„Das Ethische ist kein Sachverhalt“: Über Wittgensteins ethisches Paradox

Wilhelm Vossenkuhl

doi:10.1515/witt-2023-0004

Article

„Das Ethische ist kein Sachverhalt“

Über Wittgensteins ethisches Paradox

Wilhelm Vossenkuhl

Published/Copyright: June 21, 2023

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Wittgenstein-Studien Volume 14 Issue 1

Abstract

“The ethical is no fact of the matter.” On Wittgenstein’s ethical paradox discusses Wittgenstein’s “Lecture on Ethics” of 1929. In this lecture to the Heretics Society at Cambridge he proposes an ethical paradox based on two incompatible types of facts, the natural facts offered by science and the supernatural facts, which he claims to be the core of ethics. The paradox is partly due to his Tractarian belief that ethics has no descriptive content. Yet, although it has no descriptive content the ethical is represented by a feeling which has a metaphysical and an undeniable factual character too, as Wittgenstein claims. This kind of fact is his personal, private if not solipsistic feeling. The paper tries to clarify this highly controversial type of feeling. It seems probable that the change from the Tractatus to the Philosophical Investigations resolves the ethical paradox along the new therapeutical lines of PU. It is argued that this is not the case. The content of the ethical paradox remains unchanged.

Literatur

Adorno, Theodor W.: Ästhetische Theorie [1970], hrsg. v. Gretel Adorno u. Rolf Tiedemann, Frankfurt a. M. 1974.Search in Google Scholar

Aristoteles: Nikomachische Ethik, hrsg. v. Günther Bien, Hamburg 1972. [Zit.: EN.]Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Gordon P. & Hacker, Peter M.S.: An analytical commentary on Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations, Oxford 1980.Search in Google Scholar

Conant, James: Wittgenstein’s Methods, in: Oskari Kuusela & Marie McGinn (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein, Oxford 2011, 620 – 645.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199287505.003.0028Search in Google Scholar

Geach, Peter T.: Good and Evil, in: Analysis 17 (1956), 33 – 42.10.1093/analys/17.2.33Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten [1785], Kants Werke Bd.4, Berlin 1968. [Zit.: GMS.]Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel: Kritik der reinen Vernunft [1787], Kants Werke Bd.3, Berlin 1968. [Zit.: KrV.]Search in Google Scholar

Kienzler, Wolfgang: Wittgensteins Wende zu seiner Spätphilosophie. 1930 – 32, Frankfurt a. M. 1997.Search in Google Scholar

McGuinness, Brian (Hrsg.): Wittgenstein in Cambridge. Letters and Documents 1911 – 1951, Chichester ⁴2012.Search in Google Scholar

Moore, George Edward: Principia Ethica [1903], Cambridge 1922. [Zit.: PE.]Search in Google Scholar

Platon: Der Staat, übersetzt u. erläutert v. Otto Apelt, Hamburg 1988.10.28937/978-3-7873-2315-9Search in Google Scholar

Rhees, Rush: Discussions of Wittgenstein, London 1970.Search in Google Scholar

Scheler, Max: Zur Rehabilitierung der Tugend, Zürich 1950.Search in Google Scholar

Schubbe, Daniel, Lemanski, Jans & Hauswald, Rico (Hrsg.): Warum ist überhaupt etwas und nicht vielmehr nichts? Wandel und Variationen einer Frage, Hamburg 2013.10.28937/978-3-7873-2460-6Search in Google Scholar

Vossenkuhl, Wilhelm: Solipsismus und Sprachkritik. Beiträge zu Wittgenstein, Berlin 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Vossenkuhl, Wilhelm: The Practice of Following Rules, in: Wittgenstein-Studien 8 (2017), 137 – 158.10.1515/witt-2017-006Search in Google Scholar

Vossenkuhl, Wilhelm: Ethik und ihre Grenzen. Eine Einführung als Erzählung, Hamburg 2021.10.28937/978-3-7873-3966-2Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig & Rhees, Rush: Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Conversations with Rush Rhees (1939 – 50): From the notes of Rush Rhees, ed. by Gabriel Citron, in: Mind 124/493 (2015), 1 – 71.10.1093/mind/fzu200Search in Google Scholar

Online erschienen: 2023-06-21

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2023-0004