Abstract
Ever since the revelations by Edward Snowden, there has been a political debate about the appropriateness of mass surveillance by intelligence agencies. At the same time, surveillance practices based on complex technologies, which are almost invisible in everyday life and interlinked across national borders, have run into scarcely any widespread social protest. That is why this article poses the question: are the powers of depoliticized governance – which can rely on sustained diffuse acceptance based on an ever-widening discourse about dangers and technocratic risk management – making themselves evident here? Or is the post-Snowden debate showing signs of shifting toward (re)politicization of security policy, which is making appropriate measures and actors the subjects of public discourse and politically responsible decision making? By asking these questions, this article questions the widespread thesis of an across-the-board depoliticization of security governance, develops a conceptual framework for a differentiated analysis of politicization processes, with a special focus on the security field, and applies this framework to the specific case of the debate in Germany about the disclosures by Edward Snowden. By following this approach, the article strives to contribute to improved understanding of the dynamics, conditions and limitations of politicization in the purportedly special area of security.
Article note:
This is the translated version of an original article, which appeared in Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen (Hegemann and Kahl 2016).
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Thomas Diez, Jonas Hagmann, Delf Rothe, Klaus Schlichte and Ulrich Schneckener as well as the editorial team of zib, the three anonymous experts within zib and those who took part in two panel disucssions at the convention of the German Political Science Association (DVPW) in Duisburg and at the Pan-European Conference of the European International Studies Association (EISA) in Giardini Naxos, Italy in September 2015 for their helpful comments and suggestions. We also thank Matthew Harris for assisting with the translation of this article.
References
Aradau, Claudia (2004) “Security and the Democratic Scene. Desecuritization and Emancipation,” Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(4):388–413.10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800030Suche in Google Scholar
Balzacq, Thierry (Hrsg.) (2015) Contesting Security. London: Strategies and Logics.10.4324/9780203079850Suche in Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt, Didier Bigo, Paulo Esteves, Elspeth Guild, Vivienne Jabri, David Lyon and Rob B. J. Walker (2014) “After Snowden. Rethinking the Impact of Surveillance,” International Political Sociology, 8(2):121–144.10.1111/ips.12048Suche in Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt and David Lyon (2013) Daten, Drohnen, Disziplin. Berlin: Ein Gespräch über flüchtige Überwachung.Suche in Google Scholar
Behnke, Andreas (2005) “9/11 und die Grenzen des Politischen,” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 12(1):117–140.10.5771/0946-7165-2005-1-117Suche in Google Scholar
Bigo, Didier (2002) “Security and Immigration. Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease,” Alternatives. Global, Local and Political, 27(1):63–92.10.1177/03043754020270S105Suche in Google Scholar
Binder, Martin (2013) “Die Politisierung internationaler Sicherheitsinstitutionen? Der UN-Sicherheitsrat und NGOs.” In: (Michael Zürn and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt, Hrsg.) Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik. Berlin: Umkämpfte internationale Institutionen, pp. 134–157.Suche in Google Scholar
Bright, Jonathan (2015) “In Search of the Politics of Security,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 47(5):585–603.10.1111/1467-856X.12054Suche in Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher S. and Matt McDonald (2013) “The Future of Critical Security Studies. Ethics and the Politics of Security,” European Journal of International Relations, 19(2):235–255.10.1177/1354066111419538Suche in Google Scholar
