Abstract
An effective and regioselective synthesis of aminomethylated daidzein derivatives using a Mannich reaction of daidzein, formaldehyde with a variety of amines under ultrasound irradiation is described. The structures of the products were characterized by HRMS, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and 2D NMR spectra. Parallel reactions showed that ultrasound irradiation accelerated the reaction rate and improved the yields.
1 Introduction
Daidzein (7,4′-dihydroxyisoflavone) is one of the most abundant isoflavonoids found in legumes, especially soybeans. It has been used for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, lessening the symptoms of the menopause and protection against osteoporosis [1–3]. It was also shown to inhibit proliferation of different cancer-derived cell lines in culture and reduce the multiplicity, but not incidence, of mammary tumors in rats [4, 5]. One of the causes of its effect on cell growth may be inhibition of specific protein kinases [6, 7]. Furthermore, daidzein is also known to be an alcohol-dehydrogenase (ADH) inhibitor [8]. However, due to the low solubility of daidzein in water, its absorption upon oral administration is quite limited, which makes it difficult to be used as a natural additive in foodstuff or in medicine. In order to improve the adsorption and bioavailability of daidzein, a series of daidzein derivatives have been synthesized through different procedures in recent years. Through a convenient Atherton-Todd reaction, Chen and Xiao synthesized a series of 7-O-phosphorylated daidzein derivatives [9, 10]. Using 2,2,2-trifluoro-N-(p-methoxyphenyl)acetamidates as the glycosyl donors, 7-O-glycosides of daidzein derivatives have also been synthesized by a glycosylation procedure [11, 12]. Employing a key protecting group strategy, daidzein 4′-sulfate, daidzein 7-sulfate and daidzein 4′,7-disulfate were synthesized regiospecifically [13]. Despite a number of daidzein derivatives having been synthesized through different procedures, most of the derivatization focused on the reaction of the substituent at the 7- and/or 4′-position of daidzein, and reactions occurring directly at 8-position or other positions of daidzein are quite rare.
The Mannich reaction has been reported to be an efficient method for the introduction of a basic (alkylamino)methyl moiety to construct various nitrogen-containing compounds in pharmaceuticals featuring better water solubility and bioavailability [14]. Various drugs obtained from the Mannich reaction were found to be more effective and less toxic than parent compounds [15, 16]. Through the Mannich reaction, many nitrogen-containing flavonoid analogues have been synthesized as potential anticancer agents [17, 18]. However, the wide application of this useful reaction is limited due to some drawbacks, such as lower yield and relatively long reaction time.
Ultrasound irradiation has been demonstrated as an alternative energy source for organic reactions ordinarily accomplished by heating [19, 20]. Many homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions can be conducted smoothly by ultrasonic activation to provide improved yields and increased selectivities [21–23]. Our group has observed that the reaction rate was notably accelerated under the ultrasound irradiation during the synthesis of chrysin derivatives linked with 1,2,3-triazoles [24]. Here, we report an improved procedure for the synthesis of nitrogen-containing daidzein derivatives through a Mannich reaction under ultrasound irradiation. A series of 7,4′-dihydroxy-8-aminomethyl-isoflavone and 7,4′-dihydroxy-3′,8-bis(aminomethyl)-isoflavone derivatives were regioselectively obtained through Mannich reaction under ultrasound irradiation.
2 Results and discussion
The A ring of daidzein, especially positions C-6 and C-8, might be more reactive toward electrophiles than the C ring (Fig. 1). Other positions in daidzein, such as the C-3′ or C-5′ of the C ring could also potentially be involved in such Mannich reactions. Previous studies on the reaction of daidzein with electrophiles under a variety of conditions have shown that mixtures often result through substitution at different positions, including C-6 and C-8 of the A ring and C-3′ or C-5′ of the C ring [25, 26]. In order to acquire a pure, single product, one frequently adopted approach is to protect one or both phenolic hydroxyl groups prior to the reaction. However, such an indirect approach usually requires multi-step transformations. Obviously, it could be of great value to find a regioselevtive Mannich reaction, which would allow the addition of extended functionalized aminomethyl groups to daidzein without the need for protecting groups. Although the 4′- and 7-phenolic hydroxyl groups in daidzein are chemically similar, fine differences exist in their chemical electronic environments. We expected the C-8 of daidzein to be the most reactive site for electrophillic reactions. Optimization of appropriate Mannich conditions under the help of ultrasound irradiation may provide a highly regioselective aminomethylation of daidzein.

Structure of daidzein (1) and possible sites for the Mannich reaction.
Initially, the aminomethylation reaction of daidzein (1), formaldehyde (2), and dipropylamine (3a) under ultrasound irradiation (150 W, 45 KHz, 65 °C) in DMF was used to test the regioselectivity and the isolated product was identified as the 8-aminomethylated daidzein (4a; Scheme 1). As the formation of two regioisomers 6-aminomethylated and 3′- (or 5′-) aminomethylated daidzein derivatives seemed possible, unambiguous structure determination of the obtained product was quite crucial here. The structure of the resulting 8-aminomethylated daidzein was characterized by NMR and mass data. The mass spectrum of 4a revealed a peak at m/z = 368.1854 [M+H]+, indicating the formation of mono-aminomethylated daidzein derivative. The 1H NMR spectra of the isolated product showed the absence of the signal at δ = 6.88 ppm for 8-proton of daidzein. Moreover, the 13C NMR spectra showed that the signal of C-8 for 4a was shifted downfield to δ = 108.7 ppm compared to δ = 102.5 ppm for that of daidzein. Therefore, NMR and MS data of the product provided strong evidence for the formation of regioisomer 4a and ruled out the other alternative regioisomers.

The model reaction for optimization of the reaction conditions.
The reaction condition was further optimized to improve the yield of 4a. Factors such as solvent, ultrasonic power, frequency, temperature, and reaction time were investigated. Solvents including EtOH, iPrOH, DMF, tBuOH, EtOH-H2O, iPrOH-H2O, DMF-H2O, tBuOH-H2O (1:2, v/v), and H2O were used, and the result showed that tBuOH-H2O (1:2, v/v) was the best reaction solvent. In view of the different solubility of daidzein (1) and aminomethylated daidzein (4a) in tBuOH or H2O, the ratio of tBuOH and H2O was further optimized. When the ratio of tBuOH-H2O is lower than 4:10, the product yields increased as the ratio of tBuOH-H2O increased. A further increase of the ratio of tBuOH-H2O led to decrease the product yields. This might be tentatively attributed to the formation of bis(aminomethylated) daidzein derivatives or other byproducts. In order to acquire a pure, single Mannich product, tBuOH-H2O (2:10, v/v) was chosen as solvent. The power (Table 1, entries 1–3) and irradiation frequency (Table 1, entries 2, 4, and 5) of ultrasound irradiation were investigated and the best result was obtained with the power 150 W and irradiation frequency 45 KHz (Table 1, entry 2). Investigation of the reaction temperature showed that raising the reaction temperature increased the yield (Table 1, entries 2, 6–9), and the product was obtained with a higher yield at 65 °C, (Table 1, entry 2). The proper reaction time was found to be 2 h (Table 1, entries 2, 10–13). The optimal molar ratio of daidzein and dipropylamine (3a) was 1:1, and the yield of 4a decreased when an excess 3a was used. A reaction time longer than 2 h and usage of excess 3a led to decreased yields, this might be attributed to the formation of bis(aminomethylated) daidzein derivatives. Compared with magnetic stirring (Table 1, entries 14–15), the use of ultrasound irradiation leads to faster reaction and higher yield.
The effect of the reaction conditions on the yield of 8-aminomethylated daidzein 4aa.
Entry | Power (W) | Frequency (KHz) | Temperature (°C) | Irradiation time (h) | Yield (%)b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 100 | 45 | 65 | 2.0 | 88 |
2 | 150 | 45 | 65 | 2.0 | 98 |
3 | 200 | 45 | 65 | 2.0 | 85 |
4 | 150 | 80 | 65 | 2.0 | 82 |
5 | 150 | 100 | 65 | 2.0 | 80 |
6 | 150 | 45 | 25 | 2.0 | 62 |
7 | 150 | 45 | 35 | 2.0 | 71 |
8 | 150 | 45 | 45 | 2.0 | 76 |
9 | 150 | 45 | 55 | 2.0 | 85 |
10 | 150 | 45 | 65 | 0.5 | 28 |
11 | 150 | 45 | 65 | 1.0 | 62 |
12 | 150 | 45 | 65 | 1.5 | 83 |
13 | 150 | 45 | 65 | 3.0 | 93 |
14c | 0 | 0 | 65 | 2.0 | 41 |
15c | 0 | 0 | 65 | 4.0 | 45 |
aConditions: daidzein (0.5 g, 2.0 mmol), formaldehyde, 37 % aq. (0.6 g, 7.8 mmol) and dipropylamine (0.2 g, 2.0 mmol) was dissolved in tBuOH-H2O (2:10, v/v) solution; byields of HPLC; cconventional method with magnetic stirring.
Under the optimized reaction conditions, the scope and generality of this protocol for the synthesis of regioselective 8-aminomethylated daidzein derivatives was tested. As shown in Scheme 2, using primary amines, secondary amines, and heterocyclic amines as reactants, the corresponding 8-aminomethylated daidzein derivatives 4a–g were obtained in excellent yields. All the reactions were carried out under similiar conditions in the absence of ultrasound irradiation (Scheme 2), and the results showed that the yields decreased markedly within the same time. Thus, ultrasound showed a beneficial effect on the synthesis of 8-aminomethylated daidzein derivatives and improved the yields of the products significantly.

Synthesis of 7,4′-dihydroxy-8-aminomethyl-isoflavone derivatives. Reaction conditions: (a) the molar ratio of daidzein/amine was 1:1, tBuOH-H2O=2:10 (v/v), 65 °C, 2 h; footnotes: (b) the yield of the reaction with heating/stirring but without ultrasound; (c) the yield of the reaction with ultrasound irradiation (150 W, 45 Hz).
On the basis of the successful regioselective synthesis of 8-aminomethylated daidzein derivatives under unltrasound irradiation, we extended our study to the synthesis of bis(aminomethylated) daidzein derivatives under similar conditions. Structural analysis indicated that C-6 of the A-ring and C-3′(5′) are both the second reactive position. Using tBuOH-H2O (1:1, v/v) as the co-solvent, daidzein (1), formaldehyde (2), and dipropylamine (3a) as the reactants (molar ratio of daidzein/dipropylamine, 1:2), under ultrasound (150 W, 45 KHz) at 65 °C for 5 h, the reaction produced 3′,8-bis(aminomethylated) daidzein derivative (5a). The corresponding 3′,8-bis(aminomethylated) daidzein derivatives 5h and 5i were also synthesized under similar conditions (Scheme 3). Increasing the amount of amines was beneficial for the formation of bis(aminomethylated) daidzein derivatives.

Synthesis of 7,4′-dihydroxy-3′,8-bis(aminomethyl)-isoflavone derivatives. Reaction conditions: (a) the molar ratio of daidzein/amine was 1:2, tBuOH-H2O=1:1 (v/v), 65 °C, 5 h; footnotes: (b) the yield of the reaction with heating/stirring but without ultrasound; (c) the yield of the reaction with ultrasound irradiation (150 W, 45 Hz).
The structures of 3′,8-bis(aminomethylated) daidzein derivatives 5a, 5h and 5i are elucidated on the basis of HRMS, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and 2D NMR (DEPT, 1H-1H COSY, HSQC and HMBC spectra). For example, the mass spectrum of 5a reveals a peak corresponding to its molecular ion at m/z = 481.3058 [M+H]+. In the 1H NMR spectrum of compound 5a, two doublet signals at δ = 7.88 and 6.82 ppm are attributed to 5-H and 6-H, indicating that 6-position of daidzein is not the second aminomethylated position. The signals at δ = 7.29 (m, 2H) and 6.74 (d, 1H) ppm were attributed to three hydrogen atoms of C ring of 5a, which shows that 3′ or 5′ position of 5a was aminomethylated. Structure elucidation was further achieved on the basis of the 1H-13C connectivities (HMBC). In the 1H-13C correlation spectra of 5a, the methylene protons at δ = 4.07 ppm showed correlation with C-7 (164.5 ppm), C-8 (108.7 ppm) and C-9 (155.2 ppm), and the methylene protons at δ = 3.74 showed correlation with C-2′ (129.7 ppm), C-3′ (122.7 ppm) and C-4′ (157.8 ppm), confirming that the methylene groups are linked to C-8 and C-3′, respectively, which is in accordance with the structure of 5a.
3 Conclusion
In summary, an ultrasonic-assisted protocol for the regioselective synthesis of novel 7,4′-dihydroxy-8-aminomethyl-isoflavone derivatives and 7,4′-dihydroxy-3′,8-bis(aminomethyl)-isoflavone derivatives utilizing Mannich reaction is reported. The regioselectivity was rationalized and confirmed by NMR spectroscopic data.
4 Experimental section
4.1 General
Solvents were freshly distilled from respective drying agents before use. Daidzein (4′,7-dihydroxyisoflavone) (purity: 98.0 %) was purchased from Aladin. TLC was performed on silica gel plates and preparative chromatography on columns of silica gel (200–300 mesh). 1H, 13C NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer operating at 400.13 and 100.61 MHz, respectively, with 13C NMR spectra being recorded with broad band proton decoupled. All NMR spectra were recorded in [D6]DMSO at room temperature (20 ± 3 °C). 1H and 13C chemical shifts are quoted in parts per million downfield from TMS. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained with a Waters Micromass Q-Tof Micro instrument using the ESI technique. IR spectra were recorded on a Shimadazu IR-408 Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer using a thin film supported on KBr pellets. Sonication was performed using a Jingsu Kunshan KQ-200VDE ultrasonic cleaner with three frequencies of 45/80/100 KHz and 200 W output power, which can be adjusted. The temperature of water in the ultrasonic reactor can be adjusted from 20 to 80 °C and maintained within ±1 °C.
4.2 General procedure for the synthesis of 7,4′-dihydroxy-8-aminomethyl-isoflavone derivatives 4
Amine (2.0 mmol) was added to a solution of daidzein (0.5 g, 2.0 mmol), 37 % formaldehyde in aqueous solution (0.6 g, 7.8 mmol) in H2O (8.3 mL) and tBuOH (1.7 mL). The reaction flask was placed in an ultrasonic bath. Then the reaction mixture was irradiated by 150 W, 45 KHz ultrasound at 65 °C, and the reaction progress was monitored by TLC. After the solution was irradiated for 2 h, the precipitate from the reaction solution was removed by filtration, and the solvent was evaporated under vacuum to give the crude product, which was purified by column chromatography (CHCl3-CH3OH = 4:1 ~ 6:1, v/v).
4.2.1 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8-(dimethylamino)methyl-isoflavone (4a)
White powder, yield: 0.72 g (98 %); m. p. 145–146 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax = 3445 (-OH), 3085, 2962, 2852 (-CH3, -CH2), 1675 (C=O), 1270 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 8.29 (s, 1H, 2-H), 7.89 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (m, 3H), 4.07 (s, 2H), 2.54 (m, 4H), 1.55 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 6H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.2 (C=O), 164.5, 157.6, 155.3, 152.8, 130.5, 126.0, 123.7, 123.0, 116.4, 115.7, 115.4, 108.7, 55.4, 50.4, 19.3, 12.0. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=368.1854 (calcd. 368.1856 for C22H26NO4, [M+H]+).
4.2.2 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8-(diethylamino)methyl- isoflavone (4b)
White powder, yield: 0.36 g (53 %); m. p. 135–136 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax=3439 (-OH), 3085, 2962, 2852 (-CH3, -CH2), 1680 (C=O), 1280 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=12.02 (s, 1H, -OH), 9.70 (s, 1H, -OH), 8.38 (s, 1H, 2-H), 8.06 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 4.39 (s, 2H), 3.16 (q, J=6.9 Hz, 4H), 1.34 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 6H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.2 (C=O), 162.4, 157.8, 156.6, 153.1, 130.4, 128.8, 124.0, 122.6, 117.0, 115.5, 115.4, 114.9, 104.7, 47.7, 44.0, 9.0. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=340.1545 (calcd. 340.1543 for C20H22NO4, [M+H]+).
4.2.3 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8-(isopropylamino)methyl-isoflavone (4c)
White powder, yield: 0.42 g (64 %); m. p. 131–132 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax=3438 (-NH, -OH), 3084, 2963, 2851 (-CH3, -CH2), 1681 (C=O), 1280 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=8.24 (s, 1H, 2-H), 7.80 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (dd, J=6.7 Hz, 1.9 Hz, 2H), 6.80 (dd, J=6.7 Hz, 1.9 Hz, 2H), 6.66 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.17 (s, 2H), 2.99 (m, 1H), 1.15 (d, J=6.4 Hz, 6H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.0 (C=O), 168.5, 157.5, 155.4, 152.2, 130.5, 125.9, 123.4, 123.2, 117.3, 115.3, 114.1, 107.5, 48.4, 41.5, 21.2. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=326.1391 (calcd. 326.1387 for C19H20NO4, [M+H]+).
