Jet-Engines Revised Dictionary for the 6th-Generation-R&D in a New Era

References and notes

1. Pentagon admits the U.S. is 5 to 10 years away from ability to stop JEST-weapons, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/how-us-military-wants-shoot-down-russian-or-chinese-hypersonic-missiles-31372;https://spacenews.com/u-s-would-need-a-mega-constellation-to-counter-china-hypersonic-weapons/.https://sputniknews.com/military/201803021062138661-usa-pentagon-russia-weapons-information/.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Deyong S., Wenyan Song, Jingfeng Ye, Bo Tao, Yanhua Wang, Experimental investigation of reacting flow characteristics in a dual-mode scramjet combustor, Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, 2017, 34(1), 11-22; DOJ 10.1515/tjj-2015-0013.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Gautam C. and K. M. Pandey, Numerical studies on the performance of scramjet combustor with alternating wedge-shaped strut injector, Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, 2017, 34(1), 11-22; DOJ 10.1515/tjj-2015-0048.10.1515/tjj-2015-0048Suche in Google Scholar

4. Junsu Shin and Hong-Gye Sung, Numerical investigation of a model scramjet combustor using DDES, Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, 2017, 34(1), 75-80, DOJ 10.1515/tjj-2015-0056.10.1515/tjj-2015-0056Suche in Google Scholar

5. Ingenito, A.; Bruno, C. (2010). ”Physics and Regimes of Supersonic Combustion”. AIAA Journal. 48 (3): 515–525. Bibcode:2010AIAAJ.0.48.0.515I. doi:10.2514/1.43652. ISSN 0001-1452.10.2514/1.43652Suche in Google Scholar

6. Weber, R. J.; Mackay, John S. ”An Analysis of Ramjet Engines Using Supersonic Combustion”. ntrs.nasa.gov. NASA Scientific and Technical Information. https://web.archive.org/web/20160212161955/http://www.space.com/12441-hypersonic-x51a-waverider-scramjet-failure.html.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Satish, K. ”Scramjet Combustor Development” (PDF). Combustion Institute (Indian Section).Suche in Google Scholar

8. Colaguori, N.; Kidder, B. (2010-05-26). ”Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne Scramjet Powers Historic First Flight of X-51A WaveRider”; West Palm Beach, Florida: Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Paull, A.; Stalker, R. J.; Mee, D. J. (1995-01-01). ”Supersonic Combustion Ramjet Propulsion Experiments In a Shock Tunnel”. University of Queensland.10.1017/S0022112095002096Suche in Google Scholar

10. Leonard, D. (2002-08-16). ”HyShot Scramjet Test a Success”. Space.com.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Kors, D. L. (1990). ”Experimental investigation of a 2-D dual mode scramjet with hydrogen fuel at Mach 4-6”. 2nd International Aerospace Planes Conference. Orlando, Florida: AIAA. doi:10.2514/MIAPC90.10.2514/MIAPC90Suche in Google Scholar

12. Guinan, D. P.; Drake, A.; Andreadis, D.; Beckel, S. A. (2005-04-26). ”United States Patent: 6883330: Variable geometry inlet design for scram jet engine”. USPTO.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Harsha, P. T.; Keel, L. C.; Castrogiovanni, A.; Sherrill, R., ”2005-3334: X-43A Vehicle Design and Manufacture”. AIAA/CIRA 13th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. Capua, Italy: AIAA. ISBN 978-1624100680.10.2514/6.2005-3334Suche in Google Scholar

14. Segal, C. (2009). The Scramjet Engine: Processes and Characteristics. Cambridge Aerospace Series. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521838153.10.1017/CBO9780511627019Suche in Google Scholar

15. Voland, R. T.; Auslender, A. H.; Smart, M. K.; Roudakov, A. S.; Semenov, V. L.; Kopchenov, V. (1999). CIAM/NASA Mach 6.5 Scramjet Flight and Ground Test. 9th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. Norfolk, Virginia: AIAA. doi:10.2514/MHYTASP99.10.2514/MHYTASP99Suche in Google Scholar

16. Roudakov, A. S.; Schickhmann, Y.; Semenov, V. L.; Novelli, Ph.; “Flight Testing an Axisymmetric Scramjet - Recent Russian Advances”. 44th Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, Graz, Austria: International Astronautical Federation.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Roudakov, A. S.; Semenov, V. L.; Kopchenov, Valeriy I.; ”Future Flight Test Plans of an Axisymmetric Hydrogen-Fueled Scramjet Engine on the Hypersonic Flying Laboratory”. 7th International Spaceplanes and Hypersonics, Systems & Technology Conference November 18–22, 1996/Norfolk, Virginia. AIAA.10.2514/6.1996-4572Suche in Google Scholar

18. Roudakov, A. S.; Semenov, V. L.; “Recent Flight Test Results of the Joint CIAMNASA Mach 6.5 Scramjet Flight Program”. NASA Center for Aero-Space Information (CASI).Suche in Google Scholar

19. Jerdev, M. A. Roudakov, et al, Russian “GLL Cold” in 1998 “Needle”, Cold-2, involving TsIAM, LII, TsNII-mash, TsAGI, KBKhA, Russian Academy of Sciences, Rocket Engineering Design Bureau, Russian Ministry of Defence, etc. Information sources, Copyright: to authors, http://www.testpilot.ru/russia/tsiam/holod/.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Smart, M. K.; Hass, N. E.; Paul, A. (2006). ”Flight Data Analysis of the HyShot 2 Scramjet Flight Experiment”. AIAA Journal. 44 (10): 2366-2375. 2006; AIAAJ.44.2366S. doi:10.2514/1.20661. ISSN 0001-1452. Bibcode: 2006 AIAAJ.44.2366S. doi:10.2514/1.20661. ISSN 0001-1452. Billig, Frederick S. (1993). SCRAM - A Supersonic Combustion Ramjet Missile. 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Monterey, California: AIAA. doi:10.2514/MJPC93.10.2514/MJPC93Suche in Google Scholar

21. Editorial, Jet-Engine-Steered (JES), lack of updated textbooks to design 6th-generation air and sea combat vehicles, Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, 32(3), Jan 2015. DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2015-1001.10.1515/tjj-2015-1001Suche in Google Scholar

22. Editorial, FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: JET ENGINES AS PRIME FLIGHT EFFECTORS. THE FIRST KEY DESIGN RULES. Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Jul 1999, Dec 2000, Jan 2001 and Jan 2003.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Editorial, FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: Air, Land and Marine applications of Jet Engine Steering aka as 3D thrust vectoring flight control or 2D-Water-TVC of super-agile boats or super-agile Littoral Combat Ships, [LCS]. Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Apr. 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Editorial, FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: JES for advanced Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles, [JES-UCAV.]. Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Mar 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Editorial, Old-New European debate on thrust vectoring and adverse effects of canards, Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Jan 1997. Cf. [33, 34].Suche in Google Scholar

26. Editorial, RE-EDUCATING THE JET-ENGINE RESEARCHERS TO STAY RELEVANT, Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, 33(2), July 2016; DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2016-5001.10.1515/tjj-2016-5001Suche in Google Scholar

27. Editorial, Jet Engine Steering (JES) – The new master of advanced flight control; Civilizing military JES technology maximizes flight safety and allows pilot recovery when AOOF fails to prevent a crash; Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, 35(2):95-99, DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2018-9010. May 2018.10.1515/tjj-2018-9010Suche in Google Scholar

28. Editorial, CANCELED UCLASS-UCAV- STRIKE-PROGRAMS, down playing 6th-gen-WVR-JES, Design Team induces F-35 run-away costs & performance compromises. Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Sep 2011. Cf. GAO, [69].Suche in Google Scholar

29. Editorial, JET ENGINE STEERING TECHNOLOGY TRANSFERS, Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, 31(4):277-285, Dec 2014; DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2014-1001.10.1515/tjj-2014-1001Suche in Google Scholar

30. Editorial, FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: JES-revolution in Air-Sea Propulsion Science and R&D; Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Jan 2014. DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2014-1000.10.1515/tjj-2014-1000Suche in Google Scholar

31. Editorial, FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: Fleets of low-cost, stealth, jet-steered drones designed to fly ahead of fighter aircraft and bombers into congested regions. Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Jan 2013.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Gal-Or, B., “Vectored Propulsion, Supermaneuverability and Robot Aircraft”; Forward by USAF Chief Scientist: “LANDMARK BOOK”; Springer Verlag, N.Y. and Heidelberg, 1989-present, ISBN 0387-97161-0, 3-540-87161-0, TL685.3.G23 1989, 629.I34ʹ353-de20, 89-21797.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Gal-Or, B., Review of debates re jet engine steering aka thrust vectoring and adverse effects of canards; Journal of Thermal Science, China, Mar 1998.Suche in Google Scholar

34. Gal-Or, B., “An Old-New European Debate on Thrust Vectoring and adverse effects of canards”, Polskiej Nauki, PRACE Instytutu Lotnictwa, Poland, 152, pp. 3-8, 1998.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Aviation Week & Space Technology: “Israelis Flight Test Jet-Powered RPV Fitted With Thrust Vectoring Nozzles [JET-ENGINE-STEERED-(JES)], May 18, p. 21, 1987.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Aviation Week & Space Technology: more on first 3-D-Vectored-stealth-RPV-prototype performing post-stall Maneuvers, (Figures 3, 4), May 30, 1987; FLIGHT INT’L, May 30, 1987; JANE’S ALL THE WORLD’S AIRCRAFT, 1987.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Gal-Or, B., “Upgraded, Completely Vectored F-22”, USAF-AFOSR-EOARD, CONTRACT F61708-92-W, UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Report: February 28, 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Gal-Or, B. with Lijun Qian and E. Kreindler, Minimum-time maneuvers of thrust-vectored aircraft; Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, Mar 1998.Suche in Google Scholar

39. Gal-Or, Benjamin, Valery Sherbaum and Lichtsinder Michael, U.S.-PATENT No. 5,782,431, on “Civilizing Military Thrust Vectoring Flight Control”, [saving many lives and preventing much damage by simple, add-on, TV devices], It includes review on first proof-of-concept flight test funded by U.S. FAA during 1994-1995, April, 1998.Suche in Google Scholar

40. Aviation Week & Space Technology: THRUST VECTOR CONTROL EYED FOR TRANSPORT, August 28, 1995.Suche in Google Scholar

41. AEROSPACE AMERICA, “Civilizing Military Technology for safest civil Flight Control”, 1995.Suche in Google Scholar

42. Mishra, R.K., J. Thomas, k. srinivasan, v. nandi,, r. bhatt; investigation of HP turbine blade failure in a military turbofan engine; Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, 2014 Vol. 34 issue 1, 23-32, DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2015-0049.10.1515/tjj-2015-0049Suche in Google Scholar

43. Gal-Or, B., The Fundamental Concepts of Vectored Propulsion, AIAA J. Propulsion and Power, 6, 747-757, 1990.10.2514/3.23281Suche in Google Scholar

44. Gal-Or, B., Maximizing Post-Stall, Thrust-Vectoring Agility and Control Power, AIAA J. Aircraft, 29, 647-651, 1992.10.2514/3.46214Suche in Google Scholar

45. Gal-Or, B., Thrust Vectoring: Theory, Laboratory, and Flight Tests, AIAA J. Propulsion & Power, 9, 51-58, 1993.10.2514/3.11484Suche in Google Scholar

46. Gal-Or, B. with A. Rasputnis, Valery Sherbaum and Michael Lichtsinder, 1991-1999, various reports, patent, [39], and publications on JES-full-scale-tests with hot jet engines, [32 at 53, 76, 77, 109-113, 131, 132, 149], on JES–engine inlets calibrations, flight tests, computer simulations.Suche in Google Scholar

47. Gal-Or, B., FUNDAMENTALS OF CATASTROPHIC FAILURE PREVENTION BY THRUST VECTORING. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, May 1995. Cf., A remotely piloted, reduced-scale TVC-Boeing 727 flight tested in May 1995 to demonstrate the potentials for low-weight, add-on JES-kits for catastrophic failure prevention (1996)”; Id. and Ref. 39-41.Suche in Google Scholar

48. Gal-Or, B., Proposed flight testing standards for engine thrust vectoring to maximize kill ratio, post-stall agility and flight safety, Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Dec 1995. Gal-Or, B., Thrust-Vectoring of Converging-Diverging Nozzles, AIAA J. of Propulsion and Power, 16, 202-206, 2000.10.1515/TJJ.1995.12.4.252Suche in Google Scholar

49. Gal-Or, B., Thrust-Vectoring of Converging-Diverging Nozzles, AIAA J. of Propulsion and Power, 16, 202-206, 2000.10.2514/2.5584Suche in Google Scholar

50. Gal-Or, B. FUNDAMENTALS and SIMILARITY TRANSFORMATIONS OF VECTORED AIRCRAFT, AIAA. Journal of Aircraft, Jan 1994.10.2514/3.46472Suche in Google Scholar

51. Mishra, R.K., S. K. Kumar, S. Chandel; Lean blow-out studies in a swirl stabilized annular gas turbine combustor; Effect of fuel particle size on the stability of swirl stabilized flame in gas turbine combustor, Int’l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, 2015, 32(2):117-141, Dec 2014; DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2014-0028; –0027Suche in Google Scholar

52. Gal-Or, B., MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENOLOGY FOR THRUST VECTORING–INDUCED AGILITY COMPARISONS, Deficiencies vs. compromises regarding basic rules for maximization of jet-deflection rates are formulated. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, Mar 1993.10.2514/3.48273Suche in Google Scholar

53. Gal-Or, B., THRUST VECTORING [JES] – THEORY, LABORATORY, and FLIGHT TESTS, AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, Jan 1993.10.2514/3.11484Suche in Google Scholar

54. Gal-Or, B., “Novel, Post-Stall, Thrust-Vectored F-15 RPVs: Laboratory and Flight Tests” Funded since 1987 by USAF, (1) Canarded v. Canard-less, ROUNDED v. RECTANGULAR JES-EXHAUSTS to 1, 2 or 3 COLD-FAN-JET-ENGINES, 1/7-scaled-JES-F-15 flight-testing in abandoned airfield in ISRAEL, [32], (2) F-15-AIR-INLET-to-HOT-OPERATING-JET-ENGINE-MARBORE-II-full-scale-PERFORMANCE, [Id.], (3) SUB-SCALED-F-15-INLET-PERFORMANCE DURING POST-STALL HIGH AOA, 188-page-Report-I, 1987-1992 PROJECTS. PART I of 9 REPORTS ORIGINALLY CLASSIFIED.Suche in Google Scholar

55. Gal-Or, B., “Tailless Vectored Fighters: Theory, Laboratory and Flight Tests”, USAF funding, WPAFB, Ohio, USA, AFOSR FY 1456-8905052, 196-page-Report-II, July 15, 1991.Suche in Google Scholar

56. Gal-Or, B., “Tailless Vectored Fighters: Theory, Laboratory and Flight Tests”, USAF funding, 196-page-Report-III, July 15, 1991.Suche in Google Scholar

57. Gal-Or, B., “Vectorable Inlets/Nozzles and Tailless Flying Models vs. Pilot’s Tolerances Affecting Maximum Post-Stall Vectoring Agility”; USAF funding, 238-page-Report-IV.Suche in Google Scholar

58. Gal-Or, B., “Dynamic Scaling, Pilot v. G-Loads under post-stall Maneuvers with vectored fighters”, USAF Funded series of projects in Israel E. g., (i) San Antonio, BAFB, 1990, submitted to USAF Colonel J. Tedor team, Report-V.Suche in Google Scholar

59. Gal-Or, B., “Dynamic Scaling of Prototypes Using Radius of Gyration Method: Theory, Laboratory and Flight Tests”, REPORT #I to USAF Capt. J. Wigle (September 30, 1991), Report-VI; REPORT VII to USAF Dr D. W. Repperger, AL/WPAFB (September 30, 1991), Report-VIII; (iv) Report to USAF Col. J. Tedor, Deputy Director, Human Systems Division, BAFB, TX; USAF Special Project, SPC-91-4003, AF/AFOSR/EOARD, 141-page-Report-IX.Suche in Google Scholar

60. Gal-Or, B., Classified Reports to Lockheed-Martin/General Dynamics, Ft Worth, TX, via Spence E. Peters, Tel. 817-935-1588, Main: 817-777-2000, E-Mail: Spence.e.pters@LMCO.com and Dorsett, longest funded programs by Lockheed Martin/GD up to about 1997.Suche in Google Scholar

61. Gal-Or, B., Classified Reports to PWA, Manager, Component Technology, R. E. (Bob) Davis, 1987-1994.Suche in Google Scholar

62. Gal-Or, B., Classified Reports to General Electric, Don Dunbar, Ed Rogala and GE VP Krebs. 1987-1988.Suche in Google Scholar

63. Gal-Or, B., Agility Benefits of Integrated Aerodynamic & Thrust Vectoring Control, GD/Lockheed-Martin RFP Ref. TECH-RRJ-JK-0001, TIIT-TRDF 160-779, 1993-1995, Progress Report No. 2, February 10, 1995.Suche in Google Scholar

64. Gal-Or, B., Catastrophic Failure Prevention by Thrust Vectoring, invited Lecture & Proposal to NASA Dryden, June 1995.10.2514/3.46758Suche in Google Scholar

65. Gal-Or, B., Civilizing Military Thrust Vectoring Flight Control to Maximize Air Safety, Keynote Lecture; 3rd Int’l Conf. ISIAF, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, September 2, 1996.Suche in Google Scholar

66. Gal-Or, B., Civilizing Military Thrust Vectoring Flight Control to Maximize Air Safety, Opening Keynote Lecture; 2nd Int’l Seminar on Aeronautics & Education, Warsaw, Poland, November 25, 1996.Suche in Google Scholar

67. Gal-Or, B., Civilizing Military Thrust Vectoring Flight Control to Maximize Civil Transport safety, Keynote Lecture, Proceedings, 4th Conf., Int’l ISIAF conf., Dresden, Germany, 1999.Suche in Google Scholar

68. Gal-Or, B., Civilizing Military Thrust Vectoring Flight Control to Maximize Civil Transport Safety, 5th Int´l Symp. Aero Sci., Moscow Russia, Plenary Lecture, Proceeding, TsAGI, 1999.Suche in Google Scholar

69. U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING OFFICE, GAO, No. 15-374; 16-389R, etc. [28], vis-à-vis B-21, cf., https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-northrop-grumman-b-21-stealth-bomber-simply-unstoppable-19931?page=0%2C1UCLASS, F-35.Suche in Google Scholar

70. INDIA-RUSSIA-TREATY-VOIDED? (I), CF. Figure 9 and April 23, 2018 by Franz Stefa Gady at https://thediplomat.com/2018/04/india-pulls-out-of-joint-stealth-fighter-project-with-russia/, April 23, 2018, [71].Suche in Google Scholar

71. INDIA-RUSSIA-TREATY-VOIDED? (II), CF. “India has reportedly withdrawn from a 11-year joint program to develop a 5th generation fighter jet with Russia”; “the Sukhoi/HAL Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA), also known in India as the Perspective Multi-role Fighter (PMF).”, [72].Suche in Google Scholar

72. INDIA-RUSSIA-TREATY-VOIDED? (III), CF. “Neither the Indian nor Russian governments have so far publicly confirmed New Delhi’s decision”, [Id.]. “After evaluating the first PAK FA T-50 [Su-57] prototype (the Russian prototype of the PMF), the [IAF] wanted more than 40 changes addressing, among other things, perceived weaknesses in the plane’s engine, stealth, and weapon-carrying capabilities; http://www.pravdareport.com/russia/economics/15-07-2008/105795-unmanned-0/75, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russia-india-had-plans-build-stealth-fighter-those-plans-are-25592Suche in Google Scholar

73. HISTORY NOTE 1: “China’s J-10(B) fighter equipped with our JES “was built with Israeli assistance”; “Using this technology, the F-22 Raptor can angle its thrust up to 24 degrees up or down.” “Now China’s J-10 joins this elite club of super-maneuverable fighter jets.” Russian uses JES since mid 1990’s, [21–31]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xApU00KdRLY;https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a24742661/china’s-j-10-thrust-vector-control/?source=nl&utm_source=nl_pop&utm_medium=email&date=100118 and www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/j-10b-tvc-wows-zhuhai-crowds-with-surprise-performa-453352/;Suche in Google Scholar

74. HISTORY NOTE 2: China published author’s Review of JES v. canards-debates by its Journal of Thermal Science, Mar 1998, [25, 33, 34], invites Keynote Lecture to Chinese Academy of Sciences, 3rd Int’l Conf. ISIAF, [65], repeated to its top designers at CHENGDU. On November 6, 2018, via JES-J-10B CHINA joins the JES-revolution. https://www.janes.com/article/76804/image-suggests-china-may-be-testing-thrust-vectoring-engine-on-j-10-fighter#;https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a24680684/all-the-new-tech-from-chinas-big-airshow/Suche in Google Scholar

75. HISTORY NOTE 3: Post PST-1987-1st JES-Flight-tests, [36, 37], Russia joins the JES revolution and a new GLOBAL-JES-RACE is established.Suche in Google Scholar

76.  Gal-Or, B., Gold Medal from New York Academy of Sciences for developing New General Relativistic (Einstein’s Gravity Physics) Entropy-Free-School-of-Thermodynamics; was part of 1968-PRESENT, CLASSIFIED RADIATION PHYSICS WORK in Detection of Space-Radiation/Stealth/Stellar/Radar-Radiation-Thermodynamics, [41–68].Suche in Google Scholar

77. STEALTH DEBATE: According to https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/how-russia-could-someday-shootdown-f-22-f-35-or-b-2-stealth-bomber-35512:“While Moscow makes bold claims about the counter-stealth capabilities of their S-400/S-300 (v. western air defense systems), the fact remains that even if Russian low-frequency search and acquisitions radars can detect and track tactical fighter-sized stealth aircraft, such as the F-22 or F-35, fire control radars operating in C, X and Ku bands cannot paint low observable (LO) jets except at very close ranges.”Suche in Google Scholar

78. ARROW-3: “U.S. Missile Defense Director: ARROW-3 is more advanced than what we have ever attempted in the U.S. with our programs. … [with] greater flexibility and other aspects, such as propulsion systems.”https://defense-update.com/products/a/arrow3.html; https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/meet-russias-s-500-can-it-kill-f-22-or-f-35-37072;Suche in Google Scholar

79. Lapin, Yaakov, “Israeli Arrow 3 interceptor test previews upcoming trials in Alaska”.; Jane’s Information Group; drones.html; https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/features/2016/webt-laser-swarms-https://www.defenceprocurementinternational.com/features/air/(2018-02-19).Suche in Google Scholar

80. INF TREATY: Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty was signed in Washington, D.C. on December 8, 1987. It eliminated all nuclear and conventional missiles and their launchers with ranges of 500–1,000 kilometers (short-range) and 1,000–5,500 km (intermediate-range). Russia claims it did not include GHST. https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1065145/ww3-vladimir-putin-cuba-soviet-union-bases-cold-war-nuclear-donald-trump-spt/.Suche in Google Scholar

81. U.S. Space Command is established since 12.18. 2018, fxxn.ws/2E9Sawb.Suche in Google Scholar

82. December 29, 2018, South China Morning POST//www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2142887/now-you-see-it-now-you-dont-china-tests-stealth-invisibility/.Suche in Google Scholar

83. https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2014/12/nasa-seed-funds-sr-72-hypersonic-drones.html/.Suche in Google Scholar

84. Converting old-air-force-planes to be stealthy? ttps://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/fleet-j-20s-china-wants-take-old-air-force-planes-and-make-them-stealthy-40052/.Suche in Google Scholar

85. Stealth-propulsion under water UCAVS, https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/12/china-uses-underwater-drones-in-south-china-sea.html;https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a22593766/russia-working-on-new-cephalopod-underwater-attack-drone/.Suche in Google Scholar

86. PRE-6th-gen-Video for beginners on new THAAD, etc. v. S400/S500, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYeasKRb4zU.Suche in Google Scholar