Bundesregierung (2015) Fernmeldeaufklärung des Bundesnachrichtendienstes. Pressemitteilung, Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung, 16.12.2015, http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Pressemitteilungen/BPA/2015/12/2015-12-16-altmaier-bnd-selektoren.html; 27.7.2016.Suche in Google Scholar
Bundestag (2015) Stellungnahmen der Sachverständigen; https://www.bundestag.de/bundestag/ausschuesse18/ua/1untersuchungsausschuss/-/280848; 27.7.2016.Suche in Google Scholar
Burnham, Peter (2001) “New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticisation,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3(2):127–149.10.1111/1467-856X.00054Suche in Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (1983) People, States and Fear. Brighton: The National Security Problem in International Relations.Suche in Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2006) “Will the ‘Global War on Terrorism’ Be the New Cold War?” International Affairs, 82(6):1101–1118.10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00590.xSuche in Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver and Jaap de Wilde (1998) Security. A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO.10.1515/9781685853808Suche in Google Scholar
Corry, Olaf (2012) “Securitisation and Riskification. Second-Order Security and the Politics of Climate Change,” Millennium, 40(2):235–258.10.1177/0305829811419444Suche in Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin (2008) Post-Demokratie, Frankfurt a. M.Suche in Google Scholar
Daase, Christopher and Nicole Deitelhoff (2015) “Jenseits der Anarchie. Widerstand und Herrschaft im internationalen System,” Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 56(2):299–318.10.5771/0032-3470-2015-2-299Suche in Google Scholar
De Goede, Marieke (2012) “The SWIFT Affair and the Global Politics of European Security,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(2):214–230.10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02219.xSuche in Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole and Klaus Dieter Wolf (2013) “Wirtschaftsunternehmen in Konflikten. Das Wechselspiel staatlicher und gesellschaftlicher (Ent-)Politisierung privater Sicherheitsleistungen,” In: (Michael Zürn and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt, eds.) Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik. Berlin: Umkämpfte internationale Institutionen, pp. 158–189.Suche in Google Scholar
De Wilde, Pieter (2011) “No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration,” Journal of European Integration, 33(5):559–575.10.1080/07036337.2010.546849Suche in Google Scholar
De Wilde, Pieter, Anna Leupold and Henning Schmidtke (2016) “Introduction. The Differentiated Politicisation of European Governance,” West European Politics, 39(1):3–22.10.1080/01402382.2015.1081505Suche in Google Scholar
Fierke, Karen (2015) Critical Approaches to International Security. Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar
Floyd, Rita (2011) “Can Securitization Theory Be Used in Normative Analysis? Towards a Just Securitization Theory,” Security Dialogue, 42(4–5):427–439.10.1177/0967010611418712Suche in Google Scholar
Graulich, Kurt (2015) Nachrichtendienstliche Fernmeldeaufklärung mit Selektoren in einer transnationalen Kooperation. Prüfung und Bewertung von NSA-Selektoren nach Maßgabe des Beweisbeschlusses BND-26 (Bericht im Rahmen des 1. Untersuchungsausschuss der 18. Wahlperiode des Deutschen Bundestages), in: https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/_Anlagen/2015/10/2015-10-30-bericht-svp.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1; 9.12.2015.Suche in Google Scholar
Greenwald, Glenn (2014) Die globale Überwachung. Der Fall Snowden, die amerikanischen Geheimdienste und die Folgen, München.Suche in Google Scholar
Greven, Michael Th. (1999) Die politische Gesellschaft. Kontingenz und Dezision als Probleme des Regierens und der Demokratie, Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-322-93340-9Suche in Google Scholar
Hay, Colin (2007) Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar
Hegemann, Hendrik, and Martin Kahl (2016) “(Re-)Politisierung der Sicherheit. Legitimation und Kontestation geheimdienstlicher Überwachung nach Snowden,” Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen, 23(2):6–41.10.5771/0946-7165-2016-2-6Suche in Google Scholar
Hegemann, Hendrik and Martin Kahl (2015) “Constructions of Effectiveness and the Rationalization of Counterterrorism Policy. The Case of Biometric Passports,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 38(3):199–218.10.1080/1057610X.2014.982384Suche in Google Scholar
Hempel, Leon, Susanne Krasmann and Ulrich Bröckling (eds.) (2011) Sichtbarkeitsregime. Überwachung, Sicherheit und Privatheit im 21. Jahrhundert (Leviathan Sonderheft). Wiesbaden.Suche in Google Scholar
Herschinger, Eva, Markus Jachtenfuchs and Christiane Kraft-Kasack (2013) “Transgouvernementalisierung und die ausbleibende gesellschaftliche Politisierung der inneren Sicherheit,” In: (Zürn Michael and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt, eds.) Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik. Berlin: Umkämpfte internationale Institutionen, pp. 190–212.Suche in Google Scholar
Hurrelmann, Achim, Anne Gora and Andrea Wagner (2015) “The Politicization of European Integration. More Than an Elite Affair?” Political Studies, 63(1):43–59.10.1111/1467-9248.12090Suche in Google Scholar
Huysmans, Jef (2006) The Politics of (In)Security. Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London.10.4324/9780203008690Suche in Google Scholar
Huysmans, Jef (2011) “What’s in an Act. On Security Speech Acts and Little Security Nothings,” Security Dialogue, 42(4–5):371–383.10.1177/0967010611418713Suche in Google Scholar
Huysmans, Jef (2014) Security Unbound. Enacting Democratic Limits. London.10.4324/9781315817248Suche in Google Scholar
Huysmans, Jef (2016) “Democratic Curiosity in Times of Surveillance,” European Journal of International Security, 1(1):73–93.10.1017/eis.2015.2Suche in Google Scholar
Jenkins, Laura (2011) “The Difference Genealogy Makes. Strategies for Politicisation or How to Expand Capacities for Autonomy,” Political Studies, 59(1):156–174.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00844.xSuche in Google Scholar
Krasmann, Susanne (2011) “Der Präventionsstaat im Einvernehmen. Wie Sichtbarkeitsregime stillschweigend Akzeptanz produzieren,” In: (Leon Hempel, Susanne Krasmann and Ulrich Bröckling, eds.) Sichtbarkeitsregime. Überwachung, Sicherheit und Privatheit im 21. Jahrhundert (Leviathan Sonderheft). Wiesbaden, pp. 53–70.Suche in Google Scholar
Krause, Joachim (2013) Kritische Anmerkungen zur deutschen NSA-Debatte. Moralisieren bedroht die deutsch-amerikanische Freundschaft, in: https://zeitschrift-ip.dgap.org/de/ip-die-zeitschrift/archiv/jahrgang-2013/november-dezember/kritische-anmerkungen-zur-deutschen-nsa; 27.7.2016.Suche in Google Scholar
Loader, Ian and Neill Walker (2007) Civilizing Security. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511611117Suche in Google Scholar
Lyon, David (2015) Surveillance after Snowden. Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar
McDonald, Matt (2008) “Securitization and the Construction of Security,” European Journal of International Relations, 14(4):563–587.10.1177/1354066108097553Suche in Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal (2014) Agonistik. Die Welt politisch denken. Berlin.Suche in Google Scholar
Neal, Andrew W. (2012) “Events, Dear Boy, Events’. Terrorism and Security from the Perspective of Politics,” Critical Studies on Terrorism, 5(1):107–120.10.1080/17539153.2012.659919Suche in Google Scholar
Nonhoff, Martin, Jennifer Gronau, Frank Nullmeier and Steffen Schneider (2009) “Zur Politisierung internationaler Institutionen. Der Fall G 8,” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 16(2):237–267.10.5771/0946-7165-2009-2-237Suche in Google Scholar
Nullmeier, Frank, Anna Geis and Christopher Daase (2012) “Einleitung: Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik. Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen,” In: (Frank Nullmeier, Anna Geis and Christopher Daase, eds.) Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik. Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen (Leviathan Sonderband 27). Baden-Baden, pp. 11–38.Suche in Google Scholar
Pram Grad, Ulrik, and Karen Lund Petersen (2011) “Concepts of Politics in Securitization Studies,” Security Dialogue, 42(4–5):315–328.10.1177/0967010611418716Suche in Google Scholar
Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung (2015) Bericht der Unabhängigen Sachverständigen Vertrauensperson vom 30. Oktober 2015, in: http; http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Pressemitteilungen/BPA/2015/10/2015-10-30-bericht-sachverstaendigenperson.html; 27.7.2016.Suche in Google Scholar
Rothe, Delf (2015) “Von Weitem sieht man besser. Satellitensensoren und andere Akteure der Versicherheitlichung,” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 22(2):97–124.10.5771/0946-7165-2015-2-97Suche in Google Scholar
Schlichte, Klaus (2012) “Der Streit der Legitimitäten. Der Konflikt als Grund einer historischen Soziologie des Politischen,” Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, 1(1):9–13.10.5771/2192-1741-2012-1-9Suche in Google Scholar
Schulze, Matthias (2015) “Patterns of Surveillance Legitimization. The German Discourse on the NSA Scandal,” Surveillance and Society, 13(2):197–217.10.24908/ss.v13i2.5296Suche in Google Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian (2008) “Exceptional Lawmaking after 9/11 and 7/7,” University of Chicago Law Review, 75(3):1155–1199.Suche in Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole (1995) “Securitization and Desecuritization,” In: (Ronnie D. Lipschutz Hrsg.) On Security. New York, NY, pp. 46–86.Suche in Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole (2011) “Politics, Security, Theory,” Security Dialogue, 42(4–5):465–480.10.1177/0967010611418718Suche in Google Scholar
Walters, William and Anne-Marie D’Aoust (2015) “Bringing Publics into Critical Security Studies. Notes for a Research Strategy,” Millennium, 44(1):45–68.10.1177/0305829815594439Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (2003) “Words, Images, Enemies. Securitization and International Politics,” International Studies Quarterly, 47(4):511–531.10.1046/j.0020-8833.2003.00277.xSuche in Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold (1952) “‘National Security’ as an Ambiguous Symbol,” Political Science Quarterly, 67(4):481–502.10.2307/2145138Suche in Google Scholar
Wood, Matthew (2016) “Politicisation, Depoliticisation and Anti-Politics. Towards a Multilevel Research Agenda,” Political Studies Review 14(4):521–533.10.1111/1478-9302.12074Suche in Google Scholar
Wright, David and Reinhard Kreissl (2013) European Responses to the Snowden Revelations. A Discussion Paper (Implementation of Regulatory Submission Standards (IRISS)-Diskussionspapier), in: http://irissproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/IRISS_European-responses-to-the-Snowden-revelations_18-Dec-2013_Final.pdf; 16.10.2015.Suche in Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael (2013) “Politisierung als Konzept der internationalen Beziehungen,” In: (Michael Zürn and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt, eds.) Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik. Berlin: Umkämpfte internationale Institutionen, pp. 7–35.Suche in Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael (2016) “Opening Up Europe. Next Steps in Politicisation Research,” West European Politics, 39(1):164–182.10.1080/01402382.2015.1081513Suche in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Democratisation and New Social Movements
- (Re)Politicizing Security? The Legitimation and Contestation of Mass Surveillance after Snowden
- Institutionalisation of the Relations between the EC and the ASEAN: Analysing an Origin of the EU-Asia Relationship, 1967–1975
- Three Decades of Religious Vote in Europe
- Adversary Voting in the Czech Chamber of Deputies (1993–2013)
- The Norwegian State and Transgender Citizens: A Complicated Relationship
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Democratisation and New Social Movements
- (Re)Politicizing Security? The Legitimation and Contestation of Mass Surveillance after Snowden
- Institutionalisation of the Relations between the EC and the ASEAN: Analysing an Origin of the EU-Asia Relationship, 1967–1975
- Three Decades of Religious Vote in Europe
- Adversary Voting in the Czech Chamber of Deputies (1993–2013)
- The Norwegian State and Transgender Citizens: A Complicated Relationship