Startseite Three metal(II) complexes constructed using the 2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)quinoline ligand
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Three metal(II) complexes constructed using the 2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)quinoline ligand

  • Feriel Aouatef Sahki , Mehdi Bouchouit , Sofiane Bouacida , Lyamine Messaadia , Elsa Caytan , Aissa Chibani , Thierry Roisnel und Abdelmalek Bouraiou EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. August 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)quinoline (BQ) as ligand and three coordination compounds of formula {Zn(BQ)Cl2} (1), {Pb(BQ)Cl2} n (2) and {[Cu(BQ)2(OC(O)CH3)]OC(O)CH3 · CH3COOH} (3) have been synthesized and fully characterized. The complexes crystallize in triclinic space group P 1 . In complexes 1 and 2, the coordination geometry is a distorted tetrahedral environment around the zinc center and a distorted sixfold coordination geometry around the lead center, respectively. In complex 3 the central Cu(II) center is in a trigonal bipyramidal coordination geometry. The Cu(II) ion is surrounded by two bidentate 2-(2′-quinolyl)benzimidazole (BQ) ligands and one coordinated acetate molecule. One further acetate anion associated by a strong hydrogen bond with a molecule of acetic acid balances the charge of the compound.

1 Introduction

Rational design, synthesis, and structural characterization of new functional coordination compounds have received considerable attention in recent years [1, 2]. The design of new metal complexes was focused on designing the ligand structure and its functionality towards the metal center [3]. The current interest in coordination compounds is due to their intriguing variety of architectures and topologies and their versatile applications as functional materials.

For the creation of more coordination compounds, several ligands with multi-N-donor atoms were used [4, 5]. In this context, the use of nitrogen-rich heterocyclic compounds has attracted significant attention [6, 7]. Currently, several complexes containing heterocyclic nitrogen-donor ligands have been extensively investigated experimentally and theoretically [8], [9], [10]. The ligand 2-(2′-quinolyl)benzimidazole has been used to prepare several coordination compounds and detect metal ions [11], [12], [13]. Furthermore, several types of research have shown that their Ni, Cu, Ir, Re, Pd, Ti, Zn, and Ru complexes have good optoelectronic and catalytic properties [14, 15].

In our present work and as part of our recent research effort [16], [17], [18], quinoline, known as having desirable photophysical properties as a fluorophore group, and benzimidazole, were combined into one molecule 2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)quinoline (BQ) (Scheme 1) which can be used for the construction of new zinc, lead and copper coordination complexes. X-ray crystallographic analysis, elemental analysis, UV and IR spectra have been used to characterize these new metal complexes. Recently, several crystal structures of metal complexes with the ligand BQ were reported [18, 19] (Scheme 1). Here, we describe the synthesis and structural determination of new zinc (1), lead (2), and copper (3) complexes obtained with the 2-(2′-quinolyl)benzimidazole ligand BQ.

Scheme 1: 
Metal complexes with the BQ ligand reported in earlier studies [18].
Scheme 1:

Metal complexes with the BQ ligand reported in earlier studies [18].

2 Results and discussion

The BQ ligand was prepared following the established methods. The spectroscopic results and physical properties are in good agreement with literature reports [18, 20]. The ligand BQ was stirred in MeOH with 1 equivalent of MCl2 (M = Zn and Pb) overnight at room temperature (Scheme 2). The metal(II) complexes 1 and 2 were filtered off and dried. The copper complex 3 was obtained by reacting BQ ligand and copper(II) acetate in MeOH. All complexes are stable in the air, soluble in DMF and DMSO, but insoluble in water and other organic solvents. The crystals of complexes 1 and 2 were obtained from the crystallization of the crude products in DMF. Complex 3 is crystallized in a mixture of acetic acid and isopropanol. The complexes 1, 2, and 3 were characterized by IR, UV/Vis spectroscopy, single-crystal X-ray diffraction, and elemental analysis.

Scheme 2: 
Synthesis of 1, 2 and 3.
Scheme 2:

Synthesis of 1, 2 and 3.

To establish the structure of the coordination compounds, single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses of complexes 1–3 were undertaken. The crystal structures with the atom numbering scheme are shown in Figures 1a, 2a and 3a. All complexes 1, 2, and 3 crystallize in the triclinic crystal system, space group P 1 (Table 1). In complexes 1 and 2, the M(II) metal center is surrounded by two chlorine atoms and one bidentate 2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)quinoline ligand. The M–Cl, and M–N bond lengths for these complexes were found to be within their expected range (Table 2). The coordination of the BQ ligands at the metal(II) centers are very similar in complexes 1 and 2 and are comparable to previously reported structures [18]. The molecule of BQ consists of a benzimidazole ring with a quinoline ring in the two-position of the benzimidazole. In the benzimidazole ring, the N=C imine bond length {1.318(3) Å for 1, 1.330(3) Å for 2 and 1.331(5)–1.329(5) Å for 3} is shorter than the amine N–C bond length {1.336(3) Å for 1, 1.357(3) Å for 2 and 1.380(5)–1.384(5) Å for 3}, as expected. Other bond lengths and angles of BQ exhibit no unusual features. The benzimidazole and quinoline rings of the BQ ligand almost share a common plane with a dihedral angle of 0.65(1)° for 1, 10.14(2)° for 2, and 2.836(1)° for 3 [18].

Figure 1: 
Plots of the molecular structure, hydrogen bonding interactions, π–π stacking interactions and packing of the molecules in 1. (a) The molecular structure of 1 with the atom numbering scheme adopted. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. (b) Projection along the b axis of the atomic arrangement of 1. Dotted lines in red represent the N–H⋯Cl hydrogen bond. (c) Crystal structure highlighting the π–π stacking interactions between two quinolyl planes.
Figure 1:

Plots of the molecular structure, hydrogen bonding interactions, π–π stacking interactions and packing of the molecules in 1. (a) The molecular structure of 1 with the atom numbering scheme adopted. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. (b) Projection along the b axis of the atomic arrangement of 1. Dotted lines in red represent the N–H⋯Cl hydrogen bond. (c) Crystal structure highlighting the π–π stacking interactions between two quinolyl planes.

Figure 2: 
Plots of the asymmetric unit of compound 2, the polymeric chains and the hydrogen bonding interactions in the packing of the molecules in the solid state. (a) The molecular structure of 2 with the atom numbering scheme adopted. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. (b) Packing in the solid state viewed along the b axis (symmetry-equivalent atoms i are generated by centers of inversion with the symmetry operations –x + 2, –y + 1, –z + 1 and –x + 1, –y + 1, –z + 1). (c) View of the crystal structure showing the hydrogen bond interactions N–H⋯Cl and C–H⋯Cl as red and blue dashed lines, respectively.
Figure 2:

Plots of the asymmetric unit of compound 2, the polymeric chains and the hydrogen bonding interactions in the packing of the molecules in the solid state. (a) The molecular structure of 2 with the atom numbering scheme adopted. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. (b) Packing in the solid state viewed along the b axis (symmetry-equivalent atoms i are generated by centers of inversion with the symmetry operations –x + 2, –y + 1, –z + 1 and –x + 1, –y + 1, –z + 1). (c) View of the crystal structure showing the hydrogen bond interactions N–H⋯Cl and C–H⋯Cl as red and blue dashed lines, respectively.

Figure 3: 
Plots of the molecular structure, packing of the molecules in the solid state and hydrogen bonding interactions of 3. (a) The molecular structure of 3 with the atom numbering scheme adopted. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. (b) The crystal structure viewed along the c axis, showing N–H⋯O, O–H⋯O and C–H⋯O interactions as dashed lines.
Figure 3:

Plots of the molecular structure, packing of the molecules in the solid state and hydrogen bonding interactions of 3. (a) The molecular structure of 3 with the atom numbering scheme adopted. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. (b) The crystal structure viewed along the c axis, showing N–H⋯O, O–H⋯O and C–H⋯O interactions as dashed lines.

Table 1:

Crystal structure data for complexes 1, 2 and 3.

{Zn(BQ)Cl2} (1) {Pb(BQ)Cl2} n (2) {[Cu(BQ)2(OC(O)CH3)] OC(O)CH3·CH3COOH} (3)
Formula C16H11Cl2N3Zn C16H11Cl2N3Pb C38 H32CuN6O6
Formula weight 381.55 523.38 732.24
Crystal habit, color Prism, yellow Prism, colorless Prism, green
Crystal system tricLinic Triclinic Triclinic
Space group P 1 P 1 P 1
a, Å 7.2372(2) 8.1709(1) 9.3887(8)
b, Å 9.3947(3) 10.1495(2) 13.2627(11)
c, Å 11.5114(3) 11.1759(2) 15.0857(12)
α, ° 85.1100(10) 66.383(1) 100.280(5)
β, ° 86.183(2) 77.533(2) 106.141(5)
γ, ° 89.4560(10) 74.579(1) 100.278(5)
Volume, Å3 778.09(4) 812.33(2) 1723.0(2)
Z, Z′ 2, 2 2, 2 2, 2
Dcalcd, g cm−3 1.63 2.14 1.41
μ(Mo), mm−1 1.9 10.7 0.7
F(000), e 384 488 758
Crystal size, mm3 0.16 × 0.08 × 0.05 0.12 × 0.12 × 0.11 0.08 × 0.11 × 0.19
θ range data collection, ° 2.82–27.24 3.09–32.21 2.49–22.72
Reflections collected 9336 19,937 11,952
Independent reflections 3482 5611 5966
R int 0.0242 0.0213 0.0716
Reflections with I > 2σ(I) 3334 5086 4130
Number of parameters 199 199 464
Goodness-of-fit on F 2 1.042 1.051 1.09
Final R1 [I > 2σ(I)] 0.0333 0.0212 0.0228
R1/wR2 (all data) 0.045/0.0902 0.0257/0.0462 0.1002/0.1681
Largest diff. peak/hole, Å−3 0.34/−0.37 1.94/−0.63 1.36/−0.88
CCDC deposition no. CCDC 1478614 CCDC 1478613 CCDC 1455170
Table 2:

Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) in complexes 1, 2 and 3 in the solid state.

{Zn(BQ)Cl2} (1) {Pb(BQ)Cl2} n (2) {[Cu(BQ)2(OC(O)CH3)] OC(O)CH3·CH3COOH} (3)
Bond lengths
Zn(1)–N(1) 2.1066(18) Pb(1)–N(1) 2.708(2) Cu(1)–N(1A) 2.019(3)
Zn(1)–N(2) 2.034(2) Pb(1)–N(2) 2.486(2) Cu(1)–N(2B) 2.043(4)
Zn(1)–Cl(1) 2.2047(8) Pb(1)–Cl(1) 2.7920(8) Cu(1)–N(1B) 2.053(3)
Zn(1)–Cl(2) 2.2111(6) Pb(1)–Cl(2) 2.7755(7) Cu(1)–N(2A) 2.146(3)
C(10)–N(2) 1.318(3) Pb(1)–Cl(1)ii 3.2034(8) Cu(1)–O(21) 1.974(3)
C(10)–N(3) 1.336(3) Pb(1)–Cl(2)i 2.9868(8) O(21)–C(21) 1.274(5)
Bond angles
N(2)–Zn(1)–N(1) 80.69(7) N(2)–Pb(1)–N(1) 64.75(7) N(2B)–Cu(1)–N(1B) 81.33(13)
N(2)–Zn(1)–Cl(1) 120.00(6) N(2)–Pb(1)–Cl(2) 94.16(5) N(1A)–Cu(1)–N(1B) 177.02(13)
Cl(1)–Zn(1)–Cl(2) 111.55(3) Cl(1)–Pb(1)–Cl(2) 93.19(2) N(1A)–Cu(1)–N(2B) 95.94(13)
N(1)–Pb(1)–Cl(2)i 95.38(4) N(1A)–Cu(1)–N(2A) 80.17(13)
Cl(2)–Pb(1)–Cl(2)i 81.16(2) O(21)–Cu(1)–N(2A) 108.49(13)
Pb(1)–Cl(1)–Pb(1)ii 100.10(2) O(21)–Cu(1)–N(2B) 142.36(13)
Pb(1)–Cl(2)–Pb(1)i 98.84(2) O(21)–C(21)–O(22) 123.5(4)
Cl(1)–Pb(1)–Cl(2)i 167.39(2)
  1. Symmetry code for 2: (i) –x + 2, –y + 1, –z + 1; (ii) –x + 1, –y + 1, –z + 1.

In complex 1, the coordination geometry at the metal center is a distorted tetrahedral environment. The packing of the molecules in 1 can be described as alternating layers parallel to the crystallographic (001) plane along the a axis (Figure 1b). The molecules are linked via N–H⋯Cl intermolecular hydrogen bonds forming an infinite one-dimensional network in one line generating a RFX(1) motif ring (Figure 1b, Table 3). The crystal structure is also stabilized by intermolecular π–π stacking Cg–Cg (center of gravity) between aromatic rings. The shortest centroid-centroid distance is 3.6762(16) Å (Figure 1c).

Table 3:

Distances (Å) and angles (°) for hydrogen bonds in crystals of 1, 2 and 3.

D···A d(D–H) d(H···A) d(D–A) D–H···A Symmetry operation A
{Zn(BQ)Cl 2 } (1)
N(3)–H(3N)⋯Cl(1) 0.86 2.59 3.236(2) 132 x, 1 – y, 2 – z
N(3)–H(3N)⋯Cl(2) 0.86 2.63 3.328(2) 139 1 – x, 1 – y, 2 – z
{Pb(BQ)Cl 2 } n (2)
N(3)–H(3N)⋯Cl(1) 0.86 2.35 3.192(2) 165 1 – x, 2 – y, 1 – z
C(2)–H(2)⋯Cl(1) 0.93 2.82 3.739(3) 169 1 – x, 1 – y, 1 – z
C(4)–H(4)⋯Cl(2) 0.93 2.81 3.561(3) 138 −1 + x, y, 1 + z
C(12)–H(12)⋯Cl(2) 0.93 2.77 3.613(8) 151 x, y, z
{[Cu(BQ) 2 (OC(O)CH 3 )]OC(O)CH 3 ·CH 3 COOH} (3)
N(3A)–H(3A)⋯O(32) 0.86 1.81 2.661(5) 172 x, y, z
N(3B)–H(3B)⋯O(22) 0.86 1.82 2.669(4) 167 1 – x, –y, 1 – z
O(41)–H(41)⋯O(31) 0.82 1.80 2.480(8) 139 x, y, z
C(2A)–H(2A)⋯O(22) 0.93 2.58 3.368(6) 143 x, y, z
C(2B)–H(2B)⋯O(21) 0.93 2.40 3.013(6) 123 x, y, z
C(5A)–H(5A)⋯O(41) 0.93 2.54 3.224(8) 133 2 – x, –y, –z
C(7A)–H(7A)⋯.O(21) 0.93 2.49 3.209(5) 134 1 – x, –y, –z
C(7B)–H(7B)⋯O(42) 0.93 2.52 3.304(6) 142 2 – x, 1 – y, 1 – z
C(8A)–H(8A)⋯O(32) 0.93 2.38 3.258(7) 158 x, y, z
C(8B)–H(8B)⋯O(22) 0.93 2.37 3.225(6) 153 1 – x, –y, 1 – z
C(15A)–H(15A)⋯O(31) 0.93 2.57 3.291(8) 135 x, y, z

The structural unit of complex 2 contains one {Pb(BQ)Cl2} fragment and consists of a polymeric chain extending along the a axis, in which the PbII atoms are linked in first instance to two nitrogen atoms of BQ and two chlorine atoms (Table 2, Figure 2a). Both chlorine atoms act further as bridging ligands between Pb(II) centers with distances between Pb(1) and Pb(1)i/ii being 4.3786(1) and 4.6036(2) Å, respectively (for symmetry operations i and ii see Table 2). The bridging angles Pb(1)–Cl(1)–Pb(1)ii and Pb(1)–Cl(2)–Pb(1)i are 100.10(2)° and 98.84(2)°, respectively. Complex 2 exhibits a distorted six-fold coordination geometry around the metal center, as is seen in Figure 2b. The polymeric chains are connected via N–H⋯Cl and C–H⋯Cl hydrogen bond (Figure 2c, Table 3).

