Home Linguistics & Semiotics On necessary conditional marking and proposition suspension: The meaning of the Spanish construction si es que
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On necessary conditional marking and proposition suspension: The meaning of the Spanish construction si es que

  • Asela Reig Alamillo ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 21, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper offers a unified analysis of the coded meaning of Spanish conditional marker si es que: it conventionally conveys conditionality and the speaker’s lack of commitment to the proposition. This second meaning differentiates si es que from the general conditional marker si. It is also argued that si es que has two values: suspending a proposition and expressing a necessary condition, and established that these two share the conventional meaning but differ in the discourse status of the proposition: suspension takes place when the proposition was explicitly evoked in previous discourse, while the marking of necessary conditionals takes place when the proposition is not evoked, but typically new information. The analysis of Spanish si es que contributes to determining the relationship between the operation of suspending a content and the expression of conditionality.


Corresponding author: Asela Reig Alamillo, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Cognitivas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, 62209Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, E-mail:

References

Abusch, Dorit. 2010. Presupposition triggering from alternatives. Journal of Semantics 27. 37–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp009.Search in Google Scholar

Abbott, Barbara. 2006a. Conditionals in English and FOPL. In Dingfang Shu & Ken Turner (eds.), Contrasting meanings in languages of the East and West. Oxford/New York: Peter Lang. Available at: https://msu.edu/∼abbottb/CondsinE&F.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Abbott, Barbara. 2006b. Where have some of the presuppositions gone?. In Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 1–20. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.80.02abbSearch in Google Scholar

Abrusán, Márta. 2016. Presupposition cancellation: Explaining the soft-hard trigger distinction. Natural Language Semantics 24. 165–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-016-9122-7.Search in Google Scholar

Athanasiadou, Angeliki & René Dirven. 2000. Pragmatic conditionals. In Ad Foolen & Frederike van der Leek (eds.), Constructions in cognitive lingüistics: Selected papers from the fifth international cognitive linguistics conference, Amsterdam 1997, 1–26. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.178.03athSearch in Google Scholar

Birner, Betty J. & Gregory Ward. 1998. Information status and noncanonical world order in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.40Search in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar. Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486760Search in Google Scholar

Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed. 2001. Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110851748Search in Google Scholar

España Villasante, Margarita. 1996. Aspectos semántico-pragmáticos de la construcción “es que” en español. DICENDA. Cuadernos de Filología Hispánica 14. 129–147. Available at: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/DICE/article/view/DICE9696110129A.Search in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2014. The prospective as nonveridical: Polarity items, speaker commitment, and projected truth. In Jack Hoeksema & Dicky Gilberts (eds.), The black book. Feestschrift for frans zwarts, 101–124. Groningen: CLCG.Search in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia & Alda Mari. To appear. Veridicality in grammar and thought: modality, propositional attitudes and negation. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gutzmann, Daniel. 2013. Expressives and beyond: An introduction to varieties of use-conditional meaning. In Daniel Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Beyond expressives: Explorations in use-conditional meaning, 1–58. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004183988_002Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Los Angeles PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Jayez, Jacques, Valeria Mongeli, Anne Reboul & Jean-Baptiste van der Henst. 2015. Weak and strong triggers. In Florian Schwarz (ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions, 173–194. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-07980-6_8Search in Google Scholar

Leahy, Brian. 2011. Presuppositions and antipresuppositions in conditionals. In Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches & David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 21, 257–274. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Department of Linguistics.10.3765/salt.v21i0.2613Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Mingya. 2019. The elastic nonveridicality property of indicative conditionals. Linguistics Vanguard 5. 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Montolío, Estrella. 1999. Las construcciones condicionales. En Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 3, 3643–3738. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

Nickerson, Raymond. 2015. Conditional reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190202996.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–233. New York, NY: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reyes, Graciela. 1995. El abecé de la pragmática. Madrid: Arco Libros.Search in Google Scholar

Schwenter, Scott A. 1999. Pragmatics of conditional marking: Implicature, scalarity, and exclusivity. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Schwenter, Scott A. 2016. Meaning and interaction in Spanish independent si-clauses. Language Sciences 58. 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.04.007.Search in Google Scholar

Simons, Mandy. 2001. On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Semantics and linguistic theory 11, 431–448. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_13Search in Google Scholar

Visconti, Jacqueline. 1996. On English and Italian complex conditional connectives: Matching features and implicatures in defining semanto-pragmatic equivalence. Language Sciences 18(1). 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(96)00034-4.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-10-21
Published in Print: 2021-02-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tlr-2020-2052/pdf
Scroll to top button