4.2.4 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8-(propylamino)methyl- isoflavone (4d)
White powder, yield: 0.43 g (66 %); m. p. 137–138 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax=3445 (-NH, -OH), 3088, 2965, 2854 (-CH3, -CH2), 1683 (C=O), 1281 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=8.24 (s, 1H, 2-H), 7.83 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.80 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.74 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (s, 2H), 2.70 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.56 (m, 2H), 0.91 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.0 (C=O), 167.6, 157.6, 155.7, 152.4, 130.5, 126.2, 123.6, 123.1, 116.8, 115.3, 114.6, 107.2, 49.5, 43.3, 21.2, 11.7. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=326.1388 (calcd. 326.1387 for C19H20NO4, [M+H]+).
4.2.5 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8-(dipropylamino)methyl-isoflavone (4e)
White powder, yield: 0.35 g (57 %); m. p. 124–125 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax=3440 (-OH), 2955, 2853 (-CH3, -CH2), 1624 (C=O), 1265 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6] DMSO): δ=11.94 (bs, 1H, -OH), 9.66 (s, 1H, -OH), 8.32 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.08 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H), 4.42 (s, 2H), 2.80 (s, 6H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.2 (C=O), 162.4, 157.8, 156.6, 153.0, 130.5, 129.0, 124.1, 122.6, 117.0, 115.5, 114.9, 104.5, 49.0, 43.0. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=312.1232 (cald. 312.1230 for C18H18NO4, [M+H]+).
4.2.6 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8-(butylamino)methyl- isoflavone (4f)
White powder, yield: 0.55 g (81 %); m. p. 140–141 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax=3485 (-NH, -OH), 3020, 2833 (-CH3, -CH2), 1687 (C=O), 1274 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=8.21 (s, 1H, 2-H), 7.80 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.80 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.67 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.15 (s, 2H), 2.69 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.51 (m, 2H), 1.33 (m, 2H), 0.88 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.2 (C=O), 158.7, 157.7, 154.5, 153.1, 130.5, 124.7, 124.1, 122.7, 117.5, 115.4, 115.3, 108.5, 51.0, 44.5, 30.0, 20.1, 14.2. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=340.1546 (calcd. 340.1543 for C20H22NO4, [M+H]+).
4.2.7 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8-(dibutylamino)methyl- isoflavone (4g)
White powder, yield: 0.60 g (73 %); m. p. 152–153 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax=3439 (-OH), 3085, 2962 (-CH3, -CH2), 1680 (C=O), 1280 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=8.30 (s, 1H, 2-H), 7.88 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.81 (m, 3H), 4.07 (s, 2H), 2.58 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 4H), 1.51 (m, 4H), 1.27 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 6H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.2 (C=O), 164.6, 157.6, 155.3, 152.8, 130.5, 126.0, 123.7, 123.0, 116.3, 115.7, 115.4, 108.6, 53.2, 50.4, 28.1, 20.4, 14.2. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=396.2174 (calcd. 396.2169 for C24H30NO4, [M+H]+).
4.2.8 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8-(2-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)methyl-isoflavone (4h)
White powder, yield: 0.63 g (86 %); m. p. 155–156 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax=3470 (-OH), 2959, 2857 (-CH3, -CH2), 1625 (C=O), 1282 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=8.27 (s, 1H, 2-H), 7.86 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (m, 2H), 4.28 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 2.84 (m, 1H), 2.64 (bs, 1H), 2.31 (d, J=9.4 Hz, 1H), 1.75-1.25 (m, 6H), 1.13 (d, J= 6.3 Hz, 3H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.2 (C=O), 164.4, 157.5, 155.1, 152.8, 130.8, 125.8, 123.8, 122.9, 116.3, 115.8, 115.5, 108.7, 56.6, 51.6, 50.2, 33.7, 25.5, 22.6, 17.9. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=366.1704 (calcd. 366.1700 for C22H24NO4, [M+H]+).
4.2.9 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8-(morpholino)methyl- isoflavone (4i)
White powder, yield: 0.57 g (81 %); m. p. 148–149 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax = 3452 (-OH), 3032, 2873 (-CH3, -CH2), 1681 (C=O), 1282 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=8.34 (s, 1H, 2-H), 7.93 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (d, J= 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.94 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 3.90 (s, 2H), 3.61 (m, 4H), 2.54 (m, 4H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.3 (C=O), 162.6, 157.6, 155.8, 153.0, 130.5, 126.3, 123.7, 122.9, 116.9, 115.4, 115.2, 109.2, 66.5, 53.2, 51.9. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=354.1334 (calcd. 354.1336 for C20H20NO5, [M+H]+).
4.2.10 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8-(pyrrolidinylamino)methyl-isoflavone (4j)
White powder, yield: 0.53 g (79 %); m. p. 157–158 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax = 3450 (-OH), 3052, 2883 (-CH3, -CH2), 1675 (C=O), 1280 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=8.37 (s, 1H, 2-H), 7.88 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.90 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 4.15 (s, 2H), 2.67 (m, 2H), 2.50 (m, 2H), 1.51 (m, 2H), 1.32 (m, 2H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.3 (C=O), 158.8, 157.7, 154.6, 153.2, 130.6, 124.7, 124.2, 122.8, 117.6, 115.4, 115.3, 108.5, 51.0, 44.6, 20.2. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=338.1389 (calcd. 338.1387 for C20H20NO4, [M+H]+).
4.3 General procedure for the synthesis of 7,4′-dihydroxy-3′,8-bis(aminomethyl)-isoflavone derivatives 5
Amine (4.0 mmol) was added to a solution of daidzein (0.5 g, 2.0 mmol), 37 % formaldehyde in aqueous solution (0.6 g, 7.8 mmol) in H2O (5.0 mL) and tBuOH (5.0 mL). The reaction flask was placed in an ultrasonic bath. Then the reaction mixture was irradiated by 150 W, 45 KHz ultrasound at 65 °C, and the reaction progress was monitored by TLC. After the solution was irradiated for 5 h, the precipitate from the reaction solution was removed by filtration, and the solvent was evaporated under vacuum to give the crude product, which was purified by column chromatography (CHCl3-CH3OH=8:1, v/v).
4.3.1 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8,3′-bis(dipropylamino)methyl-isoflavone (5a)
White powder, yield: 0.61 g (65 %); m. p. 174–175 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax = 3087 (-OH), 2969, 2851 (-CH3, -CH2), 1674 (C=O), 1275 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=8.30 (s, 1H, 2-H), 7.88 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (m, 2H), 6.82 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.07 (s, 2H), 3.74 (s, 2H), 2.54 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 4H), 2.44 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 4H), 1.53 (m, 8H), 0.85 (m, 12H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.2 (C=O), 164.5, 157.8, 155.2, 152.8, 129.7, 129.1, 126.0, 123.7, 122.9, 122.7, 116.4, 115.7, 115.5, 108.7, 57.0, 55.4, 55.2, 50.3, 19.5, 19.3, 12.1, 11.9. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=481.3058 (calcd. 481.3061 for C29H41N2O4, [M+H]+).
4.3.2 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8,3′-bis((N-2-methyl-piperidyl)amino)methyl-isoflavone (5h)
White powder, yield: 0.66 g (71 %); m. p. 170–171 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax = 3452 (-OH), 3032, 2873 (-CH3, -CH2), 1656 (C=O), 1282 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=10.32 (bs, 2H, -OH), 8.19 (s, 1H, 2-H), 7.86 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (m, 2H), 6.77 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (d, J=14.5 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H), 3.34 (d, J=14.5 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (m, 1H), 2.73 (m, 1H), 2.58 (m, 1H), 2.45 (m, 1H), 2.26 (t, J=9.6 Hz, 1H), 2.09 (t, J=9.6 Hz, 1H), 1.56 (m, 8H), 1.31 (m, 4H), 1.11 (d, J=6.3 Hz, 3H), 1.07 (d, J=6.3 Hz, 3H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.1 (C=O), 164.6, 157.8, 155.0, 152.6, 129.5, 128.9, 125.8, 123.7, 122.7, 122.6, 116.4, 115.7, 115.6, 108.4, 56.6, 56.5, 56.1, 51.6, 51.0, 50.2, 34.1, 33.7, 25.8, 25.5, 22.8, 22.6, 17.8. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=477.2745 (calcd. 477.2748 for C29H37N2O4, [M+H]+).
4.3.3 7,4′-Dihydroxy-8,3′-bis((N-morpholino)amino)methyl-isoflavone (5i)
White powder, yield: 0.60 g (69 %); m. p. 163–164 °C. – IR (KBr) νmax = 3455 (-OH), 3054, 2881 (-CH3, -CH2), 1677 (C=O), 1286 cm–1 (C–N). – 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=8.33 (s, 1H, 2-H), 7.93 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J=2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 2H), 3.61 (bs, 10H), 2.52 (bs, 4H), 2.46 (bs, 4H). – 13C NMR (100.61 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=175.3 (C=O), 162.4, 156.7, 155.9, 153.2, 130.7, 129.2, 126.3, 123.7, 122.9, 122.2, 117.0, 115.4, 115.1, 109.3, 66.6, 66.5, 59.1, 53.2, 53.1, 51.7. – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z=453.2024 (calcd. 453.2020 for C25H29N2O6, [M+H]+).
5 Supplementary information
Pictures of the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 4a–4j, 4′a, 4′h, 4′i, as well as two-dimensional NMR spectra of 4′a, are given as supplementary information (DOI: 10.1515/znb-2015-0068).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21172055 and 21302042), Natural Science Foundation of Henan Scientific Committee (No. 142102210410), Natural Science Foundation of Henan Educational Committee (No. 2011B150007, 12A150007), the Program for Innovative Research Team from Zhengzhou (No. 131PCXTD605), and Scientific Fund Project of Zhengzhou Science and Technology Bureau (No. 20130883).
References
[1] S. Y. Wu, M. S. Brewer, J. Food Sci. 1994, 59, 702.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1994.tb08108.xSuche in Google Scholar
[2] G. A. Colditz, M. J. Stampfer, W. C. Willett, D. J. Hunter, J. E. Manson, C. H. Hennekens, B. A. Rosner, F. E. Speizer, Cancer Cause. Control1992, 3, 433.10.1007/BF00051356Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] D. K. Yadav, A. K. Gautam, J. Kureel, K. Srivastava, M. Sahai, D. Singh, N. Chattopadhyay, R. Maurya, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 677.10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.12.008Suche in Google Scholar
[4] G. Peterson, B. Stephen, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991, 179, 661.Suche in Google Scholar
[5] Q. Jiang, F. Payton-Stewart, S. Elliott, J. Driver, L. V. Rhodes, Q. Zhang, S. L. Zheng, D. Bhatnagar, S. M. Boue, B. M. Collins-Burow, J. Sridhar, C. Stevens, J. A. McLachlan, T. E. Wiese, M. E. Burow, G. D. Wang, J. Med. Chem.2010, 53, 6153.10.1021/jm100610wSuche in Google Scholar
[6] Y. K. Jing, K. Nakaya, R. Han, Anticancer Res.1993, 13, 1049.Suche in Google Scholar
[7] K. Higashi, H. Ogawara, Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1994, 1221, 29.10.1016/0167-4889(94)90212-7Suche in Google Scholar
[8] W. M. Keung, B. L. Vallee, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA1993, 90, 10008.10.1073/pnas.90.21.10008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[9] X. L. Chen, X. N. Shi, L. B. Qu, J. W. Yuan, J. S. Lu, Y. F. Zhao, Chin. J. Chem.2007, 25, 1008.10.1002/cjoc.200790161Suche in Google Scholar
[10] Y. M. Xiao, L. R. Yang, P. Mao, J. W. Yuan, Y. X. Deng, L. B. Qu, Spectrochim. Acta. Part A2012, 85, 298–302.10.1016/j.saa.2011.10.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] N. Al-Maharik, N. P. Botting, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 33, 5622.10.1002/ejoc.200800803Suche in Google Scholar
[12] N. Al-Maharik, N. P. Botting, Tetrahedron Lett.2006, 2047, 8703.10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.10.034Suche in Google Scholar
[13] B. Fairley, N. P. Botting, A. Cassidy, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 5407.10.1016/S0040-4020(03)00869-XSuche in Google Scholar
[14] H. Zeng, H. Li, H. Shao, Ultrason. Sonochem. 2009, 16, 758.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.03.008Suche in Google Scholar
[15] T. H. Babu, V. S. Rao, A. K. Tiwari, K. S. Babu, P. V. Srinivas, A. Z. Ali, J. M. Rao, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 1659.10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.01.055Suche in Google Scholar
[16] G. Roman, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 89, 743.10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.10.076Suche in Google Scholar
[17] S. X. Zhang, J. G. Ma, Y. M. Bao, P. W. Yang, L. Zou, K. J. Li, X. D. Sun, Bioorg. Med. Chem.2008, 16, 7127.10.1016/j.bmc.2008.06.055Suche in Google Scholar
[18] M. S. Frasinyuk, S. P. Bondarenko, V. P. Khilya, C. M. Liu, D. S. Watt, V. M. Sviripa, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 1053.10.1039/C4OB02137ASuche in Google Scholar
[19] G. Cravotto, P. Cintas, Chem. Soc. Rev.2006, 35, 180.10.1039/B503848KSuche in Google Scholar
[20] J. T. Li, Y. Yin, L. Li, M. X. Sun, Ultrason. Sonochem. 2010, 17, 11.Suche in Google Scholar
[21] A. S. Al-Bogami, T. S. Saleh, H. M. Albishri, Chem. Cent. J. 2013, 7, 101.10.1186/1752-153X-7-101Suche in Google Scholar
[22] A. Gaplovsky, M. Gaplovsky, S. Toma, J. L. Luche, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8444.10.1021/jo000611+Suche in Google Scholar
[23] Y. M. Xiao, L. R. Yang, P. Mao, Z. Zhao, X. F. Lin, Ultrason. Sonochem.2011, 18, 303.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.06.010Suche in Google Scholar
[24] Y. Q. Jiang, X. L. Chen, L. B. Qu, J. L. Wang, J. W. Yuan, S. S. Chen, X. Li, C. Qu, Ultrason. Sonochem. 2011, 18, 527.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.09.009Suche in Google Scholar
[25] C. Y. Zhou, J. Li, S. Peddibhotla, D. Romo, Org. Lett.2010, 12, 2104.10.1021/ol100587jSuche in Google Scholar
[26] Y. He, L. L. Chen, Z. T. Zhang, J. Chem. Crystallogr. 2008, 38, 27.Suche in Google Scholar
Supplemental Material:
The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/znb-2015-0068) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.
©2015 by De Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Review
- Equiatomic cerium intermetallics CeXX′ with two p elements
- Resin-assisted solvothermal synthesis of a manganese(II) coordination polymer with tetrachloroterephthalate
- Influence of metal ions on the formation of new metal complexes constructed from tetrachlorophthalic acid
- Synthesis, crystal structure and physicochemical characterization of a Hg(II) complex with 6-methoxyquinoline as ligand
- Ultrasound-assisted regioselective synthesis of aminomethylated daidzein derivatives via Mannich reaction
- I5– polymers with a layered arrangement: synthesis, spectroscopy, and structure of a new polyiodide salt in the nicotine/HI/I2 system
- 2,5-Bridged 1-Carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) Derivatives – Intermediates on the Way to Pentaalkyl-1,5-dicarba-closo-pentaboranes(5)
- N-vinylation and N-allylation of 3,5-disubstituted pyrazoles by N–H insertion of vinylcarbenoids
- Synthesis, characterization and molecular structure of a dinuclear uranyl complex supported by N,N′,N″,N′″-tetra-(3,5-di-tert-butylsalicylidene)-1,2,4,5-phenylenetetraamine
- Note
- 119Sn Mössbauer spectroscopy of solvothermally synthesized fluorides ASnF3 (A = Na, K, Rb, Cs)
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Review
- Equiatomic cerium intermetallics CeXX′ with two p elements
- Resin-assisted solvothermal synthesis of a manganese(II) coordination polymer with tetrachloroterephthalate
- Influence of metal ions on the formation of new metal complexes constructed from tetrachlorophthalic acid
- Synthesis, crystal structure and physicochemical characterization of a Hg(II) complex with 6-methoxyquinoline as ligand
- Ultrasound-assisted regioselective synthesis of aminomethylated daidzein derivatives via Mannich reaction
- I5– polymers with a layered arrangement: synthesis, spectroscopy, and structure of a new polyiodide salt in the nicotine/HI/I2 system
- 2,5-Bridged 1-Carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) Derivatives – Intermediates on the Way to Pentaalkyl-1,5-dicarba-closo-pentaboranes(5)
- N-vinylation and N-allylation of 3,5-disubstituted pyrazoles by N–H insertion of vinylcarbenoids
- Synthesis, characterization and molecular structure of a dinuclear uranyl complex supported by N,N′,N″,N′″-tetra-(3,5-di-tert-butylsalicylidene)-1,2,4,5-phenylenetetraamine
- Note
- 119Sn Mössbauer spectroscopy of solvothermally synthesized fluorides ASnF3 (A = Na, K, Rb, Cs)