Home Physical Sciences A coordination polymer of mercury(II) formed by triazole-based and chloride linkers
Article Publicly Available

A coordination polymer of mercury(II) formed by triazole-based and chloride linkers

  • Seyed Ghorban Hosseini EMAIL logo , Keyvan Moeini , Mohammed S.M. Abdelbaky and Santiago García-Granda
Published/Copyright: August 5, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this work, a coordination polymer formed from 4,5-diamino-3-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ium chloride (DAMT·HCl) and HgCl2 formulated as [Hg5(μ-DAMT)2(μ-Cl)6(μ3-Cl)2Cl2]n has been prepared and characterized by elemental analysis, FT-IR, 1H NMR spectroscopy, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. X-ray analysis of the complex revealed an organic-inorganic hybrid coordination polymer containing three different mercury atoms with coordination numbers of 4 (HgN(μ-Cl)2(μ3-Cl)), 5 (Hg(μ-Cl)3(μ3-Cl)Cl), and 6 (HgN2(μ-Cl)2(μ3-Cl)2) and seesaw, octahedral, and square pyramidal geometries, respectively. The polymeric chains are extended to a three-dimensional (3D) array by C–H···Cl and N–H···Cl interactions. In addition to these hydrogen bonds, there are Hg···Cl interactions with the mercury atoms with coordination numbers 4 and 5 to complete their pseudo-square planar and -octahedral geometries, respectively.

1 Introduction

Triazoles have been widely studied due to their broad spectrum of applications. One of the methods used to link a carbohydrate moiety with an additional function is via a triazole ring using the well-known “click chemistry” reaction [1]. Triazoles are bioisosteres of amide bonds [2]. Their units are present in the structure of compounds as receptors for anion recognition [3] and proton exchange membranes [4]. Triazole fungicides [5] are also used in wood preservatives, textiles, leather, adhesives, antifouling agents, and paints [5]. Properties such as high nitrogen content together with low sensitivity towards external forces like impact and friction [6, 7] make this compounds reliable as safe energetic material.

To extend the coordination chemistry of triazoles further, in this work, the preparation, characterization, and crystal structure of the triazole complex, [Hg5(μ-DAMT)2(μ-Cl)6(μ3-Cl)2Cl2]n, using 4,5-diamino-3-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ium chloride (DAMT·HCl, Scheme 1) is described.

Scheme 1: Structure of the 4,5-diamino-3-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ium chloride (DAMT·HCl).
Scheme 1:

Structure of the 4,5-diamino-3-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ium chloride (DAMT·HCl).

2 Results and discussion

Reaction between the ligand salt (DAMT·HCl) and an ethanolic solution of mercury(II) chloride under reflux conditions provides the title complex. The complex is air-stable and soluble in DMSO.

In the IR spectra of the ligand and the complex, the relatively strong absorption bands above 3100 cm−1 are due to the symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations of the RNH2 groups. In the IR spectrum of the complex, these bands are shifted to higher frequency (by 84 and 63 cm−1, respectively) compared to the free ligand [8]. A band at about 1680 cm−1 can be assigned to the vibration of the imine bond, ν(C=N)ar, which is slightly shifted (5 cm−1) to higher frequency upon complexation.

The 1H NMR spectrum of the compound was recorded in [D6]DMSO and is consistent with the presence of a deprotonated DAMT ligand. A singlet peak at the highest magnetic field was assigned to the hydrogen atoms of the methyl group of the ligand. With decreasing magnetic field, two singlet peaks belonging to the two amino groups are observed. Owing to the deprotonation of the ammonium group of the ligand and also to the decrease (or absence) of exchange between tautomeric forms of the ligand [8] (due to binding to mercury atom), the corresponding peak had a shift of 1.19 ppm to lower magnetic field as compared to the protonated ligand salt (7.57 ppm for the NH3+ compound [8]).

X-ray structure determination of the complex revealed a 2D organic-inorganic hybrid coordination polymer (Figs. 13). In this structure, there are three mercury atoms with different coordination numbers in the range of 4–6. A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) [9] has shown that there are only two examples [10, 11] for this type of compounds, and this new complex is the third one. The Hg1 atom is coordinated by two nitrogen atoms of two ligands and four chloride ions with coordination number 6 and slightly distorted octahedral geometry (Fig. 2a). The Hg2 atom has coordination number four with a HgN(μ-Cl)2(μ3-Cl) environment and seesaw geometry (Fig. 2b). There is only one previous example for HgNCl3 with such a geometry [12]. The bond lengths of axial Hg2–Cl4 and Hg2–Cl5 have an average value of 2.326 Å and are shorter than the equatorial ones (3.054(4) and 2.52(2) Å, respectively, for Hg2–Cl1 and Hg2–N2 bond lengths) as in the CSD analogue. The axial (167.5°) and equatorial (77.26°) bond angles around the Hg2 atom are shorter than in its analogue (174.46 and 88.49°, respectively). In addition to these four dative interactions, the Hg2 cation interacts with Cl3 at a long distance (3.208(5) Å) to complete its pseudo-square planar geometry. These interactions also appeared as the only similar structure [12]. The Hg3 atom is coordinated by five chloride ions in a Hg(μ-Cl)3(μ3-Cl)Cl coordinated sphere (Fig. 2c). The pentacoordinate geometry of Hg3 can be viewed either as a square pyramidal or as a trigonal bipyramidal structure [13]. To distinguish such structures, the formula of Addison et al. [14] was applied in which the angular structural parameter (τ) is represented as the index of trigonality. The parameter τ=(βα)/60, where α and β are the two largest angles at the mercury atom with βα. An ideal square pyramid has β=180° and α=180° and, therefore, τ=0, but an ideal trigonal bipyramidal structure has β=180° and α=120° and, therefore, τ=1 [15]. The τ value is calculated to be 0.12 for Hg3, indicating an inclination to a square pyramidal geometry. Similarly to Hg2, this cation interacts with Cl4 (3.237(5) Å) to complete its pseudo-octahedral geometry.

Fig. 1: View of the asymmetric unit of the complex.
Fig. 1:

View of the asymmetric unit of the complex.

Fig. 2: Perspective view of the coordination environments of Hg2+.
Fig. 2:

Perspective view of the coordination environments of Hg2+.

Fig. 3: Projection of the structure along the [101] direction.
Fig. 3:

Projection of the structure along the [101] direction.

DAMT acts as non-chelated N2 donor forming a bridge between two mercury atoms. A mean plane through all atoms of DAMT showed this ligand to be planar (RMS deviation, 0.039 for N4 atom), but the coordinated mercury atoms (Hg1 and Hg2) do not lie on this plane (distances, 0.444 Å for Hg1 and 0.631 Å for Hg2).

In the crystal network of the complex (Fig. 4), intermolecular C–H···Cl and N–H···Cl hydrogen bonds appear between polymeric chains and extend the network into three dimensions. In addition to hydrogen bonds, the crystal network is stabilized by Hg···Cl interactions. In one chain, all DAMT ligands are coplanar (angle between mean planes through all atoms of ligands, 0°), but because of the large distance between their centers (9.346 Å), there are no π-π stacking interactions between rings.

Fig. 4: View of hydrogen bonds found on the complex along c axis.
Fig. 4:

View of hydrogen bonds found on the complex along c axis.

3 Conclusion

In this work, a new complex, [Hg5(μ-DAMT)2(μ-Cl)6(μ3-Cl)2Cl2]n, was synthesized and its spectral (IR, 1H NMR) and structural properties were investigated. The crystal structure of the complex revealed a coordination polymer containing mercury atoms with three different coordination geometries. The Hg1 atom has a slightly distorted octahedral geometry and a HgN2(μ-Cl)2(μ3-Cl)2 environment. The Hg2 atom shows a rare seesaw geometry, although this geometry, by participating in a Hg···Cl interaction, is inclined to be pseudo-square planar. The coordination sphere of Hg3 is Hg(μ-Cl)3(μ3-Cl)Cl with a square-planar geometry. The geometry around the Hg3 atom is completed by Hg···Cl interaction to pseudo-octahedral. In the structure of complex, the DAMT ligand acts as N2 donor and bridges between two mercury atoms. This ligand participates in hydrogen bonding as donor to extend the crystal network to 3D.

4 Experimental

4.1 Materials and instrumentation

All starting chemicals and solvents (Merck, Germany) were of reagent or analytical grade and used as received. The DAMT·HCl ligand salt was prepared according to the literature [16]. The infrared spectra of KBr pellets in the range 4000–400 cm−1 were recorded with an FT-IR 8400-Shimadzu spectrometer (Japan). 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 300 instrument (USA); chemical shifts δ are given in parts per million (ppm), relative to TMS as an internal standard. The carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen contents were determined using a Thermo Finnigan Flash Elemental Analyzer 1112 EA (Italy). The melting point was determined with a Barnsted Electrothermal 9200 electrically heated apparatus (UK).

