Abstract
The gallium-containing Heusler phases ScRh2Ga, ScPd2Ga, TmRh2Ga and LuRh2Ga have been synthesized by arc-melting of the elements followed by different annealing sequences to improve phase purity. The samples have been studied by powder X-ray diffraction. The structures of Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03 (Fm3̅m, a=632.94(5) pm, wR2=0.0590, 46 F2 values, seven variables) and Sc0.88Rh2Ga1.12 (a=618.91(4) pm, wR2=0.0284, 44 F2 values, six variables) have been refined from single crystal X-ray diffractometer data. Both gallides show structural disorder through Lu/Ga and Sc/Ga mixing. Temperature dependent magnetic susceptibility measurements showed Pauli paramagnetism for ScRh2Ga, ScPd2Ga, and LuRh2Ga and Curie-Weiss paramagnetism for TmRh2Ga. 45Sc and 71Ga solid state MAS NMR spectroscopic investigations of the Sc containing compounds confirmed the site mixing effects typically observed for Heusler phases. The data indicate that the effect of mixed Sc/Ga occupancy is significantly stronger in ScRh2Ga than in ScPd2Ga.
1 Introduction
The Heusler phase structure, originally determined for MnCu2Al [1], [2] is one of the basic ternary structure types in the large family of intermetallic compounds. More than 1500 entries are listed in the Pearson data base [3]. The variability in composition is remarkable. Most Heusler phases form as a combination of two different transition metals (or a transition (T) metal with a rare earth (RE) metal) with a p element of the 3rd, 4th, or 5th main group. For various application prospects, Heusler phases were thoroughly studied with respect to high magnetic ordering temperatures and permanent magnetic materials, superconductivity, topological insulators, thermoelectrics, spintronics and the magnetocaloric effect [4], [5], [6], [7, and references cited therein]. Detailed computational studies [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] allowed a systematization of the magnetic behavior of Heusler phases and new ones could be predicted on the basis of combinatorial scans. A main structural feature of Heusler phases concerns extended homogeneity ranges and structural disorder.
Although the family of Heusler phases contains a huge number of representatives, there is still a large potential for new materials with promising properties. Phase analytical work recently revealed an extension towards magnesium and cadmium containing Heusler phases REPd2Mg, REPd2Cd, REAg2Mg, REAu2Mg and REAu2Cd [13] and pronounced solid solutions Y(T0.5T′0.5)2X (T/T′=Pd, Ag, Au; X=Mg, In) [14] which were studied by magnetic susceptibility measurements, and by 25Mg, 89Y 113Cd and 115In solid state MAS NMR spectroscopy. A noteworthy result is the high Curie temperature of TC=98.3 K for GdAg2Mg [13]. Extension of the Heusler crystal chemistry to divalent magnesium and cadmium allows for a reduction of the valence electron count and an effective influence on the physical properties. To give an example, complete substitution of Mg in GdAg2Mg by In leads to an antiferromagnetic ground state for GdAg2In and a severe drop of the magnetic ordering temperature to TN=10 K [15], [16].
When screening the Pearson data base [3] it becomes evident that gallium-containing Heusler phases so far have mostly been observed with a combination of two different transition metals. To this point, with the rare earth elements only the scandium-containing phases ScT2Ga (T=Co, Ni, Cu, Pd) [17], [18], [19], [20], [21] have been reported. During recent phase analytical studies of the rhodium-rich parts of the RE-Rh-Ga systems [22], [23], [24], [25] we obtained the new Heusler phases RERh2Ga with the small rare earth elements Sc, Tm, and Lu. Their structural details, magnetic properties and solid state NMR spectroscopic data are reported herein and compared to those of ScPd2Ga [19].
2 Experimental
2.1 Synthesis
The sublimed rare earth elements (RE=Sc, Tm, Lu; Smart Elements), rhodium powder, palladium sheets (both Agosi) and gallium lumps (Johnson Matthey), all with stated metal-based purities ≥ 99.9%, were used as starting materials for the synthesis of the Heusler phases. The elements were weighed in the ideal atomic ratio of RET2Ga and subsequently arc-melted under an argon atmosphere of 800 mbar using a laboratory scaled arc-melting furnace [26]. For a better handling, the specific amounts of rhodium, respectively palladium powder were cold-pressed into pellets (∅ 5 mm). The argon was purified via titanium sponge (873 K), molecular sieves and silica gel. To ensure homogeneity, the obtained buttons were re-melted from both sides for several times.
In order to increase the phase purity as well as the crystal quality, the melted samples were subsequently annealed at different temperatures. Therefore pieces of the crushed samples (ScT2Ga) or cold-pressed pellets (TmRh2Ga and LuRh2Ga) were sealed in evacuated silica tubes. ScRh2Ga and ScPd2Ga were heated within 5 h to 1120 K. After keeping this temperature for 24 h it was lowered within 96 h to 673 K. Both samples were kept at this temperature for another 24 h and consecutively cooled down to room temperature within 24 h. The TmRh2Ga and LuRh2Ga samples were heated within 1 h to 773 K and annealed at this temperature for 14 d. The four gallides are stable in air over several weeks. All samples showed metallic luster, ScRh2Ga, TmRh2Ga and LuRh2Ga with silvery and ScPd2Ga with bronze color.
2.2 X-ray diffraction
The ScRh2Ga, ScPd2Ga, TmRh2Ga and LuRh2Ga bulk samples were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction using a Guinier camera (Enraf-Nonius, type FR 552) equipped with an image plate system (Fujifilm, BAS-1800) and CuKα1 radiation. α-Quartz (a=491.30, c=540.46 pm) was used as an internal standard. The cubic lattice parameters (Table 1) have been derived from least-squares refinements of the powder data. Correct indexing was ensured by comparing the experimental diffraction patterns to calculated ones [27].
Lattice parameters of the Heusler phases RET2Ga, space group Fm3̅m.
| Compound | a (pm) | V (nm3) |
|---|---|---|
| ScRh2Ga | 619.2(1) | 0.2374 |
| Sc0.88Rh2Ga1.12a | 618.91(4) | 0.2371 |
| ScPd2Ga | 633.1(3) | 0.2538 |
| ScPd2Ga [19] | 634.6 | 0.2556 |
| TmRh2Ga | 635.1(2) | 0.2562 |
| LuRh2Ga | 634.5(3) | 0.2554 |
| Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03a | 632.94(5) | 0.2536 |
aSingle crystal data.
Irregularly shaped single crystals with conchoidal fracture were separated from the crushed annealed samples of LuRh2Ga and ScRh2Ga. The crystal fragments were glued to thin quartz fibers using bees wax. Subsequently the crystal quality was tested by Laue photographs on a Burger camera (white molybdenum radiation, image plate technique, Fujifilm, BAS-1800). The intensity data sets of suitable crystals were collected with a Stoe IPDS II diffractometer (graphite-monochromatized MoKα radiation; oscillation mode) at room temperature. Numerical absorption corrections were applied. All relevant crystallographic data and details of the data collections and evaluations are listed in Table 2.
Crystallographic data and structure refinement for Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03 and Sc0.88Rh2Ga1.12, space group Fm3̅m, Z=4, MnCu2Al type.
| Empirical formula | Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03 | Sc0.88Rh2Ga1.12 |
| Formula weight, g mol−1 | 446.9 | 323.4 |
| Lattice parameters, pm | a=632.94(5) | a=618.91(4) |
| Cell volume, nm3 | V=0.2536 | V=0.2371 |
| Calculated density, g cm−3 | 11.70 | 9.06 |
| Crystal size, μm3 | 20×20×50 | 20×20×40 |
| Linear absorption coeff., mm−1 | 60.5 | 28.2 |
| Detector distance, mm | 60 | 60 |
| Exposure time, s | 1200 | 360 |
| Integr. param. A/B/EMS | 13.3/2.9/0.016 | 14.0/4.0/0.010 |
| F(000), e | 764 | 573 |
| Range in hkl | ±10, ±10, ±10 | ±9, ±9, ±9 |
| θmin, θmax, deg | 5.6/34.2 | 5.7/34.8 |
| Total no. of reflections | 1986 | 1728 |
| Rint | 0.0433 | 0.0764 |
| Independent reflections | 46 | 44 |
| Reflections used [I>3 σ(I)] | 46 | 41 |
| Data/parameters | 46/7 | 44/6 |
| Goodness-of-fit on F2 | 2.42 | 1.19 |
| R1/wR2 for I>3 σ(I) | 0.0166/0.0590 | 0.0120/0.0272 |
| R1/wR2 for all data | 0.0166/0.0590 | 0.0148/0.0284 |
| Extinction coefficient | 1000(400) | 610(90) |
| Largest diff. peak/hole, e Å−3 | –0.88/0.89 | –0.67/0.42 |
2.3 Structure refinements
Both data sets showed cubic F-centered lattices and isotypism with the well-known MnCu2Al [1], [2] structure. Space group Fm3̅m was already evident from the powder patterns (Fig. 1). The positional parameters of MnCu2Al were used as starting values and the structures were refined on F2 with Jana2006 [28] with isotropic displacement parameters for all atoms. Since Heusler phases often show homogeneity ranges and disorder, we refined the occupancy parameters in separate series of least-squares cycles. The rhodium sites of both crystals were fully occupied within two standard deviations. The Lu-containing crystal showed a statistical distribution of Lu and Ga atoms on the Wyckoff sites 4a and 4b which led to the final composition Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03. In contrast, only the 4a site of the Sc-containing single crystal showed a mixed occupation of Sc and Ga atoms, resulting in the composition Sc0.88Rh2Ga1.12. The final difference Fourier syntheses showed no significant residual peaks. The final positional parameters, isotropic displacement parameters as well as the interatomic distances are given in Tables 2–4 .

