Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Criteria for a surfactant to be used sequentially as a grinding aid and collector

  • Dr. Reham M. Farag received her BSc, MSc and PhD in Mining Engineering from Cairo University, Egypt. She is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mining Engineering. Her research interests include crushing and grinding, ore preparation, mineral beneficiation, interfacial processes and chemical reagents in mineral processing.

    and

    Prof. Ayman A. El-Midany is Professor of Mining Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt. He received his PhD in 2004 from the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, USA. He has various teaching and research interests in the fields of mineral processing, applied surface and colloid chemistry, chemical metallurgy and environmental engineering. He has published several papers in international journals and conferences. He has participated in various industrial projects related to mining, rock and geological engineering and mineral industries, either international or local projects.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 25, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this study, the grinding and flotation of quartz were conducted in the presence of either a quaternary amine (QA) as a cationic surfactant or sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS) as an anionic surfactant. Both reagents were investigated to determine their suitability for sequential use as a grinding aid and a flotation collector. The results showed that although SDS was not an effective collector for quartz, it performed better than QA as a grinding aid. In contrast, the quaternary amine is efficient in both grinding and flotation. The effectiveness of SDS as a grinding aid is attributed to its ability to provide higher dispersion, which allows direct particle-grinding ball collisions to result in better grinding. However, the contamination of the quartz surface by cations, such as iron, which are predominantly present in a grinding mill, increases the floatability of quartz when SDS is used at the expense of its effectiveness as a grinding aid, as the dispersion becomes minimal. On the other hand, while the chemical affinity of QA to the quartz surface improves its flotation performance but slightly reduces the dispersion status.


Corresponding author: Ayman A. El-Midany, Mining and Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, E-mail:

About the authors

Reham M. Farag

Dr. Reham M. Farag received her BSc, MSc and PhD in Mining Engineering from Cairo University, Egypt. She is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mining Engineering. Her research interests include crushing and grinding, ore preparation, mineral beneficiation, interfacial processes and chemical reagents in mineral processing.

Ayman A. El-Midany

Prof. Ayman A. El-Midany is Professor of Mining Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt. He received his PhD in 2004 from the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, USA. He has various teaching and research interests in the fields of mineral processing, applied surface and colloid chemistry, chemical metallurgy and environmental engineering. He has published several papers in international journals and conferences. He has participated in various industrial projects related to mining, rock and geological engineering and mineral industries, either international or local projects.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank the Minerals Technology and testing lab, Mining, Petroleum and Metallurgical Engineering Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, for providing the help, guidance, and the needed equipment and instrumentation for conducting the experiments of this work.

  1. Research ethics: The authors are abide by the research ethics.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: Authors contributed equally and have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: Not applicable.

  5. Conflict of interest: No competing interest to report.

  6. Research funding: No funding to be declared.

  7. Data availability: All the necessary data used in the manuscript.

References

1. Senthilkumar, K.; Akilamudhan, P. Experimental Studies on Effect of Grinding Additives in Size Reduction Process. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2014, 6, 4428–4433. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:56342231.Search in Google Scholar

2. Toraman, O.; Çayirli, S.; Uçurum, M. The Grinding-Aids Effect of Moisture, Triethanolamine (TEA) and Ethylene Glycol (EG) on Grinding Performance and Product Quality of Calcite. Int. J. Engng. Res. Sci. 2016, 2, 121–128.Search in Google Scholar

3. El-Shall, H.; Somasundaran, P. Physico-Chemical Aspects of Grinding: A Review of Use of Additives. Powder Technol. 1984, 38, 275–293; https://doi.org/10.1016/00`32-5910(84)85009-3.10.1016/0032-5910(84)85009-3Search in Google Scholar

4. Gamal, R.; El-Midany, A. A. Enhancing Selective Dissolution of Manganese by Mechanochemical Process for Iron Ore Upgrading. Part. Sci. Technol. 2024, 42, 255–262; https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2023.2230459.Search in Google Scholar

5. Jeswiet, J.; Szekeres, A. Energy Consumption in Mining Comminution. In 23rd CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Vol. 48, 2016; pp. 140–145.10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.250Search in Google Scholar

6. Hamey, R. G.; El-Midany, A. A.; El-Shall, H. E. Novel Methodology for Mill Efficiency Determination Based on Particle Deformation. Energy 2023, 263, 125860; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125860.Search in Google Scholar

7. Farag, R. M.; El-Midany, A. A. Aspects of Talc Grinding in the Presence of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfonate (SDS). J. Surfactants Deterg. 2021, 24, 801–807; https://doi.org/10.1002/jsde.12504.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ohenoja, K.; Breitung, S.; Kinnunen, P.; Illikainen, M.; Saari, J.; Kwade, A.; Niinimaki, J. Ultrafine Grinding of Limestone with Sodium Polyacrylates as Additives in Ordinary Portland Cement Mortar. Chem. Engng. Technol. 2014, 37, 787–794; https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201300707.Search in Google Scholar

9. Chipakwe, V., Semsari, P.; Karlkvist, T.; Rosenkranz, J.; Chelgan, S. C. A Critical Review on the Mechanisms of Chemical Additives Used in Grinding and Their Effects on the Downstream Processes. J. Mater. Technol. 2020, 9, 8148–8162; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.080.Search in Google Scholar

10. Yang, A. The Influence of Grinding Aids on the Floatability of the Fine Cassiterite. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 1994, 28, 37–46.Search in Google Scholar

11. Klimpel, R.; Manfroy, W. Chemical Grinding Aids for Increasing Throughput in the Wet Grinding of Ores. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1978, 17, 518–523; https://doi.org/10.1021/i260068a022.Search in Google Scholar

12. Yusupov, T.; Kirillova, E. Surfactants in Fine Ore Grinding. J. Min. Sci. 2010, 46, 582–586; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10913-010-0073-y.Search in Google Scholar

13. Cebeci, Y.; Bayat, O. Effect of Flotation Reagents on the Wet Grinding of Celestite Concentrate. Indian J. Chem. Technol. 2004, 11, 382–387.Search in Google Scholar

14. Farag, R. M.; El-Midany, A. A. How Does the SDS Addition in Talc Grinding Affect its Floatability? Part. Sci. Technol. 2022, 40, 427–433; https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2021.1952666.Search in Google Scholar

15. El-Midany, A. A.; Farag, R. M. Foam in Grinding and Role of Ground Mineral in its Stability. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2024, 27, 269–275; https://doi.org/10.1002/jsde.12713.Search in Google Scholar

16. Gotze, J. Chemistry, Textures and Physical Properties of Quartz-Geological Interpretation and Technical Application. Mineral. Mag. 2009, 73, 645–671; https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2009.073.4.645.Search in Google Scholar

17. Muller, J. W.; Ihlen, P. Petrological and Chemical Characterization of High-Purity Quartz Deposits with Examples from Norway, Chapter 4, 2012; pp. 71–118.10.1007/978-3-642-22161-3_4Search in Google Scholar

18. Whitney, D.; Broz, M.; Cook, R. Hardness, Toughness, and Modulus of Some Common Metamorphic Minerals. Am. Min. 2007, 92, 281–288; https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2007.2212.Search in Google Scholar

19. El-Shall, H.; Vidanage, S.; Somasundaran, P. Grinding of Quartz in Amine Solutions. Int. J. Miner. Process. 1979, 6, 105–117; https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(79)90016-4.Search in Google Scholar

20. El-Mofty, S. E.; El-Bendary, A. M.; El-Midany, A. A.; Abdel-Rahman, M. K. Effect of Hydrophobicity on Talc Grinding in Attritor Mill. Theor. Found. Chem. Engng. 2023, 57, 1424–1430. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579523060039.Search in Google Scholar

21. Smith, R. W. Cationic and Amphoteric Collectors. In Reagents in Mineral Technology; Somasundaran, P.; Mondgil, B. M., Eds.; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

22. Fuerstenau, M.; Palmer, B. F.; Fuerstenau, M. C., Eds.; AIME: New York, 1976; p. 148.Search in Google Scholar

23. Smith, R.; Scott, J. Mechanisms of Dodecylamine Flotation of Quartz. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. Int. J. 1990, 7, 81–94; https://doi.org/10.1080/08827509008952667.Search in Google Scholar

24. Jiang, X.; Chen, J.; Wei, M.; Li, F.; Ban, B.; Li, J. Effect of Impurity Content Difference between Quartz Particles on Flotation Behavior and its Mechanism. Powder Technol. 2020, 375, 504–512; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.07.107.Search in Google Scholar

25. Szyszka, D.; Glapiak, E.; Drzymała, J. Entrainment-Flotation Activity of Quartz in the Presence of Selected Frothers. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2008, 42, 85–90.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-11-07
Accepted: 2025-03-05
Published Online: 2025-03-25
Published in Print: 2025-05-26

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.5.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tsd-2024-2638/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button