Home Synthesis and structure of an asymmetrical sila[1]magnesocenophane
Article Publicly Available

Synthesis and structure of an asymmetrical sila[1]magnesocenophane

  • Inga-Alexandra Bischoff , Bernd Morgenstern and André Schäfer EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 19, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The synthesis and structure of an asymmetrical sila[1]magnesocenophane, featuring a cyclopentadienyl and a tetramethylcyclopentadienyl group, are reported. The compound was obtained as a bis(tetrahydrofuran) adduct and exhibits a slipped sandwich structure in the solid state.

1 Introduction

Metallocenes with interlinked cyclopentadienyl moieties with a one-atomic bridging motif are commonly referred to as [1]metallocenophanes. Examples of such compounds are known for various transition metals as well as group 2 s-block elements [1], [2], [3], [4]. These compounds have seen applications as monomers in ring-opening polymerization and in homogenous catalysis [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. A limited number of [1]magnesocenophanes is known – only some of them being structurally characterized – but so far, most examples exhibited a symmetrical ansa-ligand system [4, 11, 13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. Herein we present the first example of an asymmetrical sila[1]magnesocenophane featuring two different ring substitution patterns that has been structurally characterized.

2 Experimental

2.1 General details

Single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis was carried out on a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer with a microfocus sealed tube and a Photon II detector, operating with graphite monochromated Mo Kα radiation. The structure was solved by Direct Methods using Shelxt [19, 20] and was refined by full matrix least squares calculations on F2 (Shelxl2018 [20]) in the graphical user interface Shelxle [21]. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 400 spectrometer.

2.2 Synthesis and characterization of sila[1]magnesocenophane 1

Me2Si(C5H5)(C5Me4H) was prepared following a literature procedure [22], starting from Me2Si(Cl)(C5Me4H) [22] and lithium cyclopentadienide. A solution of the ligand, Me2Si(C5H5)(C5Me4H), (1.12 g, 4.58 mmol) in hexane was cooled to 273 K and a hexane solution of n-butyl-sec-butylmagnesium (0.7 M, 6.55 mL, 4.58 mmol) purchased from Sigma-Aldrich was added via syringe. The yellow solution was warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight. The colorless precipitate was collected and dried in vacuo. Yield: 43%, 531 mg, 1.99 mmol.

Colorless block-shaped crystals were obtained by storing a thf solution at 248 K (CCDC code: 2109741).

Physical and spectroscopic data: 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, THF-D8, 293 K, TMS): δ = 0.52 (s, 6H, SiMe2), 1.94 (s, 6H, Cp-Me), 2.22 (s, 6H, Cp-Me), 5.83(t, 3J = 2.1 Hz, 6H, Cp-H), 6.13 (t, 3J = 2.1 Hz, 6H, Cp-H). 13C{1H} NMR (100.61 MHz, THF-D8, 294 K, TMS): δ = 2.8 (SiMe2), 12.1 (Cp-Me), 15.1 (Cp-Me), 105.2 (Cp), 110.1 (Cp), 114.0 (Cp), 116.5 (Cp), 118.1 (Cp), 121.9 (Cp). 29Si{1H} INEPT NMR (79.49 MHz, THF-D8, 294 K, TMS): δ = −22.6.

3 Results

The synthesis started from the neutral ansa-ligand system, (cyclopentadienyl)(tetramethylcyclopentadienyl)dimethylsilane. Treatment of the ligand with a hexane solution of n-butyl-sec-butylmagnesium at 273 K yielded the title compound, 1, as a colorless solid. As it is common with magnesocenophanes, 1 is essentially insoluble in apolar solvents, such as hexane or benzene. However, it readily dissolves in donor solvents such as tetrahydrofuran with the formation of the corresponding solvent complex, due to the high Lewis-acidity of the magnesium center (Scheme 1). Single crystals of 1, suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis, could be obtained by storing a tetrahydrofuran solution at 248 K.

Scheme 1: 
Synthesis of sila[1]magnesocenophane bis(tetrahydrofuran) 1‧(thf)2.
Scheme 1:

Synthesis of sila[1]magnesocenophane bis(tetrahydrofuran) 1‧(thf)2.

All structurally characterized examples of [1]magnesocenophanes are donor-solvent complexes, mostly bis(tetrahydrofuran) complexes. The solid state structures of these complexes feature slipped sandwich structures with one Cp ligand bound <η5 to the magnesium center [4]. A similar situation is found in 1 (Figure 1 and Table 1).

Figure 1: 
Molecular structure of sila[1]magnesocenophane bis(tetrahydrofuran) 1‧(thf)2 in the crystal. a) Showing only occupation A (64%), and b) showing both occupations (displacement ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability level; H-atoms, except for H5 in b), omitted for clarity).
Figure 1:

Molecular structure of sila[1]magnesocenophane bis(tetrahydrofuran) 1‧(thf)2 in the crystal. a) Showing only occupation A (64%), and b) showing both occupations (displacement ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability level; H-atoms, except for H5 in b), omitted for clarity).