Experimental Guinier powder pattern (CuKα1 radiation) of LuRh2Ga (annealed at 730 K for 14 d) compared to the calculated ones of LuRh2Ga, Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03 (both MnCu2Al type) and (Lu0.5Ga0.5)Rh (CsCl type).
Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (pm2) for Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03 and Sc0.88Rh2Ga1.12 with x=y=z and Ueq=1/3 (U11+U22+U33).
| Atom | Wyck. site | x | Ueq | s.o.f. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03 | ||||
| Lu/Ga | 4a | 0 | 96(6) | 79(2)/21(2) |
| Rh | 8c | 1/4 | 135(10) | 1 |
| Ga/Lu | 4b | 1/2 | 136(12) | 81(1)/19(1) |
| Sc0.88Rh2Ga1.12 | ||||
| Sc/Ga | 4a | 0 | 83(5) | 88(2)/12(2) |
| Rh | 8c | 1/4 | 59(3) | 1 |
| Ga | 4b | 1/2 | 69(3) | 1 |
Ueq=U11=U22=U33. U12=U13=U23=0.
Interatomic distances (pm) in the structures of LuRh2Ga and ScRh2Ga.
| LuRh2Ga | ScRh2Ga | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lu: | 8 | Rh | 274.1 | Sc: | 8 | Rh | 268.0 |
| 6 | Ga | 316.5 | 6 | Ga | 309.5 | ||
| Rh: | 4 | Lu | 274.1 | Rh: | 4 | Sc | 268.0 |
| 4 | Ga | 274.1 | 4 | Ga | 268.0 | ||
| 6 | Rh | 316.5 | 6 | Rh | 309.5 | ||
| Ga: | 8 | Rh | 274.1 | Ga: | 8 | Rh | 268.0 |
| 6 | Lu | 316.5 | 6 | Sc | 309.5 |
All distances of the first coordination spheres are listed. Standard deviations are equal or smaller than 0.1 pm. Note the mixed occupancies listed in Table 3.
Further details of the crystal structure investigations may be obtained from FIZ Karlsruhe, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (fax: +49-7247-808-666; e-mail: crysdata@fiz-karlsruhe.de) on quoting the deposition numbers CSD-433136 (Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03) and CSD-433122 (Sc0.88Rh2Ga1.12).
2.4 EDX data
The Sc0.88Rh2Ga1.12 and Lu1.03Rh2Ga0.97 single crystals studied on the diffractometer were additionally investigated via semi-quantitative EDX analyses using a scanning electron microscope (ZEISS EV MA10) in variable pressure mode (internal chamber pressure of 60 Pa) with Sc, LuF3, Rh and GaP as internal standards. The obtained compositions were close to the ideal ones and no impurity elements heavier than sodium were detected. The experimentally observed compositions of 27±3 at.-% Sc:52±3 at.-% Rh:21±3 at.-% Ga and 27±3 at.-% Lu:49±3 at.-% Rh:24±3 at.-% Ga were close to the ideal ones. The extreme conchoidal fracture of the crystal fragments hampered higher precision.
