Startseite Predicting Lean Blowout and Emissions of Aircraft Engine Combustion Chamber Based on CRN
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Predicting Lean Blowout and Emissions of Aircraft Engine Combustion Chamber Based on CRN

  • Yinli Xiao EMAIL logo , Zhengxin Lai , Zupeng Wang und Kefei Chen
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. März 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

To predict the pollutant emissions and lean blowout, chemical reactor network (CRN) model is applied to the modern aircraft engine combustion chamber. In this study, the CRN which represent the major features of aerodynamics and combustion in the combustion chamber is set up based on the OpenFOAM simulation results. The boundary and the initial conditions used for the CRN derive from the operating modes of typical aircraft engine cycle. A 21 species 30 steps chemical mechanism of kerosene is employed in the CRN method. The levels of pollutant emissions are obtained under four ICAO engine power settings of idle, approach climb and take off. The lean blowout equivalent ratio is evaluated at the idle power setting. The results will be helpful to predict the aircraft engine exhaust emissions and lean blowout (LBO).

Nomenclature

σf

kerosene surface tension (N/m)

μf

dynamic viscosity (Pa·s)

m˙f

fuel mass flow rate (kg/s)

ΔPf

injector pressure difference (Pa)

kg

gas conductivity (W/m·K)

BM

the Spalding number

ρf

fuel density (kg/m3)

CP

gas specific heat (kJ/kg·K)

P

pressure of the incoming air (Pa)

T

temperature of the incoming air (K)

σ

standard deviation of Gaussian function

S

mixing parameter

ϕˉ

mean equivalence ratio

APU

Auxiliary Power Unit

CARS

Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering

CFD

Computational Fluid Dynamics

CRN

Chemical Reactor Network

EI

Emission Index

ICAO

International Civil Aviation Organization

LBO

Lean BlowOut

LTO

Landing/Taking Off

PFR

Plug Flow Reactor

PSR

Perfect Stirred Reactor

SMD

Sauter Mean Diameter

UHC

Unburned Hydrocarbon

References

1. Lefebvre AH, Ballal DR. Gas turbine combustion: alternative fuels and emissions. 3rd ed. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Florida. 2010.10.1201/9781420086058Suche in Google Scholar

2. Wang H, Lei F, Shao W, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Xiao Y, et al. Experimental and numerical studies of pressure effects on syngas combustor emissions. Appl Thermal Eng. 2016;102:318–28.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.03.026Suche in Google Scholar

3. Leong CC, Blakey S, Wilson CW. Genetic algorithm optimised chemical reactors network: a novel technique for alternative fuels emission prediction. Swarm Evol Comput. 2016;27:180–87.10.1016/j.swevo.2015.12.001Suche in Google Scholar

4. Sturgess G, Shouse DT. A hybrid model for calculating lean blow-outs in practical combustors. 32nd AIAA/ASME/SAEE Joint Propulsion Conference. July 1–3, 1996/Lake Buena Vista, FL. AIAA paper. 1996:96–3125.10.2514/6.1996-3125Suche in Google Scholar

5. Levy Y, Gany A, Goldman Y, Erenburg V, Sherbaum V, Ovcharenko V, Rosentsvit L, et al. Increasing operational stability in low NOx GT combustor by a pilot flame. Proceeding of ASME Turbo Expo 2010: Power for Land, Sea and Air 14–18 June 2010, Glasgow, UK GT2010-22785.10.1115/GT2010-22785Suche in Google Scholar

6. Lee D, Park J, Jin J, Lee M. A simulation for prediction of nitrogen oxide emissions in lean premixed combustor. J Mech Sci Technol. 2011;25(7):1871–8.10.1007/s12206-011-0425-9Suche in Google Scholar

7. Fichet V, Kanniche M, Plion P, Gicquel O. A reactor network model for predicting nox emissions in gas turbines. Fuel. 2010;89:2202–10.10.1016/j.fuel.2010.02.010Suche in Google Scholar

8. Novosselov IV, Malte P, Yuan S, Srinivasan R, Lee J. Chemical reactor network application to emissions prediction for industrial DLE gas turbine. Proceeding of ASME Turbo Expo, GT2006-90282, Barcelona, Spain, 2006.10.1115/GT2006-90282Suche in Google Scholar

9. Novosselov IV, Malte P. Development and application of an eight-step global mechanism for CFD and CRN simulations of lean-premixed combustors. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, GT 2007-27990.10.1115/GT2007-27990Suche in Google Scholar

10. Denney RK, Tai JC, Mavris DN. Emissions prediction for aircraft conceptual design. 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit 30 July–01 August 2012, Atlanta, Georgia. AIAA paper 2012-4273.10.2514/6.2012-4273Suche in Google Scholar

11. Rezvani R, Denny RK, Mavris DN. A design-oriented semi-analytical emissions prediction method for gas turbine combustors. 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. AIAA paper 2009-704.10.2514/6.2009-704Suche in Google Scholar

12. Allaire DL, Waitz IA, Willcox KE. A comparison of two methods for predicting emissions from aircraft gas turbine combustors. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, GT2007-28346.10.1115/GT2007-28346Suche in Google Scholar

13. Cantera documentation. Available at: http://www.cantera.org/docs/sphinx/html/index.html. Accessed: 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Müller H, Ferraro F, Pfitzner M. Implementation of a steady laminar flamelet model for nonpremixed combustion in LES and RANS simulations. 8th Internatioanal OpenFOAM Workshop. 11–14 Jun 2013, Jeju, Korea.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Mattingly JD, Heiser WH, Pratt DT. Aircraft engine design. AIAA education series. 2002:336.10.2514/4.861444Suche in Google Scholar

16. Hsiao G, Mongia H Swirl cup modeling, part iII: grid independent solution with different turbulence models. AIAA-2003-1349, 2003.10.2514/6.2003-1349Suche in Google Scholar

17. Xiao Y. Investigations on ethylene combustion in a scramjet combustor using resistance heaters. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 5 Jan 2008.10.1243/09544100JAERO317Suche in Google Scholar

18. Min C, Wenyan S, Yinli X, Chen M, Song W, Xiao Y, Chen L, et al. Optical measurement and characteristic analysis of aeroengine combustor primary zone with counter rotating swirler. J Aerosp Power China. 2013 Aug;28:1727–1735.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Theory manual of Chemkin-Pro. Reaction design: San Diego. Sept 2008. Available at: www.pcimmesir.com/chemkin-pro-manual.pdf. Accessed: 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Xiaohua G. Aero gas turbine engine fuel nozzle technology. National Defense Industry Press. Beijing: China. ISBN 7-118-04153-X. April 2006:48.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Turns SR. An introduction to combustion: concept and applications. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996:375.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Charest MR. Design methodology for a lean premixed prevaporized can combustor. A thesis of Carleton University. Ottawa, Ontario. April 2005.10.1115/GT2006-91004Suche in Google Scholar

23. Environmental Protection, Annex 16, No. 1993, Vol. II Aircraft Engine Emissions, Part III.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Rezvani R. A conceptual methodology for the prediction of engine emissions. A Dissertation of PH.D, School of Aerospace. Georgia Institute of Technology. Dec 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Mishra RK, Ramanujam PS, Badrinath C, Bhat MN. Influence of operating pressure on the performance of an aero gas turbine combustor. XVII ISABE, Munich, Germany, 4–9 Sept 2005. ISABE-2005-1020.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Mishra RK, Singh K. Effect of operating conditions on the emission characteristics of an annular combustor. J Aerosp Sci Technol. 2009 May;61(2):305–11.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Yuzhen L, Quanhong X, Gaoen L. Gas turbine combustor. China: National defense industry press, May 2008:137.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-12-18
Accepted: 2018-02-01
Published Online: 2018-03-01
Published in Print: 2019-05-27

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 12.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2017-0063/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen