Three worlds of variables to control in linguistics

References

Allen, J. Sean, Joanne L. Miller & David DeSteno. 2003. Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113. 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1528172.Search in Google Scholar

Berko, Jean. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661.Search in Google Scholar

Blasi, Damián E., Steven Moran, Scott R. Moisik, Widmer Paul, Dan Dediu & Balthasar Bickel. 2019. Human sound systems are shaped by post-neolithic changes in bite configuration. Science 363(6432). eaav3218. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav3218.Search in Google Scholar

Byrd, Dani. 1992. Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92. 593–596. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.404271.Search in Google Scholar

Byrd, Dani. 1994. Relations of sex and dialect to reduction. Speech Communication 15. 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(94)90039-6.Search in Google Scholar

Capone, Alessandro. 2018. Pragmemes (again). Lingua 209. 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

Carnie, Andrew. 2010. Constituent structure, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Carnie, Andrew. 2013. Syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1965. Some controversial questions in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 1. 97–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700001134.Search in Google Scholar

Cleland, Carol E. 2002. Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science 69. 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1086/342455.Search in Google Scholar

Coleman, Ralph O. 1976. A comparison of the contributions of two voice quality characteristics to the perception of maleness and femaleness in the voice. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 19. 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1901.168.Search in Google Scholar

Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. London: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff. 2010. Quantitative methods alone are not enough: Response to Gibson and Fedorenko. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14. 234–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.012.Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, Anne. 1981. Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? Cognition 10. 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90026-3.Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, Anne, Delphine Dahan & Wilma Van Donselaar. 1997. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech 40. 141–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099704000203.Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 1997. The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Journal of Linguistics 35. 735–766. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.4.735.Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2010. Naive v. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review 27. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2010.001.Search in Google Scholar

DeCasper, Anthony J. & William P. Fifer. 1980. Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science 208(4448). 1174–1176. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7375928.Search in Google Scholar

DeCasper, Anthony J. & Melanie J. Spence. 1986. Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns’ perception of speech sounds. Infant Behavior and Development 9. 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(86)90025-1.Search in Google Scholar

Everett, Caleb, Damián E. Blasí & Seán G. Roberts. 2016. Language evolution and climate: The case of desiccation and tone. Journal of Language Evolution 1. 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzv004.Search in Google Scholar

Featherston, Sam. 2007. Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics 33. 269–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl.2007.020.Search in Google Scholar

Fernald, Anne & Thomas Simon. 1984. Expanded intonation contours in mothers’ speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology 20. 104. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.20.1.104.Search in Google Scholar

Fromkin, Victoria, Robert Rodman & Nina Hyams. 2011. An introduction to language. Boston: Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward & Evelina Fedorenko. 2010. Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14. 233–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward & Evelina Fedorenko. 2013. The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language & Cognitive Processes 28. 88–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.515080.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward & Neal J. Pearlmutter. 1998. Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2. 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01187-5.Search in Google Scholar

Han, Mieko S. & Raymond S. Weitzman. 1970. Acoustic features of Korean/P, T, K/, /p, t, k/ and /ph, th, kh/. Phonetica 22. 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259311.Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 2018 [1807]. The phenomenology of spirit, translated by Terry Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Henton, Caroline. 1995. Cross-language variation in the vowels of female and male speakers. Paper presented at Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Stockholm.Search in Google Scholar

Henton, Caroline & Anthony Bladon. 1985. Breathiness in normal female speech: Inefficiency versus desirability. Language & Communication 5. 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(85)90012-6.Search in Google Scholar

Hepper, Peter G., David Scott & Sara Shahidullah. 1993. Newborn and fetal response to maternal voice. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 11. 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646839308403210.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Archibald A. 1961. Grammaticality. Word 17. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1961.11659742.Search in Google Scholar

Householder, Fred W. 1965. On some recent claims in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 1. 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700000992.Search in Google Scholar

Huth, Alexander G., Wendy A. De Heer, Thomas L. Griffiths, Frédéric E. Theunissen & Jack L. Gallant. 2016. Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature 532(7600). 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17637.Search in Google Scholar

Kovačević, Predrag, Stefan Milosavljević & Marko Simonović. 2024. Theme-vowel minimal pairs show argument structure alternations. Journal of Linguistics. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226723000415.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1996. When intuitions fail. In Lisa McNair, Kora Singer, Lise M. Dolbrin & Michelle Aucoin (eds.), Papers from the parasession on theory and data in linguistics, vol. 32, 77–106. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Search in Google Scholar

Lapolla, Randy J. 1994. An experimental investigation into phonetic symbolism as it relates to Mandarin Chinese. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 130–147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lindblom, Björn. 2006. Rejecting the phonetics/phonology split. Theoretical Linguistics 32. 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl.2006.016.Search in Google Scholar

MacDonald, Maryellen C., Neal J. Pearlmutter & Mark S. Seidenberg. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101. 676–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676.Search in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2018. Language adapts to environment: Sonority and temperature. Frontiers in Communication 3. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00028.Search in Google Scholar

Malik-Moraleda, Saima, Dima Ayyash, Jeanne Gallée, Josef Affourtit, Malte Hoffmann, Zachary Mineroff & Evelina Fedorenko. 2022. An investigation across 45 languages and 12 language families reveals a universal language network. Nature Neuroscience 25. 1014–1019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01114-5.Search in Google Scholar