2.5 Magnetic characterization
A quantum design physical property measurement system (PPMS) was used to analyze the magnetic susceptibility of the samples. Therefore, polycrystalline pieces of 20–50 mg were attached to the sample holder rod of the vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) using Kapton tape. The temperature dependence of the susceptibility in the range of 2.1–300 K was recorded using the VSM option applying magnetic fields of up to 10 kOe (1 kOe=7.96×104 A m−1). Magnetization isotherms of TmRh2Ga were measured at 3, 10, 50 and 150 K with a magnetic field strength of up to 80 kOe.
2.6 Solid state NMR spectroscopy
Solid state MAS NMR spectra of the scandium containing samples ScRh2Ga and ScPd2Ga were recorded with a BRUKER DSX 500 (B0=11.7 T) NMR spectrometer at resonance frequencies of 121.47 MHz (45Sc) and 152.476 MHz (71Ga), respectively. The finely powdered samples were mixed with boron nitride powder in an approximate ratio of 1:1 to dilute the density and electrical conductivity of the substances and were filled into ZrO2 MAS rotors with 2.5 mm diameter. All experiments were conducted at a MAS spinning frequency of νrot=25–28.0 kHz, typical pulse lengths of p1=0.83–1.34 μs and relaxation delays of d1=0.5 s. 1 molar aqueous solutions of ScCl3 and Ga(NO3)3 were used as external reference substances at ambient temperature. The spectra were recorded using the BRUKER Topspin [29] software and data analysis was carried out with the Dmfit [30] software package. All relevant parameters are summarized in Table 5.
45Sc and 71Ga NMR spectroscopic parameters of the Heusler phases ScPd2Ga and ScRh2Ga: resonance shifts δ (±1 ppm); full width at half maximum Δ (±0.01 kHz), degree of Gaussian (G) vs. Lorentzian (L) character of the central signal, 30° pulse length p1 (μs) and relaxation delay d1 (s).
| Compound | δa | Δ | G/L | p1 | d1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ScPd2Ga | |||||
| 45Sc | 1575 | 6.38 | 0.51 | 0.83 | 0.5 |
| 71Ga | 2352 | 35.4 | 0.74 | 1.34 | 0.5 |
| ScRh2Ga | |||||
| 45Sc | 1940 | – | – | 0.83 | 0.5 |
| 71Ga | 1888 | 10.33 | 0.59 | 1.34 | 0.5 |
aResonance shift at signal maximum.
All spectra were recorded at an external magnetic field of B0=11.7 T and MAS spinning frequencies of νrot=25–28 kHz.
3 Crystal chemistry
The new gallides RERh2Ga with the small rare earth elements thulium, lutetium and scandium crystallize with the Heusler phase structure. In agreement with the lanthanide contraction we observe a slightly smaller cell volume for LuRh2Ga as compared to TmRh2Ga (Table 1) and a severe drop on going to ScRh2Ga with the smallest rare earth element.
In the following we exemplarily discuss the structural features of Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03. The unit cell is presented in Fig. 2. The lutetium and gallium atoms build up a rocksalt-type substructure in which all tetrahedral voids are filled by the rhodium atoms. Table 3 and Fig. 2 immediately emphasize the disorder problem in the Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03 structure. Although the refined composition is close to the ideal one, both four-fold sites show Lu/Ga mixing. This disorder is pronounced if the two elements have similar size and valence, and it also depends on the thermal treatment of the respective sample. The Lu/Ga mixing drastically influences the X-ray powder pattern. In Fig. 1 we present the experimental pattern of the LuRh2Ga sample along with three calculated ones: (i) the MnCu2Al model with complete Lu/Ga ordering, (ii) the MnCu2Al model with the Lu/Ga mixing as obtained from the structure refinement, and (iii) a CsCl type subcell with random Lu/Ga distribution. The experimental pattern shows no superstructure reflections, indicating a distribution of different domains with differing degrees of Lu/Ga mixing. These domains, however, still show short-range ordering. The selected single crystal which anyway contains ca. 1014 unit cells shows superstructure reflections which force a doubling of the CsCl subcell in all three directions. Cutouts of the hk4 and hk5 layers are presented as examples in Fig. 3.

Crystal structure of Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03. The Rh atoms are drawn as blue circles. The mixed occupancy of the 4a and 4b Wyckoff sites by Lu (gray) and Ga (red) atoms are emphasized. The site occupancy factors for these sites are given as well.

Cutout of the reciprocal layers hk4 (left) and hk5 (right) resulting from the single-crystal measurement of Lu0.97Rh2Ga1.03. The F-centered lattice as well as some of the observed reflections are emphasized. Yellow points indicate intensity maxima.
Since the Heusler phase structure is a superstructure of the bcc packing [31], [32] we observe coordination number 14 (8+6 or 4+4+6) for all atoms in LuRh2Ga. The strongest bonding interactions occur for the Lu–Rh contacts. The Lu–Rh distances of 274 pm are even slightly shorter than the sum of the covalent radii [33] for Lu+Rh of 281 pm. This LuRh slab in LuRh2Ga nicely matches with the binary LuRh having a distance of 289 pm [34]. In contrast we observe weaker Rh–Ga bonding. The Rh–Ga distances within the RhGa4 tetrahedra of 274 pm are much longer than the sum of the covalent radii [33] for Rh+Ga of 250 pm, as well as the Rh–Ga distance of 260 pm in CsCl type RhGa [35].
4 Magnetic properties
The samples were investigated in zero field cooled (ZFC) mode applying a magnetic field of 10 kOe after cooling down to 3 K. The temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ of the scandium and lutetium compounds is presented in Fig. 4. ScPd2Ga (χ(300 K)=1.2(2)×10−5 emu mol−1), ScRh2Ga (χ(300 K)=2.5(1)×10−4 emu mol−1) and LuRh2Ga (χ(300 K)=2.6(2)×10−5 emu mol−1) show weak, slightly positive susceptibilities, classifying these Heusler phases as Pauli paramagnetic. The upturns at low temperature (especially for the LuRh2Ga sample) can be ascribed to small amounts of paramagnetic impurities. An additional examination of the samples down to 2.1 K with an external field of 20 Oe revealed no indication for superconductivity.

Magnetic susceptibility of LuRh2Ga (black), ScRh2Ga (red) and ScPd2Ga (blue) measured in ZFC mode with an external field of 10 kOe as a function of temperature.
The temperature dependence of the reciprocal susceptibility χ of the TmRh2Ga sample (Fig. 5) measured in ZFC mode could be fitted with the Curie-Weiss law. The resulting experimental magnetic moment μexp=7.57(1) μB Tm atom−1 is close to the theoretical value of the free Tm3+ ion (μeff=7.56 μB [36]) indicating stable trivalent thulium. The paramagnetic Curie temperature θP=–5.9(5) K indicates weak antiferromagnetic interactions in the paramagnetic regime. An additional measurement of TmRh2Ga in zero field cooled/field cooled mode with a field strength of 100 Oe (not displayed) revealed no indication for magnetic ordering. Magnetization isotherms of TmRh2Ga taken at 3, 10, 50 and 150 K are presented in the bottom panel of Fig. 5. At 50 and 150 K a linear field dependence is observed as expected from a paramagnet. The isotherms measured at 3 and 10 K exhibit saturation effects. The maximal observed magnetization of TmRh2Ga at 80 kOe and 3 K of μsat=4.2(1) μB per thulium atom is lower than the theoretical saturation magnetization of 7 μB per thulium atom [36].

Magnetic properties of TmRh2Ga: (top) Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ and its reciprocal χ−1 measured at 10 kOe; (bottom) Magnetization isotherms of TmRh2Ga measured at 3, 10, 50 and 150 K.
5 45Sc and 71Ga solid state NMR spectroscopy
Figure 6 summarizes the 45Sc and 71Ga solid-state MAS NMR spectra of the Heusler compounds ScRh2Ga and ScPd2Ga. In agreement with their crystal structures both compounds give rise to one dominant signal according to one crystallographic site occupied by Sc and Ga atoms, respectively. The 45Sc NMR spectrum of ScPd2Ga shows an additional signal with an approximate area fraction of 5% indicating the presence of a Sc containing impurity phase. Both the 45Sc and 71Ga NMR spectra exhibit strong Knight shifts, indicating a high concentration of spin-polarized conduction electrons near the Fermi edge at the nuclear origin. If Sc/Ga mixing occurs on the 4a and 4b Wyckoff sites, the spectra are further expected to be influenced by Knight shift distributions and nuclear electric quadrupolar interactions, which may arise from locally distorted environments caused by this mixing. This effect has been previously noted for various other 1:2:1 and 1:1:1 Heusler and half-Heusler compositions [13], [14], [37], [38], [39], [40]. While both the 45Sc and 71Ga nuclei can be considered sensitive probes for such distortion effects, the 45Sc isotope may be considered more sensitive, owing to its larger quadrupole moment.