In addition, it can be observed that the Pb atoms take part in very weak intramolecular interactions with the aromatic H(2) atom of the quinoline ligand with the angle C(2)–H(2)⋯Pb(1) being 122.49(19)° and the distance H(2)⋯Pb(1) being 3.163(1) Å (Table 4). In addition, there are C–H⋯π and π–π interactions, the latter with the shortest centroid-centroid distance of 3.5495(19) Å between the quinolyl rings. These interactions give rise to the formation of a polymeric two-dimensional network. The interactions are much weaker than the coordinative bonds but play an essential role in creating multidimensional networks in the solid state, as is shown in the present case.

Table 4:

Distances (Å) and angles (°) for intramolecular interactions C–H⋯Pb in the crystal structure of {Pb(BQ)Cl2} n (2).

C–H···Pb d(C–H) d(H···Pb) d(C–Pb) C–H···Pb Symmetry operation Pb
C(2)–H(2)·Pb(1) 0.93 3.163(1) 3.74(2) 122.49(19) x, y, z

X-ray data revealed that the asymmetric unit of complex 3 has a penta-coordinated copper center. The metal atom is surrounded by two bidentate 2-(2′-quinolyl)benzimidazole (BQ) ligands and one monodentate O-coordinated acetate molecule (Table 2). One further acetate anion balances the charge. An acetic acid molecule is also present in the crystals (Figure 3a). The ligand BQ acts as a bidentate ligand and coordinates the copper atom by the N(1A)/N(1B) and N(2A)/N(2B) atoms. The two coordinated BQ ligands are almost planar and form a dihedral angle of 69.27(1)°. The coordination sphere of the copper center can be described as a trigonal bipyramidal geometry: the atoms N(2A), N(2B), and O(21) form the equatorial plane, and N(1A), N(1B) are in the axial positions. The deviation of the copper atom from the equatorial plane is 0.0912 Å.

The packing in the crystal can be described as alternating layers along the crystallographic [110] direction parallel to the ( 1 10 ) planes. In these layers, the arrangement of the molecules is induced by strong intermolecular π–π stacking interactions. The shortest centroid–centroid distance is 3.520(3) Å (Figure 3b). Hydrogen bonding also plays a crucial role in consolidating the crystal structure of complex 3 (Table 3). Also, this complex presents N–H⋯O, O–H⋯O and weaker C–H⋯O hydrogen bonds forming chains and rings, respectively, with graph set motifs DFX(2), DFX(2) and SFX(8). These interactions allow the formation of layers of molecules and support the stacking of these layers (Figure 3a).

3 Conclusion

This paper describes the synthesis and the single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of complexes of the 2-(2′-quinolyl)benzimidazole ligand with Zn(II), Pb(II) and Cu(II) centers. The preparation is successful with simple, conventional methods. In {Zn(BQ)Cl2} (1), the coordination geometry at the zinc center is a distorted tetrahedral environment. Complex 2 has a distorted sixfold coordination geometry around the lead center. Both molecular complex (1) and coordination polymer (2) show significant N–H⋯Cl interactions, while in crystals of complex (2) C–H⋯Cl interactions appear to support the aggregation. The third complex {Cu(BQ)2(OC(O)CH3)OC(O)CH3, CH3COOH} (3) shows trigonal bipyramidal coordination of the metal(II) center. Crystals of this complex also feature N–H⋯O, O–H⋯O and C–H⋯O interactions.

4 Experimental section

4.1 General

All reagents, unless otherwise stated, were purchased as analysis grade and were used without further purification. The melting points were determined using an Electrothermal IA9100 digital melting point apparatus. UV spectra were recorded on a UV/VIS spectrophotometer Optizen 1220. Elemental analyses were performed on a Thermo Fisher FLASH 1112 (ISCR) elemental analyzer. Infrared (IR) samples were prepared as KBr pellets and their spectra were obtained in the range 400–4000 cm−1 on a Shimadzu FT/IR-8201 PC spectrophotometer.

4.2 X-ray crystallography

Crystallographic data for all the structures was collected on a Bruker APEX three-circle diffractometer equipped with an Apex II CCD detector using Mo radiation (microfocus sealed tube with a graphite monochromator). The crystals were coated with Paratone oil and mounted on loops for data collection. The structures were solved by Direct Methods with Sir2004 [21] to locate all the non-H atoms which were subsequently refined anisotropically with Shelxl-97 [22] using full-matrix least-squares on F2 from within the WinGX [23] suite of programs. Absorption corrections were performed with the program Sadabs [24]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were placed in idealized geometrical positions and refined with Uiso tied to the parent atom with the riding model.

CCDC 1478614, 1455170, and 1478613 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for complexes 1, 2, and 3, respectively. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

4.3 Preparation of the ligand BQ and of the complexes 1, 2 and 3

4.3.1 Synthesis of 2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)quinoline (BQ)

2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)quinoline (BQ) has been synthesized in accordance with established methods [18]. Spectroscopic results and physical properties are in agreement with literature reports [18, 20].

4.3.2 Synthesis of {Zn(BQ)Cl2} (1)

Complex 1 was synthesized starting from a mixture of 2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)quinoline (BQ) (1.0 mmol), ZnCl2 (1.0 mmol) in 10 mL of MeOH at room temperature. Yield 83%; colorless powder, m.p. 210–217 °C. – Analysis for C16H11N3Cl2Zn: calcd. C 50.36, H 2.91, N 11.01; found C 49.76, H 2.86, N 10.68%. – UV/Vis (DMF): λmax = 288, 310, 338, 352 nm – IR: 3444, 3228, 2349, 1596, 1500, 1446, 1326, 1145, 1014, 833, 752, 594 cm−1. Colorless crystals of 1 suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained from dimethylformamide solution.

4.3.3 Synthesis of {Pb(BQ)Cl2} n (2)

Complex 2 was obtained in moderate yield (48% based on BQ) by a similar method as described for 1 except that PbCl2 were used instead of ZnCl2. Colorless powder, m.p. 208–215 °C. – UV/Vis (DMF): λmax = 245, 287, 337, 351 nm – IR: 3390, 3055, 1596, 1500, 1411, 1315, 1269, 1145, 1103, 833, 752, 609 cm−1. Colorless crystals of 3 suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained from dimethylformamide solution.

4.3.4 Synthesis of {[Cu(BQ)2(OC(O)CH3)]OC(O)CH3·CH3COOH} (3)

A mixture of Cu(OAc)2 (1 mmol) and 2-(2′-quinolyl)benzimidazole (BQ) (2 mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL of MeOH. The mixture was stirred for 18 h. The precipitate was collected by filtration and dried in vacuo. Yield 67%; green powder, m.p. 310–315 °C. – UV/Vis (DMF): λmax = 300, 368, 396 nm – IR: 2364, 1540, 1428, 1387, 1332, 995, 852, 751, 675 cm−1. The crude product was recrystallized in isopropanol and a few drops of acetic acid to obtain single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction.


Corresponding author: Abdelmalek Bouraiou, Unité de Recherche de Chimie de l’Environnement et Moléculaire Structurale, Université des Frères Mentouri, Constantine 25000, Algeria, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Zhang, X.-L., Guo, C.-P., Yang, Q.-Y., Wang, W., Liu, W.-S., Kang, B.-S., Su, C.-Y. Chem. Commun. 2007, 41, 4242–4244; https://doi.org/10.1039/b709118d.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Bodman, S. E., Crowther, A. C., Geraghty, P. B., Fitchett, C. M. Cryst.Eng.Comm. 2015, 17, 81–89; https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ce01851f.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Lalegani, A., Sardashti, M. K., Khalaj, M., Gajda, R., Woźniak, K. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2017, 457, 136–144; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2016.12.021.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Maekawa, M., Minamino, A., Sugimoto, K., Okubo, T., Kuroda-Sowa, T., Munakata, M. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2014, 413, 257–263; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2014.02.016.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Nasani, R., Saha, M., Mobin, S. M. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 9944–9954; https://doi.org/10.1039/c4dt00531g.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Crowley, J. D., McMorran, D. A. “Click-triazole” coordination chemistry: exploiting 1,4-disubstituted-1,2,3-triazoles as ligands. In Topics in Heterocyclic Chemistry; Košmrlj, J., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, Vol. 28, 2012; pp. 31–38.10.1007/7081_2011_67Suche in Google Scholar

7. Bernabé-Pablo, E., Campirán-Martínez, A., Jancik, V., Martínez-Otero, D., Moya-cabrera, M. Polyhedron 2016, 110, 305–313; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2015.08.004.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Cary, D. R., Zaitseva, M. P., Gray, K., O’Day, K. E., Darrow, C. B., Lane, S. M., Peyser, T. A., Satcher, J. H., Van Antwerp, W. P., Nelson, A. J., Reynolds, J. G. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 1662–1669; https://doi.org/10.1021/ic010202b.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Tyson, D. S., Henbest, K. B., Bialecki, J., Castellano, F. N. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 8154–8161; https://doi.org/10.1021/jp011770f.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Sangilipandi, S., Nagarajaprakash, R., Sutradhar, D., Kaminsky, W., Chandra, A. K., Rao, K. M. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2015, 437, 177–187; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2015.09.001.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Li, G., Zhang, D., Liu, G., Pu, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 5205–5210; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.10.027.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Zhao, Y., Chai, W. X., Song, L., Zhang, Y. C., Shi, H. S., Tao, X. D., Shu, K. Y. Phosphorus Sulfur Relat. Elem. 2016, 191, 1123–1128; https://doi.org/10.1080/10426507.2016.1146274.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Zhang, W. J., Huang, W., Liang, T. L., Sun, W. H. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2013, 31, 601–609; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-013-1253-4.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Dayan, O., Tercan, M., Özdemir, N. J. Mol. Struct. 2016, 1123, 35–43 and references cited therein; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.06.017.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Gong, D. P., Gao, T. B., Cao, D. K., Ward, M. D. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 275–286; https://doi.org/10.1039/c6dt04091h.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Bouchouit, M., Bouraiou, A., Bouacida, S., Belfaitah, A., Merazig, H. J. Struct. Chem. 2016, 57, 835–839; https://doi.org/10.1134/s0022476616040338.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Bouchouit, M., Said, M. E., Kara Ali, M., Bouacida, S., Merazig, H., Kacem Chaouche, N., Chibani, A., Zouchoune, B., Belfaitah, A., Bouraiou, A. Polyhedron 2016, 119, 248–259; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2016.08.045.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Sahki, F. A., Messaadia, L., Merazig, H., Chibani, A., Bouraiou, A., Bouacida, S. J. Chem. Sci. 2017, 129, 21–29; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-016-1210-1.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Wang, X., Fan, R., Dong, Y., Su, T., Huang, J., Du, X., Wang, P., Yang, Y. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 5406–5421; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.7b00891.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Mamedov, V. A., Saifina, D. F., Gubaidullin, A. T., Ganieva, V. R., Kadyrova, S. F., Rakov, D. V., Rizvanov, I. K., Sinyashin, O. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 6503–6506; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.10.007.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Burla, M. C., Caliandro, R., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., De Caro, L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G., Spagna, R. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2005, 38, 381–388; https://doi.org/10.1107/s002188980403225x.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr 2008, A64, 112–122; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108767307043930.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Farrugia, L. J. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2012, 45, 849–854; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889812029111.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Sheldrick, G. M. Sadabs; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, Wisconsin (USA), 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-05-08
Accepted: 2021-07-10
Published Online: 2021-08-06
Published in Print: 2021-10-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 24.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2021-0071/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen