Home Physical Sciences 2,5-Bridged 1-Carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) Derivatives – Intermediates on the Way to Pentaalkyl-1,5-dicarba-closo-pentaboranes(5)
Article Publicly Available

2,5-Bridged 1-Carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) Derivatives – Intermediates on the Way to Pentaalkyl-1,5-dicarba-closo-pentaboranes(5)

  • Bernd Wrackmeyer EMAIL logo and Hans-Joerg Schanz
Published/Copyright: September 5, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Stimulated by a report from (R. Köster, G. Benedikt, M. A. Grassberger, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1968, 719, 187.) on a carbaborane, for which the structure of 2,3,4,5,-tetraethlyl-1-methyl-2,5-μ-(ethyl-1′,1′-diyl)-1-carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) 1 was proposed, an independent synthesis was developed. Diethyl(ethynyl)borane was generated in situ in the presence of a large excess of “Et2B–H” (hydride bath) by ethynyl/H exchange, using ethynyl(trioctyl)tin to react in a mixture with diethyl(vinyl)borane at low temperature. Hydroboration and Et2B–H-catalysed condensation afforded 1, as shown by 11B, 13C NMR spectroscopy and DFT calculations. Thermal degradation of 1 gave 2,3,4-triethyl-1,5-dimethyl-1,5-dicarba-closo-pentaborane(5), whereas the pentaethyl-1,5-dicarba-closo-pentaborane(5) resulted from thermally induced decomposition of other suitably substituted arachno carbaboranes.

1 Introduction

By contrast to the parent smallest arachno carbaborane, CB4H10, wich is still unknown [1, 2], a number of 2,5-organo-bridged derivatives have been reported, formed by quite different routes [3–7], some of them rather inefficiently. Thus, the yield e.g. of 2 [3–5] was very low (ca. 2%), and it took some time until the correct structure was assigned [5]. Already in 1968, Köster et al. reported the formation of 1 (Scheme 1), isolated in small quantities from the complex reaction mixture, when Et2O-BF3-BEt3-Li were heated in THF [8]. At that time it seemed daring to propose the structure of 1 relying on a rather limited set of spectroscopic data. The protecting B-ethyl groups might have helped that 1 survived at least partly the forcing reaction conditions. Some of the crude material (0.8 g) containing ca. 20% of 1 was left in our hands and enables us now to retrieve 11B and 13C NMR data for 1, confirming the assumed structure (see below).

Scheme 1: Some 2,5-bridged 1-carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) derivantives known until 1994 (endo and exo describe the position of the μ-C-substituent relative to the carbaborane framework).
Scheme 1:

Some 2,5-bridged 1-carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) derivantives known until 1994 (endo and exo describe the position of the μ-C-substituent relative to the carbaborane framework).

We found that we could prepare the 1-carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) derivatives 5 [9] and 6 [10] (Scheme 2) via Et2B–H-catalysed condensation starting from diethyl(1-propynyl)borane, Et2B–C≡C–Me, in the presence of a large excess of “Et2B–H” (in a mixture of ethlyldiboranes(6) and BEt3 [11, 12], the so-called “hydride bath” [7]). Since the structure of 5 is very similar to that proposed for 1, we aimed at an independent synthesis of 1. Furthermore, we had observed that 6 can be converted almost quantitatively into pentaethyl-1,5-dicarba-closo-pentaborane(5) 7b, Et5C2B3, by heating to 150 °C [10, 13]. Therefore, we studied the behaviour of 1, 4 and 5 under similar conditions. Multinuclear magnetic resonance methods together with DFT calculations should serve for elucidation of structure and reactivity of the products.

Scheme 2: 1-Carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) derivantives related to 1, and thermal rearrangement of 6 into the closo-carbaborane 7 [10].
Scheme 2:

1-Carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) derivantives related to 1, and thermal rearrangement of 6 into the closo-carbaborane 7 [10].

2 Results and discussion

2.1 1-Carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) derivative 1

Aiming at a better viable synthetic route to 1, similar to the synthesis of 5 [9], we had at first to solve the problem how to obtain diethyl(ethynyl)borane, Et2B–C≡C–H. By contrast to the 1-propynyl, Et2B–C≡C–Me, or the vinyl derivative, Et2B–CH=CH2, diethyl(ethynyl)borane Et2B–C≡C–H was not accessible by reaction of Et2B–Cl with ethynyltin compounds, such as Bu3Sn–C≡C–H, Bu2Sn(C≡C–H)2 or Oct3Sn–C≡C–H. Although the organotin chlorides were formed in each case, the boron containing materials were only red-brown polymers. We decided to generate Et2B–C≡C–H in situ in the hydride bath via ethynyl/H exchange, hoping that the exchange reaction was preferred over 1,1-carboboration [14–16]. For this purpose a cooled (–78 °C) solution of Oct3Sn–C≡C–H in pentane was added to the cold (–78 °C) hydride bath, followed by addition of an equimolar amount of Et2B–CH=CH2. The reaction mixture was allowed to reach room temperature. After removal of the readily volatile materials pentane, ethlyldiboranes(6) and BEt3, fractional distillation gave compound 1(exo) (b. p. 65 –75 °C/10–3 Torr) in 22 % yield, contaminated with a small amount of the endo-isomer. The residue consisted of Oct3Sn–H (δ1H(Sn–H)[1J(119Sn,1H)] = 4.8 [1620 Hz]) and polymeric materials, containing tin and boron, which could not be distilled. At present we cannot offer a conclusive explanation which factors govern the formation of the endo or the exo isomer. These results (Scheme 3) agree with the behaviour of diethyl(1-propynyl)borane, Et2B–C≡C–Me, present in the hydride bath [9, 10]. Like (Et2B)3C–Et, the intermediacy of (Et2B)3C–Me (Scheme 3) was just assumed, whereas (Et2B)2CH2CH3 [9] can be prepared independently by stoichiometric 1,2-hydroboration.

Scheme 3: Alternative synthesis of 1-carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) derivative 1.
Scheme 3:

Alternative synthesis of 1-carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) derivative 1.

The properties of 1 prepared by following Scheme 3 are identical to those found for the “old” sample of Köster’s experiments [8], when the crude material had been purified. In particular boiling point, mass spectra, 11B (Figs. 1 and 2) and 13C NMR data (Fig. 2) are conclusive. The structure of a single molecule of 1 was optimised at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory [17–21], and the NMR parameters were calculated [22–25] at the same level (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1: 160.5 MHz 11B{1H} NMR spectrum of 1 (23 °C; 5 mg in 0.5 mL of C6D6). Small signals may belong to the endo-isomer.
Fig. 1:

160.5 MHz 11B{1H} NMR spectrum of 1 (23 °C; 5 mg in 0.5 mL of C6D6). Small signals may belong to the endo-isomer.

Fig. 2: Optimized geometry and experimental and calculated [RB3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level] 11B and 13C NMR parameters of 1(exo).
Fig. 2:

Optimized geometry and experimental and calculated [RB3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level] 11B and 13C NMR parameters of 1(exo).

Figure 2 and data in Table 1 show that the experimental NMR data are fairly well reproduced by the calculations, which means that the optimised single-molecule structures are reliable. 1H/1H NOE difference experiments served for distinguishing between the endo- and exo-isomer. Coupling constants 1J(13C,11B) of 1 were not resolved owing to rapid 11B quadrupolar relaxation. However, the broadening of 13C NMR signals of carbon atoms linked to boron, typical of partially relaxed scalar 13C-11B spin-spin coupling [26], revealed some information. Selective heteronuclear decoupling experiments 13C{11B,1H} enabled to assign the B(2,5)-Et and B(3,4)-Et groups. Moreover, decoupling of 11B(2,5) sharpened the μ-13C NMR signal and caused only slight narrowing of the broad 13C(1) NMR signal. The calculated values 1J((μ-13C,11B(2,5)) are only slightly smaller than for trialkylboranes [26]. On the other hand, decoupling of 11B(3.4) gave rise to a sharpened 13C(1) NMR signal, in agreement with the calculated coupling constants 1J(13C(1),11B(3,4)) >> 1J(13C(1)11B(2,5)). Expectedly, the calculated values for 1J(11B,11B) are small, typical for B–H–B bridges. Therefore, cross peaks for 11B-11B coupling were absent in 2D 11B/11B COSY spectra [27].

Table 1

Selected chemical shifts δ11B and δ13C of 2,5-organo-bridged 1-carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) derivatives.

Compoundδ11B(2,5)δ11B(3,4)δ13C(1)δ13C-μ
1(exo)9.5–14.50.4–10.8
1(exo) calcd.a9.3–15.50.2–11.4
1(endo) calcd.a9.5–15.80.0–8.1
2 [5]1.6–20.2n.o.b–24.3
2 calcd.a1.1–23.7–5.7–25.9
3 [6]10.0–5.712.0147.0
3 calcd.a10.6–8.011.0150.3
4(exo) [8]14.9–12.110.3–6.8
4(endo) [8]14.9–12.16.2–13.2
5(exo)12.9–12.08.3–8.9
5(endo)12.9–12.07.3–14.5

aGIAO [22], RB3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level [17–21]; bn.o., means not observed.

2.2 Thermal rearrangement of the 1-carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) derivatives 1, 4 and 5

When the compounds 1, 4 and 5 were heated in benzene to 80 °C for 1 h, there were no appreciable changes in their NMR spectra. However, heating to >100 °C without a solvent caused formation of a large amount of polymeric materials along with volatile ethyldiboranes(6) and some (<30%) pentaalkyl-1,5-dicarba-closo-pentaboranes 7a (from 1) and 7b (from 4 and 5), both isolated by fractional distillation (Scheme 4). The properties of 7a [28] and 7b [13], such as boiling points, mass spectra and NMR spectroscopic data [29] correspond to reported data. Apparently, decomposition of 1, 4 and 5 had occurred, leading back to the respective 1,1,1-tris(diethylboryl)alkane, which condenses by Et2B–H-catalysis to the closo carbaboranes 7a and 7b, respectively. We note that Me2SiH2 (from 4) was not eliminated.

Scheme 4: Thermal decomposition of 1, 4 and 5.
Scheme 4:

Thermal decomposition of 1, 4 and 5.

3 Conclusions

An “old” structural proposal [8] was confirmed via an independent synthesis and NMR spectroscopic analysis. Calculated chemical shifts δ11B and δ13C fit well with experimental data, and calculated coupling constants 1J(13C,11B) and 1J(11B,11B) aid the description of the bonding situation. It was also shown that B-ethyl substituted 1-carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) derivatives are general precursors of 1,5-dicarba-closo-pentaboranes(5). The skelatal rearrangements [30] indicate that such seemingly rather inert B-ethyl-substituted carbaboranes are attractive clusters for synthesis, spectroscopy and theoretical investigations [31–34].

4 Experimental Section

Syntheses and handling of the samples were carried out observing precautions to exclude traces of air and moisture. Carefully dried solvents and oven-dried glassware were used throughout. CDCl3 was distilled over CaH2 and C6D6 from Na metal in an atmosphere of argon and stored over a molecular sieve. The hydride bath was prepared as described [11] with a ratio of “Et2B–H”/BEt3 of 1:6 according to 11B NMR spectra [12], which showed the absence of “EtBH2” species. Triethylborane, propyne and vinylmagnesium bromide were used as received. Dibutyl(divinyl)tin [35], tributyl(propynyl)tin [36] and ethynyl(trioctyl)tin [37] were obtained following the literature procedures. Diethyl(1-propynyl)borane and diethyl(vinyl)borane were prepared as described [9]. NMR measurements in 5 mm o. d. tubes: Bruker DRX 500 and ARX 250; 1H, 11B, 13C NMR; chemical shifts in ppm are given relative to Me4Si [δ1H (C6D5H) = 7.28, (CHCl3 in CDCl3) 7.27; δ13C (C6D6) = 128.0, (CDCl3) 77.0]; external BF3-OEt2 [δ11B = 0 (±0.3) for Ξ(11B) = 32.083971 MHz], Assignments of 1H/13C NMR signals are based in the usual way on 2D 1H/13C shift correlalions [38] and on 1H{11B} and 13C{11B, 1H} selective heteronuclear decoupling experiments. Pulsed gradient enhanced 1H/1H NOE difference spectra [39, 40] (irradiation of 1H(μ-Me) transitions and obseravtion of 1H(BHB) signals showed that 1 is the exo-isomer). Mass spectra (EI, 70 eV): Finnigan MAT 8500 with direct inlet (data for 12C, 1H, 11B).

All quantum-chemical calculations were carried out using the Gaussian 09 program package [41]. Optimised geometries at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d.p) level of theory [17–21] were found to be minima by the absence of imaginary frequencies. NMR parameters were calculated [22–25] at the same level of theory. Calculated chemical shifts δ13C and δ11B were converted by δ13C(calcd.) = σ(13C, TMS)–σ(13C), with σ(13C, TMS) = +181 and [δ13C (TMS) = 0], δ11B (calcd.) = σ(11B, B2H6) – σ(11B) + 18.3, with σ(11B, B2H6) = +84.1 [δ11B (B2H6) = 18.3 and δ11B (BF3-OEt2) = 0].