Experimental and simulated (colored lines) 45Sc (top) and 71Ga (bottom) MAS NMR spectra of the Heusler phases ScPd2Ga (left) and ScRh2Ga (right) recorded at an external magnetic field of B0=11.7 T and spinning frequencies of νrot=25–28.0 kHz. The inset highlights the typical central transition line shape due to second-order quadrupolar effects in the presence of a distribution of quadrupolar coupling constants, as observed in the 45Sc spectrum of ScRh2Ga. Signals caused by impurities are denoted with +.
Figure 6 illustrates that the manifestations of nuclear electric quadrupolar coupling in these two ternary scandium gallides are distinctly different. In ScPd2Ga, the 45Sc quadrupolar coupling is rather weak. It manifests itself by a sideband pattern from the outer |±1/2〉↔|±3/2〉, |±3/2〉↔|±5/2〉 and |±5/2〉↔|±7/2〉 Zeeman transitions which are broadened by the anisotropy of first-order quadrupolar perturbations, covering a frequency range of only 400 kHz. No second-order quadrupolar effects are detectable in this case. The 71Ga NMR spectrum shows no evidence for any quadrupolar coupling. Only a broad Gaussian line shape is observed suggesting that there is a wide distribution of isotropic Knight shifts.
The situation is distinctly different in ScRh2Ga. The 45Sc MAS NMR spectrum shows a pronounced signal asymmetry, characterized by a characteristic low-frequency tail typically observed when second-order quadrupole perturbations with a wide distribution of nuclear electric quadrupole coupling constants occur. In such cases, it is hard to observe the spinning side band pattern arising from the first-order quadrupolar perturbation, as their intensity will be spread out over an extended frequency range of several MHz. The stronger quadrupolar coupling (compared to ScPd2Ga) also manifests itself in the 71Ga MAS-NMR spectrum, which shows a first-order quadrupolar spinning side band pattern covering about 500 kHz. Based on these data we conclude that the effect of mixed Sc/Ga occupancy is significantly stronger in ScRh2Ga than in ScPd2Ga. On the other hand, the Knight shift distribution in the Rh compound appears to be narrower than in ScPd2Ga, suggesting that the structural origins producing distribution effects in quadrupolar coupling (local environments) and magnetic shielding (local and non-local contributions) are different. Overall, the present results indicate that solid state NMR may be a useful method for providing semi-quantitative information on the extent of site disordering in intermetallic compounds.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dipl.-Ing. U. Ch. Rodewald for the collection of the single-crystal diffractometer data.
References
[1] O. Heusler, Ann. Phys.1934, 19, 155.10.1002/andp.19344110205Search in Google Scholar
[2] A. J. Bradley, J. W. Rodgers, Proc. Roy. Soc. A1934, 144, 340.Search in Google Scholar
[3] P. Villars, K. Cenzual, Pearson’s Crystal Data: Crystal Structure Database for Inorganic Compounds (release 2016/17), ASM International®, Materials Park, Ohio (USA) 2016.Search in Google Scholar
[4] T. Graf, C. Felser, S. S. P. Parkin, Progr. Solid State Chem. 2011, 39, 1.10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2011.02.001Search in Google Scholar
[5] T. Klimczuk, C. H. Wang, K. Gofryk, F. Ronning, J. Winterlik, G. H. Fecher, J.-C. Griveau, E. Colineau, C. Felser, J. D. Thompson, D. J. Safarik, R. J. Cava, Phys. Rev. B2012, 85, 174505.10.1103/PhysRevB.85.174505Search in Google Scholar
[6] M. Yin, J. Hasier, P. Nash, J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 50.10.1007/s10853-015-9389-ySearch in Google Scholar
[7] C. Felser, A. Hirohata (Eds.), Heusler Alloys – Properties, Growth, Applications, Springer International Publishing AG, Cham (Switzerland), 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-21449-8Search in Google Scholar
[8] Y. Kurtulus, M. Gilleßen, R. Dronskowski, J. Comp. Chem.2006, 27, 90.10.1002/jcc.20308Search in Google Scholar
[9] I. Galanakis, P. Mavropoulos, P. H. Dederichs, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2006, 39, 765.10.1088/0022-3727/39/5/S01Search in Google Scholar
[10] M. Gilleßen, R. Dronskowski, J. Comp. Chem.2009, 30, 1290.10.1002/jcc.21152Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] M. Gilleßen, R. Dronskowski, J. Comp. Chem.2010, 31, 612.Search in Google Scholar
[12] M. Siewert, M. E. Gruner, A. Dannenberg, A. Chakrabarti, H. C. Herper, M. Wuttig, S. R. Barman, S. Singh, A. Al-Zubi, T. Hickel, J. Neugebauer, M. Gillesen, R. Dronskowski, P. Entel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 191904.10.1063/1.3655905Search in Google Scholar
[13] M. Johnscher, S. Stein, O. Niehaus, C. Benndorf, L. Heletta, M. Kersting, C. Höting, H. Eckert, R. Pöttgen, Solid State Sci. 2016, 52, 57.10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2015.12.004Search in Google Scholar
[14] C. Benndorf, S. Stein, L. Heletta, M. Kersting, H. Eckert, R. Pöttgen, Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 250.10.1039/C6DT04097GSearch in Google Scholar
[15] R. M. Galera, J. Pierre, E. Siaud, A. P. Murani, J. Less-Common Met. 1984, 97, 151.10.1016/0022-5088(84)90019-5Search in Google Scholar
[16] J. W. C. de Vries, R. C. Thiel, K. H. J. Buschow, J. Less-Common Met. 1985, 111, 313.10.1016/0022-5088(85)90203-6Search in Google Scholar
[17] I. S. Gavrilenko, V. Y. Markiv, Metallofizika1979, 75, 103.Search in Google Scholar
[18] V. Y. Markiv, N. N. Belyavina, I. S. Gavrilenko, Russ. Metall.1984, 5, 227.Search in Google Scholar
[19] A. E. Dwight, C. W. Kimball, J. Less-Common Met. 1987, 127, 179.10.1016/0022-5088(87)90376-6Search in Google Scholar
[20] A. W. Carbonari, R. N. Saxena, W. Pendl, Jr., J. Mestnik Filho, R. N. Attili, M. Olzon-Dionysio, S. D. de Souza, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1996, 163, 313.10.1016/S0304-8853(96)00338-1Search in Google Scholar
[21] T. Graf, F. Casper, J. Winterlik, B. Balke, G. H. Fecher, C. Felser, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2009, 635, 976.10.1002/zaac.200900036Search in Google Scholar
[22] S. Seidel, R.-D. Hoffmann, R. Pöttgen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2015, 641, 1400.10.1002/zaac.201500059Search in Google Scholar
[23] S. Seidel, U. Ch. Rodewald, R. Pöttgen, Z. Kristallogr. 2017, 232, in press. DOI: 10.1515/zkri-2016-2016.10.1515/zkri-2016-2016Search in Google Scholar
[24] S. Seidel, U. Ch. Rodewald, O. Janka, R. Pöttgen, Z. Kristallogr. 2017, 232, 365.10.1515/zkri-2016-2017Search in Google Scholar
[25] S. Seidel, O. Janka, C. Benndorf, B. Mausolf, F. Haarmann, H. Eckert, L. Heletta, R. Pöttgen, Z. Naturforsch. 2017, 72b, 289.10.1515/znb-2016-0265Search in Google Scholar
[26] R. Pöttgen, Th. Gulden, A. Simon, GIT Labor-Fachzeitschrift1999, 43, 133.Search in Google Scholar
[27] K. Yvon, W. Jeitschko, E. Parthé, J. Appl. Crystallogr.1977, 10, 73.10.1107/S0021889877012898Search in Google Scholar
[28] V. Petříček, M. Dušek, L. Palatinus, Z. Kristallogr. 2014, 229, 345.10.1515/zkri-2014-1737Search in Google Scholar
[29] Bruker Corp., Topspin (Version 2.1), Karlsruhe, Germany, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
[30] D. Massiot, F. Fayon, M. Capron, I. King, S. Le Calvé, B. Alonso, J.-O. Durand, B. Bujoli, Z. Gan, G. Hoatson, Magn. Reson. Chem.2002, 40, 70.10.1002/mrc.984Search in Google Scholar
[31] U. Müller, Inorganic structural chemistry, 2nd edition. Wiley, Chichester, 2007.Search in Google Scholar
[32] R. Pöttgen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2014, 640, 869.10.1002/zaac.201400023Search in Google Scholar
[33] J. Emsley, The Elements, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
[34] A. E. Dwight, R. A. Conner, Jr., J. W. Downey, Acta Crystallogr. 1965, 18, 835.10.1107/S0365110X65002050Search in Google Scholar
[35] B. H. Verbeek, H. W. A. M. Rompa, P. K. Larsen, M. S. Methfessel, F. M. Mueller, Phys. Rev. B1983, 28, 6774.10.1103/PhysRevB.28.6774Search in Google Scholar
[36] H. Lueken, Magnetochemie, B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart/Leipzig, 1999.10.1007/978-3-322-80118-0Search in Google Scholar
[37] C. Benndorf, O. Niehaus, H. Eckert, O. Janka, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2015, 641, 168.10.1002/zaac.201400509Search in Google Scholar
[38] C. Benndorf, H. Eckert, R. Pöttgen, Dalton Trans.2016, 45, 8215.10.1039/C6DT00861ESearch in Google Scholar
[39] T. Harmening, H. Eckert, R. Pöttgen, Solid State Sci.2009, 11, 900.10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2008.12.007Search in Google Scholar
[40] C. Höting, H. Eckert, T. Langer, I. Schellenberg, R. Pöttgen, J. Solid State Chem.2012, 190, 216.10.1016/j.jssc.2012.02.046Search in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Rubidium chalcogenido diferrates(III) containing dimers [Fe2Q6]6− of edge-sharing tetrahedra (Q=O, S, Se)
- Cu(II)-CMC: a mild, efficient and recyclable catalyst for the oxidative alkyne homocoupling reaction
- Crystal structures and thermal decomposition of permanganates AE[MnO4]2·n H2O with the heavy alkaline earth elements (AE=Ca, Sr and Ba)
- Mg(OCH3)2-mediated one-pot synthesis of α-aminophosphonate derivatives of cytosine under mild conditions
- A coordination polymer of mercury(II) formed by triazole-based and chloride linkers
- Two 1D zinc coordination polymers based on tris(p-carboxylphenyl)phosphine oxide: syntheses, structures and photoluminescence properties
- A Cd complex with a di(imidazolyl)benzene ligand: synthesis, structural characterization, and fluorescence properties
- Synthesis and purification of metallooctachlorophthalocyanines
- The platinum-rich scandium silicide Sc2Pt9Si3
- Gallium-containing Heusler phases ScRh2Ga, ScPd2Ga, TmRh2Ga and LuRh2Ga – magnetic and solid state NMR-spectroscopic characterization
- Synthesis and crystal structures of non-symmetric 1,3-di(alkyloxy)imidazolium salts
- Note
- Crystal structure and theoretical investigation of bis(cis-1,2-diaminocyclohexane)zinc(II) tetrachloridozincate(II)
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Rubidium chalcogenido diferrates(III) containing dimers [Fe2Q6]6− of edge-sharing tetrahedra (Q=O, S, Se)
- Cu(II)-CMC: a mild, efficient and recyclable catalyst for the oxidative alkyne homocoupling reaction
- Crystal structures and thermal decomposition of permanganates AE[MnO4]2·n H2O with the heavy alkaline earth elements (AE=Ca, Sr and Ba)
- Mg(OCH3)2-mediated one-pot synthesis of α-aminophosphonate derivatives of cytosine under mild conditions
- A coordination polymer of mercury(II) formed by triazole-based and chloride linkers
- Two 1D zinc coordination polymers based on tris(p-carboxylphenyl)phosphine oxide: syntheses, structures and photoluminescence properties
- A Cd complex with a di(imidazolyl)benzene ligand: synthesis, structural characterization, and fluorescence properties
- Synthesis and purification of metallooctachlorophthalocyanines
- The platinum-rich scandium silicide Sc2Pt9Si3
- Gallium-containing Heusler phases ScRh2Ga, ScPd2Ga, TmRh2Ga and LuRh2Ga – magnetic and solid state NMR-spectroscopic characterization
- Synthesis and crystal structures of non-symmetric 1,3-di(alkyloxy)imidazolium salts
- Note
- Crystal structure and theoretical investigation of bis(cis-1,2-diaminocyclohexane)zinc(II) tetrachloridozincate(II)