Mampe, Birgit, Angela D. Friederici, Anne Christophe & Kathleen Wermke. 2009. Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current Biology 19. 1994–1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.064.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. 1979. Formal problems in semitic phonology and morphology. University of Massachusetts PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Murry, Thomas & Sadanand Singh. 1980. Multidimensional analysis of male and female voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68. 1294–1300. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385122.Search in Google Scholar

Myers, James. 2009. The design and analysis of small-scale syntactic judgment experiments. Lingua 119. 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Myers, James. 2017. Acceptability judgments. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedias: Linguistics, 1–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Dennis, James M. McQueen & Anne Cutler. 2003. Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology 47. 204–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00006-9.Search in Google Scholar

Ockleford, Elizabeth M., Margaret A. Vince, Claire Layton & Margaret R. Reader. 1988. Responses of neonates to parents’ and others’ voices. Early Human Development 18. 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3782(88)90040-0.Search in Google Scholar

Oh, Eunjin. 2011. Effects of speaker gender on voice onset time in Korean stops. Journal of Phonetics 39. 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, Timothy J. 2018. Tests for constituents: What they really reveal about the nature of syntactic structure. Language Under Discussion 5. 1–41. https://doi.org/10.31885/lud.5.1.223.Search in Google Scholar

Pearsall, Judy, Patrick Hanks, Catherine Soanes & Angus Stevenson (eds.). 2007. The new Oxford English-Chinese dictionary. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peterson, Gordon E. & Harold L. Barney. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24. 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906875.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, Denis Charles & Nicholas C. Burbules. 2000. Postpositivism and educational research. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Popper, Karl Raimund. 1994. In search of a better world: Lectures and essays from thirty years. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ran, Qibin. 2005. Experimental studies of Chinese nasal finals. Nankai Linguistics 1. 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1159/000084133.Search in Google Scholar

Robb, Michael, Harvey Gilbert & Jay Lerman. 2005. Influence of gender and environmental setting on voice onset time. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 57. 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1159/000084133.Search in Google Scholar

Schütze, Carson T. 2016. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Severijnen, Giulio G. A., Hans Rutger Bosker & James M. McQueen. 2024. Your “VOORnaam” is not my “VOORnaam”: An acoustic analysis of individual talker differences in word stress in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 103. 101296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101296.Search in Google Scholar

Sloos, Marjoleine. 2015. Accent-induced coder bias. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13. 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.1.03slo.Search in Google Scholar

Sloos, Marjoleine & Andrea Ariza García. 2015. Own variety bias. i-Perception 6(5). 2041669515593018. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669515593018.Search in Google Scholar

Sloos, Marjoleine & Denis McKeown. 2015. Bias in auditory perception. i-Perception 6(5). 2041669515607153. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669515607153.Search in Google Scholar

Sloos, Marjoleine, Andrea Ariza García, Alexandra Andersson & Neijmeijer Mathea. 2019. Accent-induced bias in linguistic transcriptions. Language Sciences 76. 101176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Nancy Jane. 1973. Differences between linguists and nonlinguists in intuitions of grammaticality-acceptability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2. 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067203.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2006. Negative evidence and the raw frequency fallacy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(1). 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2006.003.Search in Google Scholar

Swartz, Bradford L. 1992. Gender difference in voice onset time. Perceptual and Motor Skills 75. 983–992. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1992.75.3.983.Search in Google Scholar

Tonhauser, Judith & Lisa Matthewson. 2015. Empirical evidence in research on meaning. Ms. The Ohio State University and University of British Columbia. 1–50. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=c738bcc34514e95c4aaf7a745e14a7c08bc9b756.Search in Google Scholar

van de Weijer, Jeroen & Jisheng Zhang. 2008. An X-bar approach to the syllable structure of Mandarin. Lingua 118. 1416–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

Volaitis, Lydia E. & Joanne L. Miller. 1992. Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92(2 Pt 1). 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.403997.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Zhihao. 1997. The different nature of syllable-final nasals in English and Chinese. Modern Foreign Languages 20. 18–29.Search in Google Scholar

Wermke, Kathleen, Yufang Ruan, Yun Feng, Daniela Dobnig, Sophia Stephan, Peter Wermke, Volker Hesse, Hongyu Chang, Youyi Liu & Hua Shu. 2017. Fundamental frequency variation in crying of Mandarin and German neonates. Journal of Voice 31. 255.e225–255.e230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.009.Search in Google Scholar

Whiteside, Sandra P. 1996. Temporal-based acoustic-phonetic patterns in read speech: Some evidence for speaker sex differences. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 26. 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025100300005302.Search in Google Scholar

Woodward, James. 2023. Causation and manipulability. In Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Summer 2023 edn. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Chunlei & Jeroen van de Weijer. 2021. An HPSG approach to Chinese syllable structure and tone sandhi. Lingua 258. 103048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103048.Search in Google Scholar

Yip, Moira. 1980. The tonal phonology of Chinese. Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Jisheng. 2023. Chinese syllable structure. In Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. Heads. Journal of Linguistics 21. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700010008.Search in Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M. 1993. Heads, bases and functors. In Greville G. Corbett, Norman M. Fraser & Scott McGlashan (eds.), Heads in grammatical theory, 292–314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar