Complex weight distinctions in Harmonic Serialism
-
Faisal Al-Mohanna
Abstract
A number of the quantity-sensitive stress systems which are characterised by complex weight distinctions have often proven challenging for parallel constraint-based metrical frameworks. A number of parallel-OT accounts are proposed to explain stress systems with multi-level weight hierarchies, in which syllables with long vowels (CVV) are more prominent than closed syllables (CVC), and closed syllables are more prominent than short open syllables (CV). The majority of these accounts are either inadequate or implausible. This paper seeks to provide an alternative account of stress systems with complex weight distinctions. Gradual prosodification, as an application of Harmonic Serialism, is the proposed framework for analysis. Maintaining gradualness and harmonic improvement in prosodic structure across the different steps of the derivation is deemed to be sufficient to achieve the required effects. The realisation of the various prominence relations illustrated in those multi-level weight hierarchies is considered to be an epiphenomenon of the sequential application of independently motivated prosodification processes, such as coda consonant moraification and foot construction. The proposed gradual prosodification model is applied to the stress systems of Kashmiri and Pulaar, that have identical algorithms for primary stress assignment, in addition to the secondary stress patten attested in Pulaar.
References
Alderete, John. 2001. Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness. Phonology 18. 201–253. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675701004067.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Mohanna, Faisal. 2021. San’ani Arabic stress in Harmonic Serialism. International Journal of English Linguistics 11(6). 49–83. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n6p49.Suche in Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rakesh. 1989. Syllable weight and metrical structure of Kashmiri. Ms. Urbana: University of Illinois.Suche in Google Scholar
Broselow, Ellen, Su-I. Chen & Marie Huffman. 1997. Syllable weight: Convergence of phonology and phonetics. Phonology 14. 47–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095267579700331x.Suche in Google Scholar
Crowhurst, Megan. 1996. An optimal alternative to Conflation. Phonology 13. 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700002694.Suche in Google Scholar
Crowhurst, Megan & Lev Michael. 2005. Iterative footing and prominence-driven stress in Nanti (Kampa). Language 81(1). 47–95. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0013.Suche in Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul. 1997. Prosodic categorisation. Auckland: University of Auckland MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Elfner, Emily. 2009. Syllabification and stress-epenthesis interactions in Harmonic Serialism. Ms. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. (ROA-1047).Suche in Google Scholar
Elsman, Minta. 2016. Parallelism vs. Serialism, or constraints vs. Rules? Tongan stress and syllabification revisited. In John McCarthy & Joe Pater (eds.), Harmonic grammar and Harmonic Serialism, 139–154. Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2002a. A phonetically-driven account of syllable weight. Language 78. 51–80. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2002.0020.Suche in Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2002b. A factorial typology of quantity insensitive stress. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20. 491–552. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015810531699.10.1023/A:1015810531699Suche in Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2006. Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, typology. New York, NY: Routledge Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1987. An Essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 253–306.Suche in Google Scholar
Hyde, Brett. 2002. A restrictive theory of metrical stress. Phonology 19. 313–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675703004391.Suche in Google Scholar
Kager, René. 1999. Optimality theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812408Suche in Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2000. Harmonic Serialism and parallelism. In Masako Hirotani (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 30, 501–524. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2002. A thematic guide to optimality theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613333Suche in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2006. Restraint of analysis. In Eric Bakovic, Junko Ito & John McCarthy (eds.), Wondering at the natural fecundity of things: Essays in Honor of Alan Prince, 195–219. UC Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center.Suche in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2008. Doing optimality theory. Malden, MA, & Oxford, UK: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444301182Suche in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2010a. An introduction to Harmonic Serialism. Language and Linguistics Compass 4. 1001–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00240.x.Suche in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2010b. Harmonic serialism supplement to doing optimality theory. Ms. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. (ROA-1099).Suche in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2016. The theory and practice of Harmonic Serialism. In John McCarthy & Joe Pater (eds.), Harmonic grammar and Harmonic Serialism, 47–87. Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Allan Prince. 1993a. Generalized alignment. In Geert Booij & Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3712-8_4Suche in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1993b. Prosodic morphology: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Technical Report. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.Suche in Google Scholar
Mc Laughlin, Fiona & Caroline Wiltshire. 2017. Syllable weight in the phonology of Pulaar. In Paul Newman (ed.), Syllable weight in African languages (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 338), 161–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.338.10lauSuche in Google Scholar
Morén, Bruce. 2000. The puzzle of Kashmiri stress: Implications for weight theory. Phonology 17. 365–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675701003967.Suche in Google Scholar
Munshi, Sadaf & Megan Crowhurst. 2012. Weight sensitivity and syllable codas in Srinagar Koshur. Journal of Linguistics 48. 427–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226712000096.Suche in Google Scholar
Niang, Mamadou. 1995. Syllable “sonority” hierarchy and Pulaar stress: A metrical approach. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 20. 53–68. https://doi.org/10.17161/kwpl.1808.447.Suche in Google Scholar
Niang, Mamadou. 1997. Constraints on Pulaar phonology. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Suche in Google Scholar
Parker, Steve. 2013. Disjoint metrical tiers and positional markedness in Huariapano (Panobo). GIALENS 7.1.Suche in Google Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2012. Serial harmonic grammar and Berber syllabification. In Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara, Mariko Sugahara & Takahito Shinya (eds.), Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk, 43–72. Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar
Prince, Alan. 1991. Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization. In Michal Ziolkowski, Manuela Noske & Karen Deaton (eds.), Papers from the 26th Linguistic Society: Parasession on the syllable in phonetics and phonology, 355–398. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Suche in Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA, & Oxford: Blackwell. [Revision of 1993 technical report, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science].10.1002/9780470759400Suche in Google Scholar
Pruitt, Kathryn. 2008. Iterative foot optimization and locality in stress systems. Ms. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts. (ROA-999).Suche in Google Scholar
Pruitt, Kathryn. 2010. Serialism and locality in constraint-based metrical parsing. Phonology 27. 481–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675710000229.Suche in Google Scholar
Pruitt, Kathryn. 2012. Stress in Harmonic Serialism. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Rosenthall, Sam & Harry van der Hulst. 1999. Weight-by-position by position. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 499–540. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006283229291.10.1023/A:1006283229291Suche in Google Scholar
Ryan, Kevin. 2020. VV > VC > V for stress: Coercion vs. prominence. Linguistic Inquiry 51(1). 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00325.Suche in Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. The prosodic structure of function words. In Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne. Urbanczyk (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, 439–470. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Sherer, Tim. 1994. Prosodic phonotactics. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul. 1995. On the internal structure of the constraint component of UG. Ms. Los Angeles, CA: University of California. (ROA-86).Suche in Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2019. CiV lengthening and the weight of CV. In Margit Bowler, Philip Duncan, Travis Major & Harold Torrence (eds.), Schuhschrift: Papers in Honor of Russell Schuh, 160–176. Los Angeles, CA: eScholarship Publishing, University of California.Suche in Google Scholar
Torres-Tamarit, Francese. 2016. Compensatory and opaque vowel lengthening in Harmonic Serialism. In John McCarthy & Joe Pater (eds.), Harmonic grammar and Harmonic Serialism, 301–326. Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar
Torres-Tamarit, Francese & Claudia Pons-Moll. 2012. Serial prosodification and voiced stop geminates in Catalan. In Irene Franco, Sara Lusini & Andrés Saab (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2010: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Leiden 2010, 115–134. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/rllt.4.06torSuche in Google Scholar
Wiltshire, Caroline. 2006. Pulaar’s stress system: A challenge for theories of weight typology. In John Mugane, John Hutchison & Dee Worman (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 181–192. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- A comparative syntax of the formal politeness markers in Japanese and Korean: -Mas/-Des and -(Su)pni
- Negative concord by phase: multiple downward agree and the parametrization of edge features
- Complex weight distinctions in Harmonic Serialism
- A footless stroll through Italian stress
- Proleptic objects as complex-NPs
- Specifier-to-head reanalysis: evidence from mandarin and Cantonese
- The interaction between modality and negation in Turkish
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- A comparative syntax of the formal politeness markers in Japanese and Korean: -Mas/-Des and -(Su)pni
- Negative concord by phase: multiple downward agree and the parametrization of edge features
- Complex weight distinctions in Harmonic Serialism
- A footless stroll through Italian stress
- Proleptic objects as complex-NPs
- Specifier-to-head reanalysis: evidence from mandarin and Cantonese
- The interaction between modality and negation in Turkish
