen, R., Lehtonen, J. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1999, 184, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00081-2.Search in Google Scholar

18. De Almeida, R. M., Souza, F. T. C., Junior, M. A. C., Albuquerque, N. J. A., Meneghetti, S. M. P., Meneghetti, M. R. Catal. Commun. 2014, 46, 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2013.12.020.Search in Google Scholar

19. Yin, W. L. P., Liu, X., Chen, W., Chen, C., Liu, C., Qu, R., Xu, Q. Energy Convers. Manage. 2013, 76, 1009–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.051.Search in Google Scholar

20. Helminen, J., Leppamaki, M., Paatero, E., Minkkinen, P. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 44, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(98)00076-8.Search in Google Scholar

21. Poonjarersilp, C., Sano, N., Tamon, H. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 147, 726–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.006.Search in Google Scholar

22. Oliviera, C. F., Dezaneti, L. M., Garcia, F. A. C., de Macedo, J. L., Dias, J. A., Dias, S. C., Alvim, K. S. Appl. Catal. Gen. 2010, 372, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.10.027.Search in Google Scholar

23. Bedard, J., Chiang, H., Bhan, A. J. Catal. 2012, 290, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2012.03.02.Search in Google Scholar

24. Şimşek, V. Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 2019, 44, 5301–5310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3570-y.Search in Google Scholar

25. Dumanli, S., Tugce, F., Emek, M. D. Int. J. Mater. Res. 2022, 113, 1062–1070. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijmr-2021-8736.Search in Google Scholar

26. Wang, J., Shao, X., Liu, J., Ji, X., Ma, J., Tian, G. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110139.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Ziarani, G. M., Ebrahimi, Z., Mohajer, F., Badiel, A. Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 2022, 47, 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05518-6.Search in Google Scholar

28. Bhuyan, D., Selvaraj, K., Saikia, L. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 241, 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.12.025.Search in Google Scholar

29. Simsek, V., Mürtezaoğlu, K. Anadolu Univ. J. Sci. Technol. A Appl. Sci. Eng. 2018, 19, 422–432.Search in Google Scholar

30. Cavlar, N., Gonzalez, B., Dominguez, A. Chem. Eng. Process. 2007, 46, 1317–1323.10.1016/j.cep.2006.10.007Search in Google Scholar

31. Baskarana, T., Christopher, J., Ajithkumar, T. G., Sakthivel, A. Appl. Catal. Gen. 2014, 488, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2014.09.024.Search in Google Scholar

32. Zhao, D., Huo, Q., Feng, J., Chmelka, B. F., Stucky, G. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6024–6036. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja974025i.Search in Google Scholar

33. Reza, P. H., Sara, B. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2015, 34, 1.Search in Google Scholar

34. Kisler, J. M., Gee, M. L., Stevens, G. W., O’Connor, A. J. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0116018.Search in Google Scholar

35. Al-Othman, Z. A. Synthesis, Modification, and Application of Mesoporous Materials Based on MCM-41; PhD Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University: Oklahoma, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

36. Mikheeva, N. N., Zaikovskii, V. I., Mamontov, G. V. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 277, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.10.013.Search in Google Scholar

37. Gil, A. G., Wu, Z., Chadwick, D., Li, K. Appl. Catal. Gen. 2015, 506, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.09.009.Search in Google Scholar

38. Huang, H., Ji, Y., Qiao, Z., Zhao, C., He, J., Zhang, H. J. Autom. Methods Manag. Chem. 2010, 2010, 323509–323515; https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/323509.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Tang, Y. T., Chen, Y. W., Huang, H. P., Yu, C. C., Hung, S. B., Lee, M. J. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 51, 1683–1699. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.10519.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-04-25
Accepted: 2023-08-11
Published Online: 2023-08-22
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zpch-2023-0243/html
Scroll to top button