Abstract
This paper offers a unified analysis of the coded meaning of Spanish conditional marker si es que: it conventionally conveys conditionality and the speaker’s lack of commitment to the proposition. This second meaning differentiates si es que from the general conditional marker si. It is also argued that si es que has two values: suspending a proposition and expressing a necessary condition, and established that these two share the conventional meaning but differ in the discourse status of the proposition: suspension takes place when the proposition was explicitly evoked in previous discourse, while the marking of necessary conditionals takes place when the proposition is not evoked, but typically new information. The analysis of Spanish si es que contributes to determining the relationship between the operation of suspending a content and the expression of conditionality.
References
Abusch, Dorit. 2010. Presupposition triggering from alternatives. Journal of Semantics 27. 37–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp009.Suche in Google Scholar
Abbott, Barbara. 2006a. Conditionals in English and FOPL. In Dingfang Shu & Ken Turner (eds.), Contrasting meanings in languages of the East and West. Oxford/New York: Peter Lang. Available at: https://msu.edu/∼abbottb/CondsinE&F.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Abbott, Barbara. 2006b. Where have some of the presuppositions gone?. In Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 1–20. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.80.02abbSuche in Google Scholar
Abrusán, Márta. 2016. Presupposition cancellation: Explaining the soft-hard trigger distinction. Natural Language Semantics 24. 165–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-016-9122-7.Suche in Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki & René Dirven. 2000. Pragmatic conditionals. In Ad Foolen & Frederike van der Leek (eds.), Constructions in cognitive lingüistics: Selected papers from the fifth international cognitive linguistics conference, Amsterdam 1997, 1–26. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.178.03athSuche in Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J. & Gregory Ward. 1998. Information status and noncanonical world order in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.40Suche in Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar. Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486760Suche in Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed. 2001. Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110851748Suche in Google Scholar
España Villasante, Margarita. 1996. Aspectos semántico-pragmáticos de la construcción “es que” en español. DICENDA. Cuadernos de Filología Hispánica 14. 129–147. Available at: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/DICE/article/view/DICE9696110129A.Suche in Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2014. The prospective as nonveridical: Polarity items, speaker commitment, and projected truth. In Jack Hoeksema & Dicky Gilberts (eds.), The black book. Feestschrift for frans zwarts, 101–124. Groningen: CLCG.Suche in Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Alda Mari. To appear. Veridicality in grammar and thought: modality, propositional attitudes and negation. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2013. Expressives and beyond: An introduction to varieties of use-conditional meaning. In Daniel Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Beyond expressives: Explorations in use-conditional meaning, 1–58. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004183988_002Suche in Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Los Angeles PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Jayez, Jacques, Valeria Mongeli, Anne Reboul & Jean-Baptiste van der Henst. 2015. Weak and strong triggers. In Florian Schwarz (ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions, 173–194. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-07980-6_8Suche in Google Scholar
Leahy, Brian. 2011. Presuppositions and antipresuppositions in conditionals. In Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches & David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 21, 257–274. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Department of Linguistics.10.3765/salt.v21i0.2613Suche in Google Scholar
Liu, Mingya. 2019. The elastic nonveridicality property of indicative conditionals. Linguistics Vanguard 5. 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0007.Suche in Google Scholar
Montolío, Estrella. 1999. Las construcciones condicionales. En Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 3, 3643–3738. Madrid: Espasa.Suche in Google Scholar
Nickerson, Raymond. 2015. Conditional reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190202996.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–233. New York, NY: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Reyes, Graciela. 1995. El abecé de la pragmática. Madrid: Arco Libros.Suche in Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. 1999. Pragmatics of conditional marking: Implicature, scalarity, and exclusivity. New York: Garland.Suche in Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. 2016. Meaning and interaction in Spanish independent si-clauses. Language Sciences 58. 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.04.007.Suche in Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy. 2001. On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Semantics and linguistic theory 11, 431–448. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_13Suche in Google Scholar
Visconti, Jacqueline. 1996. On English and Italian complex conditional connectives: Matching features and implicatures in defining semanto-pragmatic equivalence. Language Sciences 18(1). 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(96)00034-4.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- On necessary conditional marking and proposition suspension: The meaning of the Spanish construction si es que
- General location across languages: On the division of labour between functional and lexical items in spatial categories
- Prominence conditioned transformation in metrical analysis
- Crosslinguistic similarity and variation in the simultaneous morphology of sign languages
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- On necessary conditional marking and proposition suspension: The meaning of the Spanish construction si es que
- General location across languages: On the division of labour between functional and lexical items in spatial categories
- Prominence conditioned transformation in metrical analysis
- Crosslinguistic similarity and variation in the simultaneous morphology of sign languages