Home Thrust Performance Evaluation of a Turbofan Engine Based on Exergetic Approach and Thrust Management in Aircraft
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Thrust Performance Evaluation of a Turbofan Engine Based on Exergetic Approach and Thrust Management in Aircraft

  • Enver Yalcin EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 12, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The environmental parameters such as temperature and air pressure which are changing depending on altitudes are effective on thrust and fuel consumption of aircraft engines. In flights with long routes, thrust management function in airplane information system has a structure that ensures altitude and performance management. This study focused on thrust changes throughout all flight were examined by taking into consideration their energy and exergy performances for fuel consumption of an aircraft engine used in flight with long route were taken as reference. The energetic and exergetic performance evaluations were made under the various altitude conditions. The thrust changes for different altitude conditions were obtained to be at 86.53 % in descending direction and at 142.58 % in ascending direction while the energy and exergy efficiency changes for the referenced engine were found to be at 80.77 % and 84.45 %, respectively. The results revealed here can be helpful to manage thrust and reduce fuel consumption, but engine performance will be in accordance with operation requirements.

Nomenclature

AIMS

The Airplane Information Management System

CC

combustion chamber

cp

specific heat, kJ/(kg K)

E˙

energy rate, kW

Ex

exergy rate, kW

F

fan

h

specific enthalpy, kJ/kg

HGT

high pressure gas turbine

HPC

high pressure compressor

ICAO

International Civil Aviation Organization

IP

improvement potential, %

K

Kelvin

LGT

low pressure gas turbine

LPC

low pressure compressor

m˙

mass flow rate, kg/s

P

pressure, kPa

s

specific entropy, kJ/(kgK)

S˙

entropy rate, kW

T

temperature, K

W˙

work rate, kW

Greek Letters
ψ

specific exergy, kJ/kg

η

efficiency

Subscripts
0

reference conditions

ch

chemical

dest

destruction

Ex

exergy

f

fuel

gen

generated

heat

thermal

in

inlet section

k

kinetic

mass

mass flow

out

outlet section

p

potential

ph

physical

work

work

References

1. Balicki W, Głowacki P, Szczecinski S, Chachurski R, Szczeciński J. Effect of the atmosphere on the performances of aviation turbine engines. Acta Mech Autom 2014;8:70–3. Available at: http://www.acta.mechanica.pb.edu.pl/volume/vol8no2/02_2014_005_BALICKI_GLOWACKI_SZCZECINSKI_CHACHURSKI_SZCZECINSKI.pdf. Accessed: Jan 2015.10.2478/ama-2014-0012Search in Google Scholar

2. Liu F, Sirignano WA. Turbojet and turbofan engine performance increases through turbine burners. J Propul Power 2001;17:3.10.2514/6.2000-741Search in Google Scholar

3. Garg S. Fundamentals of aircraft turbine engine control, Glenn Research Center. NASA, 2014. Available at: http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/www/cdtb. Accessed: Feb 2015.Search in Google Scholar

4. Dalmau R, Prats X. Fuel and time savings by flying continuous cruise climbs estimating the benefit pools for maximum range operations. Transp Res Part D 2015;35:62–71.10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.019Search in Google Scholar

5. Utlu Z, Hepbasli A. Assessment of the energy utilization efficiency in the Turkish transportation sector between 2000 and 2020 using energy and exergy analysis method. Energy Policy 2006;34:1611–1618.10.1016/j.enpol.2004.12.011Search in Google Scholar

6. Zarifi F, Mahlia TMI, Motasemi F, Shekarchian M, Moghavvemi M. Current and future energy and exergy efficiencies in the Iran’s transportation sector. Energy Convers Manage 2013;74:24–34.10.1016/j.enconman.2013.04.041Search in Google Scholar

7. Kilpi J. Fleet composition of commercial jet aircraft 1952–2005: Developments in uniformity and scale. J Air Transp Manage 2007;13:81–9.10.1016/j.jairtraman.2006.10.008Search in Google Scholar

8. Karagulle AO. The evaluation of fleet structures in Turkish aviation ındustry from strategic management point of view. Procedia Social Behav Sci 2012;58:93–7.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.982Search in Google Scholar

9. Gandolfi R, Pellegrini LF, Silva G, Oliveira S. Exergy analysis applied to a complete flight mission of commercial aircraft. 46th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit Proceedings, 2008.10.2514/6.2008-153Search in Google Scholar

10. Amati V, Bruno C, Simone D, Sciubba E. Exergy analysis of hypersonic propulsion systems: Performance comparison of two different scramjet configurations at cruise conditions. Energy 2008;33:116–29.10.1016/j.energy.2007.08.012Search in Google Scholar

11. Gogus YA, Camdali U, Kavsaoglu MS. Exergy balance of a general system with variation of environmental conditions and some applications. Energy 2002;27:625–46.10.1016/S0360-5442(02)00011-7Search in Google Scholar

12. Turan O. Exergetic effects of some design parameters on the small turbojet engine for unmanned air vehicle applications. Energy 2012;46:51–61.10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.030Search in Google Scholar

13. Aydin H. Exergetic sustainability analysis of LM6000 gas turbine power plant with steam cycle. Energy 2013;57:766–74.10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.018Search in Google Scholar

14. Turgut E, Karakoc TH, Hepbasli A. Exergetic analysis of an aircraft turbofan engine. Int J Energy Res 2007;31:1383–97.10.1002/er.1310Search in Google Scholar

15. Hassan HZ. Evaluation of the local exergy destruction in the intake and fan of a turbofan engine. Energy 2013;63:245–51.10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.062Search in Google Scholar

16. Tona C, Raviolo PA, Pellegrini LF, Júnior SO. Exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of a turbofan engine during a typical commercial flight. Energy 2010;35:952–9.10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.052Search in Google Scholar

17. Wenjuan C, Wei F, Hua Q, Hongqiang Q, Chuanjun Y. Thermodynamic performance analysis of turbofan engine with a pulse detonation duct heater. Aerosp Sci Technol 2012;23:206–12.10.1016/j.ast.2011.07.002Search in Google Scholar

18. Aydin H, Turan O, Karakoc TH, Midilli A. Component based exergetic measures of an experimental turboprop/turboshaft engine for propeller aircrafts and helicopters. Int J Exergy 2012;11:322–48.10.1504/IJEX.2012.050228Search in Google Scholar

19. Tai VC, See PC, Mares C. Optimisation of energy and exergy of turbofan engines using genetic algorithms. Int J Sustainable Aviation 2014;1:25–42.10.1504/IJSA.2014.062866Search in Google Scholar

20. Atilgan R, Turan O, Altuntas O, Aydin H, Synylo K. Environmental impact assessment of a turboprop engine with the aid of exergy. Energy 2013;58:664–71.10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.064Search in Google Scholar

21. Aydin H, Turan O, Karakoc TH, Midilli A. Exergo-sustainability indicators of a turboprop aircraft for the phases of a flight. Energy 2013;58:550–60.10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.076Search in Google Scholar

22. Aydın H, Turan O, Midilli A, Karakoc TH. Energetic and exergetic performance assessment of a turboprop engine at various loads. Int J Exergy 2013;13:543–64.10.1504/IJEX.2013.058107Search in Google Scholar

23. Balli O, Hepbasli A. Exergoeconomic, sustainability and environmental damage cost analyses of T56 turboprop engine. Energy 2013;64:582–600.10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.066Search in Google Scholar

24. Duman S, Tuncer O. Determination of the thrust requirement for a fighter aircraft engine via mission analysis. J Aeronaut Space Technol 2011;5:27–39, in Turkish.Search in Google Scholar

25. Turan O, Karakoc H. Analysis of overall efficiency variation with fan pressure ratio and bypass ratio for afterburning and separate flow turbofans. J Aeronaut Space Technol 2009;4:67–76 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

26. Ghenaiet A. Determination of minimum thrust requirement for a passenger aircraft. J Aircraft 2007;44:1787–92.10.2514/1.27990Search in Google Scholar

27. Brandweer. Aircraft Crash Recovery Guide Boeing 777–03, Brandweer Amsterdam Airpeor Schiphol, Nederland, 2015. Available at: http://www.brandweerschiphol.nl/luchtvaart/instructie-aircraft-crash-recovery-guide/boeing/boeing_777_03.pdf. Accessed: Apr 2015.Search in Google Scholar

28. Moran MJ, Shapiro HN, Boettner DD, Bailey MB. Fundamentals of engineering thermodynamics. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2011.Search in Google Scholar

29. Dincer I, Rosen MA. Exergy: energy, environment and sustainable development. Oxford OX5 1GB, UK: Elsevier, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

30. Sogut MZ. A research on exergy consumption and potential of total CO2 emission in the Turkish cement sector. Energy Convers Manage 2012;56:37–45.10.1016/j.enconman.2011.11.004Search in Google Scholar

31. Romero JC, Linares P. Exergy as a global energy sustainability indicator. A review of the state of the art. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 2014;33:427–42.10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.012Search in Google Scholar

32. Sogut MZ, Oktay Z, Hepbasli A. Investigation of effect of varying dead-state temperatures on energy and exergy efficiencies of a Raw Mill process in a cement plant. Int J Exergy 2009;6:655–70.10.1504/IJEX.2009.027495Search in Google Scholar

33. Le Rouxa WG, Bello-Ochende T, Meyer JP. A review on the thermodynamic optimisation and modelling of the solar thermal Brayton cycle. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 2013;28:677–90.10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.053Search in Google Scholar

34. Boeing 747–400 aircraft operations manual (1st ed.) Delta Virtual Airlines, 2009. Available at: http://www.deltava.org/library/B747%20DVA%20Manual.pdf. Accessed: Feb 2015.Search in Google Scholar

35. ICAO. Environmental report, 2010. Available at: http://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Documents/EnvironmentReport-2010/ICAO_EnvReport10-Ch2_en.pdf. Accessed: Apr 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-11-30
Accepted: 2015-12-22
Published Online: 2016-1-12
Published in Print: 2017-5-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2015-0065/html
Scroll to top button