Table 1:

Crystal data and structure refinement details for sila[1]magnesocenophane bis(tetrahydrofuran) 1‧(thf)2 (CCDC code: 2109741).

Empirical formula C24H38MgO2Si
Formula weight 410.94
Temperature 133(2) K
Wavelength 0.71073 Å
Crystal system Monoclinic
Space group P21/c
Unit cell dimensions a = 8.6050(4) Å, α = 90°
b = 14.2893(6) Å β = 95.721(2)°
c = 19.1338(9) Å γ = 90°
Volume 2340.96(18) Å3
Z 4
Density (calculated) 1.17 g cm−3
Absorption coefficient 0.1 mm−1
F(000), e 896
Crystal size 0.185 × 0.153 × 0.117 mm3
Theta range for data collection 2.139–27.998°
hkl ranges ±11/±18/±25
Reflections collected 36,417
Independent reflections 5659 [R(int) = 0.0656]
Completeness to theta = 25.242° 100.0%
Absorption correction Semi-empirical from equivalents
Max. and min. transmission 0.746 and 0.680
Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F2
Data/restraints/parameters 5659/475/518
Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.048
Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] R1 = 0.0567, wR2 = 0.1280
R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0992, wR2 = 0.1574
Extinction coefficient n/a
Largest diff. peak and hole 0.44 and −0.35 e Å−3

It is worth noting that a disorder was found in the crystal structure of 1‧(thf)2. The entire structure was split over two positions, with the occupancy factors refined to 64% for the major component. Since all C-atoms of 1‧(thf)2 are placed on two different split positions, this requires the introduction of a relatively large set of restraint parameters for the refinement of the disorder. The restraints were applied to the anisotropic displacement parameters of the disordered atoms. All non H-atoms were located on the electron density maps and refined anisotropically. C-Bound H atoms were placed in positions of optimized geometry and treated as riding atoms. Their isotropic displacement parameters were coupled to the corresponding carrier atoms by a factor of 1.2 (CH, CH2) or 1.5 (CH3). The hydrogen atoms H5A and H5B were found on the electron density maps. Their positional parameters were refined using isotropic displacement parameters, which were set at 1.2 times the Ueq value of their parent atoms. Restraints (DFIX) of 0.95 (0.01) Å were used for the C–H bond lengths.

Within the major component (64% occupation) of 1‧(thf)2, Mg–C distances of the η5 coordinated tetramethylcyclopentadienyl group are 232.8(8)–259.7(7) pm and the Mg–Cpcentroid distance is 215.2(5) pm. The C–C distances found within this Cp ring are 140.1(7)–144.1(8) pm, indicating a high degree of π conjugation. On the other hand, the unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl group exhibits a distorted η1 coordination to the magnesium atom, with significantly more diverging Mg–C distances of 238.0(8)–399.7(7) pm and C–C distance of 138.7(6)–144.1(8) pm, indicating more localized single and double bond character. The Mg–O distances of 201.0(9) and 204(1) pm are comparable to those in other sila[1]magnesocenophane tetrahydrofuran complexes [15].

The solution NMR spectra indicate that the structure is fluxional in solution at room temperature, thus that the slipped-sandwich structure is not retained, as only two signals for Cp protons are observed in the 1H NMR spectrum, along with just six resonances in the 13C{1H} NMR spectrum for Cp ring carbon atoms (Figures 2 and 3). Furthermore, a resonance at δ29Si = −22.6 is detected in the 29Si{1H} INEPT NMR spectrum, typical for a tetracoordinated silicon atom (Figure 4).

Figure 2: 
1H NMR spectrum (400.13 MHz, THF-D8, 293 K, TMS) of sila[1]magnesocenophane bis(tetrahydrofuran) 1‧(thf)2.
Figure 2:

1H NMR spectrum (400.13 MHz, THF-D8, 293 K, TMS) of sila[1]magnesocenophane bis(tetrahydrofuran) 1‧(thf)2.

Figure 3: 
13C{1H} NMR spectrum (100.61 MHz, THF-D8, 294 K, TMS) of sila[1]magnesocenophane bis(tetrahydrofuran) 1‧(thf)2.
Figure 3:

13C{1H} NMR spectrum (100.61 MHz, THF-D8, 294 K, TMS) of sila[1]magnesocenophane bis(tetrahydrofuran) 1‧(thf)2.

Figure 4: 
29Si{1H} INEPT NMR spectrum (79.49 MHz, THF-D8, 294 K, TMS) of sila[1]magnesocenophane bis(tetrahydrofuran) 1‧(thf)2.
Figure 4:

29Si{1H} INEPT NMR spectrum (79.49 MHz, THF-D8, 294 K, TMS) of sila[1]magnesocenophane bis(tetrahydrofuran) 1‧(thf)2.

In summary, the first crystal structure of a sila[1]magnesocenophane, 1, with different substitution patterns on the Cp rings is reported. The compound was crystallized as a bis(tetrahydrofuran) complex and shows a slipped sandwich structure in the solid state, with the unsubstituted C5H4 moiety exhibiting an η1 and the permethylated C5Me4 moiety exhibiting an η5 coordination mode. It holds potential applicability as a precursor in the synthesis of corresponding metallocenophanes of transition metals by transmetalation.


Corresponding author: André Schäfer, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Saarland University, Campus Saarbrücken, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: Emmy Noether Program, SCHA1915/3-1

Acknowledgments

Instrumentation and technical assistance for this work were provided by the Service Center X-ray Diffraction, with financial support from Saarland University and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (INST 256/506-1).

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG (Emmy Noether Program, SCHA1915/3-1).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Herbert, D. E., Mayer, U. F. J., Manners, I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5060–5081; https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200604409.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Musgrave, R. A., Russell, A. D., Manners, I. Organometallics 2013, 32, 5654–5667; https://doi.org/10.1021/om400488k.Search in Google Scholar

3. Russell, A. D., Musgrave, R. A., Stoll, L. K., Choi, P., Qiu, H., Manners, I. J. Organomet. Chem. 2015, 784, 24–30; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2014.10.038.Search in Google Scholar

4. Wirtz, L., Schäfer, A. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 1219–1230; https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202003161.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Rider, D. A., Manners, I. Polym. Rev. 2007, 47, 165–195; https://doi.org/10.1080/15583720701271302.Search in Google Scholar

6. Bellas, V., Rehahn, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5082–5104; https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200604420.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Manners, I. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 1146–1149; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.11.048.Search in Google Scholar

8. Hailes, R. L. N., Oliver, A. M., Gwyther, J., Whittell, G. R., Manners, I. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5358–5407; https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00155f.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Wang, B. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 242–258; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2005.05.012.Search in Google Scholar

10. Brintzinger, H. H., Fischer, D. Development of ansa-metallocene catalysts for isotactic olefin polymerization. In Polyolefins: 50 Years After Ziegler Natta II. Advances in Polymer Science; Kaminsky, W., Ed., Vol. 258. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013; pp. 29–42.10.1007/12_2013_215Search in Google Scholar

11. Wirtz, L., Haider, W., Huch, V., Zimmer, M., Schäfer, A. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 6176–6184; https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202000106.Search in Google Scholar

12. Wirtz, L., Lambert, J., Morgenstern, B., Schäfer, A. Organometallics 2021, 40, 2108–2117; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00245.Search in Google Scholar

13. Damrau, H.-R. H., Geyer, A., Prosenc, M.-H., Weeber, A., Schaper, F., Brintzinger, H.-H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 553, 331–343; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-328x(97)00618-9.Search in Google Scholar

14. Schultz, M., Sofield, C. D., Walter, M. D., Andersen, R. A. New J. Chem. 2005, 29, 919–927; https://doi.org/10.1039/b418550a.Search in Google Scholar

15. Perrotin, P., Twamley, B., Shapiro, P. J. Acta Crystallogr. E 2007, 63, m1277–m1278; https://doi.org/10.1107/s1600536807015942.Search in Google Scholar

16. Perrotin, P., Shapiro, P. J., Williams, M., Twamley, B. Organometallics 2007, 26, 1823–1826; https://doi.org/10.1021/om061136u.Search in Google Scholar

17. Westerhausen, M., Makropoulos, N., Wieneke, B., Karaghiosoff, K., Nöth, H., Schwenk-Kircher, H., Knizek, J., Seifert, T. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 1998, 965–971; https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0682(199807)1998:7<965::aid-ejic965>3.0.co;2-a.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0682(199807)1998:7<965::AID-EJIC965>3.0.CO;2-ASearch in Google Scholar

18. Antiñolo, A., Fernández-Galán, R., Molina, N., Otero, A., Rivilla, I., Rodríguez, A. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 694, 1959–1970; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2009.01.038.Search in Google Scholar

19. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112–122; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108767307043930.Search in Google Scholar

20. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, A71, 3–8; https://doi.org/10.1107/s2053229614024218.Search in Google Scholar

21. Hübschle, C. B., Sheldrick, G. M., Dittrich, B. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1281–1284; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889811043202.Search in Google Scholar

22. Stern, D., Sabat, M., Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9558–9575; https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00182a015.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-09-30
Accepted: 2021-10-07
Published Online: 2021-10-19
Published in Print: 2022-01-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2021-0152/html
Scroll to top button