Causes and effects of misreported syllable structures

References

Bowern, Claire. 2015. Linguistic fieldwork, a practical guide, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Devitt, Michael. 2006. Intuitions in linguistics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57. 481–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axl017.Search in Google Scholar

Elffers, Els. 2023. Intuitions in linguistics: A blessing or a curse? In David Romand & Michel Le Du (eds.), Emotions, metacognition, and the Intuition of Language Normativity, 215–241. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Gippert, Jost, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Ulrike Mosel (eds.). 2006. Essentials of language documentation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1962. Is the vowel-consonant dichotomy universal? Word 18. 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1962.11659766.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Synchronic and diachronic universals in phonology’. Language 42. 508–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/411706.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86. 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2021. General linguistics must be based on universals (or non-conventional aspects of language). Theoretical Linguistics 47. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2021-2002.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2023. Defining the word. Word 69. 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2023.2237272.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2006. Prosody in language documentation. In Jost Gippert, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Ulrike Mosel (eds.), Essentials of language documentation, 163–181. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus & D. Robert Ladd. 2008. Prosodic description: An introduction for fieldworkers. Language Documentation & Conservation 2. 244–274.Search in Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. 1955. A manual of phonology. Baltimore, MD: Waverly Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry. 1983. Are there syllables in Gokana? In Jonathan Kaye, Hilda Koopman, Dominique Sportiche & André Dugas (eds.), Current approaches to African linguistics, vol. 2, 171–179. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry. 1985. A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry. 2011. Does Gokana really have no syllables? Or: what’s so great about being universal? Phonology 28. 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675711000030.Search in Google Scholar

Kawahara, Shigeto. 2016. Japanese has syllables: A reply to Labrune. Phonology 33. 159–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675716000063.Search in Google Scholar

Labrune, Laurence. 2005. Autour de la syllabe: les constituants prosodiques mineurs en phonologie. In Noël Nguyen, Sophie Wauquier-Graveline & Jacques Durand (eds.), Phonétique et phonologie, approches contemporaines, 95–116. Paris: Hermès.Search in Google Scholar

Labrune, Laurence. 2012a. Questioning the universality of the syllable: Evidence from Japanese. Phonology 29. 113–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095267571200005x.Search in Google Scholar

Labrune, Laurence. 2012b. The phonology of Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Labrune, Laurence. 2024. Decentring linguistics. Language in Japan 1. 36–61. https://doi.org/10.20666/lij.1.0_36.Search in Google Scholar

Lowenstamm, Jean. 1996. CV as the only syllable type. In Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks (eds.), Current trends in phonology. Models and methods, 419–441. Manchester: ESRI.Search in Google Scholar

Lüdtke, Helmut. 1969. Die Alphabetschrift und das Problem der Lautsegmentierung. Phonetica 20. 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259279.Search in Google Scholar

Meakins, Felicity, Jennifer Green & Myfany Turpin. 2018. Understanding linguistic fieldwork. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Mehler, Jacques, Jean-Yves Dommergues, Uli Frauenfelder & Segui Jean. 1981. The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20. 298–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(81)90450-3.Search in Google Scholar

Morais, José. 1994. L’art de lire. Paris: Odile Jacob.Search in Google Scholar

Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Poser, William. 1990. Evidence for foot structure in Japanese. Language 66. 78–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/415280.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, David. 2022. Moraic tone-bearing units in Kabiye. Linguistique et Langues Africaines 8. [online edition] https://doi.org/10.4000/lla.2154.Search in Google Scholar

Sakel, Jeanette & Daniel L. Everett. 2012. Linguistic fieldwork, a student guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1933. La réalité psychologique des phonèmes. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 30. 247–265.Search in Google Scholar

Schindler, Samuel, Anna Drożdżowicz & Karen Brøcker (eds.). 2020. Linguistic intuitions: Evidence and method, online edition. Oxford: Oxford Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy / Troubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1939 (1967 for the French edition). Principes de phonologie (French translation of Grundzüge der Phonologie). Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar