Proleptic objects as complex-NPs

References

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2017. Left dislocation. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn. 2137–2170. Hoboken, USA: Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom007Search in Google Scholar

Ashton, Ethel. 1947. Swahili grammar. London: Longmans.Search in Google Scholar

Asudeh, Ash & Ida Toivonen. 2012. Copy raising and perception. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30. 321–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-012-9168-2.Search in Google Scholar

Bochnak, Ryan & Emily Hanink. 2022. Clausal embedding in Washo: Complementation vs. modification. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40(4). 979–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-021-09532-z.Search in Google Scholar

Bondarenko, Tanya. 2020. Factivity from pre-existance: Evidence from Barguzin Buryat. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1196.Search in Google Scholar

Branigan, Phil & Marguerite MacKenzie. 2002. Altruism, A¯ -movement, and object agreement in Innu-aimûn. Linguistic Inquiry 33(3). 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902760168545.Search in Google Scholar

Browning, Marguerite. 1987. Null operator constructions. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Victoria. 2018. The raising-to-object construction in Puyuma and its implications for a typology of RTO. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 1–34. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.423.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2020. The syntax of relative clauses: A unified analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108856195Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris & Andrew Radford. 2015. Gaps, ghosts, and gapless relatives in spoken English. Studia Linguistica 69(2). 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12033.Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Pete & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Davies, William. 2005. Madurese prolepsis and its implications for a typology of raising. Language 81. 645–665. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0121.Search in Google Scholar

Davison, Alice. 1984. Syntactic markedness and the definition of sentence topic. Language 60(4). 797–846. https://doi.org/10.2307/413799.Search in Google Scholar

Dawson, Virginia & Amy Rose Deal. 2019. Third readings by semantic scope lowering: Prolepsis in Tiwa. In M. Teresa Espinal, Elena Castroviejo, Manuel Leonetti, Louise McNally & Cristina Real-Puigdollars (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23, 1, 329–346. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Search in Google Scholar

Deal, Amy Rose. 2018. Compositional paths to de re. Proceedings of SALT 28. 622–648. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4443.Search in Google Scholar

den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

den Dikken, Marcel. 2017. Predication in the syntax of hyperraising and copy-raising. Acta Linguistica Academica 64(1). 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2017.64.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

Elliott, Patrick. 2017. Explaining DPs vs. CPs without syntax. Proceedings of CLS 52. 171–185.Search in Google Scholar

Elliott, Patrick. 2017/2020. Elements of clausal embedding. PhD thesis, University College London.Search in Google Scholar

Finholt, Aron & John Gluckman. 2023. A corpus analysis of Swahili’s dual-complementizer system. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 44(1). 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2023-2005.Search in Google Scholar

Gluckman, John. 2021. The meaning of the tough-construction. Natural Language Semantics 29. 453–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-021-09181-3.Search in Google Scholar

Gluckman, John. 2023. Towards a typology of Bantu complementizers. Handout from ACAL 54 at the University of Connecticut.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeannette. 1988. Universals of topic-comment structure. In Michael Hammond, Edith Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 209–239. John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.17.16gunSearch in Google Scholar

Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. Aspects of modality. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Heycock, Caroline. 1991. Layers of predication: The non-lexical status of clauses. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar

Heycock, Caroline & Edit Doron. 2003. Categorical subjects. Gengo Kenkyu 123. 95–135.Search in Google Scholar

Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. Multiple agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 40. 67–80.Search in Google Scholar

Hoeksma, Jack & Ankelien Schippers. 2012. Diachronic changes in long-distance dependencies. In Ans van Kemenade & Nynke de Haas (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2009: Selected papers from the 19th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Nijmegen, 155–170. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.320.08hoeSearch in Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 1991. Raising-to-object, ECM, and the major object in Japanese. Presented at the Japanese Syntax Workshop at the University of Rochester.Search in Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 2005. A major object analysis of the so-called raising-to-object construction in Japanese (LSA at Harvard). Handout from the LSA Workship on Raising and Control.Search in Google Scholar

Irmer, Matthias. 2011. Bridging inferences: Constraining and resolving underspecification in discourse interpretation. Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110262018Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Progress in Linguistics: A Collection of Papers, 143–173. De Gruyter Moulton.Search in Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki. 2021. ECM subjects in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 30(3). 231–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-021-09226-y.Search in Google Scholar

Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 1985. Barriers to government. North East Linguistics Society 16. 249–273.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 2006. Decomposing attitude verbs. Available at: http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/DcwY2JkM/attitude-verbs2006.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 2013. Modality for the 21st century. In The Language-Cognition Interface: 19th International Congress of Linguists.Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1976. Subject raising. In M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and semantics 3: Japanese generative grammar, 17–49. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368835_003Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 2010. Revisiting the two double-nominative constructions in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 26. 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-2010-0106.Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Informations structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar

Landau, Idan. 2010. The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 41(3). 357–388. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00001.Search in Google Scholar

Landau, Idan. 2011. Predication vs. aboutness in copy raising. Natural Language & Linguistics Theory 29(3). 779–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9134-4.Search in Google Scholar

Lappin, Shalom. 1984. Predication and raising. In Charles Jones & Peter Sells (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 14, 236–252. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Lohninger, Magdelena, Iva Kovač & Susanne Wurmbrand. 2022. From prolepsis to hyperraising. Philosophies 7(32). https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7020032.Search in Google Scholar

Major, Travis. 2021. On the nature of “say” complementation. PhD thesis. Los Angeles: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

Makino, Seiichi & Michio Tsutsui. 1986. A dictionary of basic Japanese grammar. Tokyo: The Japan Times.Search in Google Scholar

Moulton, Keir. 2009. Natural selection and the syntax of clausal complementation. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Moulton, Keir. 2013. Not moving clauses: Connectivity in clausal arguments. Syntax 16(3). 250–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12007.Search in Google Scholar

Moulton, Keir. 2015. CPs: Copies and compositionality. Linguistic Inquiry 46(2). 305–342. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00183.Search in Google Scholar

Mpiranya, Fidèle. 2015. Swahili grammar and workbook. Routledge.10.4324/9781315750699Search in Google Scholar

Murata, Masami. 1999. Syntax and semantics of the nominals mono and koto in Japanese. Master’s thesis. Massey University.Search in Google Scholar

Onea, Edgar. 2024. From information structure to argument structure. To the left, to the right, and much in between: A Feschrift for Katharina Hartman, 275–287. Frankfurt am Main: University of Frankfurt.Search in Google Scholar

Onea, Edgar & Alezandru Mardale. 2020. From topic to object, grammaticalization differential object marking in Romanian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 65(3). 350–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2020.12.Search in Google Scholar

Portner, Paul & Katsuhiko Yabushita. 1998. The semantics and pragmatics of topic phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 21(2). 117–157. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005311504497.10.1023/A:1005311504497Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen. 1998. On the limits of syntax, with reference to left-dislocation and topicalization. The limits of syntax, 281–302. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004373167_011Search in Google Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 2018. Colloquial English: Structure and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108552202Search in Google Scholar

Rawlins, Kyle. 2013. About about. Proceedings of SALT 23. 336–357. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v0i0.2688.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and Linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosphica 1. 53–94. https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82606.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Lilianne Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru. 1983. Comments on the papers on generative syntax. Studies in generative grammar and language acquisition: A report on recent trends in linguistics, 79–89. Mitaka, Japan: International Christian University.Search in Google Scholar

Salzmann, Martin. 2017. Reconstrution and resumption in indirect A′-dependencies. On the syntax of prolepsis and relativization in (Swiss) German and beyond. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781614512202Search in Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2001. Non-canonical constructions in Japanese. In Alexandra Aikhenvald, Robert Dixon & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds.), Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects, 307–354. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.46.11shiSearch in Google Scholar

Takano, Yuji. 2003. Nominative objects in Japanese complex predicate constructions: A prolepsis analysis. Natural Language & Linguistics Theory 21(4). 779–834. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025545313178.10.1023/A:1025545313178Search in Google Scholar

Takubo, Yuji. 2008. Overt marker for individual sublimation in Japanese. Current issues in the history and structure of Japanese, 135–151. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Search in Google Scholar

Tsilia, Anastasia. 2023. Proleptic constructions in modern Greek. In Maria Onoeva, Anna Staňková & Radek Šimík (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 27, 655–673. Praha: Charles University.Search in Google Scholar

van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1997. Left dislocation. In Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.), Materials on left dislocation, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Villa-García, Julio. 2023. Hanging topic left dislocations as extrasentential constituents: Towards a paratactic account. Evidence from English and Spanish. The Linguistic Review 40(2). 265–310. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2023-2003.Search in Google Scholar

Yoon, James. 2007. Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25. 615–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9020-2.Search in Google Scholar

Zyman, Eric. 2022. Proleptic PPs are arguments: Consequences for the argument/adjunct distinction and for selectional switch. The Linguistic Review 39(1). 129–158.https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2021-2083.Search in Google Scholar