4.1 2,3,4,5-Tetraethyl-1-methyl-2,5-μ-(ethane-1′,1′-diyl)-1-carba-arachno-pentaborane(10) (1)

An equimolar mixture of diethyl(vinyl)borane (0.96 g: 10 mmol) and ethynyl(trioctyl)stannane (4.83 g, 10 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL of pentane, cooled to –78 °C and added slowly within 45 m to the cold (–78 °C) hydride bath. Then, the stirred reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and the readily volatile materials were removed in a vacuum. Fractional distillation (oil bath <100 °C) of the high boiling residue gave the arachno carbaborane 1 (b. p. 65–75 °C/10–3 Torr; 0.48 g, 22%) as a colorless oil, identified by NMR as the exo-isomer. – EI-MS (70 eV) for C12H30B4 (217.6): m/z = 218 (18) [M]+, 148 (53) [M–70]+, 119 (100) [M–99]+. – 1H NMR (500.1 MHz, C6D6, 23 °C). δ1H = 1.53 (br, 1H, B3-H-B4), 0.11 (br, 2H, B2-B3, B4-H-B5), 0.82 (m, 1H μ-CH), 0.70 (d, 3H, μ-C-Me), 1.10 (s, 3H, C1-Me), 062–0.95 (m, 20 H, B-Et). – 11B NMR (160.5 MHz, C6D6, 23 °C: δ11B = see Figs. 1 and 2. – 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, C6D6, 23 °C): δ13C = see Fig. 2. Redistillation of Köster’s “old” sample [8] (0.8 g) containing presumably 1 gave polymers and 0.05 g of 1 along with traces of 7a.

4.2 Thermal degradation of 1, 1,2,3,4,5-pentaethyl-2,5-μ-(1′-dimethylsilylpropane-1′,1′-diyl)-1-carba-arachno-pentaboranes(10) (4) [7], and 1,2,3,4,5-pentaethyl(ethane-1′,1′-diyl)1-carba-arachno-pentaboranes(10) (5) [9]

The compounds were heated without a solvent in a vacuum (10–2 Torr) for 1 h to 150 °C and all volatile materials were collected in a trap cooled with liquid N2. Fractional distillation gave ethyldiboranes(6) and BEt3, followed by the air-stable closo-carbaboranes 7a, b. p. 56–58 °C/11 Torr (from 1), and 7b, b. p. 35–40 °C/1 Torr, (from 4 or 5). Polymeric materials (ca. 70–75%) were left and could not be distilled.


Corresponding author: Bernd Wrackmeyer, Anorganische Chemie II, Universität Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

We thank the late Professor R. Köster for a sample containing 1, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for support.

References

[1] R. N. Grimes, Carboranes, 2nd edition, Academic Press, New York, 2011.10.1016/B978-0-12-374170-7.00014-8Search in Google Scholar

[2] D. S. Matteson, P. K. Mattschei, Inorg. Chem. 1973, 12, 2472.10.1021/ic50128a052Search in Google Scholar

[3] R. Greatrex, N. N. Greenwood, M. Kirk, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1991, 1510.10.1039/c39910001510Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. A. Fox, R. Greatrex, N. N. Greenwood, M. Kirk, Polyhedron.1993, 12, 1849.10.1016/S0277-5387(00)81422-9Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. A. Fox, R. Greatrex, P. v. R. Schleyer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2298.10.1002/anie.199422981Search in Google Scholar

[6] B. Gangus, H. Stock, W. Siebert, M. Hofmann, P. v. R. Schleyer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2296.10.1002/anie.199422961Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. Köster, G. Seidel, B. Wrackmeyer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2294.10.1002/anie.199422941Search in Google Scholar

[8] R. Köster, G. Benedikt, M. A. Grassberger, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1968, 719, 187.10.1002/jlac.19687190120Search in Google Scholar

[9] B. Wrackmeyer, H.-J. Schanz, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.1997, 62, 1254.10.1135/cccc19971254Search in Google Scholar

[10] R. Köster, R. Boese, B. Wrackmeyer, H.-J. Schanz, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.1995, 1691.Search in Google Scholar

[11] R. Köster, G. Bruno, P. Binger, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1961, 644, 1.10.1002/jlac.19616440102Search in Google Scholar

[12] B. Wrackmeyer, H.-J. Schanz, W. Schüßler, R. Köster, Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem.1998, 362, 378.10.1007/s002160051088Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Köster, H.-J. Horstschäfer, P. Binger, P. K. Mattschei, Liebigs Ann. Chem.1975, 1339.10.1002/jlac.197519750712Search in Google Scholar

[14] B. Wrackmeyer, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1995, 145, 125.10.1016/0010-8545(95)90220-1Search in Google Scholar

[15] B. Wrackmeyer, Heteroatom Chem. 2006, 17, 188.10.1002/hc.20222Search in Google Scholar

[16] G. Kehr, G. Erker, Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1839.10.1039/C1CC15628DSearch in Google Scholar

[17] A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.10.1063/1.464913Search in Google Scholar

[18] C. Lee, W. Yang, R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B1988, 41, 785.10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785Search in Google Scholar

[19] P. J. Stevens, F. J. Devlin, C. F. Chablowski, M. J. Frisch, J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623.10.1021/j100096a001Search in Google Scholar

[20] D. McLean, D. G. S. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 5639.10.1063/1.438980Search in Google Scholar

[21] R. Krishnan, J. S. Blinkley, R. Seeger, J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys.1980, 72, 650.10.1063/1.438955Search in Google Scholar

[22] K. Wollinski, J. F. Hinton, P. J. Pulay, J. Am. Chem. Soc.1990, 112, 8251.10.1021/ja00179a005Search in Google Scholar

[23] T. Helgaker, M. Jaszunski, M. Pecul, Progr. NMR Spectrosc. 2008, 53, 249.10.1016/j.pnmrs.2008.02.002Search in Google Scholar

[24] R. H. Contreras, V. Barone, J. C. Facelli, J. E. Peralta, Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 2003, 51, 167.10.1016/S0066-4103(03)51004-3Search in Google Scholar

[25] R. H. Contreras, J. R. Cheeseman, M. J. Frisch, G. E. Scuseria, Chem. Phys. Lett.2003, 375, 452.10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00886-8Search in Google Scholar

[26] B. Wrackmeyer, Progr. NMR Spectrosc. 1979, 12, 227.10.1016/0079-6565(79)80003-5Search in Google Scholar

[27] T. L. Venable, W. C. Hutton, R. N. Grimes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 29.10.1021/ja00313a007Search in Google Scholar

[28] R. Köster, G. W. Rotermund, Tetrahedron Lett.1964, 5, 1667.10.1016/0040-4039(64)83112-9Search in Google Scholar

[29] R. Köster, B. Wrackmeyer, Z. Naturforsch. 1981, 36b, 704.Search in Google Scholar

[30] A. Berndt, M. Hofmann, W. Siebert, B. Wrackmeyer in Molecular Clusters of the Main Group Elements, (Eds.: M. Drieß, H. Nöth), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004, p. 267.10.1002/3527602445.ch3bSearch in Google Scholar

[31] B. Wrackmeyer, A. Glöckle, Z. Naturforsch. 1996, 51b, 859.10.1515/znb-1996-0616Search in Google Scholar

[32] M. Herberhold, U. Bertholdt, W. Milius, A. Glöckle, B. Wrackmeyer, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.1996, 1219.Search in Google Scholar

[33] R. Köster, G. Seidel, B. Wrackmeyer, D. Bläser, R. Boese, M. Bühl, P. v. R. Schleyer, Chem. Ber. 1991, 124, 2715.10.1002/cber.19911241019Search in Google Scholar

[34] B. Wrackmeyer, H.-J. Schanz, J. Organomet. Chem. 2015, in press. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2015.03.011.10.1016/j.jorganchem.2015.03.011Search in Google Scholar

[35] D. Seiferth, F. G. A. Stone, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 515.10.1021/ja01560a003Search in Google Scholar

[36] L. Brandsma, Preparative Acetylenic Chemistry, 2nd edition, Elsevier, Oxford, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

[37] B. Wrackmeyer in Organometallic Syntheses, (Eds.: R. B. King, J. J. Eisch), Vol. 4, Elsevier, New York 1988, p. 559.10.1016/B978-0-444-42956-8.50165-1Search in Google Scholar

[38] S. Berger, S. Braun, 200 and More NMR Experiments, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[39] K. Stott, J. Keeler, Q. N. Van, A. J. Shaka, J. Magn. Reson.1997, 125, 302.10.1006/jmre.1997.1110Search in Google Scholar

[40] T. Parella, J. Magn. Reson.2004, 167, 266.10.1016/j.jmr.2004.01.002Search in Google Scholar

[41] M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T. Vreven, J. A. Montgomery, Jr., J. E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M. Bearpark, J. J. Heyd, E. Brothers, K. N. Kudin, V. N. Staroverov, T. Keith, R. Kobayashi, J. Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. Rendell, J. C. Burant, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, M. Cossi, N. Rega, J. M. Millam, M. Klene, J. E. Knox, J. B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W. Ochterski, R.L. Martin, K. Morokuma, V. G. Zakrzewski, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg, S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, O. Farkas, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, J. Cioslowski, D. J. Fox, gaussian 09 (revision A.02), Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT (USA) 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-6-7
Accepted: 2015-7-17
Published Online: 2015-9-5
Published in Print: 2015-10-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 20.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2015-0098/html
Scroll to top button