4.2 Synthesis of [Hg5(μ-DAMT)2(μ-Cl)63-Cl)2Cl2]n

Three-tenth gram (2 mmol) of DAMT·HCl dissolved in H2O-EtOH 1:1 (10 mL) was added with stirring to a solution of 0.54 g (2 mmol) of HgCl2 in EtOH (10 mL). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 5 h. Colorless crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained from the solution after standing for 6 days. Yield: 0.52 g, 83%; m. p.: 184°C. C6H14Cl10Hg5N10 (1583.72): calcd. C 6.24, H 1.28; N 12.12; found C 6.58, H 1.24, N 11.69%. IR (KBr disk): νas=3315 (NH2), νs=3233 (NH2), ν=2980 (CH), 1687 (CN), δ=1622 (NH2), δas=1434 (CH3), δs=1395 (CH3), ν=1074 (NN) cm−1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=2.20 (s, 3H, CH3), 5.65 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.38 (s, 2H, NH2) ppm.

4.3 Crystal structure determination

The diffraction data from a selected single crystal were collected at room temperature on an Agilent Gemini CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromatized Mo radiation (0.71073 Å) at 298(2) K. Images were collected at a 55-mm fixed crystal-detector distance, using the oscillation method, with 1° oscillation and variable exposure times per image. Using Olex-II [17], the structure was solved with Shelxs [18]. The refinement was performed using full-matrix least squares on F2. All non-H atoms were anisotropically refined. All H atoms were geometrically placed riding on their parent atoms, with isotropic displacement parameters set at 1.2 times the Ueq of the atoms to which they are attached. The molecular graphics were drawn with Diamond [19]. Crystallographic data and details of the data collection and structure refinement, selected bond lengths and angles, and hydrogen bond geometries are listed in Tables 13 , respectively.

Table 1:

Crystal data and structure refinement for complex.

Empirical formulaC6H14Cl10Hg5N10
Formula weight, g mol−11583.72
Crystal size, mm30.20×0.12×0.08
Temperature, K293
Crystal systemMonoclinic
Space groupP21/c
Unit cell dimensions (Å, deg)
a, Å10.079(2)
b, Å9.3464(8)
c, Å18.017(4)
β, deg125.16(3)
Volume, Å31387.6(7)
Z2
Calculated density, g cm−33.79
Absorption coefficient, mm−128.6
F(000), e1380
θ range for data collection, deg2.4–25.1
h, k, l ranges−13≤h≤14, −12≤k≤13, −25≤l≤26
Reflections collected/independent/Rint19578/4589/0.101
Data/parameters4589/142
Goodness-of-fit on F21.05
R1/wR2 (I>2 σ(I))0.074/0.174
R1/wR2 (all data)0.139/0.206
Largest diff. peak/hole, e Å−32.80/−3.83
Table 2:

Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg) for the complex with estimated standard deviations in parentheses.a

Bond lengthsAngles
Hg1–N12.11(13)N1–Hg1–N1i180
Hg1–Cl12.875(5)N1–Hg1–Cl1i88.9(4)
Hg1–Cl43.012(6)N1–Hg1–Cl191.1(4)
Hg2–Cl52.320(5)Cl1–Hg1–Cl1i180
Hg2–Cl42.331(5)Cl5–Hg2–Cl4167.5(2)
Hg2–N22.52(2)Cl5–Hg2–N298.2(4)
Hg2–Cl13.054(4)N2–Hg2–Cl177.3(4)
Hg3–Cl22.335(5)N2–Hg2–Cl493.0(4)
Hg3–Cl32.356(5)Cl2–Hg3–Cl3164.10(17)
Hg3–Cl12.804(4)Cl2–Hg3–Cl1105.12(15)
Hg3–Cl2i3.001(7)Cl2–Hg3–Cl2i86.0(2)
Hg3–Cl53.058(7)Cl2–Hg3–Cl588.0(2)
  1. aSymmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+2, −z+1.

Table 3:

Hydrogen bonds dimensions (Å and deg) in the complex.

D–H·Ad(D–H)d(H···A)<(DHA)d(D·A)Symmetry code of atom A
C(3)–H(3E)·Cl(2)0.962.9461473.79(2)1+x, 1.5−y, 0.5+z
C(3)–H(3D)·Cl(3)0.962.8741553.76(2)x, 1+y, z
C(3)–H(3C)·Cl(1)0.962.8311563.73(2)2−x, 0.5+y, 1.5−z
N(5)–H(5B)·Cl(1)0.862.6961553.50(1)2−x, 0.5+y, 1.5−z

CCDC 1533645 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support from Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO-13-MAT2013-40950-R, MAT2016-78155-C2-1-R and FPI grant BES-2011-046948 to MSMA), Gobierno del Principado de Asturias (GRUPIN14-060), and FEDER funding.

References

[1] R. Huisgen, G. Szeimies, L. Möbius, Chem. Ber.1967, 100, 2494.10.1002/cber.19671000806Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. Taddei, S. Ferrini, L. Giannotti, M. Corsi, F. Manetti, G. Giannini, L. Vesci, F. M. Milazzo, D. Alloatti, M. B. Guglielmi, M. Castorina, M. L. Cervoni, M. Barbarino, R. Foderà, V. Carollo, C. Pisano, S. Armaroli, W. Cabri, J. Med. Chem.2014, 57, 2258.10.1021/jm401536bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] V. Haridas, M. B. Bijesh, S. Dhawan, A. Shandilya, Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem.2017, 245, 903.10.1016/j.snb.2017.02.032Search in Google Scholar

[4] M.-K. Ahn, S.-B. Lee, C.-M. Min, Y.-G. Yu, J. Jang, M.-Y. Gim, J.-S. Lee, J. Membrane Sci.2017, 523, 480.10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.018Search in Google Scholar

[5] X. Lv, L. Pan, J. Wang, L. Lu, W. Yan, Y. Zhu, Y. Xu, M. Guo, S. Zhuang, Environ. Pollut.2017, 222, 504.10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] A. A. Dippold, T. M. Klapötke, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2011, 637, 1453.10.1002/zaac.201100196Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. A. Dippold, T. M. Klapötke, N. Winter, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.2012, 2012, 3474.10.1002/ejic.201200221Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Hakimi, M. Maeder, G. A. Lawrance, J. Coord. Chem.2011, 64, 105.10.1080/00958972.2010.537331Search in Google Scholar

[9] F. H. Allen, Acta Crystallogr.2002, B58, 380.10.1107/S0108768102003890Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] G. Mahmoudi, V. Stilinović, M. S. Gargari, A. Bauzá, G. Zaragoza, W. Kaminsky, V. Lynch, D. Choquesillo-Lazarte, K. Sivakumar, A. A. Khandar, A. Frontera, Cryst Eng Comm2015, 17, 3493.10.1039/C5CE00382BSearch in Google Scholar

[11] L. K. Das, C. J. Gómez-García, M. G. B. Drew, A. Ghosh, Polyhedron2015, 87, 311.10.1016/j.poly.2014.11.025Search in Google Scholar

[12] H. R. Khavasi, B. M. Mohammad Sadegh, Inorg. Chem.2010, 49, 5356.10.1021/ic100604kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] M. Hakimi, K. Moeini, Z. Mardani, F. Mohr, Polyhedron2014, 70, 92.10.1016/j.poly.2013.12.033Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. W. Addison, T. Rao, J. Reedjik, J. V. Rijn, G. Verschoor, Dalton Trans.1984, 1349.10.1039/DT9840001349Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. Hakimi, Z. Mardani, K. Moeini, F. Mohr, E. Schuh, H. Vahedi, Z. Naturforsch.2012, 67b, 452.10.5560/znb.2012-0064Search in Google Scholar

[16] R. I. Trust, J. D. Albright, F. M. Lovell, N. A. Perkinson, J. Heterocyclic Chem.1979, 16, 1393.10.1002/jhet.5570160721Search in Google Scholar

[17] O. V. Dolomanov, L. J. Bourhis, R. J. Gildea, J. A. K. Howard, H. Puschmann, J. Appl. Crystallogr.2009, 42, 339.10.1107/S0021889808042726Search in Google Scholar

[18] G. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] G. Bergerhof, M. Berndt, K. Brandenburg, J. Res. Natl. Stand. Technol.1996, 101, 221.10.6028/jres.101.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2017-3-22
Accepted: 2017-6-2
Published Online: 2017-8-5
Published in Print: 2017-8-28

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2017-0052/html
Scroll to top button