Home Optimization of the primary purification process of extracting sphorolipid from the fermentation broth to achieve a higher yield and purity
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Optimization of the primary purification process of extracting sphorolipid from the fermentation broth to achieve a higher yield and purity

  • Yogita Pal

    Yogita Pal: She was student at the Institute of Chemical Technology (University under Section 3 of UGC Act 1956, Formerly UDCT/UICT), Nathalal Parekh Marg, Matunga (East), Mumbai 400019, India.

    , Suraj N. Mali

    Suraj N. Mali: completed his M. Pharm (Pharmaceutical Chemistry) at Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai in 2019. He has completed his B. Pharm at Government College of Pharmacy, Karad, India. Then, he joined Dr. Reddy’s Lab, Hyderabad as analytical scientist. He has 61+ international publications of repute (Citations: 463; H-index: 14) at his credit in the field of drug discovery, medicinal chemistry, computer-aided drug design, and synthetic/organic chemistry. He is also associate editor member of Journal, “Current Indian Science” (Bentham Science Publisher).

    and Amit P. Pratap EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 6, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Sophorolipid (SL) is a surface-active glycolipid biosurfactant with promising industrial applications. It is synthesised by fermentation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic substrates using selected non-pathogenic yeasts. However, its applications are limited by high production costs and ineffective product recovery in downstream purification stages. Natural sophorolipids are produced in six to nine different hydrophobic sophorosides, where the carboxyl end of the fatty acid is either free, which is known as the acidic or open form, or it can be esterified internally to produce the lactonic form. The present study deals with the screening and selection of suitable solvents for the extraction of acidic and lactonic SL from fermentation broth. The optimisation study involves exhaustive extraction with the six different immiscible solvents ethyl acetate, butyl acetate, methylene dichloride, methyl tert.-butyl ether, methyl iso-butyl ketone and methyl ethyl ketone. The partition coefficient (Kd), which is the ratio of the solute concentration in the organic layer compared to the aqueous layer, determines the performance measurement of the extraction process in terms of yield and purity of the desired solute. The factors that influence exhaustive extraction were the broth to solvent ratio and the extraction stages. The optimal extraction conditions for the highest possible yield were a broth to solvent ratio of 1:1 and a number of extraction steps of 2. Methylene dichloride showed better results in terms of yield and selectivity in the extraction of acidic and lactonic SL from the fermentation broth compared to the other solvents investigated. For lactonic SL, the highest Kd value determined was 36.6 and for acidic SL the highest Kd value was 1.14.


Corresponding author: Amit P. Pratap, Department of Oils, Oleochemicals and Surfactants Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology (University under Section 3 of UGC Act 1956, Formerly UDCT/UICT), Nathalal Parekh Marg, Matunga (East), Mumbai 400019, India, E-mail:

About the authors

Yogita Pal

Yogita Pal: She was student at the Institute of Chemical Technology (University under Section 3 of UGC Act 1956, Formerly UDCT/UICT), Nathalal Parekh Marg, Matunga (East), Mumbai 400019, India.

Suraj N. Mali

Suraj N. Mali: completed his M. Pharm (Pharmaceutical Chemistry) at Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai in 2019. He has completed his B. Pharm at Government College of Pharmacy, Karad, India. Then, he joined Dr. Reddy’s Lab, Hyderabad as analytical scientist. He has 61+ international publications of repute (Citations: 463; H-index: 14) at his credit in the field of drug discovery, medicinal chemistry, computer-aided drug design, and synthetic/organic chemistry. He is also associate editor member of Journal, “Current Indian Science” (Bentham Science Publisher).

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: Authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

References

1. Fleurackers, S. J. On the use of waste frying oil in the synthesis of sophorolipids. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2006, 108, 5–12; https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200500237.Search in Google Scholar

2. Claus, S., Van Bogaert, I. N. Sophorolipid production by yeasts: a critical review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 7811–7821; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8519-7.Search in Google Scholar

3. Archana, K., Sathi Reddy, K., Parameshwar, J., Bee, H. Isolation and characterization of sophorolipid producing yeast from fruit waste for application as antibacterial agent. J. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 2, 107–115; https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-019-00069-x.Search in Google Scholar

4. Ashby, R. D., McAloon, A. J., Solaiman, D. K., Yee, W. C., Reed, M. A process model for approximating the production costs of the fermentative synthesis of sophorolipids. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2013, 16, 683–691; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-013-1466-0.Search in Google Scholar

5. Daniel, H. J., Otto, R. T., Reuss, M., Syldatk, C. Sophorolipid production with high yields on whey concentrate and rapeseed oil without consumption of lactose. Biotechnol. Lett. 1998, 20, 805–807; https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BILE.0000015927.29348.1a.10.1023/B:BILE.0000015927.29348.1aSearch in Google Scholar

6. Gautam, K. K., Tyagi, V. K. Microbial surfactants: a review. J. Oleo Sci. 2006, 55, 155–166; https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.55.155.Search in Google Scholar

7. Van Bogaert, I. N., Saerens, K., De Muynck, C., Develter, D., Soetaert, W., Vandamme, E. J. Microbial production and application of sophorolipids. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 76, 23–34; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-0988-7.Search in Google Scholar

8. Makkar, R., Cameotra, S. An update on the use of unconventional substrates for biosurfactant production and their new applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 428–434; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-001-0924-1.Search in Google Scholar

9. Lang, S. Biological amphiphiles (microbial biosurfactants). Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 7, 12–20; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0294(02)00007-9.Search in Google Scholar

10. Matvyeyeva, O. L., Aliievа, O. R. Microbial biosurfactants role in oil products biodegradation. Int. J. Environ. Bioremediat. Biodegrad. 2014, 2, 69–74.Search in Google Scholar

11. Van Bogaert, I. N., Soetaert, W. Sophorolipids. In Biosurfactants; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011; pp. 179–210.10.1007/978-3-642-14490-5_7Search in Google Scholar

12. Pekin, G., Vardar-Sukan, F., Kosaric, N. Production of sophorolipids from Candida bombicola ATCC 22214 using Turkish corn oil and honey. Eng. Life Sci. 2005, 5, 357–362; https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200520086.Search in Google Scholar

13. Mukherjee, S., Das, P., Sen, R. Towards commercial production of microbial surfactants. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 509–515; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.09.005.Search in Google Scholar

14. Deshpande, M., Daniels, L. Evaluation of sophorolipid biosurfactant production by Candida bombicola using animal fat. Bioresource Tech. 1995, 54, 143–150; https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(95)00116-6.Search in Google Scholar

15. Weuster-Botz, D., Hekmat, D., Puskeiler, R., Franco-Lara, E. Enabling technologies: fermentation and downstream processing. In White Biotechnology; Ulber R., Sell D., Eds. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006; pp. 205–247; https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2006_034.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Chen, J., Song, X., Zhang, H., Qu, Y. B., Miao, J. Y. Sophorolipid produced from the new yeast strain Wickerhamiella domercqiae induces apoptosis in H7402 human liver cancer cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 72, 52–59; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0243-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Tang, Y., Ma, Q., Du, Y., Ren, L., Van Zyl, L. J., Long, X. Efficient purification of sophorolipids via chemical modifications coupled with extractions and their potential applications as antibacterial agents. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2020, 245, 116897; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116897.Search in Google Scholar

18. Shah, V. H., Pham, V., Larsen, P., Biswas, S., Frank, T. Liquid–liquid extraction for recovering low margin chemicals: thinking beyond the partition ratio. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 1731–1739; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03914.Search in Google Scholar

19. Daverey, A., Pakshirajan, K. Sophorolipids from Candida bombicola using mixed hydrophilic substrates: production, purification and characterization. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2010, 79, 246–253; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.04.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Chen, J., Song, X., Zhang, H., Qu, Y. Production, structure elucidation and anticancer properties of sophorolipid from Wickerhamiella domercqiae. Enzyme Microbial. Tech. 2006, 39, 501–506; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.12.022.Search in Google Scholar

21. Bhangale, A. P., Wadekar, S. D., Kale, S. B., Mali, S. N., Pratap, A. P. Non-traditional oils with water-soluble substrate as cell growth booster for the production of mannosylerythritol lipids by Pseudozyma antarctica (ATCC 32657) with their antimicrobial activity. Tenside Surfactants Detergents 2022, 59, 122–133; https://doi.org/10.1515/tsd-2021-2366.Search in Google Scholar

22. Pratap, A. P., Mestri, R. S., Mali, S. N. Waste derived-green and sustainable production of Sophorolipid. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100209; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100209.Search in Google Scholar

23. Sivagiri, S. D., Mali, S. N., Pratap, A. P. Improved synthesis of sophorolipid biosurfactants using industrial by-products and their practical application. Tenside Surfactants Detergents 2022, 59, 17–30; https://doi.org/10.1515/tsd-2021-2365.Search in Google Scholar

24. Singh, P. S., Mali, S., Sangale, N. R., Pratap, A. P. Synthesis of (2-hydroxyl-3-butoxyl) propyl-succinyl-chitosan (HBP-SCCHS)–an amino sugar anionic surfactant under Microwave Irradiation and its application;(TJPS-2021-0086. R1). Thai J. Pharm. Sci. (TJPS) 2021, 45, 461–469; http://www.tjps.pharm.chula.ac.th/ojs/index.php/tjps/article/view/552.10.56808/3027-7922.2527Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-04-20
Accepted: 2022-06-17
Published Online: 2022-09-06
Published in Print: 2022-09-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tsd-2022-2450/html
Scroll to top button