‘Direct’ elicitation and phonological argumentation

References

Blust, Robert A. 2013. The Austronesian languages. Revised edition. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/10191.Search in Google Scholar

Bracks, Christoph. 2020. Prosodic Systems in the languages of Eastern Indonesia: The prosody-syntax Interface in Totoli. PhD dissertation. Universität zu Köln.Search in Google Scholar

Bracks, Christoph. 2021. The intonation unit in Totoli. Oceanic Linguistics 60. 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2021.0003.Search in Google Scholar

Bracks, Christoph. 2024. Compound intonation Units in Totoli: Postlexical prosody and the prosody-syntax interface. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Breen, Gavan & Rob Pensalfini. 1999. Arrernte: A language with no syllable onsets. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999553940.Search in Google Scholar

Bross, Fabian. 2019. Acceptability Ratings in linguistics: A practical Guide to grammaticality judgments, data collection, and statistical analysis. Version 1.02. Mimeo Online: www.fabianbross.de/acceptabilityratings.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein. 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6. 201–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700001019.Search in Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian (ed.). 1981. A Festschrift for native speaker. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Culhane, Kirsten. 2024. The prosodic foot: A typological study of greater Timor languages. Freiburg: Universität Freiburg PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0999094x.Search in Google Scholar

Featherston, Sam. 2007. Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics 33. 269–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl.2007.020.Search in Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline. 2017. Intonation and prosodic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goedemans, Rob W.N. & Ellen van Zanten. 2014. No stress typology. In Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn F.L. Heeren, Jos J.A. Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller & Ellen van Zanten (eds.), Above and beyond the segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics, 83–95. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1991. Tomini-tolitoli sound structures. NUSA 33. In James N. Sneddon (ed.), Studies in Sulawesi languages, Part II, 49–70. Jakarta: Atma Jaya. Available at: http://sealang.net/nusa/.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1997. The paragogic vowel in Lauje (Tomini-Tolitoli): Phonology or morphosyntax? In Cecilia Odé & Wim Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the seventh International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 81–103. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2001. Sourcebook on Tomini-Tolitoli languages. General information and word lists. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2012. Linguistic data types and the interface between language documentation and description. Language Documentation & Conservation 6. 187–207.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2018. Some preliminary observations on prosody and information structure in Austronesian languages of Indonesia and East Timor. In Sonja Riesberg, Asako Shiohara & Atsuko Utsumi (eds.), A cross-linguistic perspective on information structure in Austronesian languages, 347–374. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2023. On the comparability of prosodic categories: Why ‘stress’ is difficult. Linguistic Typology 27. 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2022-0041.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Daniel Kaufman. 2020. Prosodic systems: Austronesia. In Carlos Gussenhoven & Aoju Chen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosody, 370–383. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 1983. Are there syllables in Gokana? In Jonathan Kaye, Hilda Koopman, Dominique Sportiche & André Dugas (eds.) Current approaches to African linguistics, Vol. 2, 171–179. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2011. Does Gokana really have no syllables? Or: what’s so great about being universal? Phonology 28. 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675711000030.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2015. Does Gokana really have syllables? A postscript. Phonology 32. 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675715000160.Search in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah. 2014. Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.). Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 520–539. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn. 2019. Acoustic correlates of word stress in Papuan Malay. Journal of Phonetics 74. 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn. 2020. Offline and online processing of acoustic cues to word stress in Papuan Malay. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147. 731–747. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000578.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn, Angela Kluge & Vincent J. van Heuven. 2021. Lexical analyses of the function and phonology of Papuan Malay word stress. Phonetica 78. 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2021-2003.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn, Marc Swerts & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2023. Red and blue bananas: Time-series f0 analysis of contrastively focused noun phrases in Papuan Malay and Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 96. 101200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101200.Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, Daniel & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2024. Suprasegmental phonology. In Alexander Adelaar & Antoinette Schapper (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Western Austronesian languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1975. What is a linguistic fact? Lisse: de Ridder.Search in Google Scholar

Lindström, Eva & Bert Remijsen. 2005. Aspects of the prosody of Kuot, a language where intonation ignores stress. Linguistics 43. 839–870. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.4.839.Search in Google Scholar

Maskikit-Essed, Raechel & Carlos Gussenhoven. 2016. No stress, no pitch accent, no prosodic focus: The case of Ambonese Malay. Phonology 33. 353–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675716000154.Search in Google Scholar

Mayani, Luh Anik. 2013. A grammar of Tajio. A language spoken in Central Sulawesi. PhD dissertation. Universität zu Köln. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/6963/.Search in Google Scholar

Odé, Cecilia. 1994. On the perception of prominence in Indonesian. In Cecilia Odé & Vincent J. van Heuven (eds.), Experimental studies of Indonesian prosody, 27–107. Leiden: Vakgroep Talen en Culturen van Zuidoost-Azië en Oceanië, Leiden University.Search in Google Scholar

Penke, Martina & Anette Rosenbach. 2004. What counts as linguistic evidence. Studies in Language 28. 480–526. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.28.3.03pen.Search in Google Scholar

Schütze, Carson T. 1996. The empirical Base of linguistics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sneddon, James N. 1984. Proto-Sangiric and the Sangiric languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (=PL B-91).Search in Google Scholar

Sneddon, James N. 1993. The drift towards final open syllables in Sulawesi languages. Oceanic Linguistics 32. 1–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3623095.Search in Google Scholar

van Heuven, Vincent J. & Ellen van Zanten (eds.), 2007. Prosody in Indonesian languages. Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Yi. 2020. Syllable is a synchronization mechanism that makes human speech possible. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9v4hr (Accessed 21 Jun 2022).Search in Google Scholar